HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dossche, K. Articles by Deloof, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dossche, K. Articles by Deloof, T.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 9, 562-566, Copyright © 1995 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Free-hand sewn allografts, stentless (Prima Edwards) and stented (CESA) porcine bioprostheses. A comparative hemodynamic study

K Dossche, H Vanermen, F Wellens, R De Geest, I Degrieck and T Deloof
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, O.L.V. Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.

In a retrospective, non-randomized study, the clinical and hemodynamic properties of 50 consecutively implanted hand-sewn allografts (group I), 50 stentless bioprostheses (group II) and 50 stented bioprostheses (group III) were compared. Preoperative hemodynamic and clinical data were identical in the three groups, except for age (group I: 54.4 +/- 8.7, group II: 67.0 +/- 5.1, group III: 70.0 +/- 5.1). Peak and mean gradients and flow characteristics with echo Doppler were performed at 1 week, 6 and 12 months. For the 21, 23 and 25 diameter prostheses, group differences between groups II and III in peak and mean gradients were not significant after 1 week and 1 year. In all groups, allografts had significantly lower gradients. Regurgitation (I-II) was present after 1 week and 1 year in group I: in 17/48 and 22/42 patients respectively, in group II 7/49 and 11/44 patients and in group III: in 1/49 and 2/44 patients. Early mortality and morbidity were comparable in all groups. Allografts have superior hemodynamic properties. Differences in gradients in groups II and III were not significant, though differences in technique allowed the implantation of a larger bioprostheses in group II. Regurgitation was most prominent in the allograft group. Immediate postoperative results were not influenced by the type of prosthesis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Totaro, N. Degno, A. Zaidi, A. Youhana, and V. Argano Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: A stented valve with stentless performance? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1668 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Bortolotti, G. Scioti, A. Milano, G. Borzoni, C. Nardi, and G. Tartarini The Edwards Prima stentless valve: hemodynamic performance at one year Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1999; 68(6): 2147 - 2151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Eriksson, G.o. Kallner, S. Rosfors, T. Ivert, and L.-A. Brodin Hemodynamic performance of cryopreserved aortic homograft valves during midterm follow-up J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1998; 32(4): 1002 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Y. Jin, K. Dhital, K. Bhattacharya, R. Pieris, N. Amarasena, and R. Pillai Fifth-year hemodynamic performance of the prima stentless aortic valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 805 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Luciani, P. Bertolini, B. Vecchi, and A. Mazzucco Midterm results after aortic valve replacement with freehand stentless xenografts: a comparison of three prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1287 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]