EJCTS Click here to locate an Ethicon representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irtun, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sorlie, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irtun, O.
Right arrow Articles by Sorlie, D. G.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 9, 139-142, Copyright © 1995 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Delivery pressure of the cardioplegic solution influences myocardial protection

O Irtun and DG Sorlie
Department of Surgery, University of Tromso, Norway.

To investigate whether cardioplegic solution (CS) delivery pressure influences myocardial protection, intermittent infusions of CS at different pressures were used in an isolated Langendorff rat heart preparation. In group 1 the hearts were kept arrested for 210 min at 12 degrees C with intermittent infusions of 5 ml CS every 20 min at 30 cm H2O (22 mmHg) pressure, in group 2 the same volume of CS was infused at 100 cm H2O (73.5 mmHg) pressure, in group 3 at 145 cm H2O (106.5 mmHg) pressure and in group 4 at 238 cm H2O (175 mmHg) pressure. There was a significantly higher coronary resistance in groups 1 and 4 (7.3 +/- 0.2 RU and 6.9 +/- 0.2 RU) than in groups 2 and 3 (4.2 +/- 0.2 RU and 4.2 +/- 0.2 RU) (P < 0.05) during the ischemic period. There were no significant differences between group 2 and 3 in the reperfusion period. Groups 2 and 3 showed higher coronary flow and left ventricle developed pressure than group 1 and 4. Hearts from group 1 and 4 had lower adenosine triphosphate (7.88 +/- 0.44 mumol.g-1, 5.56 +/- 0.56 mumol.g-1) (P < 0.05) and creatine phosphate (24.66 +/- 0.47 mumol.g-1, 15.34 +/- 0.94 mumol.g-1) (P < 0.05) content at the end of the reperfusion period than group 2 (10.56 +/- 0.41 mumol.g-1, 30.06 +/- 0.38 mumol.g-1) and group 3 (14.13 +/- 0.69 mumol.g-1, 35.25 +/- 0.78 mumol.g-1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Parolari, P. Rubini, A. Cannata, L. Bonati, F. Alamanni, E. Tremoli, and P. Biglioli
Endothelial damage during myocardial preservation and storage
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 682 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.