EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Grotte, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merrick, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Grotte, G. J.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 9, 146-149, Copyright © 1995 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Comparison of propafenone to atenolol for the prophylaxis of postcardiotomy supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: a prospective trial

AF Merrick, NJ Odom, DJ Keenan and GJ Grotte
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK.

To compare the efficacy of propafenone to atenolol in the prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) following cardiac surgery, 207 consecutive patients were randomly allocated to receive either propafenone 300 mg twice daily (105 patients) or atenolol 50 mg once daily (102 patients) orally for 7 days after operation. Double blinding was achieved using placebos. The end point was the development of a SVT which was symptomatic, recurrent, or lasting over 2 minutes, or the occurrence of adverse effects possibly attributable to the drugs. The groups were well matched for age, sex, bypass- and cross-clamp times, and other data. Thirteen patients in the propafenone group and 11 in the atenolol group developed SVT during the first week after operation. (P = 0.89, non significant, chi-squared with Yates' correction). In our study propafenone and atenolol were of approximately equal efficacy in preventing post cardiotomy SVT. Propafenone may have an advantage in being less negatively inotropic than atenolol; it could therefore be used in patients with poor left ventricular function or marginal haemodynamics when a beta blocker is contraindicated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. C. Burgess, M. J. Kilborn, and A. C. Keech
Interventions for prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation and its complications after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2006; 27(23): 2846 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Bradley, L. L. Creswell, C. W. Hogue Jr., A. E. Epstein, E. N. Prystowsky, and E. G. Daoud
Pharmacologic Prophylaxis: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 39S - 47S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. DiDomenico and M. G. Massad
Pharmacologic Strategies for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Open Heart Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 728 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Kerstein, A. Soodan, M. Qamar, M. Majid, E. Lichstein, G. Hollander, and J. Shani
Giving IV and Oral Amiodarone Perioperatively for the Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The GAP Study
Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3): 716 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. H. Maisel, J. D. Rawn, and W. G. Stevenson
Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery
Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2001; 135(12): 1061 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Hogue Jr and M. L. Hyder
Atrial fibrillation after cardiac operation: risks, mechanisms, and treatment
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 69(1): 300 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Gomes, J. Ip, F. Santoni-Rugiu, D. Mehta, A. Ergin, S. Lansman, E. Pe, T. Takle Newhouse, and S. Chao
Oral d,l sotalol reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 334 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. R. Ommen, J. A. Odell, and M. S. Stanton
Atrial Arrhythmias after Cardiothoracic Surgery
N. Engl. J. Med., May 15, 1997; 336(20): 1429 - 1434.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.