EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Stephen Westaby
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westaby, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Westaby, S.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:632-633
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Editorial comment

Stephen Westaby*

Oxford Heart Center, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

* Tel.: +44 1865 220269; fax: +44 1865 220268. (E-mail: swestaby@ahf.org.uk).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

In this paper from the renowned Mount Sinai Aortic Surgery Group, Halstead and Colleagues advocate a more radical approach to aortic root pathology in acute Type A dissection. Their concluding sentence states that "These results support an aggressive policy of composite root replacement in acute Type A dissection". Is this really the case?

The study design does not test the hypothesis that root replacement with a prosthetic valved conduit provides better short or long-term results than supracoronary aortic replacement with valve re-suspension. This is a retrospective analysis and comparative study of two difference circumstances. Patients with more extensive root involvement (Group B) and aortic regurgitation (in 82% of cases) were treated by prosthetic valved conduit root replacement. Those without root involvement or dissection limited to the non-coronary sinus received the less taxing approach of supracoronary aortic replacement (Group A) and valve re-suspension if prolapse occurred. More . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. L. Estrera and H. J. Safi
Editorial comment: Proximal reconstruction during Type A aortic dissection
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 41 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.