|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:1006-1007
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL
Cardiac Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 207 242 9789; fax: +44 207 831 0488. (Email: r.anderson@ich.ucl.ac.uk).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
It was, perhaps, paradoxical that as I prepared to write this editorial comment to accompany the article describing tricuspidisation of the bifoliate aortic valve [1], I also had at my elbow the December issue of the Journal for the year 2005. In this issue, I discovered another editorial comment, entitled The aortic valve: an everlasting mystery to the surgeon [2]. In the light of my own comments that will follow, it is worth quoting in its entirety the opening sentence of this editorial. Manuel Antunes started his own comment by stating Despite its apparent simplicity, the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the aortic valve have persistently defied the comprehension of the surgeons. I do not consider myself qualified to express an opinion on the reasons why understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology have defeated the combined attentions of the surgical world, but I do
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Piazza, P. de Jaegere, C. Schultz, A. E. Becker, P. W. Serruys, and R. H. Anderson Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve Circ Cardiovasc Intervent, August 1, 2008; 1(1): 74 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dhareshwar, D. V. Miller, and T. M. Sundt III Reply to the editor. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1402 - 1404. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |