EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lacour-Gayet, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lacour-Gayet, F.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:989-990
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Editorial comment

The goal is performance evaluation not outcome prediction

Francois Lacour-Gayet *

Denver Children's Hospital, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80262, USA

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 303 8616624; fax: +1 303 7648022. (Email: lacour-gayet.francois@tchden.org).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The article [1] from the Great Ormond Street (GOS) group raises a precise question: ‘Does the Aristotle Score Predict Outcome in Congenital Heart Surgery?’ The answer from the authors is ‘The Basic Aristotle score is only weakly associated with post-operative mortality in this GOS series.’ In fact, the Aristotle score showed a statistically significant correlation with mortality in their series with a p-value of 0.02 or 0.03. This seems acceptable for a score that was not created to predict mortality. The Aristotle Basic Score (ABS) was designed [2], based on a subjective approach, to define a constant called complexity, which is calculated as the sum of mortality, morbidity, and technical difficulty for 145 procedures in our specialty. Complexity, that we believe is a global constant for a given patient, serves as the basis to compare performance between centers or surgeons.

In contrast, the RACHS 1 was designed specifically to predict mortality as quoted in their initial article [3]. ‘The aim of RACHS . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.