HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mestres, C.-A. Articles by Yankah, A. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mestres, C.-A. Articles by Yankah, A. C. Related Collections Education Professional affairs

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:571-573
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Editorial

The European Working Time Directive: quo vadis?

A well-planned and organized assassination of surgery

^a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínico, University of Barcelona, Villaroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
^b Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Universitario "Marqués de Valdecilla", Santander, Spain
^c Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

^_* Corresponding author: Tel.: +34 93 2275749; fax: +34 93 4514898. (Email: cmestres@clinic.ub.es).

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this issue of the European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Lim and Tsui [1] on behalf of the Registrars and Consultant Cardiac Surgeons of Papworth Hospital refer to the impact of the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) on exposure to operative cardiac surgical training. They have performed a cohort study to determine the factors that influenced operative surgical training. In summary, out of 3312 cardiac surgical operations that were performed over a 2-year period, the proportion of cases performed by trainees was 39% and 40% in each of the 2 years before and after the EWTD was introduced. Using logistic regression analysis, which is a tool that our beloved Papworth colleagues know very well, they reach the conclusion that with a successful institution specific training module and a commitment to training, exposure to operative surgical training can be sustained despite shortening of working hours.

This is an institutional experience that is very well presented by the authors. The question is: Will this be a good example for everybody? It is difficult to say. There are too many differences among public and private institutions, including the case load, and also among accredited teaching institutions and those with no teaching programme. There are also too many differences among European countries. The interest of this paper is that it addresses a very important point for our immediate future as a Specialty and also for Medicine and Surgery in general. Is Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery endangered? As rightly stated by the authors in their introduction, it is true that there is considerable disquiet among trainers and trainees. The authors have come with an elegant paper that, however, does not address all the problems and all the doubts. Let's have a look at it.

Number one and a big problem. A full-shift pattern was introduced . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Sadaba, D. J. O'Regan, and A. P. Kappetein Adapt or die: The imperative for a culture of innovation in cardio-thoracic surgical training Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 31(5): 959 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-A. Mestres, J. M. Revuelta, and A. C. Yankah Reply to Sadaba et al. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 31(5): 960 - 960. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Molnar The price to pay: perversions in (cardio)thoracic surgical training Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 569 - 569. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-A. Mestres, J. M. Revuelta, and A. C. Yankah Reply to Thomas F. Molnar Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 31(3): 570 - 570. [Full Text] [PDF]