|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:4-6. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.11.001
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Editorials |
Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 341 865 1421; fax: +49 341 865 1452. (Email: mohrf@medizin.uni-leipzig.de).
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Successful treatment strategies for cardiovascular diseases have often been initiated and driven by surgeons, which is true for both coronary artery and valvular heart diseases. Radical excision of diseased tissue, repair and replacement strategies lead to long-term successful treatment of the underlying diseases and clearly improved patient outcome. For many surgeons it was and may still be hard to understand that balloon dilation and stenting of severely diseased arteriosclerotic coronary arteries could be competitive for bypass surgery. The impact of all interventional strategies was underestimated by the surgeons, which lead to the overwhelming development of a new discipline of interventional cardiology. They further developed and steadily improved such strategies, heavily supported by medical industry, which lead to a steady growth of PCI, by far surpassing CABG surgery worldwide. Right now interventional cardiologists supported by some cardiac surgeons are on their way to transform some conventional open surgical procedures into catheter-based less invasive interventions, such as valve repair and replacement. Most of the surgeons react very conservatively and some get themselves involved to evaluate such techniques in order to have a fair comparison and control.
Conventional aortic and mitral valve replacement is a routine procedure that has been performed safely for decades. The majority of patients present with severely calcifying aortic valve stenosis, accounting for approximately 1030% of cardiac surgical workload. Resection of all calcified tissue with subsequent prosthetic heart valve implantation using a standard suturing technique has been the only definitive therapy. Excellent haemodynamic outcome and functional results are achieved, and good long-term performance of conventional prostheses has been proven by numerous studies. Can similar results ever be accomplished by balloon dilation and stent based valve implantation without complete resection of the heavily calcified cusps? This is hard to believe for most surgeons since balloon dilation of aortic valve stenosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Quaden, T. Attmann, M. Schunke, D. Theisen-Kunde, J. Cremer, and G. Lutter Percutaneous aortic valve replacement: Endovascular resection of human aortic valves in situ. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1081 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kostolny, V. Tsang, J. Nordmeyer, C. Van Doorn, A. Frigiola, S. Khambadkone, M. R. de Leval, and P. Bonhoeffer Rescue surgery following percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 607 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Walther, V. Falk, M. A. Borger, and F. W. Mohr Reply to Kalavrouziotis et al. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 32(1): 189 - 190. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |