EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:469-470. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.038
Copyright © 2008, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Narcis Hudorovic
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vucetic, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lovricevic, I.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vucetic, B.
Right arrow Articles by Lovricevic, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Mediastinum
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi
Right arrow Esophagus - other


Letters to the Editor

Apologia for change in management of blunt rupture of the thoracic aorta

Borki Vucetica,*, Narcis Hudorovicb, Ivo Lovricevicb

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital "Sestre milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia
b Department of Endo and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital "Sestre milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia

Received 6 February 2008; accepted 30 April 2008.

* Corresponding author. Address: University Department of Surgery, University Hospital ‘Sestre milosrdnice’, 10000, Vinogradska 29, Zagreb, Croatia. Tel.: +385 1 37 87 404; fax: +385 1 38 62 292. (Email: borki.vucetic@zg.htnet.hr).

Key Words: Traumatic aortic rupture • Endovascular repair • Asymptomatic patients

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The article by Buz and associates [1] calls attention to the possibility of an endovascular treatment of traumatic aortic rupture.

This policy may have a strong impact on mortality and morbidity rates that are usually very high in this condition, considering a conventional surgical approach. The obtained results [30-day mortality rate in conventional surgical group 20% (7 of 35), vs endovascular group 7.7% (3 of 39); complication rate (28.5% vs 3%); and survival rate (75% vs 86.4–81.6%)] were due to severely compromised clinical status preoperatively, and it seems fair to assume that conventional surgery would have much higher risk or would . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.