|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:148-151
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL
a Cardiac Surgery Division, San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
b Cardiac Surgery Institute, University Of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
accepted 5 May 1998.
Corresponding author. Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Monoblocco M 85/2°, Ospedale San Martino, Largo R. Benzi, 10 16132 Genova, Italy. Tel.: +39 10 5552400; fax: +39 10 5556662; e-mail: mgbuzzi@smartino.ge.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Aortic incompetence Ascending aorta replacement Ascending aorta aneurism Aortic annuloplasty
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the latter cases, aortic cusps are often found to be normal in shape and pliability, whereas anatomic alterations are restricted to the dilated annulus and sino-tubular junction both of which prevent correct leaflet coaptation [1].
Different surgical strategies lead surgeons to choose between combined replacement of valve and ascending aorta, according to the BentallDe Bono procedure [2] [3], or isolated ascending aorta replacement, leaving aortic cusps in situ as described by David et al. [5] [6] [7] [9] [10].
We describe our experience with a technique of aortic annulus reconstruction and ascending aorta replacement, which shows the advantages of a direct and simple approach together with satisfying mid-term results.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pre-operative conditions were assessed by clinical evaluation, Doppler echocardiogram and emodinamic-cardioangiography (Table 1).
|
Surgical technique
Routine CPBP was instituted in every patient with aortic cannulation, single atrial cannula, systemic hypothermia to 30°C, intermittent isothermic antegrade blood cardioplegia and LV venting.
An aortic clamp was positioned just over the distal edge of the aneurysmatic tract, the ascending aorta was transected about 1 cm from the valve plane and the malacic wall was fully resected.
After the aortic bulb had been fully transected, the excessive wall tissue was resected by three triangular excisions just above the valve commissures. Wall excision was indicated in those patients with aortic diameter exceeding 65 mm at the sino-tubular junction. Tissue excision should not exert tension on to the coronary ostia or excessively reduce aortic diameter. Three external Teflon strips, overriding each other, were placed around the aortic bulb and included in the direct suture of the edges of the triangular excisions. If needed, additional double pledgetted 3/0 Prolene sutures were placed through the aortic annulus and the external strips to shrink the annulus when tied ( Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 ).
|
|
|
When the aortic diameter exceeded 80 mm, an external plicature of the aortic wall was carried out at the level of each commissure.
The space between the strips and the aortic wall was then generously glued and the free border of the reconstructed aortic root was included in a Prolene running suture.
In each case, a tubular Dacron graft of adequate calibre was interposed to replace ascending aorta; aortic valve competence was then tested by flushing cardioplegic solution into the prosthesis, observing eventual left ventricle distension.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In one case a residual moderate valve incompetence was noticed and a successful valve replacement was carried out during the same operative session (this patient will be no longer considered in this study).
Patients were discharged between the 10th and 13thp.o. day, with minimal pharmacologic therapy based on Digoxin, Ca-antagonists and temporary oral anticoagulation.
Each patient was then submitted to a follow-up protocol, including a Doppler echocardiogram and chest X-ray examination before hospital discharge, at 90 days and then every 6 months.
The last data analysis is drawn from a mean follow-up time of 42 months (range 1878), and the results are reported in Table 2.
|
One patient (5%) developed dispnoea and acute effort intolerance about 2 months after operation. An echocardiogram displayed massive incompetence and regurgitation of the aortic valve, due to prolapse of the non-coronary cusp; a re-do was performed, with aortic valve replacement, without further complications.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nevertheless, the presence of thin and pliable aortic cusps has led to the development of conservative procedures.
In this direction Cabrol, then Duran et al. obtained good results using a technique of circumferential reduction of the annulus by means of commissural plication, but with a high incidence of late recidivation, as also happened with the technique proposed by Carpentier et al., with commissural transannular stitches [5] [6] [7] [8].
Sarsam and Yacoub developed a procedure of excision of the tract of ascending aorta above leaflet insertion, with successive placement of a tubular graft, adequately tailored on the native valve with coronary re-implantation. David and Coll proposed a similar technique describing proximal anastomosis of the tubular graft directly on the outflow tract of the left ventricle, and the successive re-suspension of the native valve cusps inside the tubular graft and coronary re-implantation [9] [10].
Our technique leads to a reduction in annular diameter utilising the same principle on which Carpentier's ring, used in mitral incompetence, is based. The aortic annulus is fixed and enveloped in a tubular structure made up by the three Teflon patches in order to prevent later dilatation of the native aortic tissues left in situ; furthermore sub-annular stitches or coronary anastomosis are not needed [4].
The effectiveness of this procedure, in spite of the small number of cases, is confirmed by the results of short-term follow-up, showing persistence of repaired aortic valve competence and freedom from recurrence of annular and bulbar dilation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Reichenspurner, D. H. Boehm, H. Gulbins, C. Schulze, S. Wildhirt, A. Welz, C. Detter, and B. Reichart Three-dimensional video and robot-assisted port-access mitral valve operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2000; 69(4): 1176 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |