Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:624-628
© 1998 Elsevier Science NL
Diagnosis and management of entrapped embolus through a patent foramen ovale
V. Aboyans,
P. Lacroix,
E. Ostyn,
E. Cornu,
M. Laskar
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and Angiology, Dupuytren University Hospital, 2 Ave Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges, France
Received 25 May 1998;
received in revised form 28 September 1998;
accepted 6 October 1998.
Corresponding author.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The diagnosis of impending paradoxical embolus by echocardiography is exceptional and its management remains unclear. Through a personal case, we performed an exhaustive review of the medical literature of this rare finding. Since the first report, only 43 cases have ever been reported. The superiority of transesophageal echocardiography is underlined. The clinical features are complex. The classical simultaneous pulmonary and paradoxical embolism is often absent. Therapeutic options are cardiac surgery, thrombolysis or anticoagulation. The early mortality rate is high (21%). In addition, recurrent embolisms are reported when a medical treatment is chosen. The cumulative results of each possibility are described.
Key Words: Echocardiography Embolism Foramen ovale
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Since the last decade, the improvement of echocardiography made the diagnosis of entrapped embolus through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) more common. As this finding remains extremely rare, the clinical features and therapeutic management of the condition are still unknown. As we recently detected one case, we studied all reported cases through an exhaustive review of the medical literature indexed by MedLine database. For each case, we studied the clinical presentations, the diagnostic and therapeutic methods and the management of this unusual form of thrombo-embolic disease. After a brief report of our personal case, we present the cumulative results of each strategy and the clinical outcome of these cases.
 |
Our case
|
|---|
A 66-year-old-man, admitted to a primary care hospital for fever and cough 10 days earlier, suddenly presented an acute dyspnea and then collapsed. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) suspected a thrombus in the right atrium. The patient, transferred to our institution, had a TEE that confirmed the presence of a long serpentine like thrombus in the right atrium, protruding in the left atrium through a PFO (
Fig. 1
). The patient underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for embolectomy. The intracardiac thrombus (
Fig. 2
) was adherent to the foramen ovale and the left atrium. After thrombus removal the PFO had been sutured and an embolectomy of both main pulmonary arteries was performed. Unfortunately, the patient died at the end of the cardiopulmonary bypass, from a severe right ventricle failure.

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Transesophageal echocardiography (four chambers view): LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium; T, thrombus.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Since the first report by Nellessen et al.
[1] in 1985, 43 cases of entrapped thrombus through a PFO have been published
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]. Table 1 summarises the clinical presentations at the time of diagnosis. Among 40 cases with clinical data, the mean age is 61.2±14.2 years old (range 2084 years).
Clinical presentation
Clinical features can be misleading (Table 1). In 53% of available data (21 cases of total 40), pulmonary embolism is not associated with any paradoxical embolism. As illustrated in our case, the clinical presentation is not predictive of this complication and without routine echocardiography, the thrombus would be misdiagnosed. Conversely, isolated systemic embolus is rare. Only three cases are known
[14]
[27]
[29], even though echocardiography is generally performed after any stroke or distal acute ischaemia. The reason could be that a high right atrial pressure is necessary to protrude a thrombus through the inter-atrial shunt
[35]. Finally only 16 of 40 cases (40%) presented a typical pulmonary and paradoxical embolism, as expected.
Echocardiographic findings
In most cases (35 cases/44, 80%), TTE correctly made the diagnosis or was doubtful, making TEE necessary for more information. In 20 of these cases, TTE was combined with TEE. There is no report of false positive diagnosis by TTE being corrected by TEE or macroscopic verification. In four cases (
[16]
[32]
[39] and our case) only the right part of the thrombus was detected, and in one case
[38] only the left side segment of the thrombus was revealed by TTE. In our case, the quality of TTE images was unsatisfactory and TEE was necessary before referring the patient to surgery. In nine cases, only TEE is presented as making the diagnosis possible.
Management and prognosis
The overall early mortality of the reported cases is high: eight patients out of 39 with known outcomes died (21%; see
[3]
[8]
[18]
[19]
[24]
[31] and our case). The best management remains unclear. Three therapeutic options can be discussed. The impending thrombus can be removed surgically or be dissolved by thrombolytics and/or anticoagulation.
Theorically, thrombolysis or even anticoagulation seem to be hazardous in great and mobile intracardiac thrombi with an important risk of either fragmentation or complete embolization. Moreover the deep vein thrombosis can also be a source of recurrent embolism. For Gulba et al.
[41], the high risk of recurrent embolism during thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism suggest the indication of temporary caval filters. However, the presence of intra atrial thrombi contra-indicate the insertion of this device via jugular punction. A phlebography could therefore be mandatory to affirm the inferior vena cava patency before a controlateral femoral punction, which appears to be time-consuming.
Conversely, the delay between clinical presentation and echographic diagnosis could be extremely variable, from 1 h to few weeks, as shown in Table 2. In the cases with long delays (as in our case), the efficacy of thrombolytics or anticoagulants might be more hypothetical on an old thrombus.
In this review, 11 patients (mean age 67.9±12.2 years) benefited from anticoagulation alone (heparin relayed by oral anticoagulants). Seven patients survived (64%) but two had a recurrent embolism during treatment administration: in one case
[4] a transient ischemic attack, and in another one
[21], a pulmonary embolism was noted. In another report
[24], anticoagulation was performed before surgery scheduled for the following day, but the patient died before surgery.
Thrombolysis was attempted only in six cases (mean age 58.8±7.6 years); this small number was insufficient to be evaluated. One patient died before discharge
[8] and thrombolysis had to be repeated for complete resolution in two cases
[21]
[32].
In our case, we preferred surgery even though we were aware of the risks of cardiac surgery, as the patient suffered cardiac failure. This therapeutical choice seemed to be more rapid and complete than the others, as the PFO would be closed at the same time.
In our case, 24 patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for embolectomy and suture of the inter-atrial shunt (mean age 56.2±16.1 years). The outcome was known in 22 cases (Table 2). Nineteen (86%) survived. No embolization after thrombus removal is reported. Moreover, a clip was often inserted on the inferior vena cava during surgery avoiding post-operative recurrent embolism.
 |
Conclusion
|
|---|
The echocardiographic diagnosis of entrapped thrombus through a patent foramen ovale is extremely rare. Surprisingly, more than one half of the reported cases presented atypical clinical presentation, without paradoxical or pulmonary embolism. This could be an additional reason to perform routine TTE after any pulmonary or arterial embolism. Each time this complication is suspected by clinical presentation or TTE data, TEE on emergency is mandatory for more precise information. Whether a systematic TEE should be performed on any patient with a suspected pulmonary embolism is debatable
[42]
[43]. As the entrapped embolus through a PFO is a very rare finding, it cannot be a sufficient argument for a systematic use of TEE in every case of pulmonary embolism. A duplex scanning of abdominal and deep veins of legs could also have been recommended, especially to examine the possibility of placing an inferior caval filter or clip.
The cumulative results of these sparse reports do not allow us to make surgery a definite medical option. As the series is a compilation of individual and heterogeneous case reports, we did not make any statistical comparison between different groups. Nevertheless, surgery seems to have the best results. In addition, anticoagulation or thrombolysis can pose secondary complications, especially recurrent embolisms. There is no report of such complications when surgery has been performed.
Each alternative is to be considered separately. When surgical removal seems too hazardous, i.e. in the older patients, anticoagulation with echocardiographic controls can be proposed. The use of thrombolytics requires the absence of classical contra-indications to prevent life-threatening haemorrhage. The efficacy and safety of thrombolysis remain to be evaluated as only six cases are reported.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Nellessen U., Daniel W.G., Matheis G., Oelert H., Depping K., Lichtlen P.R. Impending paradoxical embolism from atrial thrombus: correct diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography and prevention by surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1002-1004.[Abstract]
- Loscalzo J. Paradoxical embolism: clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. Am Heart J 1986;112:141-145.[Medline]
- Yang S.C., Raheja R., Puri V.K. Detection of right atrial mass by echocardiography in pulmonary thromboembolism. Crit Care Med 1986;14:255-256.[Medline]
- Cazzani E., Benvenuto M., Muzio L. Embolia polmonare e sistemica in un caso di trombosi biatriale. G Ital Cardiol 1987;17:1169-1172.[Medline]
- Okun M., Plotnick G.D., Salmon D., Lee Y.C. Two-dimensional echocardiographic detection of biatrial thrombi. Am Heart J 1987;114:184-186.[Medline]
- Kasper W., Geibel A., Tiede N., Hofmann T., Meinertz T., Just H. Die Echokardiographie in der Diagnostik der Lungembolie. Herz 1989;14:82-101.[Medline]
- Kronik G. The European Cooperative Study on the clinical significance of right heart thrombi. Eur Heart J 1989;10:1046-1059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sardesai SH, Marshall RJ, Mourant AJ. Paradoxical systemic embolisation through a patent foramen ovale. Lancet 1989;i:732733.
- Mazzoni V., Bini A., Giaconi A. Masse atriali destre: ruolo della ecocardiografia bidimensionale nell'indicazione chirurgica di urgenza. G Ital Cardiol 1990;20:738-741.[Medline]
- Barnard S.P., Kulatilake E.N.P., Ikram S. Straddle embolus-imminent paradoxical embolus diagnosed by echocardiography and treated surgically. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 1990;5:105-107.[Abstract]
- Mügge A., Daniel W.G., Haverich A., Lichtlen P.R. Diagnosis of noninfective cardiac mass lesions by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1991;83:70-78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nagelhout D.A., Pearson A.C., Labovitz A.J. Diagnosis of paradoxic embolism by transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 1991;121:1552-1554.[Medline]
- Nelson C.W., Snow F.R., Barnett M., McRoy L., Weschler A.S., Nixon J.V. Impending paradoxical embolism; echocardiographic diagnosis of an intracardiac thrombus crossing a patent foramen ovale. Am Heart J 1991;122:859-862.[Medline]
- Speechly-Dick M.E., Middleton S.J., Foale R.A. Impending paradoxical embolism: a rare but important diagnosis. Br Heart J 1991;65:163-165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gin K.G., Thompson C.R., Jue J., Ling H. Embolic occlusion of a patent foramen ovale: A cause of false negative contrast echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992;5:444-446.[Medline]
- Black M.D., Masters R.G., Sochowski R.A., Higginson L.A.J., Keon W.J. Paradoxical embolism-in-transit: diagnosis and surgical treatment. Can J Cardiol 1993;9:437-440.[Medline]
- Chapoulot L., Metz D., Canivet E., Maillier B., Torossian F., Pommier J.L., Nazyrollas P., Sal A., Baehrel B., Elaerts J. Thrombus mobile du coeur droit et embolie pulmonnaire: problèmes diagnostique et thérapeutique. Arch Mal Coeur 1993;86:1039-1045.
- Mirode A., Tribouilloy C., Adam M.C., Poulain H., Lesbre J.P. Diagnostic par échographie d'un thrombus enclavé dans un foramen ovale perméable. Arch Mal Coeur 1993;86:1065-1068.
- Siebenlist D., Gattenlöhrer W. Transit-Thrombus im offenen Foramen ovale mit pulmonaler und paradoxer Embolisation. Dtsch med Wschr 1993;118:1105-1109.[Medline]
- Brogno D., Lancaster G., Rosenbaum M. Embolism interruptus. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1761-1762.[Free Full Text]
- Daley L., Deitcher S.R., Bojar R.M., Pandian N.G. Urokinase resolution of impending paradoxic embolus in transit: evaluation by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 1994;128:1239-1241.[Medline]
- Hargreaves M., Maloney D., Gribbin B., Westaby S. Impending paradoxical embolism: A case report and literature review. Eur Heart J 1994;15:1284-1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schreiter S.W., Phillips J.H. Thromboembolus traversing a patent foramen ovale: Resolution with anticoagulation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994;7:659-662.[Medline]
- Adam M.C., Tribouilloy C., Mirode A., Rey J.L., Bickert P., Lesbre J.P. Embolies paradoxales au décours d'une embolie pulmonaire. Presse Med 1995;24:479-482.[Medline]
- Caes F.L., Van Belleghem Y.V., Missault H., Coenye K.E., Van Nooten G. Surgical treatment of impending paradoxical embolism through patent foramen ovale. Ann Thor Surg; 1995;59:1559-1561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- De Dominicis E., Boschello M., Trevisan G., De Nardis R. Minaccia di embolia paradossa: visualizzazione diretta mediante ecocardiografia bidimensionale. G Ital Cardiol 1995;25:733-736.[Medline]
- Hust M.H., Staiger M., Braun B. Migration of paradoxic embolus through a patent foramen ovale diagnosed by echocardiography: successful thrombolysis. Am Heart J 1995;129:620-622.[Medline]
- Mathew T.C., Ramsaran E.K., Aragam J.R. Impending paradoxic embolism in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography and treatment by emergent surgery. Am Heart J 1995;129:826-827.[Medline]
- Ward R., Jones D., Haponik E.F. Paradoxical embolism. Chest 1995;108:549-558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zerio C., Antonini Canterin F., Pavan D., Nicolosi G.L. Spontaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale and disappearance of impending paradoxical embolism after fibrinolytic therapy in the course of massive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:422-424.[Medline]
- Barbour S.I., Izban K.F., Reyes C.V., McKiernan T.L., Louie E.K. Serpentine thrombus traversing the foramen ovale: paradoxical embolism shown by transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:111-113.[Free Full Text]
- Kreuzer J., Weinbrenner C.E., Borst M.M., Koch T.W., Kübler W., Kücherer H.F. Impending paradoxical embolism and dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction in a patient with recurrent pulmonary embolism and secondary pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 1996;17:1448-1449.[Free Full Text]
- Rosenzweig B.P., Glassman L., Kronzon I. Impending paradoxical embolus. Circulation 1996;93:387.[Free Full Text]
- Otmani A., Jarry G., Vermes E., Leborgne L., Bruaire J.P., Quiret J.C. Embolie pulmonnaire et thrombus enclavé dans un foramen ovale perméable. Arch Mal Coeur 1996;89:375-377.
- Augusseau M.P., Pacouret G., Charbonnier B., Sirinelli A., Dreyfus X., Aupart M. Embolie paradoxale et thrombus enclavé dans le foramen ovale. Arch Mal Coeur 1997;90:1533-1538.
- Culclasure T.F., Kruger M. Impending paradoxical embolus. Circulation 1997;95:753.[Free Full Text]
- Zuber M., Erne P. Right to left thromboembolism through a patent foramen ovale. Heart 1996;76:143.[Free Full Text]
- Falk V., Walther T., Krankenberg H., Mohr F.W. Trapped thrombus in a patent foramen ovale. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 1997;45:90-92.[Medline]
- Plotkin I.M., Fox J.A., Aranki S., Collard C.D. Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis and surgical management of a paradoxical embolus extending through a patent foramen ovale. Anesth Analg 1997;84:1166-1167.[Medline]
- Srivastava T.N., Payment M.F. Paradoxical embolism: thrombus in transit through a patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 1997;337:681.[Free Full Text]
- Gulba D.C., Schmid C., Borst H.G., Lichtlen P., Dietz R., Luft F.C. Medical compared with surgical treatment for massive pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1994;343:576-577.[Medline]
- Pruszczyk P., Torbicki A., Kuch-Wocial A., Chlebus M., Miskiewicz Z.C., Jedrusik P. Tranoesophageal echocardiography for definitive diagnosis of haemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 1995;16:534-538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Steiner P., Lund G.K., Debatin J.F., Steiner D., Nienaber C., Nicolas V., Bücheler E. Acute pulmonary embolism: value of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in comparison with helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:931-936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Willis, T. S. Welch, J. P. Scally, M. W. Bartoszek, L. E. Sullenberger, J. C. Pamplin, and O. W. Hnatiuk
Impending Paradoxical Embolism Presenting as a Pulmonary Embolism, Transient Ischemic Attack, and Myocardial Infarction
Chest,
October 1, 2007;
132(4):
1358 - 1360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rousselle, P.-V. Ennezat, J.-M. Aubert, J. Darchis, X. Gonin, D. Lenica, J.-J. Bauchart, J.-L. Auffray, V. Gaxotte, T. H. LeJemtel, et al.
Momentarily stuck in the foramen ovale
Eur J Echocardiogr,
June 1, 2007;
8(3):
223 - 226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Ngaage, G. S. Bhamra, S. Gaynor, and U. R. Nair
Saved by the bell: Early surgical treatment for cardiosystemic thromboembolism
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
May 1, 2002;
123(5):
1010 - 1011.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Hyers, G. Agnelli, R. D. Hull, T. A. Morris, M. Samama, V. Tapson, and J. G. Weg
Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease
Chest,
January 1, 2001;
119(1_suppl):
176S - 193S.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|