|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:24-30
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
b Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
c Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Received 8 June 1998; received in revised form 26 October 1998; accepted 2 November 1998.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-31-342-1443; fax: +46-31-827-614; e-mail: odd.bech-hanssen@sahlgrenska.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Gender Aortic stenosis Doppler Echocardiography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An exaggerated response to pressure overload with increased relative wall thickness and with a female preponderance has been claimed to identify a subgroup of patients with increased early mortality and morbidity [3] [4] [5]. In some cases the hypertrophic left ventricle with relatively small diastolic and systolic volumes is associated with a supernormal ejection fraction. Patients with small chamber volumes run the risk of developing a low cardiac output syndrome postoperatively, when the afterload reduction further decreases chamber volume [4]. The situation may be worsened by inotropic and chronotropic agents, as well as by hypovolemia.
Gender differences in the left ventricular response to systolic pressure overload have previously been described [6] [7] [8] [9]. However, these reports conflict and it is unclear whether systolic function is reduced and the left ventricle is dilated in males, or whether females have more pronounced hypertrophy and supernormal systolic function. The patient populations which have been studied are either small [2] [6] [9], retrospectively selected or prone to gender-based selection bias [8]. There is only one report on gender aspects and diastolic function in aortic stenosis [9] and we are unaware of any study reporting the influence of gender on early mortality and morbidity.
The aims of the present Doppler echocardiographic study were to describe gender differences in left ventricular geometry, as well as systolic and diastolic function, and to evaluate the impact of such differences on early mortality and morbidity in aortic valve replacement.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results were compared with those from a healthy control group of 33 male and 27 female individuals with normal resting ECG and without hypertension, diabetes mellitus or a history of heart disease.
Methods
M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography
Preoperative (n=195) and postoperative (n=179) echocardiography was performed using an Acuson 128 or 128XP Computed Sonograph (Acuson, Mountain View, CA). Both M-mode registrations and off-line measurements were guided by the two-dimensional image. This was important to avoid incorrect measurements of septal and posterior wall thicknesses. M-mode measurements were made according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography
[11]. Measurements of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVd), thickness of the interventricular septum (IVS) and thickness of the posterior wall (LVPW) were made at the beginning of the QRS in the ECG. Relative wall thickness was defined as the ratio 2xLVPW/LVd and the diastolic diameter and wall thickness ratio as 2xLVd/IVS+LVPW. The ejection fraction according to Simpson's rule was derived on-line from left ventricular volumes calculated from planimetry of two apical, orthogonal views of the left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic areas
[12]. The image quality was regarded as acceptable for measurement when at least 75% of the endocardial border was visualized. Planimetry of the left atrium was performed on-line from a late systolic stop frame with the maximum atrial area. Left ventricular mass was calculated according to the truncated ellipsoid model described by Byrd et al.
[13].
Doppler measurements
All the patients were investigated by color Doppler, as well as by pulsed and continuous wave Doppler. The Doppler investigation was performed during quiet respiration. Blood flow velocity in the left ventricular outflow tract was estimated by pulsed wave duplex Doppler from an apical four-chamber view (sample size of 5 mm). Mitral flow was recorded at the tips of the mitral leaflets in the four-chamber view. From the mitral velocity tracings, early flow velocity (E), deceleration time of the early filling wave and peak velocity during atrial contraction (A) were measured. Pulmonary venous flow velocities were obtained by placing the sample volume at the orifice of the upper right pulmonary vein. Peak velocity during systole (S) and diastole (D) were measured. Continuous wave Doppler signals were recorded by a 2 MHz non-imaging probe to obtain an optimal signal-to-noise ratio and multiple windows were used.
Abnormal intraventricular flow velocity was defined as an intracavitary Doppler spectrum with a late peak systolic velocity of >1.5 m/s.
The stroke volume was calculated as the product of the cross-sectional area of the left ventricular outflow tract and the velocity time integral. Cardiac index was calculated as the product of heart rate and stroke volume divided by body surface area. Pressure gradients were calculated according to the simplified Bernoulli equation (pressure =4x(maximum velocity)2). Effective orifice area was calculated according to the continuity principle using the velocity integrals [14].
Postoperative morbidity
To describe postoperative morbidity, we report the days at the intensive care unit, the maximum aspartate aminotransferase level and classification according to the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System
[15]. In this system a point score number is given for different interventions in the critical care unit describing the severity of illness.
Inter- and intra-observer variability
In our laboratory the inter-observer/intra-observer variability defined as the mean value of difference/mean value of measurements in percent are as follows: for 2-dimensionally guided M-mode (left ventricular diameter in diastole) 1/1%; 2-dimensional echocardiography (ejection fraction according to Simpson's rule) 2/8%; Doppler measurements (mitral early deceleration time) 5/12%; calculations based on Doppler (E/A ratio) 9/8% and calculations based on 2-dimensional and Doppler measurements (effective orifice area) 2/1%. In the intraobserver study, the patients were investigated on two different occasions (median 18 days apart) while in the interobserver study they were investigated on the same occasion
[10].
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD). The mean of three M-mode and Doppler measurements were used in patients with sinus rhythm. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded from the Doppler assessment of diastolic function. We analysed primarily gender differences in this study, while comparisons between controls and patients were performed as secondary analyses. Unpaired Student's t-tests were used to compare data with normal distribution, while the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for data with skewed distribution and the
2-square test was used for proportions. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis with early mortality as the dependent variable and gender, age and left ventricular outflow diameter as independent variables.
Since the prevalence of coronary artery disease differs between female and male patients, we compared also female (n=59) and male patients (n=35) known not to have coronary artery disease. We selected variables likely to be influenced by coronary artery disease: those expressing left ventricular volume, ejection fraction and diastolic function.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Left ventricular diastolic function
Left atrial area was larger in males compared with females, but not when the area was normalized to body surface area (Table 5). The peak systolic velocity in the pulmonary vein was significantly higher in female patients, as was the mitral E/A ratio. However, in patients without coronary artery disease neither peak systolic velocity (56±15.5 vs. 58±14.4 cm/s P=0.530) nor E/A ratio (1.1±0.61 vs. 1.02±0.77, P=0.312) differed significantly between males and females.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Left ventricular geometry, systolic and diastolic function
According to Laplace's law, the magnitude of wall stress is determined by the pressure burden and the left ventricular geometry (the left ventricular diameter/wall thickness ratio). In the present study, females and males had comparable systolic blood pressure and valvular pressure gradients. Therefore, the left ventricular diameter/wall thickness ratio represents a substitute for wall tension. Left ventricular geometry is closely correlated to ejection performance and some investigators claim that systolic dysfunction (reduced ejection fraction) in patients with aortic stenosis is due to inappropriate geometry (inadequate hypertrophy) rather than depression of intrinsic myocardial contractility
[1]
[7]. We found a reduced ejection fraction (<45%) in approximately 20% of the study population, without gender differences. However, there was a significant but small gender difference in left ventricular volumes based on two-dimensional measurements corrected for body surface area. Our data therefore suggest that there is an inappropriate increase in left ventricular volume and consequently higher wall stress in male patients compared with females.
Our findings relating to systolic function differ from those in previous reports. We are therefore unable to confirm findings of a reduced ejection fraction in male patients compared with females [2] [6] [8] [9]. The reasons for the detected differences and the proposed mechanisms vary. Aurigemma et al. and Douglas et al. found a supernormal ejection fraction in females [2] [8], while Carroll et al. and Villari et al. found a subnormal ejection fraction in male patients [6] [9]. Possible causes of the differences in systolic function may include changes in chamber geometry [2], excess hypertrophy in women, [8] excess hypertrophy in men [9] and afterload excess in male patients [6]. The different findings can probably be explained by small number of patients [2] [6] [9] and selection bias [8]. Carroll et al. (n=63) and Aurigemma et al. (n=65) surveyed patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and echocardiography retrospectively over a period of 5 years. Douglas et al. retrospectively studied 232 patients selected for balloon dilatation of isolated aortic stenosis.
To our knowledge, no explanatory data are currently available for the observed gender difference in adaptation to pressure load. Both hormonal factors and gender differences in physical activity may contribute to these findings.
Impact of gender and ventricular geometry on mortality and morbidity
The geometric changes which were observed, with increased wall thickness relative to left ventricular diameter, tends to reduce wall stress and thereby myocardial metabolic demand However, in some cases, this adaptive response is not necessarily beneficial to the patient. The hypertrophic left ventricle with a small diastolic volume is often associated with increased left ventricular stiffness and relatively high filling pressures (preload). In our study. we observed an abnormal intraventricular flow velocity (>1.5 m/s) in 2% of the patients preoperatively and 11% at an early postoperative stage. The increased postoperative incidence after valve replacement can be explained by a further decrease in volume due to afterload reduction, where hypovolemia, tachycardia, inappropriate preload combined with inotropic therapy might further worsen the situation. Compared with survivors (>30 days) after operation, patients who died early (n=17) had higher incidence of abnormal intraventricular flow velocity (33 vs. 8%, P=0.02). Interestingly, Bartunek et al. found no increase in mortality among 14 patients with abnormal intraventricular flow velocity detected among 100 patients who underwent operation
[16]. The early mortality in their study was 1% (1/100). All the patients included in their study had an echocardiographic investigation performed postoperatively (range, 210 days). It is therefore possible that the postoperative treatment of patients was influenced and improved by the Doppler echocardiographic findings. In our study, a postoperative Doppler echocardiographic examination was performed in only 9 of 17 patients in the early mortality group.
Study limitations
The study population consists of a 35% subsample of patients with severe aortic stenosis operated upon with aortic valve replacement. Although, we cannot exclude influence of some selection bias on our results, it seems unlikely that the study population differs importantly from the total population.
The control subjects in the present study were younger than the patients. However, apart from the diastolic function, age did not influence other echocardiographic parameters Therefore, we did not compare diastolic function between patients and control subjects.
Clinical implications
Gender-associated differences in left ventricular geometry and function characterized by increased relative wall thickness, small left ventricular systolic cavities with narrow outflow tracts and supernormal ejection performance in female patients have been claimed to increase early mortality and morbidity
[3]
[4]
[5]
[17]. However, it is important to recognize the problem of small hypertrophic left ventricles in the early postoperative period, irrespective of gender. In addition to describing the severity of aortic stenosis, the preoperative echocardiographic investigation can provide information of prognostic and possible therapeutic value about left ventricular function and geometry, including outflow tract diameter
[18]. It is conceivable that postoperative care will benefit from greater use of Doppler echocardiographic investigations in patients with aortic stenosis and this could have a beneficial effect on mortality and morbidity by reducing the inappropriate use of inotropic drugs, avoiding hypovolemia and correcting tachyarrhythmias.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. I. Duncan, B. S. Lowe, M. J. Garcia, M. Xu, A. M. Gillinov, T. Mihaljevic, and C. G. Koch Influence of Concentric Left Ventricular Remodeling on Early Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2030 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Iyem, C. Sekuri, M. Tavli, and S. Buket Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Remodeling after Aortic Valve Replacement Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2007; 15(6): 459 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Taniguchi, T. Takahashi, K. Toda, H. Matsue, Y. Shudo, H. Shintani, M. Mitsuno, and Y. Sawa Left ventricular mass: impact on left ventricular contractile function and its reversibility in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 32(4): 588 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Kincaid, A. R. Cordell, J. W. Hammon, S. M. Adair, and N. D. Kon Coronary Insufficiency After Stentless Aortic Root Replacement: Risk Factors and Solutions Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 964 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Doenst, J. Ivanov, M. A. Borger, T. E. David, and S. J. Brister Sex-specific long-term outcomes after combined valve and coronary artery surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1632 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gjertsson, K. Caidahl, M. Farasati, A. Oden, and O. Bech-Hanssen Preoperative moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction: A novel Doppler echocardiographic long-term prognostic factor in patients with severe aortic stenosis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 890 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Lamb, H. P. Beyerbacht, A. de Roos, A. van der Laarse, H. W. Vliegen, F. Leujes, J. J. Bax, and E. E. van der Wall Left ventricular remodeling early after aortic valve replacement: differential effects on diastolic function in aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2182 - 2188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Oyama and W. P. Thomas Two-Dimensional and M-Mode Echocardiographic Predictors of Disease Severity in Dogs With Congenital Subaortic Stenosis J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., May 1, 2002; 38(3): 209 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, B. Wall, P. Myken, S. Larsson, and I. Wallentin INFLUENCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT, PROSTHESIS TYPE, AND SIZEON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND VENTRICULAR MASS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 57 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |