|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:340-345
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
b Department of Anesthesiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Received 26 October 1998; received in revised form 31 December 1998; accepted 13 January 1999.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-941-944-9801; fax: +49-941-944-9802; e-mail: andreas.liebold@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Interleukin-6 E-selectin Coronary sinus Inflammatory response Coronary artery bypass grafting
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anesthesia and surgery
Anesthesia was induced intravenously with fentanyl, etomidate and pancuronium, and was maintained with isoflurane supplemented with fentanyl and pancuronium bolus doses throughout the procedure. A SwanGanz catheter (93A-931; Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA) was introduced through the jugular vein, as well as a radial arterial catheter as routinely performed before surgery. The operative procedure was carried out by the same surgeon in all patients. CPB was instituted at mild hypothermia (3234°C) with an arterial cannula placed in the ascending aorta and a venous cannula placed through the right atrium. Cardioplegic arrest was induced with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (HTK solution) administered pressure controlled via the aortic root. CPB time ranged from 64 to 112 min (mean 91.5±15 min). Duration of aortic cross clamp time ranged from 33 to 61 min (mean 45.2±10 min). All patients received an internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending artery. The mean number of coronary anastomoses was 3.8±1 per patient. During reperfusion, the coronary sinus (CS) was cannulated with a 3.6 French catheter (Jostra, Hirrlingen, Germany) which is normally used for left atrial pressure measurement. The same catheter was introduced into the left atrium (LA) via the right upper pulmonary vein. The catheters were fixed at the epicardium using 6.0 prolene sutures and then brought out through the skin allowing transcutaneous retraction.
Blood sampling and measurements
CS and LA blood samples were drawn from the transcutaneous catheters in the CS and LA respectively. Systemic arterial and pulmonary artery blood samples were obtained from the patients' radial arterial line and the SwanGanz catheter. Systemic arterial blood samples were drawn before and immediately after CPB. Samples of all four sampling sites were collected 1, 6, 12 and 18 h after reperfusion. The samples were centrifuged immediately at 5000 min-1 (20 min, 4°C) and the plasma was deeply frozen (-70°C) until analysis. The plasma levels of IL-6 were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a commercially available kit (Immulite IL-6, Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions. E-selectin was assayed using a double primary sandwich ELISA (R & D Systems, Abingdon, UK).
Statistics
The data for each parameter were checked for normal distribution using the Lillifors modification of the KolomogorovSmirnov test. As the data were normally distributed, they are expressed as means±standard deviation The significance of differences within the same group was tested using the Student's paired t-test. Repeated measures analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to test the significance of differences between the groups. Values were considered to be statistically significant when the P-value was less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In CS blood samples, mean plasma levels of IL-6 was significantly higher than in arterial blood samples at each time point during the postoperative course (1 h: 1511.9±1023 vs. 858.8±700 pg/ml; 6 h: 1070.0±535 vs. 923.7±499 pg/ml; 12 h: 595.8±287 vs. 538.8±271 pg/ml; 18 h: 311.6±212 vs. 252.8±183 pg/ml; P<0.01) ( Fig. 1 ).
|
E-selectin
In arterial blood samples, mean plasma levels of E-selectin obtained preoperatively, at the beginning of reperfusion and 1 h after reperfusion were similar (25.7±8, 19.7±6 and 27.1±11 ng/ml, respectively; P, not significant). The values increased significantly at 6 h (46.1±20 ng/ml), peaked at 12 h (49.4±20 ng/ml), and were still elevated at 18 h (39.2±15 ng/ml; P<0.05).
In CS blood samples, mean E-selectin levels were significantly higher than in arterial blood samples (1 h: 33.8±13 vs. 27.1±11 ng/ml; 6 h: 55.6±18 vs. 46.1±20 ng/ml; 12 h: 55.3±22 vs. 49.4±20 ng/ml; 18 h: 45.1±18 vs. 39.2±15 ng/ml; P<0.01) ( Fig. 2 ).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relationship between inflammation and extracorporeal circulation continues to be an area of intensive investigation. Alterations to the cytokine network after exposure to the artificial surfaces of CPB are described to be part of the `postperfusion syndrome' together with the activation of complement and neutrophils, endothelial dysfunction, increased capillary permeability, accumulation of interstitial fluid and severe organ dysfunctions [2] [13]. Inflammation that follows CPB or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation always appears systemic and may be responsible for common post pump syndromes such as myocardial stunning, respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, pancreatitis and neurologic dysfunction [2] [3] [7] [16].
Numerous studies have described alterations of the proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 immediately after open heart surgery. Most cytokine concentration studies report amounts measured in systemic blood
[3]
[4]
[13]
[17]
[18]
[19]. Kalfin et al.
[17] documented an increased production of IL-8 24 h after cardiac surgery and suggested that IL-8 may play an important role in leucocyte activation after CPB. Steinberg et al.
[4] reported increased IL-6 and complement plasma levels in response to extracorporeal circulation. Sablotzki et al.
[13] found an increased IL-6 production after weaning off CPB with peak values 6 h after the end of the surgical procedure, coinciding with a peak in body temperature.. Menasche et al.
[18] found that IL-6 levels were higher in patients having normothermic bypass and suggested that vasodilation occurring with warm heart operations is mediated by a temperature-dependent release of cytokines. Cremer et al.
[3] reported on ten patients with hyperdynamic circulatory dysregulation requiring
-constrictors following routine CABG. Significant higher serum levels of IL-6 were measured in those patients as compared with a group of patients with stable hemodynamic conditions.
There are few reports on the transcardiac, CS and systemic blood differences in inflammatory cytokines during CPB [7] [12] [14] [15]. Karube et al. [14] could not find a significant difference in the serum levels of IL-6, IL-8 and polymorphnuclear elastase between CS and systemic arterial blood immediately after CPB. The authors therefore concluded that the myocardium is not a predominant source of proinflammatory cytokines during CPB [14]. One limitation of the study was the short duration of CS blood sampling, since all the parameters determined are known to peak later after reperfusion.
We recently introduced CS blood sampling using a 3.6 French transcutaneous catheter as a means of monitoring cardiac metabolism during the postoperative course. The same transcutaneous catheter was used also for left atrial blood sampling. By the use of four sampling sites (arterial lineCS, PALA) we were able to follow the transcardiac as well as the transpulmonary differences in mediator concentrations throughout the first 18 h following surgery. We expected to find higher cytokine levels in CS blood than in systemic arterial blood, and accordingly, higher levels in the LA than in the PA. However, a sizable pulmonary release of both IL-6 and E-selectin did not occur. This observation indicates that not the lungs but the heart was a predominant source of mediator release following CPB. This finding corresponds to the results of Wan et al. [20] who measured elevated plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IL-6 in the CS as compared with peripherial arterial blood up to 2 h after aortic declamping, whereas the cytokine levels in the mixed venous blood showed no increase. The authors concluded from their data that the lungs may consume rather than release proinflammatory cytokines in the early phase of reperfusion [20]. The principle difference between the two organs in the setting of our clinical study was that only the heart was exposed to complete ischemia and topical cooling during CPB, whereas the lungs were nearly normothermic and partially perfused via the bronchial arteries. The relationship between ischemia and inflammation has been established in both experimental and clinical studies. In experimental models of myocardial infarction, inflammatory responses are the primary cause of microvascular incompetence in ischemia and reperfusion [21] [22] [23] [24]. Recently, Neumann et al. [6] reported on cardiac release of cytokines and inflammatory responses in acute myocardial infarction and recanalization therapy. They found differences in CS and systemic arterial blood in IL-6 before and after recanalization and in IL-8 after recanalization. The cardiac release of both cytokines significantly increased with reperfusion. The authors speculated that the vascular endothelium in the heart may be the predominant source of the cardiac release of IL-6 and IL-8 [6]. This theory may be supported by our observation that also the soluble adhesion molecule E-selectin, which is a marker for endothelial activation, is released by the reperfused myocardium.
The mechanism by which inflammatory mediators are removed from the pulmonary circulation still remains unclear. A simple effect of dilution by bronchial blood seems unlikely, since bronchial arteries contribute not more than 5% to the pulmonary venous return. A possible explanation might be that the cytokines are absorbed by chemotactic polymorphnuclear cells in the lungs during reperfusion.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr Liebold: The reason for this phenomenon is completely unknown. We assume that not cardiopulmonary bypass per se is the reason for that. We had a strong correlation between cytokine release of the heart and ischemic markers measured in the coronary sinus, that means troponin levels were also higher in the coronary sinus than in the aorta. So we think a possible explanation for this phenomenon could be that the cytokines are released by the vascular endothelium and this is exposed to ischemia during aortic cross-clamping, whereas the endothelium in the lungs is not exposed to ischemia. We are now planning further steps in this study. We want to look at the question whether this phenomenon is also seen in patients who undergo coronary operation on the beating heart but on cardiopulmonary bypass.
Mr A. El Gamel (Manchester, UK): Just a comment on the situation that bypass is the one that released the cytokines, the question that was asked early on. In the postgraduate course there was a very good review from Paul Wilson, who just enlightened us that congestive heart failure is associated with increased inflammatory mediator, particularly cytokines. So there are a lot of other conditions that lead to the release of cytokines. Bypass is an inflammatory stimulus. Any other condition, common cold or bacterial infection or chronic bronchitis or dental abscess, will lead to the release of systemic cytokines.
My only question to you really, and I am not trying to be critical, you made a statement saying cytokines get released from the heart and absorbed by the lung. I think you only showed that interleukin-6 gets released by the heart and absorbed in the lung and E-selectin gets released by the heart and absorbed by the lung. But the rest of the cytokines could have a different metabolism and a different pathway, and, for example, interleukin-10 is absorbed by the liver and gets released by the liver. So I think just a little correction, you shouldn't have made a generalized statement. I think this is a complex subject with a lot of cytokines and each of them has a different pathway and different interaction.
Dr Liebold: I agree with you in terms of being correct with our general statement. The headline of our paper should be a little bit provocative. Of course, there is a network of cytokins which is altered during cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac ischemia. It was not the aim of our study to show the complexity of alterations to the humoral and cellular immunity. This was already done by others. We believe we could demonstrate that there are certain differences of mediator release between the heart and the lungs, which not only could be explained by the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.
Dr J. Gurevitch (Tel Aviv, Israel): In our laboratory, we have shown that the isolated heart releases significant amounts of tumor necrosis factor following 1 h of global ischemia, so the reason you got your marvelous results is the cross-clamp, or ischemia attained on the hearts.
Regarding the questions that were asked here, whether tumor necrosis factor or other cytokines will be released in lower quantities following no-pump procedures, we have heard this morning that in no-pump operations there was lower incidence of pulmonary complications.
I definitely agree with your conclusion that the heart is the source of cytokines. In fact, we have stained ischemic hearts with specific immunoantibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor, and found tumor necrosis factor immunostaining not only in the endothelium, but also in cardiac myocytes. Hence, your conclusions that the heart is the source of cytokine release following ischemia and that the lung is their absorption site were absolutely correct.
Mr G. Angelini (Bristol, UK): We have just concluded a randomized study looking at lung function, on beating heart versus conventional surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. I can tell you that in this particular instance the cardiopulmonary bypass has got nothing to do with damage to the lung. It is exactly the same story as if you do the operation on a beating heart with no heart-lung machine.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
release in association with neutrophil activation after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Infection 1994;22:37-41.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Liuba, H. Ahlmroth, L. Jonasson, A. Englund, A. Jonsson, K. Safstrom, and H. Walfridsson Source of inflammatory markers in patients with atrial fibrillation Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 848 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S.H. Ng, A. A. Arifi, S. Wan, A. M.H. Ho, I. Y.P. Wan, E. M.C. Wong, and A. P.C. Yim Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Impact on Cytokine Response and Cardiopulmonary Function Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 154 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Hammon Extracorporeal Circulation: The Response of Humoral and Cellular Elements of Blood to Extracorporeal Circulation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 370 - 389. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lehle, L. A. Kunz-Schughart, P. Kuhn, S. Schreml, D. E. Birnbaum, and J. G. Preuner Validity of a patient-derived system of tissue-specific human endothelial cells: interleukin-6 as a surrogate marker in the coronary system Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1721 - H1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Glauber, A. Farneti, S. Bevilacqua, and J. Karimov Pump-assisted beating heart surgery MMCTS, February 19, 2007; 2007(0219): 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Beghi, F. Nicolini, A. Agostinelli, B. Borrello, A. M. Budillon, F. Bacciottini, M. Friggeri, A. Costa, L. Belli, L. Battistelli, et al. Mini-Cardiopulmonary Bypass System: Results of a Prospective Randomized Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1396 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Bittar, J. A. Carey, J. B. Barnard, V. Pravica, A. K. Deiraniya, N. Yonan, and I. V. Hutchinson Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Influences the Inflammatory Response After Coronary Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 132 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.P. Remadi, Z. Rakotoarivello, P. Marticho, F. Trojette, A. Benamar, H. Poulain, and C. Tribouilloy Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized prospective trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2004; 128(3): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dybdahl, A. Wahba, R. Haaverstad, I. Kirkeby-Garstad, P. Kierulf, T. Espevik, and A. Sundan On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: more heat-shock protein 70 is released after on-pump surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 985 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Remadi, P. Marticho, I. Butoi, Z. Rakotoarivelo, F. Trojette, A. Benamar, S. Beloucif, D. Foure, and H. J. Poulain Clinical experience with the mini-extracorporeal circulation system: an evolution or a revolution? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2172 - 2175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Menasche and L. H. Edmunds Jr. Extracorporeal Circulation: The Inflammatory Response Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 349 - 360. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Vallely, P. G. Bannon, C. F. Hughes, and L. Kritharides Endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 is suppressed by postbypass plasma containing increased soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2002; 124(4): 758 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S.H. Ng, S. Wan, A. P.C. Yim, and A. A. Arifi Pulmonary Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery* Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1269 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P Vallely, P. G Bannon, C. F Hughes, and L. Kritharides Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecules and Cardiopulmonary Bypass Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2001; 9(4): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Corbi, M. Rahmati, A. Delwail, D. Potreau, P. Menu, J. Wijdenes, and J.-C. Lecron Circulating soluble gp130, soluble IL-6R, and IL-6 in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with or without extracorporeal circulation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 18(1): 98 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |