|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:597-601
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL
a Clinique Chirurgicale, Calmette hospital, Rue du Pr J Leclerc 59037 Lille Cedex, France
b Radiologie Ouest, Huriez hospital, Lille University hospital, Rue du Pr J Leclerc 59037 Lille Cedex, France
Received 5 October 1998; received in revised form 6 January 1999; accepted 27 January 1999.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +33-3-2044-4559; fax: +33-3-2044-4890.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Non-small-cell lung cancer Adrenal gland metastasis Adrenal gland adenoma Computed tomography scan Magnetic resonance imaging Computed tomography guided biopsy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consequently, the characterization of an adrenal mass as a likely metastasis almost always requires CT-guided biopsy (CTGB) before potentially curative surgical therapy. Recent improvements in non-invasive procedures for adrenal mass identification such as, CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) led us to undertake a prospective study in which we compared the results of CTGB with those of CT plus MRI. The study was designed to define the situations in which CTGB is absolutely necessary before potentially curative resection of the NSCLC.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the basis of a review of threshold densities used in other studies, lesions were classified into two groups. An adrenal mass was considered as an adenoma when its density was below 10 HU, and as a metastasis, when its density exceeded 10 HU. The latter was regarded as a positive CT result when the diagnosis was confirmed.
A metastasis with a density below 10 HU was considered as a false negative result. An adenoma with a density exceeding 10 HU was considered as a false positive result.
Magnetic resonance imaging
All the patients who had an adrenal mass detected by CT underwent MRI. On MRI, the signal from the enlarged adrenal gland on the T2 weighted images was compared with that from the liver parenchyma. An adrenal mass with a signal superior to kidney signal on these images was considered as a pheochromocytoma.
An adrenal mass with a signal inferior or equal to liver signal was considered as an adenoma. If the final diagnosis was a metastasis, it was considered as a false negative result. An adrenal mass with a signal superior to liver and inferior to kidney signal was considered as a metastasis. When the diagnosis was confirmed, it was regarded as a positive result. An adenoma with a signal intensity superior to liver signal was considered as a false positive result.
CT guided biopsy
When the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was ruled out (no biological signs and no high signal intensity on T2 weighted images), patients underwent CTGB of this mass.
They were biopsied in the prone position under conscious sedation, thus allowing a posterior or posterolateral approach to the mass.
The mass was analyzed with 5 mm axial sections and needle position documented by repeated 5 mm axial sections. The approach was direct in most cases, but was sometimes trans renal or trans hepatic. The 19 or 22 gauge needles were used. In cases of bilateral adrenal gland enlargement, both masses were biopsied. After the biopsy, CT sections were obtained to check for hemorrhage and 1 h after biopsy, chest radiography was performed to check for the absence of pneumothorax.
Cytological and histological studies were considered positive when metastatic tissue or neoplastic cells were found. When benign adrenal tissue or cells were found, the mass was considered as a non-functional adenoma.
Inconclusive data (muscular tissue, necrotic debris, fibrous tissue) were regarded as false negative results when the final diagnosis was metastasis.
One radiologist, blinded to the histological results of CTGB interpreted the results of CT and MRI. CT scan, MRI and CTGB data were summarized in order to define the cases in which CTGB was absolutely necessary to obtain a diagnosis affecting the patient's therapeutic management.
Therapeutic management and follow up according to histological data
In the case of solitary adrenal gland metastasis homolateral to the NSCLC, adrenalectomy was performed synchronously with lung resection. In case of solitary adrenal gland metastasis controlateral to the NSCLC, an adrenalectomy was performed 3 months after lung resection
[2]. Patients with bilateral adrenal metastatic spread were treated by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Those with adenoma, underwent potentially curative lung resection. In each group, follow-up consisted of a thoracic CT examination including the adrenals, every 6 months.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Nineteen lesions had a density above 10 HU. They comprised 16 metastases and three adenomas. Consequently, there were three false positive results of CT scan and 21% (3/14) of the adenomas were misdiagnosed as metastases.
Thirteen lesions had a density below 10 HU: they comprised two metastases and 11 adenomas. Consequently, there were two false negative results of CT scan and 2/18 (11%) of the metastases were misdiagnosed as adenomas.
Magnetic resonance imaging
There was no lesion with a signal superior to kidney signal. The seven lesions with a signal inferior or equal to liver signal comprised seven of the 14 adenomas according to the final diagnosis. There were no false negative results of MRI, as none of the metastases were misdiagnosed as an adenoma.
Twenty-five lesions had a signal superior to that of the liver. They included all the 18 metastases and seven of the 14 adenomas. There were seven false-positive results of MRI and 7/14 (50%) of the adenomas were misdiagnosed as metastases.
CT+MRI
The seven lesions with a signal inferior to liver signal had a diameter below 3 cm and a density below 10 UH on CT. When MRI and CT criteria were taken together to diagnose adenoma, a precise diagnosis was obtained for seven patients without false negative results. The six remaining lesions classified as adenomas by CT (two metastases and four adenomas according to final diagnosis) were classified metastasis by MRI. To diagnose a metastasis, the most specific examination was CT, with 16 accurate results for the 18 patients with adrenal gland metastasis, and three false-positive results (adenomas) not corrected by MRI, which also classified these three adenomas as metastases. Among the 25 adrenal masses classified as metastases by MRI (18 metastases and seven adenomas according to final diagnosis), four adenomas were correctly classified by CT, and three others were incorrectly classified as metastases. Overall, MRI never corrected the CT data, and was only specific for the diagnosis of adenomas.
CT guided biopsy and therapeutic management
The diagnosis material of tissue cylinders was, in all cases, enough to make a certain pathological. The morbidity was nil, and a precise histological diagnosis was obtained for all 32 patients. The 14 patients with adenoma underwent potentially curative lung resection and their follow-up, mean 44 months (range:12 to 84) confirmed the diagnosis of adenoma in all cases. Among the 18 patients with adrenal gland metastasis, nine had a metastatic spread in other sites. The remaining nine patients (2% of the original cohort of 443) underwent lung and adrenal resection with confirmation of their metastatic diagnosis
[2]. Eight of them died from their recurrent lung cancer respectively, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 14, 19 and 24 months after surgery. One patient is still alive 78 months after surgery. In the nine patients with adrenal metastases and metastatic spread in other sites who were not operated on (all the other patients underwent surgery), follow up, mean 6 months (range 2 to 15) confirmed the diagnosis.
The sensitivity and specificity of CT, MRI, CT+MRI and CTGB are given in Table 2.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The typical imaging features of an adrenal adenoma on CT are those of a small and usually homogeneous mass, with a smooth rounded appearance [3] [4]. Despite the fact that on CT, metastases tend to be larger than adenomas, less well defined and of inhomogeneous density, the imaging features of adrenal metastases are non-specific. Small metastases are often homogeneous, but large ones often have heterogeneous appearance due to hemorrhage or central tumor necrosis [3] [4]. Assessment of size is of interest because adrenal masses larger than 3 cm are malignant in 9095% of the cases (84% in our study) and masses less than 3 cm in diameter are benign in 7887% of cases (85% in our study) [5] [6] [7]. However in our series, using size alone as a diagnostic criterion would have misclassified two malignant lesions which had a maximum diameter of less than 3 cm and three benign lesions which had a maximum diameter superior to 3 cm. Consequently, size alone is not a sufficient parameter for discriminating between adenomas and non-adenomas and its interpretation must be corrected by CT attenuation values [5] which indicate the amount of histological lipids in the lesion [6]. Various authors have examined the value of CT density in classifying adrenal masses. The data from many of these studies are difficult to pool, since the studied populations and the techniques used differed considerably [5] [6] [7] [8]. Korobkin et al. demonstrated that for CT attenuation values of less than 10 HU on a non-enhanced scan, the diagnosis of adenoma was 100% specific, with a sensitivity of 85% [6]. Van Erkel et al. confirmed these results and recommended a threshold of 16.5 HU units with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% for an adenoma when applied retrospectively to their series [7]. In our study, we misdiagnosed two metastases using 10 UH as cutoff point pointing out that an adrenal lesion should not be diagnosed as benign on the basis of attenuation measurement alone.
Recently, very encouraging results have been published about the usefulness of delayed contrast enhanced CT [9] [10] [11]. Szolar et al. demonstrated that delayed enhanced CT scans obtained 10 and 30 min after the start of contrast material injection have higher sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation of adenomas and non-adenomas than do unenhanced CT scans. One of the potential advantages of delayed enhanced CT densitometry compared with unenhanced CT scans is the opportunity to detect the lipid poor adenomas that result in an unenhanced attenuation value of greater than 10 UH [10]. Nevertheless, in the same field Boland [9] and Korobkin [10] point out that a larger number of patients have to be included to substantiate their results and to predict the exact modalities of delayed-contrast enhanced-CT in the evaluation of the adrenals to make it reproducible in various institutions.
Several different MRI techniques like conventional spin-echo-imaging, and chemical shift MRI [8] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] have been used to distinguish benign adenomas from metastases. On MRI, low signal intensity below or equal to that of the liver signal on T2 weighted images is highly suggestive of benign adenomas. Very high signal intensity, above that of the kidney signal is highly suggestive of pheochromocytoma, but moderate high signal intensity above that of the liver signal but below that of the kidney signal has no specificity as shown in our series.
Chemical shift MRI is based on the decrease in signal intensity on opposed phase images when lipid is present in an adrenal mass. Schwartz et al. recently showed that chemical shift MRI can obviate the need for CTGB in 55% of patients with operable NSCLC and an adrenal mass. Their study mainly demonstrates that chemical shift MRI is interesting to ascertain the diagnosis of adenoma (100% specificity), but CTGB is still required to ascertain the diagnosis of metastasis [15]. Consequently, chemical shift MRI is no more conclusive than CT attenuation measurements, because, both methods gave indeterminate values for a similar subset of benign lesions [16].
Recently, PET with F-Fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG) has been used to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma [17]. A study by Erasmus et al. revealed that 80% of patients with lung cancer and increased FDG activity in an adrenal mass had metastatic disease. Furthermore, all adrenal lesions that exhibited normal FDG activity were benign [17]. The most obvious problem related to PET are its limited availability and the nature of FDG itself, leading to non-specific imaging in cases of non-specific inflammation or acute infection [18]. Consequently, the sensitivity of PET with FDG for the detection of adrenal gland metastases is high, but its specificity is still unacceptable as a basis for withholding a potentially curative treatment of the primary lesion.
Our evaluation of imaging technics could be criticized since we did not employ the most up-to-date imaging protocols, i.e. delayed contrast-enhanced CT and MRI chemical shift imaging. However, according to literature data, further studies about these are necessary to demonstrate enough specificity for the diagnosis of adrenal metastases in patients with resectable NSCLC and density measurements on non enhanced CT is still the `gold standard' and cost effective imaging protocol to evaluate the adrenals.
In our study, CTGB proved to be a perfect standard of reference with 100% sensitivity and specificity. These results are substantiated by a large world-wide experience reporting mainly minor complications (pneumothorax) in 39% and only two cases of needle tract metastases [19] [20] [21].
We therefore, propose the following strategy, only designed for cases in which diagnosis of a metastatic adrenal mass will alter the surgical management.
The first step is to measure the density of the mass by non-contrast CT. If it is less than 10 HU. MRI should be the next step. If the signal intensity on T2 weighted images is below or equal to liver signal, the lesion can be classified as an adenoma and no further investigation is required. Follow-up by non-contrast CT is required every 6 months. Except for pheochromocytoma, all other lesions with signal superior than liver signal should be biopsied.
If the lesion density is superior to 10 UH on non-enhanced CT, CTGB must be performed after a pheochromocitoma has been eliminated.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Vikram, H. D. W. Yeung, H. A. Macapinlac, and R. B. Iyer Utility of PET/CT in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Adrenal Nodules in Patients with Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Silvestri, M. K. Gould, M. L. Margolis, L. T. Tanoue, D. McCrory, E. Toloza, and F. Detterbeck Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 178S - 201S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lucchi, P. Dini, M. C. Ambrogi, P. Berti, G. Materazzi, P. Miccoli, and A. Mussi Metachronous adrenal masses in resected non-small cell lung cancer patients: therapeutic implications of laparoscopic adrenalectomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 753 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Nabi and J. M. Zubeldia Clinical Applications of 18F-FDG in Oncology J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2002; 30(1): 3 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |