|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:337-341
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL
1st Cardiac Surgery Department, Silesian Heart Center, ul. Ziolowa 47, 40-635 Katowice, Poland
Corresponding author. Tel.: +48-32-2527041, ext. 1640
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Tropinin T Coronary surgery Cross-clamp On-pump Off-pump Beating heart
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are many strategies for intraoperative protection of the heart. Current cardioplegic techniques do not consistently avoid myocardial ischemic damage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Potassium cardioplegic arrest and myocardial cooling are common adjuncts for myocardial protection during cardiac operations [5].
Crystalloid vs. blood cardioplegia, warm vs. cold blood cardioplegia, antegrade vs. retrograde delivery and intermittent vs. continuous perfusion are the main methods currently used. In hearts with relatively normal preoperative ventricular performance, hypothermic potassium cardioplegia provides adequate protection during aortic cross-clamping, even when cardioplegic arrest is prolonged. Complete recovery of ventricular performance and metabolism even in the arrested hypothermic heart is not always achieved because anaerobic metabolism is not completely adequate to satisfy metabolic demand during ischemia [69]. Alternatively, revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass is not always technically feasible.
Currently noncardioplegic technique is our initial consideration for all patients who require coronary arteries bypass grafting (CABG) regardless of the presence of severe left ventricular dysfunction, ventricular aneurysm, advanced age, or the need for an emergency operation.
The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate the role of cardiac TnT in the diagnosis of minor myocardial tissue damage in noncardioplegic CABG surgery. Besides our routine myocardial protection method which is an intermittent aortic cross-clamp with ventricular fibrillation we took into consideration a group of patients operated on beating heart. This group of patients was operated with conventional sternotomy as a pilot group to minimally invasive CABG with minithoracotomy which is routinely being carried out at our department nowadays.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In group I the myocardial protection consisted of intermittent aortic cross-clamp technique with ventricular fibrillation while distal anastomoses were completed. Proximal anastomosis was performed on beating heart with an aortic side clamp. All operations were performed using cardiopulmonary bypass with ascending aorta cannulation and two-stage venous cannula and moderate hypothermia 32°C. Systemic rewarming was started during the completion of the last distal anastomosis.
In group II no special myocardial protection technique was used. The beating heart without aortic cross-clamp was unloaded on conventional normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. The left ventricle was consistently vented through the right superior pulmonary vein. The target vessel was occluded proximally and distally using a 4-0 Prolene suture passed beneath the artery. The grafts were anastomosed distally to the target coronary vessel and than to the aorta with the aid of a side clamp.
In group III no cardiopulmonary bypass was used and after median sternotomy, anastomoses were completed on beating heart with the same surgical strategy like in group II.
All distal anastomoses were performed with running sutures 7-0 distally and 6-0 proximally (Prolene, Ethicon).
A standard anaesthesiological regimen was applied. Anaesthesia was induced with Fentanyl 0.0050.01 mg/kg b.w. and Pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg body wt. and maintained after intubation with Isoflurane with an inspiratory concentration of 0.51.0% as required.
In all patients perioperative haemodynamic measurements: heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), left ventricle stroke work index (LVSWI) with use of a Swan-Ganz catheter were made.
Serial venous blood samples were drawn just before sternotomy, 1, 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after the end of the ischemic time. Blood samples for the measurement of TnT were collected in tubes with no preservatives and were centrifuged immediately for 5 min. The plasmas were aliquoted into tubes and subsequently frozen and stored at -20°C until determination. TnT concentration was measured in plasma by an enzyme immunoassay (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) which is highly specific for TnT and was developed by Katus et al. [3]. The cross-reactivity of the antibody combination of the assay with purified skeletal TnT is below 1% [10].
Data was analysed with Statistica PL 97 statistical program (Stat Soft, Tulusa, USA). Student's t-test, MannWhitney test,
2 and Fisher's exact test were used when appropriate. The two-factor ANOVA followed by the Duncans multiple range test was carried out to compare mean serum Troponin levels in the three groups. Results were expressed as mean±standard deviation, P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are many potential reasons why cardiac troponins failed to detect differences between different cardioplegic protection strategies. First of all despite the type or the route of cardioplegia being used, the myocardial protection was always adequate thus having its reflection in low troponin concentration levels. On the other hand one should remember that the aortic cross-clamping, the fact of the cardiopulmonary bypass use, reperfusion injury following prolonged cardioplegic ischemia may all influence same myocardium cell damage [14].
This study was designed to compare three different noncardioplegic myocardial protection techniques. Since all operated patients were at low operative risk and intermittent aortic cross-clamping with ventricular fibrillation is our routine cardioprotection method we had no technical problems with anastomoses. The most frequent procedure was LIMA to LAD anastomosis accompanied by saphenous vein graft either to RCA or Dl (intermediate artery in one case only). As the octopus technique was not available for us at that time we elevated the heart using towels and the manoeuvres with pericardial sutures. In our opinion the heart manoeuvres as well as same tissue damage caused by sutures passed beneath targeted artery are reflected in early 4 h postischemic peak of TnT in both group II and group Ill operated on beating heart.
Surprisingly there were significant differences in TnT levels following 48 postoperative h between group II and group III. Does it really mean that cardiopulmonary bypass itself causes same minor myocardial damage which can be detected by TnT serum concentration? We rather think that despite present statistical differences myocardial cell damage was very low in both beating heart groups. It is probably worth considering a beating heart surgery either on or without cardiopulmonary bypass as a routine technique of myocardial protection or rather a technique of no myocardial endanger in low left ventricle ejection fraction/high risk patients [15]. We believe, there is a place for beating-heart coronary arteries operation with sternotomy especially in patients with very poor left ventricular function. When feasible we use this technique in patients with LVEF 2025% which is now quite common in our practice.
Certainly in such a group of patients the invasiveness of coronary artery operation is determined more by myocardial ischemia during the cross-clamp period and the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) than by the type of incision.
There were significantly higher TnT concentration levels observed in group I (cross-clamp group) in contrast to group II and group III. However, even the highest observed TnT serum concentration level was far below 3.5 ng/ml which is usually considered as a border level of significant myocardial ischemia [3]. The TnT postischemic levels in group I correspond well with data from other authors comparing different types of cardioplegic protection techniques [4,11,12]. This may suggest that aortic cross-clamping itself and even intermittent however total ischemia of myocardium plays the major role in myocardial cell damage.
The time courses of TnT serum concentration level were roughly monophasic in fact in all three groups studied, with only one peak during 4 h after the end of ischemia in group II and group III and one peak during 48 h following end of ischemia in group I. Some kind of biphasic release of TnT observed is probably the result of a rapid loss of the cytoplasmic pool superimposed on prolonged myofibrillar degradation [3]. This may explain why the peak TnT level seems to depend on the aortic cross-clamp use. The detection of TnT could be short-dated and long-dated during the postoperative period, but ends in our study at 72 h post ischemia and make us doubt whether 48 h TnT level in group I represents a real peak level.
We know that this study showing our initial experience with beating heart surgery has many limitations and that it is focused to troponin T release mainly in patients with good LV function and one or two vessel disease only. Much larger study comparing different beating heart operative techniques (Octopus, CTS, thoracoscopic-video) is now being carried out at our department.
In conclusion we believe that measuring troponin T in the early postoperative period is very useful for detecting myocardial injury or evaluating different regimens of myocardial protection. The beating heart technique offers superior myocardial protection and may be an acceptable alternative in selected high-risk patients.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2008; 16(2): 164 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Dewey and M. J. Mack Myocardial Revascularization without Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 633 - 654. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. C Whitaker, J. Stygall, M. J. Harrison, I. J Mackie, M. Kemp, J. Hooper, W. B Pugsley, and S. P Newman Leucocyte-depleting arterial line filtration does not reduce myocardial injury assessed by Troponin T during routine coronary artery bypass grafting using crossclamp fibrillation Perfusion, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 55 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Wijeysundera, W. S. Beattie, G. Djaiani, V. Rao, M. A. Borger, K. Karkouti, and R. J. Cusimano Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery for Reducing Mortality and Morbidity: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 872 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bainbridge, J. Martin, and D. Cheng Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Stamou, K. A. Jablonski, P. C. Hill, A. S. Bafi, S. W. Boyce, and P. J. Corso Coronary Revascularization Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass Versus the Conventional Approach in High-Risk Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 552 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Shinn, Y. J. Oh, S. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, C. S. Lee, and Y. L. Kwak Evaluation of serial haemodynamic changes during coronary artery anastomoses in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: initial experiences using two deep pericardial stay sutures and octopus tissue stabilizer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 978 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Ryan, M. Hicks, J. R. Cropper, S. R. Garlick, S. H. Kesteven, M. K. Wilson, M. P. Feneley, and P. S. Macdonald The initial rate of troponin I release post-reperfusion reflects the effectiveness of myocardial protection during cardiac allograft preservation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Ruzzeh, K. Nakamura, T. Athanasiou, T. Modine, S. George, M. Yacoub, C. Ilsley, and M. Amrani Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 50 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Dewey and M. J. Mack Myocardial Revascularization Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 609 - 625. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Vassiliades Jr, J. L. Nielsen, and J. L. Lonquist Coronary perfusion methods during off-pump coronary artery bypass: results of a randomized clinical trial Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1383 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Asimakopoulos Systemic inflammation and cardiac surgery: an update Perfusion, September 1, 2001; 16(5): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Stamou and P. J. Corso Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients: a route to the future Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 1056 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |