EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marisa De Feo
Maurizio Cotrufo
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ducceschi, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ducceschi, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:435-439
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

Perioperative clinical predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence following coronary artery surgery

Valentino Ducceschi, Antonello D'Andrea, Biagio Liccardo, Alfonso Alfieri, Berardo Sarubbi, Marisa De Feo, Lucio Santangelo, Maurizio Cotrufo

Istituto Medico-Chirurgico di Cardiologia, Piazza, L. Miraglia, 80138 Napoli, Italy

Corresponding author. Present address: Corso Europa 72, 80127, Naples, Italy. Tel.: +39-081-643-055; fax: +39-081-714-5205
e-mail: adandrea{at}synapsis.it


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently encountered arrhythmic complication associated with coronary surgery. The aim of this paper was then to identify the clinical predictors of post-CABG AF occurrence. Methods: 150 consecutive patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to the absence (SR group, 104 male and 22 female, age 58.4±8.8 years) or presence (AF group, 23 male and 1 female, age 65.4±6.3 years) of post-CABG AF. Forty-seven perioperative variables were considered. Results: After univariate analysis, advanced age (SR vs. AF: 58.4±8.8 vs. 65.4±6.3, P<0.001), an increased BMI (SR vs. AF: 26.1±2.7 vs. 27.4±2.5, P=0.026), a prior history of paroxysmal AF (SR vs. AF: 3.2% vs. 16.7%, P=0.028), left atrial enlargement (SR vs. AF: 21.1% vs. 70.8%, P<0.001) and a more severe coronary artery disease (CAD) (SR vs. AF: no. of diseased vessels: 2.42±0.7 vs. 2.91±0.3, P=0.001; three-vessel CAD (54.1% vs. 91.3%, P=0.002) were the only factors that statistically differed between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified left atrial enlargement (P<0.0001), a prior history of paroxysmal AF (P=0.007) and a more severe CAD (P=0.0047) to be independent correlates for AF. Conclusions: Post-CABG AF seems to require a well definite anatomical and electrical substrate that is generated by increased left atrial dimensions, a greater extension of coronary lesions and a possible electrical remodeling consequent to prior repetitive episodes of paroxysmal AF.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • Coronary artery bypass graft • Postoperative arrhythmia


   1. Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently encountered post-operative arrhythmic complication associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery [1–16]. Its incidence has been reported in 10–40% of patients after CABG [1–16], occurring most commonly 24–72 h after the operation [1–4].

Despite it is often regarded as a benign and self-limited condition, post-CABG AF may lead to severe complications, including systemic embolization and even significant haemodynamic instability [1–3].

The pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the arrhythmia remain still unclear, although many studies have underlined the importance of different perioperative variables that appear independently related to its occurrence [1–16]. An increased age, preoperative beta-blockers withdrawal together with postoperative sympathetic activation and a history of preoperative paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias seem to play a major role, but many other factors appear to be involved somehow [4–16]. These apparently confounding results derive from the fact that only few studies comprised a satisfactory number of the different perioperative variables that might exert a possible influence on atrial arrhythmogenesis.

The aim of our paper was then to identify the clinical predictors of post-CABG AF, extending our analysis to all the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors that might be potentially linked to its occurrence


   2. Materials and methods
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
One-hundred and fifty consecutive patients who underwent CABG surgery at our Institution between September and December 1997 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the presence of preoperative chronic AF and intraoperative or postoperative death during the in-hospital stay. On the contrary, patients who underwent associated interventions like left ventricular aneurysmectomy or valve replacement were deliberately included as intraoperative variables to test the contribution of adjunctive surgical procedures to increase atrial susceptibility to arrhythmias.

For each patient a complete preoperative echocardiographic evaluation had been performed using an Acuson XP10 ultrasound system (Mountain View, CA). Left atrial enlargement was defined as an anteroposterior M-mode diameter >41 mm measured in parasternal long-axis view.

Data collection was performed at the time of hospital discharge and consisted in filling a proper form containing all the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables considered in all the patients (see Tables 1–3). In particular, preoperative episodes of paroxysmal AF were verified by accurate anamnesis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Preoperative variablesa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Intraoperative variablesa

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Postoperative variablesa

 
2.1. Operative techniques
Cardiopulmonary bypass with moderate haemodilution (Hct, 20–28%), flow rates of 22–24 l/min/m2 and a mean pressure of 50–70 mmHg was used. Hyperkalaemic warm blood cardioplegia was routinely used, except for few operations performed with cold crystalloid cardioplegia. In both cases, a volume of 10 ml/kg of the solution was given through the antegrade route at a rate of 200–250 ml/min. If necessary, a further half-dose of the cardioplegic solution was given every 20 or 30 min, depending on the type of cardioplegia adopted (respectively warm blood or cold crystalloid). The distal anastomoses were done during a single period of total aortic occlusion, whereas the proximal ones were performed after removal of the total occluding clamp. Finally, a left ventricular vent was only rarely used.

2.2. Postoperative protocols
Patients were weaned off of the ventilator as soon as they appeared haemodynamically stable, they presented no major bleeding, they were normothermic and conscious. Potassium and magnesium supplements were provided as necessary to maintain electrolytic balance within the normal range. For each patient heart rate, ECG lead II, arterial and central venous pressure were continuously monitored during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Twelve-lead ECGs were routinely done until the day of discharge once a day or more, if necessary, to confirm any rhythm disturbance or ischemic incident. A postoperative echocardiogram was performed for those patients suspected of having a postoperative impairment of the systolic function of one or both the ventricles. An inotropic support with dobutamine was provided for a good deal of patients in order to achieve more rapidly a stable haemodynamic condition in the ICU. Further inotropic agents were then added only if ventricular contractility resulted frankly impaired and dobutamine alone did not prove to be sufficient in maintaining an adequate ejection fraction.

2.3. Statistics
The relation of all preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors with the occurrence of postoperative AF was performed using the chi-square and Student's t test. Differences were considered statistically significant when P<0.05. Univariate factors exhibiting a P-value of less than 0.05 were entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis in order to assess the independent correlates for AF. Again, statistical significance was obtained only for P-values less than 0.05.


   3. Results
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
4. Discussion
 References
 
Post-CABG AF occurred in 24 out of 150 patients (16%). Of these, 22 patients were discharged in sinus rhythm after successful antiarrhythmic therapy with amiodarone and only two persisted in AF despite repetitive attempts at restoring sinus rhythm even with electrical cardioversion. Table 1 shows the preoperative baseline patient characteristics for each group, with the appropriate univariate P values. Patients with AF were significantly older, exhibited a more severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and a greater body mass index (BMI) than those remaining in sinus rhythm (SR). Besides this, AF patients presented more frequent left atrial enlargement and prior episodes of paroxysmal AF (see Table 1 and Fig. 1).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Differences noted between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation patient groups. SR, sinus rhythm; AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; 3V CAD, three-vessel coronary artery disease; LA ENLARG, left atrial enlargement.

 
The intraoperative and postoperative variables are respectively summarized in Tables 2 and 3. None resulted in a significant difference between the two groups.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified left atrial enlargement, a history of prior episodes of paroxysmal AF and the severity of CAD to be independent correlates for AF. The OR and the P-value for each multivariate predictor are shown in Table 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4. Multivariate predictors of AFa

 

   4. Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
References
 
Recent experimental studies have suggested that AF is the result of multiple wavelets that wander around anatomical obstacles and areas of functional conduction block, randomly activating contiguous regions once they have recovered excitability from previous depolarization by another wavelet [17–20]. The fibrillation process, therefore, is based on re-entry, with different simultaneous circuits that characteristically exhibit a notable variability in terms of number and dimensions [17–20]. However, the reason why the arrhythmia is frequently encountered following CABG surgery is still a matter of debate.

Among the different factors possibly related to post-CABG AF occurrence, the patient's age, male sex and preoperative beta-blockers withdrawal turned out to be the most reliable predictors [7–9,11,12]. However, some authors underlined the importance of other variables, such as the type of cardioplegia approach and delivery [13,14], the existence of an obstructive disease of the seno-atrial and atrio-ventricular nodal arteries [15], the degree of right coronary artery stenosis [21], the development of postoperative fluid and electrolytes shifts and sympathetic activation [4,5]. Even an increased P wave duration might represent a risk factor [6,16], probably expressing an impaired intra-atrial and inter-atrial conduction.

Surprisingly, most of the major studies did not analyse the role exerted by left atrial enlargement and coronary artery disease severity on postoperative atrial arrhythmogenesis. These variables may alter atrial architecture and structure and were then included in our study in an attempt to test all the major factors that might be in some way related to post-CABG AF onset.

Our data suggest that the propensity to develop postoperative AF may be connected with the presence of advanced age, a greater body mass index, left atrial enlargement, a history of preoperative episodes of paroxysmal AF and finally a more severe coronary artery disease. Of these factors, only the last three seem to play an independent predictive role. A possible explanation might derive from the fact that AF needs a well-defined anatomical and electrical basis. In other words, greater left atrial dimensions, together with the structural changes that are likely to be associated with a more severe CAD and possibly also related to increased age and body mass index (i.e. atrial myocytes replacement with fibrous and/or adipose tissue) might constitute a fertile anatomical substrate for the development of post-CABG AF. This tendency could then be favoured by electrical triggering events. Prior episodes of paroxysmal AF, in fact, may predispose to further atrial tachyarrhythmias, acting through a complex electrophysiological remodeling of both the atria that finally leads to a progressive and spatially dyshomogeneous shortening of atrial relative and effective refractory periods [22]. On this basis, an ectopic impulse might encounter contiguous regions with different refractoriness and therefore propagate with different conduction velocities. As a result, if this phenomenon takes place at a microscopic level, it may generate multiple wavelets that could trigger and maintain the fibrillation process.

There are several final points raised by our study that need to be clarified. First, the relationship between the severity of CAD and postoperative occurrence of AF would apparently disagree with the lack of any predictive role played by the number of bypass grafts performed. A possible explanation might be inferred from the fact that the extension of CAD is not necessarily related to the number of vessels suitable for grafting. Furthermore, in accordance with previously reported studies [8,23], a depressed left ventricular function does not increase the risk of post-operative AF. Finally, additional valvular surgery does not seem to predispose to postoperative AF either. However, such a curious finding may be related to the small number of patients enrolled undergoing coronary surgery together with valve replacement.


   Footnotes
 
This paper is supported by: Dottorato in Cardiochirurgia, Seconda Università Napoli.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lauer M.S., Eagle K.A., Buckley M.J., De Sanctis R.W. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989;31:367-378.[Medline]
  2. Davison R., Hartz R., Kaplan K., Parker M., Feiercisel P., Michaelis L. Prophylaxis of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia after coronary bypass surgery with oral verapamil: a randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:336-339.[Abstract]
  3. Pires L.A., Wagshal A.B., Lancey R., Huang S.K. Arrhythmias and conduction disturbances after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: epidemiology, management and prognosis. Am Heart J 1996;129:799-808.
  4. Nally B.R., Dunbar S.B., Zellinger M., Davis A. Supraventricular tachycardia after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and fluid and electrolyte variables. Heart Lung 1996;25:31-36.[Medline]
  5. Kalman J.M., Munawar M., Howes L.G., Louis W.J., Buxton B.F., Gutteridge G., Tonkin A.M. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with sympathetic activation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1709-1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Frost L., Lund B., Pilegaard H., Christiansen E.H. Re-evaluation of the role of P-wave duration and morphology as predictors of atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 1996;17:1065-1071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mathew J.P., Parks R., Savino J.S., Friedman A.S., Koch C., Mangano D.T., Browner W.S. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:300-306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Aranki S.F., Shaw D.P., Adams D.H., Rizzo R.J., Couper G.S., VanderVliet M., Collins J.J.J., Cohn L.H., Burstin H.R. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 1996;94:390-397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ali I.M., Sanalla A.A., Clark V. Beta-blocker effects on postoperative atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:1154-1157.[Abstract]
  10. Frost L., Molgaard H., Christiansen E.H., Jacobsen C.J., Pilegaard H., Thomsen P.E. Atrial ectopic activity and atrial fibrillation/flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery. A case-base study controlling for confounding from age, beta-blocker treatment and time distance from operation. Int J Cardiol 1995;50:153-162.[Medline]
  11. Almassi G.H., Schowalter T., Nicolosi A.C., Aggarwal A., Moritz T.E., Henderson W.G., Tarazi R., Shroyer A.L., Sethi G.K., Grover F.L., Hammermeister K.E. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event?. Ann Surg 1997;226:501-511.[Medline]
  12. Cox J.L. A perspective of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:405-409.[Medline]
  13. Arom K.V., Emery R.W., Petersen R.J., Bero J.W. Evaluation of 7000 patients with two different routes of cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1619-1624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Paull D.L., Tidwell S.L., Guyton S.W., Harvey E., Woolf R.A., Holmes J.R., Anderson R.P. Beta blockade to prevent atrial dysrhythmias following coronary bypass surgery. Am J Surg 1997;173:419-421.[Medline]
  15. Kolvekar S., D'Souza A., Akhatar P., Reek C., Garratt C., Spyt T. Role of atrial ischaemia in development of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:70-75.[Abstract]
  16. Dimmer C., Jordaens L., Gorgov N., Peene I., Francois K., Van Nooten G., Clement D.L. Analysis of the P wave with signal averaging to assess the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Cardiology 1998;89:19-24.[Medline]
  17. Cox J.L., Canavan T.E., Schuessler R.B. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. II. Intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping and description of the electrophysiologic basis of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:406-426.[Abstract]
  18. Konings K.T.S., Kirchhof C.J.H.J., Smeets J.R.L.M., Wellens H.J.J., Penn O.C., Allessie M.A. High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation 1994;89:1665-1680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Holm M., Johansson R., Brandt J., Luhrs C., Olsson S.B. Epicardial right atrial free wall mapping in chronic atrial fibrillation. Documentation of repetitive activation with a focal spread – a hitherto unrecognised phenomenon in man. Eur Heart J 1997;18:290-310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Allessie M.A., Kirchhof C.J.H.J., Konings K.T.S. Unravelling the electrical mysteries of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 1996;7:2-9.
  21. Mendes L.A., Connelly G.P., McKenney P.A., Podrid P.J., Cupples L.A., Shemin R.J., Ryan T.J., Davidoff R. Right coronary artery stenosis: an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery by pass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25(suppl C):198-202.[Abstract]
  22. Allessie M.A. Electrophysiological sequelae of atrial fibrillation. In: Kulbertus H.E., Wellens H.J.J., Bourgeois I.M.G.P., Sutton R., eds. Atrial fibrillation – facts from yesterday – ideas for tomorrow. Armonk, NY: Futura, 1994:74-87.
  23. Borzac S., Tisdale J.E., Amin N.B., Goldberg A.D., Frank D., Padhi I.D., Higgins R.S. Atrial fibrillation after by pass surgery: does the arrhythmia or the characteristics of the patients prolong hospital stay?. Chest 1998;113:1489-1491.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received January 20, 1999; received in revised form May 31, 1999; accepted June 8, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
C. W. Hogue Jr., L. L. Creswell, D. D. Gutterman, and L. A. Fleisher
Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Risks: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 9S - 16S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Mandal, E. Torsney, J. Poloniecki, A. J. Camm, Q. Xu, and M. Jahangiri
Association of High Intracellular, But Not Serum, Heat Shock Protein 70 With Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 865 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Alex and L. Guvendik
Evaluation of Ventral Cardiac Denervation As a Prophylaxis Against Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 517 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
K. Mandal, M. Jahangiri, M. Mukhin, J. Poloniecki, A. J. Camm, and Q. Xu
Association of Anti-Heat Shock Protein 65 Antibodies With Development of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2588 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
J. M. Leung, W. H. Bellows, and N. B. Schiller
Impairment of left atrial function predicts post-operative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2004; 25(20): 1836 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Z.-K. Wu, T. Iivainen, E. Pehkonen, J. Laurikka, S. Zhang, and M. R. Tarkka
Fibrillation in patients subjected to coronary artery bypass grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1477 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
M. Funk, S. B. Richards, J. Desjardins, C. Bebon, and H. Wilcox
Incidence, Timing, Symptoms, and Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2003; 12(5): 424 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Yagdi, S. Nalbantgil, F. Ayik, A. Apaydin, F. Islamoglu, H. Posacioglu, T. Calkavur, Y. Atay, and S. Buket
Amiodarone reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1420 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Z.-K. Wu, T. Iivainen, E. Pehkonen, J. Laurikka, and M. R. Tarkka
Perioperative and postoperative arrhythmia in three-vessel coronary artery disease patients and antiarrhythmic effects of ischemic preconditioning
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 578 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Hakala, A. Hedman, A. Turpeinen, R. Kettunen, O. Vuolteenaho, and M. Hippelainen
Prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting by measuring atrial peptide levels and preoperative atrial dimensions
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 22(6): 939 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Hakala, E. Berg, J. E.K. Hartikainen, and M. J. Hippelainen
Intraoperative high-rate atrial pacing test as a predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2072 - 2075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. J. Skubas, B. Barzilai, and C. W. Hogue Jr.
Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Is Unrelated To Cardiac Abnormalities Detected By Transesophageal Echocardiography
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 14 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Siebert, L. Anisimowicz, R. Lango, J. Rogowski, R. Pawlaczyk, M. Brzezinski, S. Beta, and M. Narkiewicz
Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: does the type of procedure influence the early postoperative incidence?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 19(4): 455 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
X. M. Mueller, H. T. Tevaearai, P. Ruchat, F. Stumpe, and L. K. von Segesser
Did the introduction of a minimally invasive technique change the incidence of atrial fibrillation after single internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery grafting?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 683 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marisa De Feo
Maurizio Cotrufo
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ducceschi, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ducceschi, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cotrufo, M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS