EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mountney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, G.A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mountney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, G.A.L.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:440-443
© 1999 Elsevier Science NL

Saphenous neuralgia after coronary artery bypass grafting

J. Mountney, G.A.L. Wilkinson

Northern General Hospital NHS Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. Tel.: +44-1703-777-222
e-mail: jm84{at}jmountney.freeserve.co.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: To determine the incidence, extent and site of saphenous neuralgia (anaesthesia, hyperaesthesia and pain) in the lower limb after harvesting of great saphenous vein (GSV) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients (39 lower limbs) aged 58±16 years undergoing CABG were prospectively reviewed. All patients were assessed pre-operatively to establish the presence of normal sensation, then at 3 days, 6 weeks and 20±4 months post-operatively for symptoms or signs of saphenous neuralgia. The data were recorded on serial diagrammatic representations, and the area of sensory loss for each site was recorded at each review. The decrease in areas of sensory loss over time was investigated with statistical analysis. Results: Thirty-five (90%) of the lower limbs examined showed some degree of anaesthesia at 3 days with 23 (72%) still symptomatic at a mean follow up of 20 months. Hyperaesthesia and pain were infrequently noted. Anaesthesia was generally confined to three main areas, which were denoted sites A, B and C for descriptive purposes. The mean area of sensory loss in the lower limb at 3 days post-surgery was 53.4 cm2, for an incision of mean length 42±22 cm from the medial malleolus. This area reduced to 31.7 cm2 by 20 months, and the decrease in area over time for each site was found to be statistically significant using analysis of variance for repeated measures and the Freidman–Rubin test. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that saphenous neuralgia after harvest of GSV for CABG is common. The main symptom is anaesthesia and certain areas may persist for some considerable time post-operatively.

Key Words: Saphenous neuralgia • Great saphenous vein • Coronary artery bypass grafting


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 
Saphenous neuralgia [1] describes the symptom complex which includes anaesthesia, hyperaesthesia and pain within the distribution of the saphenous nerve. This sensory nerve is closely related to the great saphenous vein during its subcutaneous course through the medial aspect of the leg, and the continuity of the nerve and its branches are at risk during any surgical procedure in this region. Arterial grafts are the first choice as a conduit for myocardial re-perfusion, however with advances in interventional radiology most coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures require several grafts. Despite the availability of synthetic conduits autogenous great saphenous vein (GSV) is the most commonly used conduit for myocardial re-perfusion and saphenous neuralgia is therefore seen after harvesting of various lengths of vein from the leg or thigh. It has also been described after varicose vein [2], arterial [3] and orthopaedic [4] procedures. We have investigated the incidence, extent and area of saphenous neuralgia after CABG with a prospective longitudinal cohort study.


    2. Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 
A prospective study was made of 32 consecutive patients undergoing CABG by a single consultant surgeon. In seven cases these had bilateral GSV stripping, making a total of 39 vein harvest sites for the study. Their mean age was 58±16 years. Any patients with diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, varicose veins or previous lower limb injuries were excluded from the study. All lower limbs were examined pre-operatively to establish the presence of normal sensation to light touch and pin prick, and none had any significant soft tissue swelling of the legs. Most patients had the left internal mammary artery anastamosed to the left anterior descending artery, and the remaining two or three grafts used GSV as the conduit. Sufficient length and quality of GSV was harvested using sharp soft tissue dissection from the medial malleolus to mid-thigh, with all 39 lower limbs having GSV stripped in the leg. Only 25 of the lower limbs required the harvest to extend above the knee to provide suitable vein for the grafts.

At operation every effort was made to preserve the continuity of the saphenous nerve or its branches. The wounds were closed using two layers of continuous absorbable sutures, with the use of a suction drain if the wound extended into the thigh. A compression dressing was applied to the lower limb immediately after the wound was closed, which was replaced with an above knee anti-thrombo-embolic stocking 3 days later and continued for a further 6 weeks. The lower limbs were assessed for sensory change to the modalities of light touch and pin prick. The incidence and site were recorded on a diagrammatic representation, and the extent measured using a one cm2 transparent grid. All 39 lower limbs were reviewed at 3 days and 6 weeks post-surgery, and 32 (82%) of these were examined at a mean of 20±4 months. The data were recorded on serial diagrammatic representations and transferred to a computerised database for statistical analysis with SPSS software.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 
Thirty-nine lower limbs were reviewed after GSV harvesting at 3 days and 6 weeks, in which 25 (64%) of the harvest sites extended above the knee. The 32 (82%) lower limbs reviewed at a mean of 20 months post-surgery formed the complete data set, of which 22 (69%) harvest sites extended above the knee. The mean length of incision used was 42±22 cm from the medial maleolus.

The major symptom of the saphenous neuralgia complex reported was anaesthesia (Table 1), with sensory loss to both light touch and pin prick, whilst other symptoms were reported very infrequently. Dermatitis was also noted in one patient around the distal aspect of the incision. The sensory loss was generally found to occur in three main sites (Fig. 1), and have been designated: anterior to the skin incision in the leg (site A), posterior to the skin incision in the leg (site B) and posterior to the skin incision at the knee (site C). Each site was directly adjacent to the skin incision and extending for a variable distance perpendicular from it. Frequently areas of anaesthesia were noted on one side of the scar with normal sensation immediately the other side. No areas of sensory loss were identified that did not extend to the skin incision.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Number (percentage) of lower limbs with symptoms of saphenous neuralgia

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagrammatic representation of the three main sites of sensory loss recorded: denoted A, B and C for descriptive purposes.

 
Anaesthesia was found consistently throughout all three sites, with site A (anterior to the skin incision in the leg) most commonly affected. The areas that the patients described for their sensory loss was noted by the examiner to be reasonably accurate and reproducible at subsequent review when plotted on their diagrammatic representations, and some patients described almost exactly the same sites at their 20 month review. The pattern of sensory loss was also consistent with one or two patches of anaesthesia described within each site, whilst some patients experienced no sensory loss at all for a particular site.

The areas of sensory loss were noted to decrease over time (Table 2) from a total mean sensory loss of 53.4 cm2 at 3 days to 31.7 cm2 at 20 months. This is demonstrated (Fig. 2) with the lined area marking the lesser extent at 20 months and the dotted and lined areas combined representing 6 weeks.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean (range) areas of sensory loss seen at the different sites, with P-values for decrease in median area of sensory loss over time using the Freidman–Rubin test

 


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Clinical photograph demonstrating areas of sensory loss at 20 months (dots) and 6 weeks (dots plus lines).

 

    4. Statistical analysis
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 
The complete data set of the 32 lower limb harvest sites was investigated using statistical analysis for a decrease in the areas of sensory loss for sites A, B and C with serial review at 3 days, 6 weeks and 20 months. The mean areas of sensory loss for each site were tested with repeated measures analysis of variance, and are significant: site A P<0.001, F=14.03, site B P=0.001, F=7.31 and site C P=0.002, F=6.99.

In view of the lack of normality of these data (multiple zeros) analysis using the Friedman–Rubin distribution free alternative to the analysis of variance was used. The differences between the median scores are significant: site A P<0.001, S=30.59, site B P=0.004, S=11.13 and site C P=0.005, S=10.65.


    5. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 
The saphenous nerve is the terminal sensory branch of the femoral nerve (L 2,3,4), supplying the skin of the antero-medial aspect of the leg through its two major divisions: the sartorial and infrapatella nerves. It arises anterior to the femoral artery within the adductor canal, and perforates the anterior wall of the canal, travelling around the medial border of sartorius to become closely associated with the GSV in the subcutaneous tissues of the leg. It gives a medial articular branch to the knee and numerous cutaneous branches as it descends through the leg with the vein, with its terminal branches supplying the skin around the medial malleolus.

Saphenous neuralgia describes the symptom complex of anaesthesia, hyperaesthesia and pain in the area innovated by the saphenous nerve [1].

It is a recognised complication of CABG [5], however the actual incidence remains unknown. The mechanism of injury is thought to be from local division of the nerve or its branches, or from compression by post-operative soft tissue swelling. Nair [6] has reported sensory loss after GSV harvesting, documenting 92 and 88% immediately post-operation, falling to 19 and 5% after 14–18 months in wounds that were closed in two layers and a single layer, respectively. This study also reports less hyperaesthesia and pain with wounds that were closed with only a single layer, and concludes that there is better preservation of cutaneous sensation if the wound is closed using this method. Wellwood [2] has reported the incidence and area of sensory loss seen after GSV stripping with a vein stripper, documenting 50% of patients experiencing a mean loss of 39.2 cm2 at 3 months if the vein is stripped upwards, and 23% of patients reporting a mean loss of 36.5 cm2 at 3 months if the vein is stripped downwards. The incidence, extent and site of saphenous sensory loss and its change with time has not previously been reported.

In this study sufficient vein was harvested for each myocardial re-perfusion procedure. If the GSV was of sufficient calibre or quality or fewer grafts required, then a shorter incision to the knee was sufficient, however if more vein was required then the harvest was continued proximally into the thigh. The fact that the study has demonstrated sensory loss only in the areas of the leg and behind the knee adds weight to the theory that the saphenous nerve is damaged with the harvest, as almost no sensory loss was noted in the thigh where cutaneous branches of the obturator nerve must have been transected.

The decreasing mean areas of sensory loss within this cohort with time for areas A, B and C show a clear trend, although recovery may only be partial even after several months. It is noted that for a more scientific assessment of this phenomenon electro-physiological studies may have produced a more complete analysis. However in view of the practicalities of data acquisition at serial review, the modalities of light touch and pin prick with their subjective limitations were accepted.

Urayama [3] has reported an 18% incidence of saphenous neuralgia after femero-popliteal bypass grafting. However in this series the symptoms were not found to be related to GSV harvest or below knee anastomosis, but rather postulates that the injury occurs to the nerve at the site of its leaving the adductor canal from manipulation of the limb during the procedure. There is a growing recognition of the association between saphenous neuralgia and dermatitis around the harvest site. Reported cases [7] also document objective sensory loss around the leg wounds, and we confirm a low incidence of this complication in our own series.


    Acknowledgments
 
We would like to thank Mr B. Higgins for statistical support and Mr J. Stefano for data collection.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Statistical analysis
 5. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Adar R., Meyer E., Zweig A. Saphenous neuralgia: a complication of vascular reconstruction below the inguinal ligament. Ann Surg 1979;190:609-613.[Medline]
  2. Wellwood J.M., Cox S.J., Martin A., Cockett F.B., Browse N.L. Sensory changes following stripping of the long saphenous vein. J Cardivasc Surg 1975;16:123-124.
  3. Urayama H., Misaki T., Watanabe Y., Bunko H. Saphenous neuralgia and limb edema after femeropopliteal artery by-pass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1993;34:389-393.[Medline]
  4. Hunter L.Y., Louis D.S., Riccardi J.R. The saphenous nerve: Its course and importance in medial arthrotomy. Am J Sports Med 1979:227-229.
  5. Lavee J., Schneidermann J., Yorav S., Schewach-Mileet M., Adar R. Complications of saphenous vein harvesting following coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 1989;30:989-991.[Medline]
  6. Nair U.R., Grifiths G., Lawson R.A.M. Post-operative neuralgia in the leg after saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft: a prospective study. Thorax 1988;43:41-43.[Abstract]
  7. Hruza L.L., Hurza G.J. Saphenous vein graft donor site dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1993;129:609-612.[Abstract]
Received May 25, 1998; received in revised form July 12, 1999; accepted August 4, 1999.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Dayan, L. Cura, S. Cubas, and G. Carriquiry
Surgical Anatomy of the Saphenous Nerve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 896 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M.-C. Taillefer, M. Carrier, S. Belisle, S. Levesque, H. Lanctot, A.-M. Boisvert, and M. Choiniere
Prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of chronic nonanginal postoperative pain after a cardiac operation: A cross-sectional study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1274 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
H. P. Grocott, J. A. Clark, H. M. Homi, and A. Sharma
"Other" Neurologic Complications After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 213 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Bonde, A. N. J. Graham, and S. W. MacGowan
Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2076 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. Garland, F.A. Frizelle, B.R. Dobbs, and H. Singh
A retrospective audit of long-term lower limb complications following leg vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 950 - 955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. S.R. Souza, M. R. Dashwood, J. C.S. Tsui, D. Filbey, L. Bodin, B. Johansson, and J. Borowiec
Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1189 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. S.R. Souza, V. Bomfim, H. Skoglund, M. R. Dashwood, J. W. Borowiec, L. Bodin, and D. Filbey
High early patency of saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass harvested with surrounding tissue
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 797 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Sharma, C. L. Parmley, G. Sreeram, and H. P. Grocott
Peripheral Nerve Injuries During Cardiac Surgery: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Prevention
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2000; 91(6): 1358 - 1369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mountney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, G.A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mountney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, G.A.L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS