|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:20-24
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Herz-Kreislauf-Klinik Bevensen, Römstedter Str. 25, 29549 Bad Bevensen, Germany
b Department of Cardiovascular Research, University Hospital Skejby Sygehus, Brendstrupg
rdsvej, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-5821-821-702; fax: +49-5821-821-777
e-mail: prof.laas{at}t-online.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: High intensity transient signals Prosthetic heart valves Medtronic St. Jude Medical
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The number of microemboli to the brain following mechanical valve replacement depends on valve size, implantation technique and especially valve design [1,16]. Sliwka et al. [17] observed less HITS in patients carrying a Medtronic Hall (MH) valve compared to patients carrying a St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve substitute, but could not demonstrate a clinical relevance of this observation. Gencbay et al. [18] also demonstrated, that microbubbles were associated more with bileaflet prosthetic heart valves than with monoleaflet valves.
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of valve orientation on HITS for the tilting disc and bileaflet valve with both valves in their best (Figs. 1 and 2) and worst orientation, which have been defined in previous studies [19,20] with respect to downstream turbulence and other hemodynamic parameters. In these studies the optimally oriented Medtronic Hall valve demonstrated almost physiological results with respect to turbulence, whereas the St. Jude bileaflet valve was less susceptible to orientation, but could not match the optimum results of the tilting disc valve.
|
|
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.1. Construction of the rotation device
The rotation device (Acutec, St. Michael, MN) [19] consisted of an outer conventional sewing ring and two inner rings, between which the rotation was performed via two fishing lines. Into the inner ring the Medtronic Hall and the St. Jude Medical valve with a diameter of 23 mm were implanted. The fishing lines were stitched through the aortic wall. Pulling one fishing line 2 cm led to 45° rotation of the valve implanted into the rotation device.
Having completed valve implantation, closure of the aortotomy was achieved via a running suture. Reperfusion led to a satisfying hemodynamic situation in all pigs. Approximately 30 min after weaning from extracorporeal circulation, a Doppler probe was placed on both common carotid arteries. In different orientations of the implanted valves (best and worst position as defined in the previous studies [19,20]), HITS were detected by the Doppler probe placed on both carotid arteries and recorded for ten min by a transcranial Doppler sonography device (Medilab Inc., Estenfeld, Germany). Throughout this time period hemodynamics were kept stable with a cardiac output between 45 l/min. All relevant regulations of Denmark concerning animal experiments were fully observed.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the HITS measurements are illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4. HITS counts varied with rotation for both valve designs. With the major orifice of the MH oriented towards the non-coronary leaflet (optimum position), very low HITS-counts (0.81.7/min) were observed, whereas the SJM in its optimum orientation showed significant HITS of 23.424/min. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the worst orientation HITS rose to 4366/min (MH) vs. 3848/min (SJM) with no statistically significant difference between the two valves.
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The origin (up- or downstream the valve) as well as the nature (gaseous or solid) of HITS remain unclear. A clear correlation between HITS and the hemodynamic performance of the valve has also not yet been proven, as HITS can occur independent of valve size, hemodynamic parameters and patient characteristics. It has though been observed, that valve design has an important impact on the occurrence and number of HITS with superior results for tilting disc valves [17,18].
In previous in vivo studies [19,20] the influence of valve orientation on the hemodynamic performance of mechanical aortic valves has been demonstrated for the tilting disc and bileaflet valve design. In these studies the optimally oriented Medtronic Hall valve (major orifice facing the non-coronary leaflet) showed superior results especially with respect to downstream turbulence over the bileaflet valve in any orientation. As downstream turbulence leads to platelet activation, the number of microembolization originating from a tilting disc valve might also be influenced and this might explain the superior results of the tilting disc valves regarding microembolization. Therefore, this study investigated the role of valve orientation on HITS with the tilting disc and bileaflet valve implanted in their optimum and worst implantation as defined previously.
A significant impact of valve orientation on HITS was indeed demonstrated by the study. In the optimum orientation the MH showed a neglectible low number of emboli (with no significant difference between left- and right-sided HITS counts), but a significant rise in HITS was observed with rotation of the valve into the hemodynamically worst position. The SJM bileaflet valve demonstrated significant HITS counts in any orientation, but also a tendency to lower embolization rates in the hemodynamically optimum orientation. These results favor the hypothesis of a correlation between hemodynamic valve performance and microembolization, although the exact origin of HITS remains unclear. Further investigations in this field are necessary before HITS can account as a further parameter for the hemodynamic performance of a mechanical valve in aortic position.
As the MH in the worst position shows significantly higher turbulent stresses than the SJM [1] but no higher incidence of HITS, a strong correlation between downstream turbulence and HITS was not demonstrated by this study, which might be due to the limited number of experiments. As the MH in the optimum orientation shows almost physiological turbulent stresses in the animal model [19], the low HITS counts in this position may partially be explained by a reduced platelet aggregation, which is caused by turbulent shear stresses, although this study could not demonstrate a clear relationship between turbulence and HITS. Thus, the exact origin of HITS remains unclear, and further studies are required to investigate the role of turbulent shear stresses in the pathogenesis of continuous cerebral microembolization following mechanical aortic valve replacement.
In conclusion, valve design as well as valve orientation play an important role in microembolization rates of mechanical valve substitutes. The MH showed superior results in the optimum orientation. A one-to-one correlation between downstream turbulence and HITS was not observed. The origin and nature of HITS remain unclear, although platelet activation by turbulent shear stresses might contribute to the occurrence of HITS in the presence of mechanical aortic valves.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Guerrieri Wolf, B. P. Choudhary, Y. Abu-Omar, and D. P. Taggart Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization after biologic and mechanical aortic valve replacement: Investigation with multirange and multifrequency transcranial Doppler ultrasound J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 512 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Machler, G. Reiter, M. Perthel, U. Reiter, P. Bergmann, M. Zink, R. Rienmuller, and J. Laas Influence of a tilting prosthetic mitral valve orientation on the left ventricular flow -- an experimental in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 32(1): 102 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Hassanein, A. Albert, I. Florath, Y. Y. Hegazy, U. Rosendahl, S. Bauer, and J. Ennker Concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass: the effect of valve type on the blood flow in bypass grafts Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 391 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N C Radu, E W M Kirsch, M-L Hillion, F Lagneau, L Drouet, and D Loisance Embolic and bleeding events after modified Bentall procedure in selected patients Heart, January 1, 2007; 93(1): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nyboe, J. A. Funder, M. H. Smerup, H. Nygaard, and J. M. Hasenkam Turbulent stress measurements downstream of three bileaflet heart valve designs in pigs. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1008 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Machler, M. Perthel, G. Reiter, U. Reiter, M. Zink, P. Bergmann, A. Waltensdorfer, and J. Laas Influence of bileaflet prosthetic mitral valve orientation on left ventricular flow--an experimental in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 26(4): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kleine, M. Scherer, U. Abdel-Rahman, A. A. Klesius, H. Ackermann, and A. Moritz Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: Comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2002; 124(5): 925 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kofidis, S. Fischer, R. Leyh, H. Mair, M. Deckert, R. Haberl, A. Haverich, and B. Reichart Clinical relevance of intracranial high intensity transient signals in patients following prosthetic aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 21(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Butchart, H.-H. Li, N. Payne, K. Buchan, and G. L. Grunkemeier Twenty years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2001; 121(6): 1090 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |