|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:462-467
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiopulmonary Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
b Department of Clinical Perfusion, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-30-609-2047; fax: +31-30-609-2120
e-mail: dossche{at}planet.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion Proximal thoracic aorta Risk factors Mortality Morbidity
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since 1989, we have been using ASCP first partial, later bilateral as an adjunct to extend the safe period of circulatory arrest in operations on the proximal thoracic aorta, in which a circulatory arrest period of more than 30 min is anticipated. Our experience with ASCP has been described before [6]. This study is an update on our continuing experience with bilateral ASCP in combination with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2.1. Operative technique
A median sternotomy was used in 152 (93%) patients, a left posterolateral thoracotomy in 10 (6%) patients, and a clamshell incision in one (1%) patient. Table 2 summarizes the operative procedures. Details of our cannulation techniques were described elsewhere [6].
|
Details of the operative procedures are listed in Table 2. In general, all diseased aortic tissue was resected in every patient; there were no patients in whom the aortic graft prosthesis was covered by the native aortic wall. If aortic dissection was present, the proximal and distal aortic cuffs were supported by a rim of Teflon felt to reinforce these aortic segments. In the case of aortic arch replacement, the aortic vessels were reimplanted through a single cuff in 29 patients, or separately in 40 patients.
2.2. Statistical methods
The continuous data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. A number of patient-, disease- and operation-related variables (Table 1) were first analyzed using univariate analysis (chi-square or Fisher's exact test) to determine whether any single variable influenced early mortality and perioperative neurologic complications. A variable with a P-value of less than 0.05 was found to be significant. The same variables were then analyzed using backward logistic regression analysis; a multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the independent predictability of the retained variables in influencing early mortality and postoperative central neurologic complications. All computations were performed with the aid of SPSS (SPSS for Windows, version 7.5; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software packages.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.2. Hospital morbidity
All but three patients regained consciousness postoperatively, and were included for neurologic examination. Excluded from the analysis are the patient who died of exsanguination in the operating room, and two patients who died within 24 h after surgery. Of these patients, 69% (n=112) were awake and alert within 24 h; 88% (n=143) within 48 h. Temporary neurologic dysfunction (TND) including mental confusion, lethargy, and weakness, associated with negative computed tomographic scanning and complete resolution of symptoms before discharge was reported in six (3.8%; 70% CL: 2.35.3%) patients. These temporary disturbances were excluded from the definition of postoperative permanent neurologic damage. On univariate analysis, preoperative hemodynamic instability (P=0.009), emergency operation (P=0.034) and acute type A dissection (P=0.031) emerged as dominant determinants predicting temporary neurologic dysfunction (TND). By multiple logistic regression, the only independent predictor of temporary neurologic dysfunction was preoperative hemodynamic instability (P=0.003, odds ratio 13).
Postoperative permanent central neurologic injury was reported in 11 (6.9%; 70%CL: 4.98.9%) patients, although five of them presented with a recent (<24 h) central neurologic deficit before the operation. Thus, only six (3.8%; 70% CL: 2.35.3%) patients sustained perioperative permanent central neurologic damage (defined as any lateralizing deficit that was present immediately postoperatively, i.e. without free interval, but not preoperatively). One patient who developed a delayed stroke (5 days after the intervention), but was not considered as a neurologic problem caused by the ASCP technique. The neurologic damage consisted of hemiplegia in three patients, multiple cerebral infarction in another two patients, and paraparesis in one patient. These patients were further analyzed statistically. On multivariate analysis, acute type A dissection (P=0.019, odds ratio 8) and the non-use of a midline sternotomy left posterolateral thoracotomy or clamshell incision (P=0.049, odds ratio 8) were found to be independent predictors of postoperative permanent neurologic damage (Table 3). Again, the duration of ASCP did not significantly influence the incidence of permanent neurologic damage.
|
Perioperative myocardial infarction (serum CPK>500 IU/l with a CPK-MB fraction >3%) occurred in 7 (4.3%; 70% CL: 2.75.9%) patients. Three of these patients presented with acute type A dissection and did not undergo preoperative coronary angiography. Postoperative coronary angiography revealed three-vessel coronary disease in one of them, requiring PTCA of the target lesion.
Stable elevated serum creatinine levels (>200 µmol/l) were present in seven (4.3%; 70% CL: 2.75.9%) patients; one of them already had elevated serum creatinine levels preoperatively. Temporary hemodialysis was necessary in four (2.5%; 70% CL: 1.33.8%) patients; two of them died subsequently, the other two recovered completely.
3.3. Extracorporeal circulation data
The data concerning extracorporeal circulation in the 162 patients who left the operation theatre alive were as follows: total pump time (ECC) ranged from 96 to 431 min (mean 216±62 min), myocardial ischemic time (CC) ranged from 28 to 267 min (mean 123±45 min), and ASCP time ranged from 16 to 119 min (mean 48±20 min) (defined as the time period during which only the brain is perfused); 48% of patients had an ASCP time >45 min.
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perioperative permanent central neurologic damage was encountered is 3.8% of patients in our series. This compares favorably with other reports using the same technique for ASCP [4,5] or DHCA [1,2]. We did not encounter a significant increase in stroke rate beyond 40 min of ASCP as was the case in an important contribution of Svensson and colleagues on the use of DHCA [2]. Okita and associates found no correlation between the technique for brain protection and the incidence of postoperative stroke [13,15]. This is in agreement with findings of the group of Ergin et al. [1]. It is now assumed that perioperative stroke or central neurologic damage is largely due to embolization of atheromatous material. Multiple regression analysis identified acute type A dissection and the non-use of a midline sternotomy as risk factors for perioperative central neurologic damage in our series. The isolation of the aortic arch vessels and installation of our ASCP catheters through a posterolateral thoracotomy requires more manipulation of the aortic arch or descending aorta than through a midline sternotomy. We think that this may enhance the risk of embolization of atheromatous debris from these usually atheromatous aortic segments into the arch vessels. In one patient, central neurologic complications occurred due to inadequate deairing of the ASCP catheters. Throughout the series, we did not encounter problems in isolating the aortic arch vessels or in introducing the catheters into the arch vessels.
We do not feel that ASCP results in a more complex and time-consuming procedure. The preparation and introduction of the ASCP catheters usually takes less than 1 min in experienced hands. As the perfusion catheters are flexible, they can be placed towards the patient's head; therefore, they do not obscure the operation field. Most of our elective operations are now performed with continuous bilateral TCD monitoring of the MCA. We found that the embolic event rate during manipulation of the arch vessels was absent or low in most of our procedures. We do not use routinely the bilateral TCD in situations where a posterolateral thoracotomy is used, because of the patient's position. TCD flow monitoring has the additional advantage that it provides the surgical team with on-line information on the proper functioning of the ASCP system. Especially in situations of acute type A dissection or postdissection aneurysm with involvement of the arch vessels, it may be difficult to identify the true lumen. Malpositioning is easily and immediately recognized during TCD flow monitoring. We do not feel that the TCD monitoring system makes a complex operation even more complex. The installation of the system takes only a few minutes.
The number of reoperations for bleeding was high in our series, compared to data of other studies. We used the open technique in every patients, i.e. the native diseased aorta was not wrapped around the vascular graft in any of the patients. In addition, we did not use aprotinin or other hemostatic agents in any of these patients. This may be an explanation for this high number of reoperations. Whether or not damage to the various blood components, induced by prolonged perfusion of the brain using small 15-F catheters, may be an additional factor, is unclear.
We conclude that the use of bilateral ASCP in operations on the proximal thoracic aorta, where it is necessary to interrupt the blood circulation to the brain, allows these operations to be performed with a low hospital mortality and few neurologic complications. The duration of ASCP was not a significant predictor of hospital mortality or perioperative neurologic damage in our series. The ASCP system is easy to set up and does not create additional difficulties to the surgeon. Considering the low incidence of postoperative TND, ASCP seems to be an effective adjunct in prevention of ischemic damage to the brain.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr Dossche: I must say in all our cases of type A dissection we encircled the arch vessels, and this has never been a problem with regard to damage of those vessels. Then, after opening the aorta, we always had a nice view of where the true lumen was. There have been cases in which initially the cannula was not in the proper position, but thanks to our transcranial Doppler measurement, you immediately see whether the flow is adequate or not. That's why we don't rely on one monitoring system. We usually try to have three monitoring systems available, just to avoid the occurrence of malperfusion of one of the extracranial vessels.
Dr Minale: Sometimes we encounter a partial thrombosis along the false lumen of the arch vessels. With introduction of a cannula in those vessels there is the potential risk of mobilizing forward thrombotic material. Should this be the case, perhaps you would discover a malperfusion by your monitoring system, but at the same time it would mean that an embolization has already occurred.
Dr Dossche: Could you please repeat the question?
Dr Minale: If you have a thrombosis of the false lumen and you control the perfusion of cerebral vessels with your Doppler, then it could be too late, because you could have already caused embolization of the cerebral vessels.
In such cases we have done something different, that is, we prepared directly the common carotid artery at the bifurcation, we implanted a vascular graft to the bifurcation and ligated the carotid below to avoid embolization or malperfusion. Then we put the perfusion cannula directly into the graft just to avoid this accidental embolization. What is your opinion about this solution?
Dr Dossche: It's difficult to answer the question, because we really did not encounter that problem. I must say we have no experience with that.
Dr E. Jansen (Utrecht, The Netherlands): I noticed in your series that you have a very high percentage of early awakening thanks to antegrade perfusion, so that is a very positive point; but also I noticed that you have 25% in your series of type A dissections. So my concern is that antegrade perfusion of a dissected anonymous artery is rather dangerous. What is your policy? Do you first glue the anomalous trunk and then perfuse it, so you take a few minutes before you perfuse it, or are you going directly with your cannula into the dissected anomalous trunk?
Dr Dossche: Thanks to the antegrade cerebral perfusion, we are rather aggressive in, let's say, also, dissections including the arch vessels. But to answer your question, we open the aorta and we immediately insert a cannula. So we don't do any procedure before we insert the cannula. And as I told you, when we opened up the aorta, in nearly all operations, we had a nice view of where one had to put the cannula. So we just start by inserting the cannula and then we have a good look at the pathology.
Dr Y. Okita (Osaka, Japan): I agree with you regarding the patient who is a total arch replacement, a complex arch procedure, in terms of using antegrade cerebral perfusion, especially a procedure that requires over 40 or 50 min. But in patients with ascending aorta only or a hemiarch repair, we found no problem with the deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. In selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, sometimes it requires two cannulations and a cumbersome operative field and sometimes causes thrombosis. What is the advantage in such a sick patient or subset of patients? And my second question is what is the percentage of patients who are total arch replacement in this series?
Dr Dossche: To answer your first question, we initially had the same drawbacks regarding the use of the technique in, let's say, when you only have to do an open distal anastomosis. But with our growing experience, we found it very simple to insert these cannulas. And the alternative in our hospital was the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, but there have been some recent reports by a group of Dr Griepp stating that probably the safe duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest may be less than 30 min. So considering that, we found it no problem using these antegrade cannulas also for open distal anastomosis. With regard to your second question, I think about half of the patients underwent a complete arch replacement.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Pretre and M. I. Turina Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 431 - 442. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pacini, A. Leone, L. Di Marco, D. Marsilli, F. Sobaih, S. Turci, V. Masieri, and R. Di Bartolomeo Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in thoracic aorta surgery: safety of moderate hypothermia Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 618 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Gulbins, A. Pritisanac, and J. Ennker Axillary Versus Femoral Cannulation for Aortic Surgery: Enough Evidence for a General Recommendation? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1219 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A.A.M. Schepens Aortic arch replacement: the conventional 'elephant trunk' technique MMCTS, January 2, 2007; 2007(0102): 2006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Budde, D. L. Serna Jr, S. C. Osborne, M. A. Steele, and E. P. Chen Axillary Cannulation for Proximal Aortic Surgery is as Safe in the Emergent Setting as in Elective Cases Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2154 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, M. Schepens, E. Tan, A. D. Amore, W. Morshuis, K. Dossche, M. Bergonzini, N. Camurri, L. B. Reggiani, G. Marinelli, et al. Early and late outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection: analysis of risk factors in 487 consecutive patients Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2005; 26(2): 180 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.K. Harrington, A.S. Walker, H. Kaukuntla, R.M. Bracewell, T.H. Clutton-Brock, M. Faroqui, D. Pagano, and R.S. Bonser Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion Attenuates Brain Metabolic Deficit in Aortic Arch Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-231 - II-236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hagl, N. Khaladj, S. Peterss, K. Hoeffler, M. Winterhalter, M. Karck, and A. Haverich Hypothermic circulatory arrest with and without cold selective antegrade cerebral perfusion: impact on neurological recovery and tissue metabolism in an acute porcine model Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 73 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Eusanio, M. A. A. M. Schepens, W. J. Morshuis, K. M. Dossche, T. Kazui, K. Ohkura, N. Washiyama, R. Di Bartolomeo, D. Pacini, and A. Pierangeli Separate grafts or en bloc anastomosis for arch vessels reimplantation to the aortic arch Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2021 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hagl, N. Khaladj, M. Karck, K. Kallenbach, R. Leyh, M. Winterhalter, and A. Haverich Hypothermic circulatory arrest during ascending and aortic arch surgery: the theoretical impact of different cerebral perfusion techniques and other methods of cerebral protection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 24(3): 371 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Numata, H. Ogino, H. Sasaki, Y. Hanafusa, M. Hirata, M. Ando, and S. Kitamura Total arch replacement using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion with right axillary artery perfusion Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 771 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Eusanio, R. M. J. Wesselink, W. J. Morshuis, K. M. Dossche, and M. A. A. M. Schepens Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during ascending aorta-hemiarch replacement: A retrospective comparative study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 849 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Eusanio, M. E. S.H. Tan, M. A.A.M. Schepens, K. M. Dossche, R. Di Bartolomeo, A. Pierangeli, and W. J. Morshuis Surgery for acute type A dissection using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion: experience with 122 patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 514 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pretre and M. I. Turina Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 401 - 412. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Eusanio, M. A. A. M. Schepens, W. J. Morshuis, R. Di Bartolomeo, A. Pierangeli, and K. M. Dossche Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during operations on the thoracic aorta: Factors influencing survival and neurologic outcome in 413 patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2002; 124(6): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Neri, M. Massetti, L. Barabesi, G. Pula, R. Tassi, T. Toscano, E. Tucci, A. Benvenuti, G. Capannini, F. Miraldi, et al. Extrathoracic cannulation of the left common carotid artery in thoracic aorta operations through a left thoracotomy: Preliminary experience in 26 patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2002; 123(5): 901 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Schepens, K. M. Dossche, W. J. Morshuis, P. J. van den Barselaar, R. H. Heijmen, and F. E. Vermeulen The elephant trunk technique: operative results in 100 consecutive patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 276 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Di Bartolomeo, M. Di Eusanio, D. Pacini, M. Pagliaro, C. Savini, A. Nocchi, and A. Pierangeli Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion during surgery of the thoracic aorta: risk analysis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 765 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |