EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Graham J. Cooper
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casha, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casha, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. J.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:502
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL


Letter to the Editor

New improved sternal bands – a biomechanical analysis

Aaron R. Cashaa, Marilyn Gaucib, Lang Yangc, Graham J. Cooperd

a Department of Biomechanics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
b Department of Anaesthesia, St. Luke's Hospital, Guardamangia, Malta
c Department of Biomechanics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
d Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Received 17 July 2000; accepted 18 July 2000.

Corresponding author. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. Tel./fax: +44-113-2456170

Median sternotomy is the most commonly used surgical approach in cardiac surgery. Sternal dehiscence results in significant mortality and morbidity. The efficacy and safety of sternotomy closure using sternal bands has previously been demonstrated to provide an effective median sternotomy fixation [1].

We have previously measured the force-displacement curves of various fixation techniques with a metal sternal model using a computerized materials-testing machine [2]. Steel sternal bands (Sternaband, Stony Brook Surgical Innovations, Inc., Stony Brook, NY) have recently been modified by the addition of a spot weld on either side of the buckle region. The two different types of sternal bands were tested and the results interpreted using force-displacement curves in order to assess any change in biomechanical characteristics. The rigidity of sternotomy fixation, defined as displacement at 20 kg force (the force at which wires used in sternotomy closures start to untwist), was also determined. We also measured the pull-through strength of sternotomy fixation using sternal bands.

The most rigid closure was the new welded sternal band closure that displaced 0.5±0.1 mm (mean±SD) at a force of 20 kg. The original non-welded sternal band closure displaced 1.4±0.5 mm (t-test P=0.003, single factor ANOVA P=0.001). Failure displacement for the welded closure was 72.2±9.4 kg and 73.3±1.6 kg for the non-welded closure (t-test and single factor ANOVA, non-significant).

The new welded sternal bands demonstrated significantly superior rigidity compared to the non-welded closure. The rigidity of the welded sternal bands is 345% that of the non-welded sternal bands. Rigidity is an important characteristic of a closure technique since rigid fixation of the sternum results in earlier union with primary osseous healing (osteosynthesis) [3]. The method of failure of the two sternal bands is different, with the non-welded buckle unravelling by rotating through 90° to an upright position, before failing by fracturing at the junction of the buckle with the band. The welded buckle on the other hand does not fail, and the sternal band visibly stretches until it finally fractures.

The spot welds in the buckle produce a considerable change in the biomechanical properties of the sternal bands. The new welded sternal band is now 50% more rigid than a closure with two conventional steel wires, whilst in comparison the original non-welded sternal band had only half the rigidity of the steel wires [2].

References

  1. Soroff H.S., Hartman A.R., Pak E., Sasvary D.H., Pollak S.B. Improved sternal closure using steel bands: early experience with three-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61(4):1172-1176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Casha A., Yang L., Kay P.H., Saleh M., Cooper G.J. A biomechanical study of median sternotomy closures. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 1999;15(3):365-369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sargent L.A., Seyfer A.E., Hollinger J., Hinson R.M., Graeber G.M. The healing sternum: a comparison of osseous healing with wire versus rigid fixation. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:490-494.[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Graham J. Cooper
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casha, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casha, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS