|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:608-610
© 2000 Elsevier Science NL
How to do it |
a Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
b Foundation A. Carrel, Pavia, Italy
Received 16 September 1999; received in revised form 24 July 2000; accepted 22 August 2000.
Corresponding author. Residenza Parco 152, 20080 Basiglio, Milano 3, Italy. Tel.: +39-0382-529118; fax: +39-0382-525853
e-mail: nazaris{at}tin.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Pneumothorax Pleurectomy Blebs Bullae
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Surgical technique |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the anterior margin of the first thoracic vertebral bodies (Fig. 1) , the mediastinal pleura is sectioned and the oesophagus displaced anteriorly by blunt dissection. The contralateral lung parenchyma then becomes clearly visible underneath the contralateral mediastinal pleura. Taking care to avoid, in this phase, the opening of the contralateral pleural space, the apical parietal pleura is mobilized as much as possible by blunt dissection. The pleura is then opened widely and the apex of the left lung is drawn into the right space (Fig. 2) . The blebs of the apex can then be easily resected by stapling (roticulator@) or base ligature.
|
|
| 3. Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Contralateral surgical manoeuvres require very long instruments. Long spatulas may be useful for individual exposure and electrocoagulation of occasional pleural adhesions that prevent contralateral apex full mobilization. Contralateral bullectomy requires stapler with rotating head (roticulator@) or can be carried out by means of absorbable running suture.
In this patient series, reported in detail elsewhere [3], there were no complications that can be referred to the transmediastinal access to the contralateral lung; in particular no lesions occurred to the thoracic duct which lies at this level to the left side of the oesophagus.
Although videothoracoscopy approach is now the choice treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax [4] its recurrence rate was never reported to equal that of open standard surgical approach, being in the range 510% [5]; moreover reports on simultaneous bilateral videothoracoscopic treatment are still anecdotal [6] and the corresponding recurrence rate is lacking.
This approach may be reasonably expected to offer the virtual zero recurrence rate of standard open treatment on one side and at least that of videothoracoscopic bullectomy on the transmediastinally treated side; all this with a surgical trauma substantially similar to that of open, one side treatment.
Obviously the described technique is not intended to be a substitute for the videothoracoscopy bullectomy with parietal pleurectomy or other appropriate pleurodhesis manoeuvres [7] but rather an option to be adopted in appropriate cases. These may include cases in which recurrence after videthoracoscopic treatment would indicate an open access, as well as those cases seeking zero recurrence treatment after many pneumothorax at one side only, in which the preoperative CT scan shows clinically still silent apical blebs also at the other side.
The philosophy at the basis of this approach is the feeling that this particular patients population looks for surgery not for the pneumothorax itself, which is usually already fixed when they are referred for surgery, but for the prevention of possible (probable) future recurrences, the fear of which may condition their life style [8]; in these patients then the presence of contralateral apical blebs, documented by CT scan, of course cannot rule out the chance of future pneumothorax also on the contralateral side, even though this has not yet occurred. Thus the possibility of removing, through the same surgical wound used for one side treatment, also the contralateral blebs may be particularly appreciated by this particular patient subsetting.
In practical terms our policy has been to reserve this operation to all patients in which radical open treatment of one side was independently decided for any reasons and apical blebs (and/or previous pneumothorax) where documented also at the other side.
Whether the subaxillary surgical cicatrix plus the three drain holes is less cosmetic and/or traumatic than the three+three holes on both sides of the bilateral videothoracoscopy may be debatable; of course videothoracoscopy accomplishment also of this transmediastinal approach, theoretically hypothesizable, in combination with standard videothoracoscopy homolateral bullectomy and pleurectomy would annul this debate.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. G. Cho, K. Do Cho, C. U. Kang, and M. Seop Jo Thoracoscopic apico-posterior transmediastinal approach for bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 352 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J-M. Tschopp, R. Rami-Porta, M. Noppen, and P. Astoul Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: state of the art. Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2006; 28(3): 637 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rossella, P. Buniva, A. Aluffi, and S. Nazari Simultaneous Bilateral Apical Bullectomy Through Access From Only One Side Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 1098 - 1098. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yavuzer, S. Enon, and U. Kumbasar Anterior transmediastinal contralateral access Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2004; 3(2): 331 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |