EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.T.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.T.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:376
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL


Letter to the Editor

Reply to Rescigno et al.

A.T.M. Tang

Wessex Regional Cardiac & Thoracic Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK

Received 18 December 2000; accepted 20 December 2000.

Tel.: +44-1703-777222; fax: +44-1703-798508
e-mail: gus.tang{at}ntlworld.com

We would like to thank Dr. Rescigno's comments regarding treatment of sternotomy wound infection. Primary skin closure with suction drains after debridement of an infected sternotomy wound seemingly offers the advantage of a one-stage procedure and potentially shorter hospitalization. However, the authors indicated that this approach has only been applied to a diagnosis of superficial wound infection. No further technical details were provided such as the actual number of drains, their physical properties, the extent of suction used and how well distributed the negative pressure was. It will also be interesting to learn of the impact of multiple drains on patient's discomfort and ultimate cosmesis. Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) fundamentally differs from their approach in several ways [1]: firstly it works well with both superficial and deep sternal wound infection so that an initial mis-diagnosis will not jeopardize subsequent management; secondly it allows for regular wound inspection with minimal trauma to the granulation tissue and also further debridement if necessary. Adequate and sometimes radical clearance of necrotic and infected materials remains the cornerstone of successful wound treatment. Sternal osteomyelitis and mediastinal involvement may develop or progress following initial wound inspection with devastating consequences. Primary closure creates an unnecessary obstacle to these targets. Thirdly complete wound closure can be achieved with VAC alone without resorting to advancement flaps or other reconstruction techniques which carry inherent complications. A longer treatment course is implicit with the VAC approach but evolving technology will still allow for earlier hospital discharge. A randomized comparison of the two techniques in treating superficial sternotomy wound infection may be justified.

References

  1. Tang A.T.M., Ohri S., Haw M. Novel application of vacuum assisted closure technique for the treatment of sternotomy wound infection. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 2000;17:482-484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.T.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.T.M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS