|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:853-858
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Herzzentrum University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Received 13 October 2000; received in revised form 19 February 2001; accepted 19 March 2001.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-341-865-1421; fax: +49-341-865-1485
e-mail: faba{at}server3.medizin.uni-leipzig.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Coronary artery bypass grafting Perioperative ischemia
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocardial ischemia was defined as follows: (a) increase in the isoenzyme ratio of CK/CK-MB above 10%; (b) ischemic electrocardio-graphic episodes (new onset of elevated ST-segment change lasting at least 1 min and involving a shift from baseline (adjusted for positional changes) of greater than or equal to 0.1 mV of ST depression (with slope less than or equal to 0) at J+60 ms or 0.2 mV of ST elevation at the J-point) and a new association of a postoperative Q; baseline was adjusted for positional changes and temporal drift; (c) recurrent episodes of, or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia as well as ventricular fibrillation; (d) hemodynamic deterioration and left ventricular failure despite adequate inotropic support. All electrocardiographic episodes were verified with the use of the ECG monitor printout (ECG complexes) and a 12 lead electrocardiogram.
2.1. Statistics
The design of this study was retrospective. Continuous variables are presented as median range and categorical data are presented as actual number and percentages.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Definite myocardial infarction confirmed by elevated CK/CK-MB values above 10%, significant ST changes and/or new Q-waves were seen in 72 patients (57.4%) of group A (47 with angiographic findings and 15 with no angiographic findings) and 21 patients (91.3%) of group B (Table 1). In group A a total of 53 patients of 63 patients (84.1%) with angiographic findings showed to have more than a CK-MB value threshold level of 50 U/l, whereas only 15 out of 45 patients (33.3%) with no angiographic findings were above that level.
|
|
|
|
|
3.4. Consequences of angiographic findings
Out of 63 patients showing pathological angiographic findings, 47 patients (74.6%) showed myocardial infarction with elevated CK/CK-MB values above 10%, significant ST changes and/or new Q-waves. Thirty-four patients (53.9%) underwent immediate re-operation and nine patients (14.3%) received immediate angioplasty. After the redo procedure four patients (6.3%) required an intra aortic balloon pump (IABP), which was explanted after 3 days in three of them, one patient (0.9%) additionally required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for temporary cardiopulmonary assistance. Due to poor coronary status 20 patients (31.7%) were treated conservatively without additional intervention. In all of the latter patients myocardial infarction was confirmed with elevated CK/CK-MB values above 10%, significant ST changes and/or new Q-waves.
3.5. Group B
There were 15 males and eight females with an over all median age of 65 years (range 4384 years). All 23 patients in this group were in too unstable hemodynamic condition to be transported to the cath-lab. Twenty-two patients had circulatory collapse despite ongoing resuscitation on the intensive care unit and were rushed to the operating room whereas one patient developed circulatory collapse when leaving the operating room.
During re-operation graft occlusions due to acute thrombosis were found in ten patients (43.5%) as well as incorrect anastomosis in five patients (21.7%); additional findings were bleeding, stretched graft, venous spasm, and displaced graft in one patient each (4.3%). In the other four patients (17.4%) no evident morphological cause for their severely impaired hemodynamic status was found. In 22 patients an IABP was implanted during re-operation, six patients additionally required a temporary extracorporal membrane oxygenation. Twenty-one of these patients (91.3%) had confirmed infarction with elevated CK/CK-MB values above 10% (with CK-MB values above 50 U/l) and significant ST changes. Data are summarized in Table 6.
|
Nine out of 23 patients died in group B (39.1%), two of them had been operated on in off-pump technique. During re-operation all of these patients presented with graft occlusion and in all of them myocardial infarction was confirmed with elevated CK/CK-MB values above 10%, significant ST changes and/or new Q-waves.
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With this study we intended to assess criteria for early identification and adequate management of perioperative ischemia. Localized ST-changes followed by an elevation of the CK/CK-MB ratio above 10% were the main criteria that led to an angiographic control on which an angiography was based on in hemodynamic stable patients after CABG. A combination of a new ST change in a ST-segment and an elevated CK/CK-MB ratio of >10% was found in the majority of patients (85.7%) with pathologic angiographic findings; only 27.9% of patients with no pathologic findings showed CK-MB values below 50 U/l, eight of them showing CK-MB levels below 50 U/l, thus assuming poor myocardial protection or other temporary disorders as mentioned above. Clinically we rely on CK/CK-MB ratio >10% rather than on a certain threshold level for the CK-MB value, although an elevation of CK-MB activity peaks of more than 50 U/l has been shown to support the diagnosis of myocardial infarction [17] which is also supported by our results since most of the patients (84.1%) with pathologic angiographic findings showed an elevation above that threshold. Only for the purpose of this study we retrospectively categorized CK-MB values above or below 50 U/l.
We have demonstrated that the majority (63 of 108 patients, 58.3%) of perioperative ischemias was explained by patho-morphological findings; however, there were only 12 of 29 patients (41.4%) in whom a technical incorrect anastomosis led to a narrowing of the native coronary bed which could possibly explain an infarction. In the other patients with a technical incorrect anastomosis and no change of the coronary bed there was no obvious reason other than the stenosis at the anastomotic site which, one might assume, should not necessarily lead to an infarction theoretically.
Angiography led to an exact diagnosis and identification of the cause which helped further decision making as most of the findings were graft related. Poor coronary status with no option for further re-revascularization led to a non-interventional course; all other patients showed a low risk for angioplasty or re-operation, underlining that re-intervention should be opted for if possible.
Mortality in all patients (groups A and B) with definite myocardial infarction was 22.9% (19 out of 83 patients) and 14.5% in patients with perioperative myocardial ischemia (19 out of 131 patients) and of was associated with poor coronary status and no option for re-revascularization as well as early hemodynamic deterioration. Nevertheless, the fatal infarction rate was less than 1% of all interventions (19 of 2052 patients).
Not much is known on the influence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and infarction on late survival. We will investigate that outcome in a follow-up.
In conclusion, we found that the combination of ST-segment change and CK/CK-MB ratio is highly effective in detecting graft failure. Early angiography should be performed in the stable patient in the event of perioperative ischemia after CABG since it allows for safe and precise diagnosis thus enabling early re-intervention and salvage of myocardium. Whenever repeat intervention in the stable patient can be performed after graft failure, the outcome is favorable whereas poor coronary artery status and hemodynamic instability were major causes of mortality.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr Fabricius: No, I didn't mention it. The time span of all patients was like an hour at least and 48 h at the most, and the median was 14, the median, and the median statistically was 19.8.
Dr Messmer: The fact is that I was a little bit surprised about the new Q-wave you postulated. It takes some time until you have a new Q-wave after perioperative ischemia.
Dr M Dullum (Washington, DC, USA): Was there any correlation between the size of the coronary vessels that you grafted and those that were occluded, that is, were they small vessels occluded when you looked at them, or not?
Dr Fabricius: No, we didn't work that up statistically.
Dr B. Walpoth (Bern, Switzerland): I think that in your Institute you do measure intraoperative flow routinely: therefore, I would be interested to know whether in any of the presented cases you measured abnormally low flow rates or grafts with failure. Is it a problem which occurred after the moment you measured your flow and you closed the patient? When did you do your angiographic follow-up studies?
Dr Fabricius: It is standard for all patients in the OR that the grafts are being verified by flow measurement, and if flow measurements are fine, then the patient will proceed on to intensive care. So if afterwards problems arose, then it's an indication not to go to the OR but to go to the cath lab if the patient is stable seen by hemodynamic terms. So flow measurement was all right.
Dr M. Turina (Zurich, Switzerland): I am surprised with the last statement that this operation can be performed with a low risk. First, you had a 9.3% mortality, which is not so low, and, second, you excluded a substantial proportion of patients. You stated that only those who were stable enough were taken to the angiography. Can you tell us what happened to the patients who crashed and were not taken to the angiography but directly to the operating room?
Dr Fabricius: To your first question, those patients who had a higher mortality of 8.9% were actually the patients who were not operated on. That was exactly the patients who the policy was gone for noninterventional course due to poor coronary status.
And the second question?
Dr Turina: 9.3% mortality rate includes all patients who crashed, not only the group which was angiographed?
Dr Fabricius: No, no: 9.3% were all patients with an angiogram, and out of these, the majority accounted for the patients who were not operated on, 8.3%. So there was just one death related to a patient who was reoperated, actually.
Dr V. Subramanian (New York, NY, USA): Can you tell us if there is a difference in the OPCAB and beating heart, because you have a very high rate of angiographic occlusion, 65%, and there is no distribution changes in the anterior versus the lateral posterior? I presume that is all LIMA in the anterior graft. If that is so, you have a very high rate of occlusion. Can you tell me if it is all LIMA where you had a problem?
Dr Fabricius: Out of these 108 patients, there were 12 patients either operated by MIDCAB or OPCAB, and five of those MIDCAB patients had problems with the left anterior LIMA, actually.
Dr P. Gerometta (Bergamo, Italy): Do you have any late follow-up data of those 41% of patients that had normal grafts at the perioperative angiography?
Dr Fabricius: The 30-day mortality of those normal patients was zero, they all went out of hospital, and that is all I know of them.
Dr Gerometta: Can you give us some details on the angiographic aspect of the grafts and coronary arteries of patients that underwent an early angiographic control? In my experience they often look very small as if they had spasm. How do you classify them?
Dr Fabricius: The contracted ones were accounted for into the group of the stenosed ones, because sometimes it is difficult for the doctor in the cath lab to say if it's either a stenosis or if it's a spasm. They would just rather guess. So for this study retrospectively we just included them all in this stenosis group.
Dr I. Munoz (Cordoba, Spain): In case of a stenosed anastomotic graft failure, what is your selection criteria for a PTCA or redo operation?
Dr Fabricius: Actually we ask the doctor from the cath lab, and if it is going to be an easy angioplasty being performed, then it's done right away or it's done later on, and if the problem is multifocal, let's put it that way, then we proceed to go to surgical reintervention again.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Tanaka, F. Y. Chen, R. Flaumenhaft, G. J. Graham, R. G. Laurence, and J. V. Frangioni Real-time assessment of cardiac perfusion, coronary angiography, and acute intravascular thrombi using dual-channel near-infrared fluorescence imaging J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2009; 138(1): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C.J. Sun, R. Whitlock, J. Cheng, J. W. Eikelboom, L. Thabane, M. A. Crowther, and K. H.T. Teoh The effect of pre-operative aspirin on bleeding, transfusion, myocardial infarction, and mortality in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review of randomized and observational studies Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 1057 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai, S. Miwa, D. Kodama, T. Koyama, G. Cohen, M. P. Pelletier, E. A. Cohen, G. T. Christakis, B. S. Goldman, and S. E. Fremes A randomized comparison of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography and transit-time flow measurement to detect technical errors in coronary bypass grafts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 585 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thielmann, P. Massoudy, B. R. Jaeger, M. Neuhauser, G. Marggraf, S. Sack, R. Erbel, and H. Jakob Emergency re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention, reoperation, or conservative treatment in patients with acute perioperative graft failure following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 117 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vernhet-Kovacsik, P. Battistella, R. Demaria, J. L. Pasquie, C. Bousquet, G. Dogas, F. Leclercq, B. Albat, and J. P. Senac Early Postoperative Assessment of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency and Anatomy: Value of Contrast-Enhanced 16-MDCT with Retrospectively ECG-Gated Reconstructions Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S395 - S400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai, S. Miwa, D. Kodama, G. Cohen, G. T. Christakis, B. S. Goldman, M. O. Baerlocher, M. P. Pelletier, and S. E. Fremes Improving the Quality of Coronary Bypass Surgery With Intraoperative Angiography: Validation of a New Technique J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1521 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ivascau, D. Buklas, M. Massetti, R. Sabatier, O. LePage, E. Neri, G. Babatasi, and A. Khayat Can An Early Peri-Anastomotic LITA Stenosis Be Reversible? Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 348 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thielmann, P. Massoudy, G. Marggraf, S. Knipp, A. Schmermund, J. Piotrowski, R. Erbel, and H. Jakob Role of troponin I, myoglobin, and creatine kinase for the detection of early graft failure following coronary artery bypass grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 102 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Glantz, T. Ezri, Y. Cohen, S. Konichezky, A. Caspi, D. Geva, and A. Leviav Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Sternectomy Shortly After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1566 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |