EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hutter, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennink, G. B.W.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hutter, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennink, G. B.W.E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic
Right arrow Great vessels

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:82-88
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL

Fate of the aortic root after arterial switch operation

Paul A. Huttera, Bastiaan J.M. Thomeera, Patricia Jansena, J. Francois Hitchcocka, Joop A.J. Faberb, Erik J. Meijbooma, Ger B.W.E. Benninka

a Children's Heart Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
b Center of Biostatistics, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Received 9 October 2000; received in revised form 21 March 2001; accepted 6 April 2001.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-30-2504002; fax: +31-30-2505347
e-mail: p.hutter{at}wkz.azu.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 
Objective: Concerns have been voiced about possible dilation and insufficiency of the neo-aortic valve after the arterial switch operation (ASO). Aims: To determine growth of the neo-aortic valve and the aortic anastomosis after ASO and the prevalence of insufficiency or stenosis. Patients and methods: Since 1977, 144 consecutive patients (pts) underwent ASO for transposition of the great arteries (TGA). Median follow-up was 8.65 years (0.1–22.5 years). Simple TGA was present in 97 pts and 47 had TGA with ventricular septal defect (VSD). Detailed echocardiography included measurements of aortic diameter at four levels. The 608 measurements were compared with published normal values. Results: The mean aortic valve z-score was 1.5, without significant change with age (P=0.75). Under 4 months, mean valve z-score was 0.63±2.20, between 5 and 12 months 2.56±2.30 (P<0.0001). Gradual growth occurs thereafter. The aortic sinus follows an identical growth pattern. The aorta at the anastomosis, is initially smaller than normal (z-score -0.64). After 4 months the z-score is 0.83, followed by continued growth of 0.1 z-score per year. At the last visit, the aortic valve z-score was above 2 in 51 patients, between -2 and 2 in 72 and less than -2 in six patients, none of whom had a flow velocity above 2 m/s. z-score of patients with VSD remained above those without VSD (P<0.0001).Aortic insufficiency was grade 2/4 in three patients, grade 3/4 in one and grade 4/4 in one. No patient developed aortic stenosis. Conclusion: After ASO the neo-aortic valve and sinus are larger than normal, representing the natural size difference in the prenatal situation and influence of associated cardiac malformations. In the first year of life, rapid dilatation of the new aorta is observed, followed by growth towards normalization of the valve and sinus size. Stenosis at the anastomosis was not observed. Aortic dilatation by itself is rarely associated with significant insufficiency.

Key Words: Arterial switch operation • Transposition of the great arteries • Congenital heart disease • Aortic valve • Aortic root


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 
The function of the aortic root, including the pulmonary valve, that has become the new aortic valve, plays a crucial role in the long-term follow-up after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Disproportionate dilatation of the neo-aortic root and insufficiency has been reported [1], but these reports are short in follow-up duration. The technique of the arterial switch however introduces possible growth interference at different levels, such as the pulmonary-aortic anastomosis and the introduction of aortic tissue due to coronary transfer. Each growth interference may have an impact on the aortic valve, the neo-aortic (pulmonary) sinuses and the aortic root. This retrospective longitudinal study therefore determines the growth of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta at multiple levels in a group of children, after the arterial switch with a follow-up up to 22.5 years. The influence of associated cardiac malformations and the prevalence of insufficiency or stenosis at all levels of the thoracic aorta are included in the study.


    2. Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 
Since 1977, 189 patients underwent the arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) in our institution. Early mortality was 31 patients (16%) over the entire 23 years experience. Current mortality (1996–2000) is below 2%. Fourteen patients residing outside The Netherlands were excluded from the study.

The follow-up of the remaining 144 patients is 8.65 years (0.1–22.5 years). Ninety-seven patients had TGA with intact ventricular septum and 47 had TGA with ventricular septal defect (VSD), of whom 16 patients had double outlet right ventricle with sub-pulmonary VSD (Taussig–Bing anomaly). Eight patients had coarctation of the aorta, one had interrupted aortic arch and one had TGA with atrioventricular septal defect and cor triatriatum. The arterial switch was the first surgical procedure in 122 patients, 22 had a staged procedure, 21 after a prior pulmonary band and one after an aorto-pulmonary shunt in a patient with hypoplastic pulmonary artery branches. Median age at the arterial switch was 8 days (1–1878 days).

The aortic anastomosis was sutured with continuous 7.0 Prolene. The coronary arteries were implanted in trapdoor incisions, and also sutured with continuous 7.0 Prolene. Analysis of the coronary development of the same group of patients has previously been published in this journal [2].

Detailed echocardiography was performed yearly including Doppler interrogation of the flow-velocity in ascending and descending aorta. Since 1992, the diameter of the aorta was measured at four levels (Fig. 1) . After Lecompte's manoeuvre, the pulmonary bifurcation is anterior to the ascending aorta. At this level it is not possible to distinguish between aortic and pulmonary wall. Therefore, we preferred to measure the internal diameter at all levels. Measurements were performed at the time of the investigation, using 2D cineloop just prior to opening of the aortic valve. The resulting 608 measurements were compared to published normal values [3,4]. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated from length and weight using Mosteller's formula [5].



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the aorta indicating the positions of the diameter measurements. (1) The lower hinge-point of the valve; (2) the widest point of the sinus of Valsalva; (3) the anastomosis at the sinu-tubular junction; (4) the ascending aorta. PA, pulmonary artery, in the position after Lecompte's manoeuvre.

 
2.1. Statistical analysis
Developments over time were investigated using mixed linear model analysis, taking into account longitudinal data of each patient [6]. The trend of aortic growth (Fig. 2) was computed as described by Royston [7] and Altman [8]. To eliminate skewed distribution of the data of the aortic flow velocities, logarithmic transformation was performed before statistical analysis. Continuous variables were investigated with independent sample t-tests, ordinal variables with {chi}2. The analysis was performed using commercially available software [9].



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Line plot of aortic valve growth vs. age, each line representing a patient. The trend-line given is a description of the development of the aortic valve in relation to age. Starting point is a linear mixed effects model, where the fixed part is a 7th degree polynomial for age comparable to a smoothing procedure, with the level per patient as the random part of the model. The dotted lines represent the 95% prediction interval.

 

    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 
3.1. Growth of the aortic valve and ascending aorta
The growth of the aortic valve in relation to age is demonstrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 3 demonstrates the development of the aortic valve diameter, expressed as z-score, in relation to age. No progressive valve dilatation could be demonstrated: the coefficient of aortic valve z-score growth was not significantly different from 0. At the last visit, the aortic valve z-score was above 2 in 51 patients, between -2 and 2 in 72 and less than -2 in six patients, none of whom had a flow velocity above 2 m/s.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Line plot of aortic valve z-score vs. age, each line representing a patient. The fat line is the overall trend of the patient-lines, with 95% prediction intervals. The formula of the line is z-score=1.52(a)-0.007(b)*age. The coefficient (b) is not significantly different from 0 (P=0.78): the valve z-scores remain unchanged with time. The constant (a) is significant (P<0.0001). The width of the 95% interval is ±4.47.

 
Fig. 4 shows the development of the sinus, expressed as z-score, in relation to age. No progressive dilatation could be demonstrated.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Line plot of sinus z-score vs. age, each line representing a patient. The fat line is the overall trend of the patient-lines, with 95% prediction intervals. The formula of the line is sinus z-score=1.42(a)+0.011(b)*age. The coefficient (b) is not significantly different from 0 (P=0.44): the sinus z-scores remain unchanged with age. The constant (a) is significant (P<0.0001). The width of the 95% prediction interval is ±1.92.

 
The ratio sinus/valve with age can be expressed by the formula: ratio=1.37-0.004*age. The constant 1.37 is larger than the normal value of 1.3(±0.1) (P<0.01). The coefficient -0.004 was not significantly different from 0 (P=0.08): no evidence of dilatation over time is present. The figure gives the impression of increase during the first year of life, followed by a gradual decrease. A polynomial trend-line refuted this impression and did not have a better fit to the data.

Fig. 5 demonstrates development of the sinu-tubular junction, the site of the aorto-pulmonary anastomosis. When a linear description is chosen, the anastomosis is less than 1 standard deviation larger than normal, but this is still significant (P=0.0001) and the anastomosis is dilating with age, increasing by almost 0.1 standard deviation per year (P<0.0001). On further analysis, this increase is mostly limited to the first 1–2 years of life. Because of this non-linearity, a polynomial was used in the figure.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Line plot of z-score of the anastomosis at the sinu-tubular junction. Each line represents a patient. The fat line is the overall trend of the patient-lines, with 95% prediction intervals. A polynomial trend was used, because the development of the z-score was non-linear. The method of calculation is the same as in Fig. 2. The formula of the polynomial is: y=-0.88+3.1*age-1.53*age2+0.36*age3-0.044*age4+0.0030*age5-0.00010*age6+0.000001*age7. Intercept and coefficients are all significant (P<0.0001). The width of the prediction interval is ±2.7.

 
The ratio of anastomosis/valve shows an increase during follow-up. Immediately after the arterial switch the ratio is 0.89, below the normal value of 1.0±0.1 (P<0.01). The ratio anastomosis/valve can be expressed by the formula: ratio=0.89+0.007*age. Both constant (P<0.0001) and coefficient (P=0.003) are significant, indicating that the anastomosis grows faster than the valve.

The ratio ascendens/valve is 0.92, without significant in- or decrease with time. The observed mean ratio was smaller than the normal ratio (1.0±0.1, P<0.01).

On further analysis the z-scores of the aortic valve, sinus as well as the anastomosis show a rapid increase in the first year of life, followed by a decrease of the z-score of the valve and the sinus. The z-score of the anastomosis increases further, but more slowly, beyond the first year of life. This is demonstrated in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Measurements of z-scores of aortic valve, sinus and anastomosis in different age groupsa

 
3.2. Development of aortic flow and prevalence of aortic stenosis
The flow velocity measured by Doppler in the ascending aorta had a mean of 1.31 m/s. The velocity was significantly larger than 1 m/s (P<0.0001). There was no significant increase with time (P=0.14).

At the latest follow-up, aortic flow velocity was less than 2 m/s in 128 patients, 2–3 m/s in eight patients and one patient had a velocity of 3.2 m/s. No patient developed stenosis of the aortic valve or of the aortic anastomosis leading to LV hypertrophy on ECG or echo.

One patient had transposition with sub-pulmonary VSD and LV outflow-tract stenosis. Pre-operative it was estimated that this stenosis was largely caused by bulging of the septum because of the pressure difference between the ventricles and would resolve when the pressures would be reversed. After the arterial switch at 4 months of age, the stenosis persisted and worsened, requiring re-operation 6 months later.

The patient with interrupted aortic arch developed severe stenosis at the site of aortic cannulation, requiring re-operation within the first post-operative week. A third patient required re-operation for pulmonary stenosis, this patient had, in addition, an aortic flow of 3 m/s and an invasive pressure gradient of 20 mmHg. Despite the mild gradient and the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography and ECG, it was decided to perform angioplasty of the ascending aorta, rather than risking worsening of the stenosis necessitating a second re-intervention later in life. This patient developed moderate aortic insufficiency (grade 3/4) later.

3.3. Flow in the aortic arch, coarctation and re-coarctation
The flow in the aortic isthmus, when eliminating patients operated for coarctation, was 1.41+0.01*age. The increase with time, though clinically irrelevant, was statistically significant (P=0.013).

Transposition was associated with coarctation of the aorta in eight patients. Of these patients, two had an intact ventricular septum, three had coarctation in the setting of Taussig–Bing anomaly and the remaining three had muscular VSDs.

One additional patient had transposition, muscular VSD and interrupted aortic arch. Re-coarctation developed in two patients and were treated with balloon-angioplasty 6 and 7 years after initial surgery. The patient with interrupted arch developed re-stenosis at the anastomosis between ascending and descending aorta, initially balloon-angioplasty was performed, but 3 years later the stenosis recurred and the patient was treated with patch-angioplasty.

3.4. Influence of associated cardiac malformations
3.4.1. VSD
Patients with VSD have an aortic valve z-score 0.75 higher than patients without VSD (P=0.027). Development over time was not significantly different between patients with or without VSD (P=0.80). This is demonstrated in Fig. 6A. No significant influence of VSD on the sinus z-score at birth or during growth was encountered.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Line plots of aortic valve z-score vs. age, demonstrating the influence of associated cardiac malformations on the development of the aortic valve z-score. (A) Influence of VSD. Dotted lines line represent the patients with intact ventricular septum (n=97), continuous lines patients with VSD (n=47). The formula of the trend-lines is: z-score=1.31(a)-0.017(b)xage+0.76(c)*VSD. Significance of the coefficients: (a) P<0.0001; (b) P=0.52 (NS); (c) P=0.027. There was no significant interaction term Age*VSD (P=0.80), meaning that development over time is similar in both groups and the lines are parallel, with the VSD patients significantly larger. (B) Influence of Taussig–Bing (TB) anomaly. Dotted lines: patients without Taussig–Bing anomaly (including patients with other types of VSD, n=128). Continuous lines: patients with Taussig–Bing anomaly (n=16). The formula of the trend-lines is: z-score=1.27(a)+0.0002(b)*age+3.43(c)*TB-0.21(d)*TB*age. Significance of the coefficients: (a) P<0.0001; (b) P=0.99 (NS); (c) P=0.009; (d) P=0.0001. There is a significant interaction term (d), meaning that the lines are not parallel. Without Taussig–Bing anomaly the line is horizontal, with Taussig–Bing anomaly z-score decreases with age. (C) Influence of coarctation. Dotted lines: patients without coarctation (n=135). Continuous lines: patients with coarctation (n=9, including the patient with interrupted arch). The formula of the two lines is: z-score=1.34(a)-0.007(b)*age+2.5(c)*Coarctation. Significance of the coefficients: (a) P<0.0001; (b) P=0.81 (NS); (c) P=0.009. There was no significant interaction term (P=0.58).

 
3.4.2. Taussig–Bing anomaly
Patients with Taussig–Bing anomaly had a significantly larger valve at birth, 3.3 standard deviations higher than patients without Taussig–Bing anomaly. During growth, the valve z-score decreases in Taussig–Bing anomaly, whereas the z-score remains constant in patients without Taussig–Bing anomaly. This is demonstrated in Fig. 6B. The sinus z-score follows the same pattern: Without Taussig–Bing anomaly the z-score at birth is 1.28, significantly higher than 0 (P<0.0001), with growth no change occurs (P=0.15). Patients with Taussig–Bing anomaly have a z-score at birth of 2.83 (P=0.0028) and with increasing age the z-score decreases with 0.11/year (P=0.014).

3.5. Coarctation
Aortic valve z-score of patients with coarctation was 2.5 above patients without coarctation (P<0.001). During somatic growth, z-score did not change significantly in either group (Fig. 6C). The sinus is larger in patients with coarctation than in patients without coarctation (2.25 vs. 1.36, P=0.011) and doesn't change with increasing age in either group. All coarctations were present before the arterial switch operation.

The initial size and the development of the anastomosis were not significantly different in patients with or without VSD, Taussig–Bing anomaly or coarctation.

3.6. Influence of banding and age at arterial switch
3.6.1. Banding
Second stage arterial switch after pulmonary artery banding did not influence the aortic valve z-score (P=0.7) and the anastomosis (P=0.3), but did have a significant influence on the size of the sinus.

After banding the sinus is 2.8 z-scores larger (P=0.014). During the arterial switch, the band was opened, and the pulmonary artery was transected at the level of the band. This resulted in sufficient size. No additional surgical procedures, such as patch implantation, were necessary to relieve residual stenosis.

3.6.2. Age at arterial switch
For every day the patient was older at the time of arterial switch, the aortic valve z-score increased by 0.013 (P=0.008). There was no significant influence on the sinus (P=0.16) or the anastomosis (P=0.66).

3.7. Aortic insufficiency
Aortic insufficiency was absent in 100, trivial in 39, grade 2/4 in three and grade 3/4 in one. One patient required valve replacement for grade 4/4 insufficiency. This patient's post-operative course was complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and arrhythmia. Patients with no or trivial aortic insufficiency had valve z-scores of 1.5±2.3. The patients with insufficiency grade 2/4 or above had mean z-score 4.6±2.6 (P=0.004). Three of these patients had Taussig–Bing anomaly (P=0.01) and one had pulmonary artery banding and second stage arterial switch (P=0.55).


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 
The function of the pulmonary valve in the systemic circulation, after the arterial switch operation, the Ross, Damus–Kaye–Stansel, and Norwood procedures, has been the focus of extensive speculations. Initial reports on the disproportionate dilatation of the neo-aortic root and insufficiency [1] are short in follow-up duration. More recent publications have addressed growth and dilatation of pulmonary autografts after implantation in the systemic circulation, both in the experimental animal setting [10] and in humans [11].

After the Ross operation, it has been demonstrated that the graft does increase in size and that the pattern of this increase is suggestive of early passive dilation followed by normal active growth [12]. The Ross operation however, is a free transplant, with the pulmonary root anastomosed both distally and proximally with re-implantation of the coronaries. This disturbs the anatomy at the sinu-tubular junction, the sinus, and at the ventriculo-aortic junction. During the arterial switch, the infringement on the neo-aorta occurs only at the sinus and the sinu-tubular junction, not at the ventriculo-aortic junction. However, a similar pattern of dilatation followed by growth is encountered in our study. This longitudinal study with up to eight measurement moments per patient allows us to postulate that in the development of the neo-aorta three factors may play a dominating role: (1) the larger initial pre-operative size of the aorta, (2) the immediate post-operative dilating phase and (3) the final normal growth of the vessel.

The larger initial size of the aorta finds its origin in the fetal circulatory physiology, where 60% of the combined cardiac output passes the right ventricle. Despite the fact that the pulmonary artery originates from the left ventricle, a larger size of the pulmonary artery in comparison to the aorta, is reported [13,14]. The immediate post-operative dilating phase in the Ross procedure has been described in recent publications by Solymar et al. [15] and to a lesser extent by Solowiejczek et al. [11] and attributed to passive dilatation [16] due to the higher systemic blood pressure and the implantation technique employed. In transposition, the annulus is not involved in the surgical technique, however, we find a similar rapid initial dilatation of the valve. The thinner pulmonary wall, as reported by Schoof [10], is likely to distend under systemic pressures. In the third phase, gradual neo-aortic growth occurs. The size regresses to more normal values over a period of 6–10 years, although the mean remains 1 standard deviation above normal, possibly representing a balance between a structurally thinner pulmonary (neo-aortic) wall and the systemic blood pressure it is exposed to. The valve, sinus and ascending aorta all show a similar pattern of initial dilatation and slowly regress towards the normal values over a period of more than 10 years. Unlike the report by Solowiejczek et al. [11] where surgical technique during the Ross procedure prevents dilatation of the semilunar valve, the arterial switch technique allows dilatation at all levels. We deliberately compared the neo-aortic values to the values of normal aortas and not pulmonary arteries since pulmonary normal values are less reliable and obtained from different echocardiographic views and are therefore incomparable.

The fact that six patients have an aortic valve below -2 SD represents the normal statistical spread and not pathology, as evidenced by their normal flow velocities. The explanation of the ongoing increase in z-score of the anastomosis is unclear. Real aneurysmatic dilatation caused by turbulence at the mismatched anastomosis as postulated by Blume and Wernovsky [14] seems unlikely. On angiography performed at the end of follow-up in 61/144 patients, the anastomosis is most often not even recognizable [2].

The effects of associated cardiac malformations on the development of the neo-aorta have not yet been included in previous studies. We addressed the influence of associated cardiac malformations and long-term consequences of disproportionate valves after the arterial switch in VSD, Taussig–Bing anomaly and coarctation of the aorta. In transposition with subpulmonary VSD the outlet septum is variably malaligned, eventually encroaching on the right ventricular outflow tract. The diminished fetal flow to the aorta and compensatory increased flow to the pulmonary artery results in a more pronounced mismatch. After the arterial switch growth is normal and shows a trend towards normal (0.009*age). A less pronounced mismatch is present in patients with other types of VSD, in whom a small difference in valve z-scores remains, throughout the study period. Statistical analysis failed to find a trend towards normalization in these patients. Patients with coarctation have larger valves, but their numbers are small, and again no trend toward normalization could be proven. Age at arterial switch did influence valve size; the size of the sinus or anastomosis was not affected. There is no reason to believe that the pulmonary root dilates prior to the arterial switch, while it is not submitted to exceedingly high flow or pressure. We therefore believe that this is not a direct effect, but some interaction with other factors: patients who were operated early in our experience were operated older, especially when the patient had a VSD, in addition more of these patients were banded as a method to delay arterial switch. However, banding did not influence the valve, nor the anastomosis, but did influence the sinus. This dilatation of the sinus, without dilatation of the valve, can not be explained by surgical enlargement, as none of the patients required patch-plasty to overcome narrowing caused by the band.

Aortic stenosis leading to LV hypertrophy did not occur. The incidence of re-coarctation is not dissimilar to the series of native coarctation without transposition. Unlike Serraf, [17] we did not encounter any coarctation that developed after the arterial switch.

Finally, clinically significant insufficiency of the aortic valve is encountered in only five patients in our series. This group is too small for reliable statistical analysis. All patients with insufficiency have large valves, however, many patients with large valves have no insufficiency. Three out of five patients with insufficiency had Taussig–Bing anomaly. The lack of subvalvar support for the overriding semilunar valve in Taussig–Bing anomaly might form a possible explanation for the development of insufficiency. We did not find an influence of prior pulmonary artery banding as was reported by Blume [14] and by Martin et al. [18].

4.1. Limitations
This study is a retrospective study based on measurements obtained in a normal out-patient clinic setting without sedation of the patients. This means that not all observation could be performed at all moments and studies were performed by different echocardiographists. Inter- and intra-observer variability could not be assessed.

4.2. Conclusion
After the arterial switch, the neo-aortic valve and sinus are larger than normal. This, at least in part, represents the natural size difference in the prenatal situation. Patients with associated cardiac malformations, VSD, Taussig–Bing anomaly and coarctation, have a more pronounced difference in size. In the first year of life, there is rapid dilatation of the new aorta followed by active growth with tendency towards normalization of the valve and sinus size. Stenosis at the anastomosis was not observed. Aortic dilatation by itself is rarely associated with significant insufficiency.


    Footnotes
 
Presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Frankfurt, Germany, October 7–11, 2000.


    Appendix A. Conference discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 
Dr V. Alexi-Meskishvili (Berlin, Germany): You compared the pulmonary valve to the normal aortic valve. Did you compare the diameter of the pulmonary valve to normal pulmonary valve, because we know the pulmonary valve development is different from the aortic valve development?

Dr Bennink: I saw a recent article of Solowiejczyk and Quaegebeur from the New York group that compared the pulmonary valve in the Ross procedure with the pulmonary valve in the normal patients. One of the reasons that we went for the comparison with the aortic valve is that, according to my cardiologists, the pulmonary valve, it is more difficult to assess with less reliable measurements. That's why we went for the aortic valve. Another thing is that during the life it will behave like an aortic valve, and although your starting point is similar to the pulmonary valve, for the rest of the life we think you have to consider it as an aortic valve.

Dr F. Lacour-Gayet (LePlessis Robinson, France): The arterial switch is increasing the aortic root. The coronary button that are placed on the neo-aortic root enlarge the diameter. Therefore there is always a discrepancy in diameter between the proximal aorta and the distal aorta, and this is particularly true in transposition with VSD. I have been using for several hundred patients a technique that tries to cope with this problem. The technique is to use the top of the right coronary button to patch and to enlarge the distal ascending aorta. This is quite helpful, allows to place the right coronary in good position, and control the potential sinotubular problem. My question is, have you observed in patients with very large discrepancy a funny shape of the aortic control and more significant aortic insufficiency?

Dr Bennink: Actually we have used in the last 2 years the same technique that you described. We did not see, although there was a funny shape, any problems with tapering of that starting neoaortic root versus the native aorta. I'm pretty sure about this because last year we presented here a paper about the coronary problems after the arterial switch, and in 70 patients we did an angiography, and in none of those patients can you see any sign of stenosis. If you look at echocardiographic measurements at that level, out of those 144 patients, only in two patients was there a flow of more than 2 m/sec. I think it was up to 3 m/sec, but without any clinical significant effects.

Dr H. Uemura (Osaka, Japan): Have you included patients with a bicuspid pulmonary valve? In the setting of a bicuspid pulmonary valve, do you think its growth is normal?

Dr Bennink: I think in the whole series there were six patients with a bicuspid valve.

Dr Uemura: Its growth was normal in such patients?

Dr Bennink: The growth was normal in such patients.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A. Conference...
 References
 

  1. Hourihan M., Colan S.D., Wernovsky G., Maheswari U., Mayer J.E., Jr, Saunders B. Growth of the aortic anastomosis, annulus and root after the arterial switch procedure performed in infancy. Circulation 1993;88:615-620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hutter P.A., Bennink G.B.W.E., Ay L., Raes I.B., Hitchcock J.F., Meijboom E.J. Influence of coronary anatomy and reimplantation on the long-term outcome of the arterial switch. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 2000;18:207-213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Henry W.L., Ware J.H., Gardin J.M., Seymour I., McKay J., Weiner M. Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects: growth-related changes that occur between infancy and early adulthood. Circulation 1978;57:278-285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Roman M.J., Devereux R.B., Kramer-Fox R., O'Loughlin J., Spitzer M., Robins J. Two dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:507-512.[Medline]
  5. Mosteller R.D. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. New Eng J Med 1987;22(317(II):1098.
  6. Brown H., Prescott R. Applied mixed models in medicine. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999.
  7. Royston P. Constructing time-specific reference ranges. Stat Med 1991;10:675-690.[Medline]
  8. Altman D.G. Construction of age-related reference centiles using absolute residuals. Stat Med 1993;12:917-924.[Medline]
  9. PLUS 2000 Professional release 1. Seattle, WA: MathSoft Inc. 2000:1998-1999.
  10. Schoof P.H., Gittenberger-de Groot A.C., de Heer E., Bruijn J.A., Hazekamp M.G., Huysmans H.A. Remodeling of the porcine pulmonary autograft wall in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:55-65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Solowiejczyk D.E., Bourlon F., Apfel H.D., Hordof A.J., Hsu D.T., Crabtree G., Galantowicz M., Gersony W.M., Quaegebeur J.M. Serial echocardiographic measurements of the pulmonary autograft in the aortic valve position after the Ross operation in a pediatric population using normal pulmonary artery dimensions as the reference standard. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:1119-1123.[Medline]
  12. Puntel R.A., Webber S.A., Ettedgui J.A., Tacy T.A. Rapid enlargement of neoaortic root after the Ross procedure in children. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:747-749.[Medline]
  13. Ichida U., Aubert A., Denef B., Dumoulin M., Hauwaert vd L.G. Cross sectional echocardiographic assessment of great artery diameters in infants and children. Br Heart J 1987;58:627-634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Blume E.D., Wernovsky G. Long-term results of arterial switch repair of transposition of the great vessels. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;1:129-137.
  15. Solymar L., Südow G., Holmgran D. Increase in size of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross operation in children: growth or dilatation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:4-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Elkins R.C. The Ross operation: applications to children. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;8:345-349.[Medline]
  17. Serraf A., Roux D., Lacour-Gayet F., Touchot A., Bruniaux J., Sousa-Uva M., Planche C. Reoperation after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:892-899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Martin R.P., Ettedgui J.A., Qureshi S.A., Gibbs J.L., Baker E.J., Radley-Smith R., Maisey M.N., Tynan M., Yacoub M.H. A quantitative evaluation of aortic regurgitation after anatomic correction of transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1281-1284.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. Lange, J. Cleuziou, J. Horer, K. Holper, M. Vogt, P. Tassani-Prell, and C. Schreiber
Risk factors for aortic insufficiency and aortic valve replacement after the arterial switch operation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 711 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Ando, H. Kado, M. Masuda, T. Nakano, K. Hinokiyama, A. Shiose, and M. Kajimoto
"Spiral-Cuff" Technique for Repair of Anomalous Left Coronary Artery From the Pulmonary Artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 667 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Bove, F. De Meulder, G. Vandenplas, K. De Groote, J. Panzer, B. Suys, D. DeWolf, and K. Francois
Midterm Assessment of the Reconstructed Arteries After the Arterial Switch Operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 823 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Agnoletti, P. Ou, D. S. Celermajer, Y. Boudjemline, D. Marini, D. Bonnet, and Y. Aggoun
Acute angulation of the aortic arch predisposes a patient to ascending aortic dilatation and aortic regurgitation late after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 568 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. K. Pasquali, M. S. Cohen, D. Shera, G. Wernovsky, T. L. Spray, and B. S. Marino
The Relationship Between Neo-Aortic Root Dilation, Insufficiency, and Reintervention Following the Ross Procedure in Infants, Children, and Young Adults
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2007; 49(17): 1806 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. K. Pasquali, D. Shera, G. Wernovsky, M. S. Cohen, S. Tabbutt, S. Nicolson, T. L. Spray, and B. S. Marino
Midterm outcomes and predictors of reintervention after the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 893 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Y. Hayashi, A. D. Cochrane, S. Menahem, and J. A. Smith
Neoaortic root dilatation with saccular aneurysm formation after the arterial switch operation for Taussig-Bing anomaly
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 569 - 572.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Losay, A. Touchot, A. Capderou, J.-D. Piot, E. Belli, C. Planche, and A. Serraf
Aortic Valve Regurgitation After Arterial Switch Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 2057 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. Y. Hwang, W.-H. Kim, J. G. Kwak, J. R. Lee, Y. J. Kim, J. R. Rho, E. J. Bae, and C. I. Noh
Mid-term follow-up of neoaortic regurgitation after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 162 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Pocar, E. Villa, A. Degandt, P. Mauriat, P. Pouard, and P. R. Vouhe
Long-Term Results After Primary One-Stage Repair of Transposition of the Great Arteries and Aortic Arch Obstruction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2005; 46(7): 1331 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. G Raja, A. Shauq, and M. Kaarne
Outcomes after Arterial Switch Operation for Simple Transposition
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2005; 13(2): 190 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. L. Schwartz, K. Gauvreau, P. del Nido, J. E. Mayer, and S. D. Colan
Long-Term Predictors of Aortic Root Dilation and Aortic Regurgitation After Arterial Switch Operation
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-128 - II-132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Mohammadi, A. Serraf, E. Belli, B. Aupecle, A. Capderou, F. Lacour-Gayet, I. Martinovic, D. Piot, A. Touchot, J. Losay, et al.
Left-sided lesions after anatomic repair of transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect, and coarctation: Surgical factors
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 44 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Formigari, A. Toscano, A. Giardini, G. Gargiulo, R. Di Donato, F. M. Picchio, and L. Pasquini
Prevalence and predictors of neoaortic regurgitation after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1753 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. B. Luciani, G. Casali, A. Favaro, M. A. Prioli, L. Barozzi, F. Santini, and A. Mazzucco
Fate of the Aortic Root Late After Ross Operation
Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-61 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
W. G. Williams, B. W. McCrindle, D. A. Ashburn, R. A. Jonas, C. Mavroudis, E. H. Blackstone, and the members of the Congenital Heart Surgeon's Soci
Outcomes of 829 neonates with complete transposition of the great arteries 12-17 years after repair
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. H. Hovels-Gurich, M.-C. Seghaye, Q. Ma, M. Miskova, R. Minkenberg, B. J. Messmer, and G. von Bernuth
Long-term results of cardiac and general health status in children after neonatal arterial switch operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 935 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E. Prifti, A. Crucean, M. Bonacchi, M. Bernabei, B. Murzi, S. V. Luisi, and V. Vanini
Early and long term outcome of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: predictors and functional evaluation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 22(6): 864 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. A. Hutter, D. L. Kreb, S. F. Mantel, J. F. Hitchcock, E. J. Meijboom, and G. B. W. E. Bennink
Twenty-five years' experience with the arterial switch operation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2002; 124(4): 790 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hutter, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennink, G. B.W.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hutter, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennink, G. B.W.E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic
Right arrow Great vessels


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS