|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:399-404
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, University Medical School of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, A-8036 Graz, Austria
Received 17 October 2000; received in revised form 8 May 2001; accepted 11 May 2001.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +43-316-385-3302; fax: +43-316-385-4679
e-mail: sabine.gabor{at}kfunigraz.ac.at
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Tracheobronchial rupture Trauma Iatrogenous Surgery Outcome
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ruptures of the tracheobronchial tree often present a dramatic, life-threatening situation. Tension pneumothorax and mediastinal emphysema, as well as prolapse of the esophageal wall into the tracheal lumen, can cause acute asphyxia. In the later course of the injury mediastinitis and sepsis can occur. Nevertheless, some patients, especially those with smaller ruptures run a less eventful course with only minor signs of penetration of air into the pleural space and into the soft tissues.
This is why therapy is still controversial. Though non-operative treatment by antibiotics and intubation with the cuff inflated distal to the tear may be effective in some cases, surgical repair is unavoidable in many others. Up to this time, however, no criteria for the choice of treatment have been established
We present a series of 31 patients with iatrogenous or traumatic tracheobronchial ruptures treated since 1975, trying to define parameters suggesting the need for a surgical intervention.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Depending on the localization of the rupture, we either used a cervical approach (N=3) or right posterolateral thoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space (N=19) or both a cervical and thoracotomy approach (N=7). Longitudinal tears were closed by continuous running suture, and transverse abruptions by interrupted suture in the cartilaginous and by running suture in the membranous part of the organ. Only absorbable sutures (Vicryl R; Ethicon Hamburg-Norderstedt) were used. In patients who had been diagnosed only after considerable delay, clear-cut suturing was not always possible due to mediastinitis and inflammatory changes of the tracheobronchial wall. In these cases a pedicled pectoralis mayor muscle flap was used to cover the suture line and to prevent the formation of an esophagotracheal fistula. In most cases the anesthetic management was demanding: jet-ventilation, frequent bronchoscopically guided, intra-operative repositioning of the tube, intubation over the operated site, and apneic oxygenation were used.
In two small lacerations(<2 cm) localized in the mid-trachea or cervical trachea, respectively, which did not involve the whole thickness of the tracheal wall, the decision for non-operative treatment was made the patients were intubated with the cuff inflated distal to the tear, a chest tube was inserted in case of pneumothorax, and antibiotic treatment was initiated. For the treatment modalities see Table 1.
|
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty-five out of the 29 patients who underwent surgical repair experienced an uneventful recovery. Mean stay at the intensive care unit was 5.7 days (210 days), mean hospital stay was 12.3 (920 days). No post-operative stenosis developed within the follow-up period between 6 months and 20 years.
Four patients died of sepsis unrelated to the tracheobronchial trauma (two multi-organ failures due to underlying sepsis, one following esophageal resection in a patient with impaired hepatic function, one sepsis and multi-organ failure in the later course of severe thoracoabdominal trauma). In two out of these four patients, adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developed, necessitating high ventilatory pressures, which eventually caused the suture line to yield after 8 and 10 days, respectively. One patient even developed secondary oesophagotracheal fistula, which was not amenable to treatment because of the poor general condition.
One out of the two patients, who underwent non-operative therapy, also experienced an uneventful recovery. Control endoscopy after 1 week showed a mucosal scar. Follow-up endoscopies after 6 and 12 months showed no evidence of the previous tear. The other patient died of multi-organ failure due to underlying myocardial infarction.
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A pneumothorax is often present, particularly if the injury communicates freely with the pleural space. The development of a pneumothorax following endotracheal intubation or positive pressure ventilation is another common finding with airway injury. Persistent severe air leak and the failure of the lung to reexpand after chest tube insertion are further evidences of a major airway injury (Fig. 3 ).
|
The role of a computerized tomography (CT) scan in the diagnosis of tracheobronchial injuries is not clear at this time. Its greatest value is the possibility of detecting mediastinal emphysema not yet visible by routine chest roentgenograms, or of documenting mediastinal hematoma and associated injuries of great vessels. If tracheobronchial trauma is suspected, an inconspicuous CT, however, does not obviate the need for bronchoscopy or further diagnostic measures.
Early bronchoscopy is the most effective diagnostic tool in case of suspected airway injury [112]. In all our patients the tentative diagnosis was confirmed by emergency bronchoscopy. Moreover, bronchoscopy allows a rather clear determination of the extent and depth of the rupture, establishing a further important parameter for the choice of treatment. For emergency bronchoscopy, which was done under anesthesia, we chose a flexible endoscope inserted through an endotracheal tube, the latter being uncuffed in order not to increase the damage and to be readily repositioned for inspection of the rims of the rupture. This technique enabled sufficient ventilation, a meticulous inspection, and a clear-cut positioning of the endotracheal tube once the investigation was finished, without any need for changing endoscopic devices.
The indications for surgical repair are based upon a synopsis of clinical, radiological, and endoscopical findings. Respiratory distress in the absence of a pneumothorax, rapidly increasing subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema, and/or pneumothorax showing continuous air leak and no reexpansion of the lung after intercostal suction drainage are strong indicators for the need of surgery. We found these criteria in all patients who during emergency endoscopy had tears involving the full thickness of the organ, longer than approximately 2 cm. Furthermore, transmural ruptures involving the paracarinal region and/or prolapse of the oesophageal wall into the tracheal lumen are indications for surgery (see Fig. 1). In none of our patients was a CT-scan necessary to make the decision for or against surgery.
The choice of the approach for surgical repair depends on the location and the length of the tear. Injuries of the cervical trachea and larynx are best dealt with by a collar incision. A right posterolateral thoracotomy through the fourth or fifth intercostal space gives an excellent exposure of the distal trachea, the bifurcation, and both mainstem bronchi. Only for isolated transverse abruptions of the left mainstem bronchus close to the lobar orifices is a left thoracotomy to be preferred [4,8,9]. Only in three of our patients was the cervical approach alone sufficient; 26 patients had thoracotomies, seven of them both thoracotomy and cervical incision. We do not have experience in transcervicaltranstracheal endoluminal repair of membranous tracheal disruptions. Some authors [13,14] discuss a possible reduction of the risk of laryngeal nerve injury or of disconnection of the trachea from its vasculature by avoiding lateral and posterior dissection. This technique, however, is not the method of choice in ruptures of the intra-thoracic trachea or of the bifurcation, which made up the majority of our cases. Moreover, an extensive longitudinal tracheotomy is also a further trauma to the already injured trachea and it may carry the risk of cicatriceal stricture.
The principles of surgery for airway injuries include trimming of the borders of the rupture in case of transverse disruptions, mucosa to mucosa repair, and if necessary, the use of protective tissue (muscle, pericard, pleura, mediastinal fat pads) [3] for the anastomosis or suture line, respectively. Like most authors, we prefer the use of absorbable suture material, applying continuous running sutures whenever possible. As to our experience, an additional protective tracheostomy as advocated by some authors [1] is unnecessary and would only mean additional trauma to the trachea.
Non-operative treatment is reserved for patients in whom the laceration is either small (less than approximately 2 cm) and amenable to adequate cuff positioning, or not involving the whole thickness of the tracheobronchial wall, as well as for patients in a poor general condition with a very high operative risk [47,10,11]. Most authors report higher mortality rates for conservatively treated cases, but this may be due to the high proportion of a poor general condition in these very patients. Our own two observations fit into this concept. In general, the indication for a non-operative treatment of tracheobronchial injuries should never be overextended. In case of doubt a second decision for surgery, if possible, should be made quickly.
Non-operative management includes intubation with the cuff inflated distal to the tear, a chest tube drainage if necessary and adequate antibiotic management. High ventilatory pressures should be avoided at any rate. Furthermore, these patients should be observed carefully for airway obstruction and pulmonary and mediastinal sepsis.
In conclusion, surgical repair of tracheobronchial ruptures ensures a quick relief from a vitally dangerous situation at a tolerable operative risk. The post-operative results are good. The decision for or against surgery must be based upon a synopsis of clinical, radiological, and endoscopical findings. Conservative measures are indicated in well-selected cases, predominantly in those localized in the two upper thirds of the trachea, provided the laceration is small and/or does not involve all tracheal layers.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr Gabor: In our two cases, yes.
Dr Fuentes: There are a lot of patients who have a small laceration on the membrane and they do not need to be intubated at all.
Dr Gabor: Of course, but in these specialized two cases it was necessary.
Dr Fuentes: How long?
Dr Gabor: One patient, about 6 days, and one patient, 4 days.
Dr H.-B. Ris (Lausanne, Switzerland): In two patients, the lesions were probably due to an intubation related injury.
Dr Gabor: No.
Dr Ris: How do you treat those lesions using prolonged intubation in order that the cuff will not be situated where you have the lesion of the trachea?
Dr Gabor: Endoscopically.
Dr Ris: Have you observed movements of the tube and cuff during this prolonged time of intubation which could interfere with the lesion?
Dr Gabor: It's controlled endoscopically.
Dr M. Perelman (Moscow, Russia): Our strategy for patients with tracheobronchial ruptures must be surgical treatment, surgical treatment in principle only. In selected cases it is possible to treat these patients non-surgically but under three important conditions: the first, the tear, the rupture must be small; the second condition, it is necessary to have careful observation, careful monitoring of the patient in the hospital; and the third, there must be an experienced surgeon for conservative treatment of such patients.
Dr T. Thorpe (Leeds, UK): I think we have got to also make sure that we have a good anesthetist as well, because we have had about five percutaneous tracheostomies that have perforated the membranous trachea, and out of these, one had to have surgery, so four have been treated conservatively. So I think we ought to tell our anesthetists to be a bit more careful.
Dr K. Al Kattan (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia): What do you do with late presentation of bronchial rupture? We had a couple of cases where they actually had bronchial rupture and they were not managed in a specialized center, that they actually presented to us with complete obstruction of that lung due to old rupture and fibrosis. We tried to attempt to resect and reanastomose again, like a bronchotomy, and it always failed, although the underlying lung is healthy. Do you have experience with late cases of bronchial rupture with fibrosis?
Dr Gabor: In these 31 patients I presented there was no case with such stenosis after rupture. So I have no experience with these things. I have read about it in the literature, but in all of these cases, even in this one who had a delay from about 5 days, there was no stenosis.
Dr V.V. Sokolov (Kiev, Ukraine): Have you ever seen in your practice complete transections of the trachea?
Dr Gabor: Yes.
Dr Sokolov: In our experience we have five patients with complete transection of the trachea. In three patients the transection was due to a penetrating trauma and in two patients the transections were due to blunt trauma. Do you have such cases?
Dr Gabor: Yes. In these cases there were two patients after blunt thoracic trauma with complete disruption of the trachea.
Dr M.C. Ambrogi (Pisa, Italy): What surgical technique did you utilize to repair the membranous tracheal tear?
Dr Gabor: I repaired with a running continuous suture using an absorbable suture.
Dr Ambrogi: Do you make a lateral and posterior tracheal dissection approaching the membranous wall from behind?
Dr Gabor: It depends on the localization of the rupture. I would use a cervical approach or a thoracotomy. In most of the cases we need a thoracotomy through actually the fourth intercostal space and in a few cases also the fifth and the sixth.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Belcher, M. Conti, P. Goldstraw, and S. Jordan A modified technique of selective lung ventilation through a tracheostomy to facilitate conservative management of iatrogenic tracheal rupture. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2009; 137(6): 1562 - 1564. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Barbetakis, G. Samanidis, D. Paliouras, and C. Tsilikas Tracheal laceration following double-lumen intubation during Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 866 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dango, W. Sienel, K.-H. Kopp, and B. Passlick Successful Repair of a Subtotal Rupture of Distal Tracheobronchial Tree With Complete Abridgment of the Right Bronchus in a 4-Year-Old Child Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 1020 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. K. Park Reply to the Editor: J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 232 - 232. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirami, S. Toyooka, Y. Sano, and H. Date Postoperative perforation in the bronchus intermedius membrane after a primary lung cancer resection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 130 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Conti, M. Pougeoise, A. Wurtz, H. Porte, F. Fourrier, P. Ramon, and C.-H. Marquette Management of postintubation tracheobronchial ruptures. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Roh and J.-H. Lee Spontaneous Tracheal Rupture After Severe Coughing in a 7-Year-Old Boy Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): e224 - e227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Leinung, C. Mobius, H.-S. Hofmann, R. Ott, H. Ruffert, E. Schuster, and U. Eichfeld Iatrogenic tracheobronchial ruptures - treatment and outcomes Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 303 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gomez-Caro Andres, F. J. Moradiellos Diez, P. Ausin Herrero, V. Diaz-Hellin Gude, E. Larru Cabrero, E. de Miguel Porch, and J. L. Martin De Nicolas Successful Conservative Management in Iatrogenic Tracheobronchial Injury Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 1872 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Costache, C. Renaud, L. Brouchet, T. Toma, F. Le Balle, J. Berjaud, and M. Dahan Complete tracheal rupture after a failed suicide attempt Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1422 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Foroulis, M. Simeoforidou, D. Michaloudis, and K. Hatzitheofilou Pericardial patch repair of an extensive longitudinal iatrogenic rupture of the intrathoracic membranous trachea Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 595 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.S. Hofmann, G. Rettig, J. Radke, H. Neef, and R.E. Silber Iatrogenic ruptures of the tracheobronchial tree Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 649 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |