|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:544-549
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Passau General Hospital, 94032 Passau, Germany
b Institute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology (IMSE), Technical University, 81675 Munich, Germany
Received 10 October 2000; received in revised form 24 April 2001; accepted 30 May 2001.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-851-53002437; fax: +49-851-53002908
e-mail: eigel{at}fmi.uni-passau.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Troponin I Coronary surgery Predictor for outcome
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anesthetic technique was standardized for all patients. Etomidate (0.20.3 mg/kg) and sufentanyl (35 mg/kg) were used for induction. Neuromuscular blockade was achieved by Pancuronium bromide (0.2 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using either a continuous infusion of sufentanyl (3060 mg/h or boluses of 34 mg/kg. According to clinical requirements, additional isoflurane was given. Initial anticoagulation was accomplished with 3 mg/kg body weight of heparin and was supplemented as required in order to maintain an activated clotting time of 400 s or above.
2.1. Surgical technique
All patients were operated on through median sternotomy and with standard CPB techniques using a disposable hollow fiber oxygenator. In all patients, aprotinin was administered according to the Hammersmith scheme. A loading dose of 2 million kallikrein inactivation units (KIU) was given before sternotomy, followed by an infusion of 0.5x106 KIU/h until the end of the operation. Additionally, 2 million KIU was added to the priming volume. Myocardial protection consisted of systemic hypothermia (32°C), topical cooling with iced saline or slush, and intermittent cold antegrade blood cardioplegia with or without retrograde cardioplegia delivered into the aortic root or coronary sinus, as appropriate. Proximal anastomoses were completed either during a single period of myocardial ischemia or on a beating heart using an aortic partial occlusion clamp, according to the surgeon's preference. In all but 21 patients, at least one internal mammary artery graft was used.
Blood samples for Troponin I assays were drawn immediately before the induction of anesthesia and after the termination of CPB. With no need for centrifugation, whole blood samples were measured with the novel automated Stratus CSTM fluorometric enzyme immunoassay analyzer (DadeBehring) running on site in the OR. Results could be obtained within 15 min.
After surgery, analgesia was continued by intravenous boluses of piritramid (0.10.2 mg/kg), and sedation was maintained with a propofol infusion adapted according to clinical needs until the patients were ready to be extubated. Both a 12-lead electrocardiogram, recorded 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively, and serial arterial blood samples for creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB, collected at the same intervals, and daily thereafter until the 7th postoperative day, served for diagnosis of a recent myocardial infarction.
2.2. Statistical analysis
Quantitative data were expressed as means±standard deviation. For group comparisons, the non-parametric MannWhitney U-test for two independent samples was applied. Relative frequencies are given in percentages and compared with the
2 test or Fisher's Exact test for expected cell counts of less than five. The relationship between cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB time) in minutes and change in troponin level was assessed by means of linear regression analysis. The respective P value indicates the significance of the effect of covariate CPB time. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the optimal cut-off value of the troponin level at the end of CPB in order to predict AO. The Youden-index was applied as an optimality criterion.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relevant risk factors and troponin levels for predicting AO. The following factors were included: age over 70 years, sex, diabetes, severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF, ejection fraction<40%), Cleveland Clinic preoperative severity score, aortic cross-clamp time, CPB time, troponin level at CPB termination, high preoperative serum creatinine level (>1.9 mg%) and the number of grafts performed. Both variable selection procedures (stepwise forward and stepwise backward regressions) yielded the same final model. The variables excluded are as follows: age over 70 years, aortic cross-clamp time, diabetes, Cleveland Clinic score; LV dysfunction; high creatinine level, number of grafts. For the remaining parameters, the logistic regression was performed again. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for odds ratios were calculated in order to indicate precision of the estimates.
All P values are two-sided and subject to a 5% significance level.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1 shows the preoperative Troponin I level and the AO rate resulting from myocardial infarctions and death. The preoperative Troponin I level was 0.04±0.17 ng/l. There were 19 (3.5%) myocardial infarctions and six deaths (1.1%), resulting in 21 patients with an AO (3.9%), classed as group 2. Group 1 contains all other patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Postoperatively, moderate elevation of Troponin I indicates reversible minor myocardial damage occurring in most patients undergoing CABG [6,13]. However, the identification of patients who are at risk of developing postoperative complications based on intraoperative myocardial infarction and heart failure as early as possible is desirable, as it allows for prompt adequate therapeutic interventions (i.e. insertion of the balloon pump, re-exploration of grafts, administration of afterloading drugs) before hemodynamic deterioration occurs. ECG changes are difficult to interpret at this point (bundle branch block, pacing, pericardial inflammation, ventricular hypertrophy) [13]; however, cTnI above a well-defined cut-off value would allow for identification of patients at risk. Serum Troponin T levels higher than 3.4 ng/l 48 h after CABG and serum Troponin I levels higher than 3.9 ng/l 24 h postoperatively were found by Carrier and coworkers to be the most reliable indicators for perioperative myocardial infarction [6]. Recently, by measuring cardiac Troponin T with monoclonal antibodies, they found, 3648 h after CABG, a blood level of Troponin T lower than 0.65 ng/l to indicate the absence of major perioperative myocardial damage, and a level higher than 1 ng/l to correlate with perioperative myocardial infarction. In our patients, early postoperative Troponin I levels averaged at 0.37 ng/l in the non-AO group (no death, no myocardial infarction) as compared with 0.91 ng/l in the AO group. The ROC curve indicates 0.495 ng/l, calculated by the Youden-index, as the optimal cut-off value with a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and an area under the curve of 0.83.
Etievent and coworkers found no positive correlation between aortic cross-clamping time and cTnI level at 6 h after CABG [5], and we did not, even for our patients with AO at the end of CPB. Ante/retrograde cold blood cardioplegia and complete revascularization seems to minimize the extent of myocardial damage caused by aortic clamping, but cannot prevent myocardial infarction and heart failure because of remaining ischemic areas that could not be grafted.
4.1. Limitations of the study
The endpoint of the study is defined as predicting AO including myocardial infarction and death peri/postoperatively by analyzing cTnI release intraoperatively. Postoperative myocardial infarctions and death due to both surgical failures and ICU problems contribute to that, however, by nature. Thus, these events cannot be predicted by intraoperative cTnI levels.
The results presented in this study are calculated on a powerful number of patients with positive outcomes, however, on a limited number with AOs, as severe ischemia and myocardial infarction are rare events after CABG. Notwithstanding, we end up with a sensitivity and specificity of 76% for cTnI levels at the end of CPB in predicting AOs.
In conclusion, cTnI release, as determined at the end of CPB, represents a predictor of an AO after surgery. Analyzing blood samples for cTnI with an automated device on site in the OR provides for immediate results, so that specific therapeutic interventions can be performed before a catastrophe occurs.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr van Ingen: No, we did not take the oxygenation of the patient into account, in our study, and we operated with a moderate level of oxygenation, in other words.
Dr P. Sergeant (Leuven, Belgium): I enjoyed your presentation very much and also the way you approached the problem. In an earlier analysis, when we used the word predictor, we meant in fact preceding the procedure. Are you certain about the word predictor when you said about your measurement that that measurement is a predictor? Is it more a monitor than a predictor? Because the event is there already.
Dr van Ingen: Perhaps one could describe it as an indicator that something has happened, not so much a predictor. So I could change the word to indication. To indicate that something can happen.
Dr O. Alfieri (Milan, Italy): If you have a patient who is well but has changes in troponin, what do you do? Do you change your policy? Do you insert, for instance, an intra-aortic balloon?
Dr van Ingen: Yes. First of all, you have to consider: was I able to revascularize this patient completely? So, for instance, if you used arterial grafts and you are not sure of it and you have this raise in troponin, you can put a venous graft, let's say, for instance, to the LAD. On another level, and we did that, as a matter of fact, you can decide to put in, even though the patient is doing clinically well, an intra-aortic balloon pump.
Dr S. Takamoto (Tokyo, Japan): I would like to ask about the cause of the elevation of troponin. Is that relating to myocardial protection or the procedure itself?
Dr van Ingen: It is an indicator of myocardial damage. It is not related to the aortic clamp time. It is certainly related to the bypass time, as I showed. I can't remember from the literature whether the protection had any influence. In most papers that I read on the subject, they did use retrograde blood cardioplegia, and as I said, it is certainly an indication of ischemia of the myocardium whether related to the protection or not.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Petaja, M. Salmenpera, K. Pulkki, and V. Pettila Biochemical Injury Markers and Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review. Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1981 - 1992.e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Stearns, V. G. Davila-Roman, B. Barzilai, R. E. Thompson, K. L. Grogan, B. Thomas, and C. W. Hogue Jr Prognostic Value of Troponin I Levels for Predicting Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 719 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Capuano, C. Simon, A. Roscitano, G. Sclafani, E. Tonelli, and R. Sinatra Cardiac Troponin I Concentrations During On-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2007; 15(6): 502 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paparella, G. Cappabianca, P. Malvindi, A. Paramythiotis, A. Galeone, N. Veneziani, C. Fondacone, and L. de Luca Tupputi Schinosa Myocardial injury after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting operation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 32(3): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Minkin, D. Cotiga, S. Noack, A. Dobrescu, P. Homel, and J. M. Shapiro Use of Admission Troponin in Critically Ill Medical Patients J Intensive Care Med, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 286 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paparella, G. Cappabianca, G. Visicchio, A. Galeone, A. Marzovillo, N. Gallo, C. Memmola, and L. d. L. T. Schinosa Cardiac Troponin I Release After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Operation: Effects on Operative and Midterm Survival Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1758 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J Murphy, R. Ascione, and G. D Angelini Coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart: surgical revascularization for the next decade? Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2077 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Jarvinen, J. Julkunen, T. Saarinen, J. Laurikka, H. Huhtala, and M. R. Tarkka Perioperative myocardial infarction has negative impact on health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 26(3): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R de Vroege, F te Meerman, L Eijsman, W R Wildevuur, C. R. Wildevuur, and W van Oeveren Induction and detection of disturbed homeostasis in cardiopulmonary bypass Perfusion, September 1, 2004; 19(5): 267 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lehrke, H. Steen, H. H. Sievers, H. Peters, A. Opitz, M. Muller-Bardorff, U. K.H. Wiegand, H. A. Katus, and E. Giannitsis Cardiac Troponin T for Prediction of Short- and Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality after Elective Open Heart Surgery Clin. Chem., September 1, 2004; 50(9): 1560 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nesher, E. Zisman, T. Wolf, R. Sharony, G. Bolotin, M. David, G. Uretzky, and R. Pizov Strict Thermoregulation Attenuates Myocardial Injury During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery as Reflected by Reduced Levels of Cardiac-Specific Troponin I Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 328 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |