EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Naresh Trehan
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meharwal, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meharwal, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:894
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL


Letter to the Editor

Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques – minithoracotomy or sternotomy

Zile Singh Meharwal, Naresh Trehan

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Escorts Heart Institute And Research Centre, New Delhi, India

Received 9 May 2001; accepted 19 June 2001.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +91-11-6825000; fax no.: +91-11-6825013
e-mail: meharwal{at}hotmail.com

Key Words: Minothoracotomy • Ministernotomy • Beating heart

We read with great interest the article by Detter et al. entitled ‘Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques – minithoracotomy or sternotomy’ [1]. The authors have beautifully analysed their results of minithoracotomy and sternotomy. We agree with authors that sternotomy is relatively safer and easier approach as compared to minithoracotomy, though both techniques can achieve good early and midterm results.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) through a small left anterior thoracotomy probably is the commonest approach for LITA-LAD anastomosis and has been associated with good results [2]. We started this approach for single vessel LAD revascularisation in March 1994 and continued till 1998 when we also started using lower partial sternotomy for LIMA-LAD anastomosis. Results of LIMA-LAD anastomosis comparing minithoracotomy and lower partial sternotomy (ministernotomy) were reported from our institute [3]. Between October 1998 and December 1999, 269 patients each were operated using two techniques. Patients in ministernotomy group had less pain than minithoracotomy group from postoperative day 2 onwards. Requirement of pain medication was significantly less in ministernotomy group. Length of harvested IMA was significantly more in ministernotomy group and free flow of IMA also was more in ministrenotomy group. Patency of IMA at mean interval of 10±1.5 months was comparable in two groups.

In our opinion, ministernotomy is superior to full sternotomy for single vessel revascularisation. This technique has the advantage of smaller incision which is cosmetically better and it maintains the sternal stability because sternotomy is required only upto 4th intercostal space. The whole length of the IMA can be harvested under direct vision with the help of the long-tip electrocautry. The ministernotomy can be easily and quickly converted to full sternotomy, if required. Using this technique multiple coronary bypass grafts can also be performed [4].

References

  1. Detter C., Reichenspurner H., Boehm D.H., Thalhammer M., Schutz A., Reichart B. Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques – minithoracotomy or sternotomy?. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 2001;19:464-470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Calafiore A.M., Di Giammarco G., Teodori G., Gallina S., Maddestra N., Paloscia L., Scipioni G., Iovino T., Marco Contini M., Vitolla G. Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary surgery (LAST operation). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:763-771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Trehan N., Malhotra R., Mishra Y., Shrivastava S., Kohli V., Mehta Y. Comparison of ministernotomy with minithoracotomy regarding postoperative pain and internal mammary artery characteristics. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3(4):300-306.[Medline]
  4. Hiroshi N., Takeuchi Y., Suda Y., Ross D.E. Lower sternal splitting approach for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1431-1433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Naresh Trehan
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meharwal, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meharwal, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Trehan, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS