|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1122-1127
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
anb
çia
a Yedikule Hospital for Chest Disease and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zeytinburnu, Istanbul, Turkey
b Florence Nightingale Hospital, Ça
layan, Istanbul, Turkey
Received 14 June 2001; received in revised form 6 September 2001; accepted 25 September 2001.
Corresponding author. Cami Sok, Muminderesi Yolu, Emintas Camlik Sit. No:32/22, Sahrayicedid, Kadikoy, Istanbul 81080, Turkey. Tel.: +90-216-411-3675; fax: +90-216-411-6651
e-mail: aturna{at}turk.net
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Thoracic surgery Bleeding Aprotinin High transfusion risk surgery Blood saving
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2.3. Blood transfusion protocol
During the operations the patients were routinely given 1000 ml/h lactated Ringer's solution. The indications for perioperative whole blood or packed erythrocyte suspension were the presence of excessive active bleeding (>200 ml/h) or unpreventable systolic blood pressure decrease despite of Ringer's solution infusion below 90 mmHg. No autotransfusion was done during or after the operations.
2.4. Postoperative care
In our institution during the postoperative period, pethidine chloride, a synthetic morphine analogue, was used as narcotic analgesic via subcutaneous or intramuscular route at a dose of 30 mg for each administration when the patient noticed a strong pain despite the routinely administered non-steroid analgesic agent (metamisole). Metamisole was administered twice for the first postoperative 12 h intravenously at a dose of 200 mg and was given 2 g orally per day until the day upon which the last chest tube was removed. Blood loss from the chest tubes was recorded daily from the time the patient arrived in the ICU.
2.5. Drainage calculation
Due to the non-hemorrhagic serous component of thoracic drainage, amount of tube drainage itself was not thought to be appropriate for the evaluation of blood loss from thoracic cavity. Therefore, every morning, red-cell percentages of shaken and homogenized fluid from drainage bottles were recorded and using the blood hematocrit level of the patient of the day before, the corrected value for the patient's blood volume equivalent of daily drainage was calculated and recorded. Postoperatively, patients with hematocrit levels less than 30% were transfused until the hematocrit level rose above 30%.
The study has been approved and certified to be appropriate by the ethical committee of the hospital.
2.6. Statistical analysis
Data are reported as mean±standard error of mean (SEM) or as a number (percentage). SPSS software for Power Macintosh computers was used on a personal Apple computer for statistics. The Student's t-test was used as test for statistical significance of normally distributed values. A MannWhitney U rank sum test or chi-square test (number of operations, sex comparison) were used for non-parametric values. If the P-value was less than 0.05, the result was considered to be significant.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean number of given units of blood product during operations was 0.98±0.13 unit in the control group and only 0.45±0.08 unit in the aprotinin group (P=0.0026; Fig. 1) . However, during the postoperative course, aprotinin did not reduce the number of blood transfusions in a statistically significant manner (means were 0.18±0.06 unit in the control group and 0.12±0.016 unit in the aprotinin group; P=0.32; Fig. 1). We found that the blood volume equivalent of total chest tube drainage (as described in Section 2) was 28.2±5.2 ml in the aprotinin group compared with 76.9±7.4 ml in control group (Fig. 2 ; P=0.0004).
|
|
Thirty patients out of 103 underwent more blood-demanding procedures such as decortication (n=13), chest wall resection due to tumor invasion (n=6), pneumonectomy for pleuropulmonary infection (n=6), and lobectomy for pleuropulmonary infection (n=5). In those patients, 16 had been randomized to the aprotinin group and another 14 to the control group. There was no difference between the aprotinin and control groups with respect to clinical characteristics. In those 30 patients, the effect of aprotinin in perioperative, postoperative blood transfusion and postoperative blood loss were found to be more prominent between the aprotinin and the placebo group (Table 2; P=0.007, P<0.01, P<0.005). Additionally, the mean hospital stay decreased from 9.4±1.2 to 6.5±0.8 days in the aprotinin group (P=0.002). ICU stay of the aprotinin group was reduced compared with that of the control group (from 4.4±0.4 to 2.1±0.5 days; P=0.007). There also appeared to be a significant difference, favoring aprotinin, in the duration of chest tube drainage, 2.6±1.1 vs. 1.4±0.3 days (P=0.009).
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, is a polypeptide consisting of 58 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 6512 Da, whose method of action remains elusive [5]. It preserves fibrinogen levels [13], prevents the platelet adhesive receptor (GPIb) from degradation and reduces thromboxane A2 release [5]. It has been also reported that aprotinin shows its protective effect via preserving GP IIbIIIa receptor function [14,15]. It could possibly decrease expression of fibrinogen binding [16]. Aprotinin has been used extensively in patients undergoing cardiac operations in an effort to minimize perioperative blood loss and prevent the potential complications associated with blood transfusions and re-operations for the control of bleeding [6,8,11,14]. Also it has been shown that aprotinin reduced the need for blood products during liver transplantation [8], neurosurgery [9], urological surgery [10], and diminished the bleeding of patients with pulmonary aspergillosis and leukemia [11].
We evaluated the effect of aprotinin in patients undergoing major thoracic surgery operations that are associated with a considerable risk of bleeding. As seen in the study, aprotinin significantly reduced the postoperative bleeding as measured by means of blood volume equivalent of total thoracic drainage. Aprotinin also caused a significant reduction in perioperative blood transfusion. Although aprotinin seemed to recover the postoperative decrease in the hematocrit level, the difference was not found to be statistically significant. Since patients with intraoperative accidental venous or arterial hemorrhage were excluded from the study, the effect of aprotinin was thought to be directed to oozing-type hemorrhage during or after the operations.
For perioperative blood loss, the difference of the mean 1.44 units seen in high-transfusion-risk thoracic surgery patients is more clinically relevant than the 0.58 unit recorded in all patients of our study.
It was reported that platelet dysfunction is considered to be the most frequent cause of blood loss after cardiothoracic surgery [17]. Although the mechanism of the reported beneficial effect of aprotinin has not been investigated in non-cardiac thoracic surgery, it appears that a platelet-protective effect during thoracic surgery may play a role. It was also published that aprotinin preserved the functional receptor GPIIbIIIA, which is mainly responsible for platelet aggregation [5,11,15].
We also demonstrated that patients potentially susceptible to hemorrhage during and after thoracic operations such as decortication for empyema thoracic with or without tuberculosis, thoracic wall resection due to tumor invasion to thoracic wall, and pneumonectomy for inflammatory pulmonary diseases mostly benefited from aprotinin administration. Having known that operations in those patients may lead to intraoperative oozing-type bleeding probably due to dense adhesions between lung and thoracic wall [18], saving the platelet function using the effect of aprotinin might have a preventive role in such patients.
We have also demonstrated that aprotinin slightly reduced the patient's additional need for narcotic analgesia during the first 35 days after operation, but this reduction was not found to be statistically significant. Although the value of that finding is limited since we did not measure the pain intensity of the patients by means of any standardized pain scoring method, there is a theoretical possibility of an analgesic effect of aprotinin since aprotinin as a non-specific serine antiprotease blocks the kallikrein-to-kinin conversion [5] and kinins are among the most important pain-inducing substances produced in various tissues. It was also shown that aprotinin reduces nitric oxide production, which may indicate an inflammation- and pain-modifying effect through a different mechanism of action [19]. However, although the possible effect of aprotinin on narcotic usage was considered in this study, its use as an analgesic agent could not be justified. The possible effect is only of importance in order to give insight for investigating the modus operandi of pain-generating mechanisms. A study with larger series might clarify this analgesic effect. We demonstrated no difference in the monitoring period of patients in the ICU, suggesting that aprotinin had no benefit on overall hemodynamic and oxygenation status of patients, which were decisive factors for patients stay at the ICU (data not shown). It must be emphasized that a shortened stay at the ICU has yet to be attributed to the effect of aprotinin administration.
However, an analysis of 30 patients who have high risk for bleeding and who underwent decortication, chest wall resection due to tumor invasion, pneumonectomy for pleuropulmonary infection, and lobectomy for pleuropulmonary infection showed that the blood-saving effect of aprotinin during and after thoracic operation was found to be more prominent and statistically significant (Table 2). Postoperative blood loss decreased to one third that of the control patients (Table 2). This effect appears to be consistent with the platelet-preserving effect of aprotinin which seems to be the result of preservation of efficient blood plugs. The importance of blood plugs is the prevention of oozing-type bleeding from the multiple hemorrhagic sites formed by parietal pleural or thoracic-wall injury.
The adverse effects of aprotinin have been well documented and reported to be almost limited to allergic reactions in less than 0.1% [5]. We observed no allergic reaction in patients, probably due to the fact that no patient had been given aprotinin before. We observed no other considerable side effect of aprotinin in this study.
Recently, Kyriss et al. reported the blood-saving effect of aprotinin in thoracic surgery interventions associated with an increased risk of bleeding due to inflammatory conditions which were similarly seen in our patients [20]. In that study, a different dose of aprotinin (2x106 KIU) and an infusion (5x105 KIU/h) were used. In our study, we showed the efficacy of aprotinin in intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, and ICU and hospital stay in general elective surgery patients not only with inflammatory, but also with non-inflammatory conditions. By using blood-equivalent of chest-tube drainage as a parameter. we additionally documented the real hemorrhage-diminishing effect of aprotinin.
In our trial, we were unable to measure the local (thoracic cavity) or generalized effects of aprotinin such as the reduction of D-dimer production, thrombinantithrombin complex, and the promotion of fibrin formation which might be speculated to play some role in reducing the blood loss during thoracic surgery.
In summary, aprotinin reduces perioperative blood loss and the need for blood products during major thoracic surgery operations. Although a routine use of aprotinin in all thoracic operations is yet to be justified, patients who are at risk of greater blood loss during and after certain procedures have a greater potential to benefit from prophylactic aprotinin treatment. Further studies to clarify the effect and unveil the mechanism of its action are warranted.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Bakaeen, D. Rice, A. M. Correa, G. L. Walsh, A. A. Vaporciyan, J. B. Putnam, S. G. Swisher, J. A. Roth, J. Huh, D. Chu, et al. Use of Aprotinin in Extrapleural Pneumonectomy: Effect on Hemostasis and Incidence of Complications Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 982 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Poston, C. White, J. Gu, J. Brown, J. Gammie, R. N. Pierson, A. Lee, I. Connerney, T. Avari, R. Christenson, et al. Aprotinin Shows Both Hemostatic and Antithrombotic Effects During Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 104 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Mahdy and N. R. Webster Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 842 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Johi, R. Mills, P. J. Halsall, and P. M. Hopkins Anaesthetic management of coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with central core disease and susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia on statin therapy Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 744 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Englberger, P. Markart, F.S. Eckstein, F.F. Immer, P.A. Berdat, and T.P. Carrel Aprotinin reduces blood loss in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 22(4): 545 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |