|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1152-1156
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK
Received 13 March 2001; received in revised form 19 July 2001; accepted 22 August 2001.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-1895-828-550; fax: +44-1895-828-992
e-mail: mr.amrani{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Off-pump coronary artery bypass Elderly
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of studies investigated in detail the relative significance of operative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing CABG and attributed this to the use of CPB in addition to the preoperative risk factors associated with advanced age [2,6]. They also studied the degree of functional recovery and quality of life postoperatively to conclude that surgical revascularisation is a justified and a cost-effective approach to achieve, or at least maintain, a reasonable and meaningful quality of life for elderly patients. This is in spite of the fact that considerable health-care resources are being expended on the growing minority of elderly patients.
Recent studies have indicated the advantages of operating using the off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) particularly in the elderly patients. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to assess whether OPCAB has actually improved the postoperative outcome compared to conventional CABG in the elderly patients.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups with respect to any of the preoperative variables as listed in (Table 1). Renal problems included: renal impairment (creatinine
200 µmol/l), previous acute or chronic renal failure and renal transplants. Cerebro-vascular problems included: transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) and cerbro-vascular accidents (CVA). Peripheral vascular disease included: acute and chronic ischaemia of the upper and lower limbs and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Inotropes, nitrates and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) indicate whether they were used before surgery.
|
2.2.1. OPCAB
Anticoagulation was achieved using 150 U/kg of heparin. The activated clotting time was maintained above 250 s. Heparin was reversed by protamine at the end of the procedure. The operation was performed through median sternotomy using Octopus 3® (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Blood pressure was optimised during the procedure by means of repositioning the heart and selective use of vasoconstrictors. Other measures to improve cardiac output such as elevation of feet and increasing the heart rate were used as appropriate. A standby perfusionist with bypass circuit primed was available for all cases.
2.2.2. CPB
Anticoagulation was achieved using 250 U/kg of heparin. The activated clotting time was maintained above 480 s. Heparin was reversed by protamine at the end of the procedure. The operation was performed through median sternotomy. CPB was instituted with a single right atrial cannula and an ascending aorta perfusion cannula. Standard bypass management included membrane oxygenators, arterial line filters, non-pulsatile flow of 2.4 l/min/m2, with a mean arterial blood pressure greater than 50 mmHg. Myocardial protection was achieved with intermittent cold blood cardioplegia (4:1 blood to crystalloid ratio).
2.3. Statistical analysis
Non-parametric MannWhitney test was used whenever the data did not appear to have normal distributions. Numerical variables are presented as mean±standard deviation for CPB and the OPCAB patients. A P-value of less than 0.05 indicates a significant difference.
For ordinal variables, we calculated the frequencies of each value (and percentages of each value) for each group. The P-value (based on a MannWhitney test) indicates whether the distribution of values is the same for the two groups; small values of P <0.05 indicate significant difference.
For binary variables, we studied the sample sizes for each group, along with the numbers of patients possessing the characteristic. The P-value (based on a Fisher Exact Test) indicates whether the percentages are the same for the two groups; small values of P <0.05 indicate significant difference.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.2. Postoperative morbidity
Postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) was decided to be present when one of the following was observed: (1) new Q waves in the electrocardiogram (ECG); (2) creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB)>50 with ECG changes or (3) CK-MB>70 without ECG changes. Low cardiac output (LCO) was said to be present when the systolic arterial blood pressure was persistently <90 mmHg; or the mean arterial blood pressure was persistently below <50 mmHg despite appropriate fluid management and requiring inotropic or vasoconstrictor therapy. Atrial fibrillation was identified by cardiac monitoring and confirmed by 12-lead ECG.
We defined the term serious complications to include: pulmonary oedema or adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septicaemia, permanent stroke and renal dysfunction requiring haemofiltration or haemodialysis. Only one (2%) OPCAB patient had pulmonary oedema, while 11 (13%) CPB patients (P=0.028) developed serious complications. Six (55%) out of these 11 CPB patients developed more than one serious complication at the same time. Five (6%) had pulmonary oedema or ARDS, four (5%) had permanent stroke, two (2%) had septicaemia and six (7%) had renal dysfunction requiring haemofiltration or haemodialysis. Postoperative insertion of IABP was also significantly higher in the on-pump group. Only one (2%) OPCAB patient required IABP while ten (12%) CPB patients (P=0.05) did so.
Nine (11%) CPB patients were re-operated on for bleeding while no OPCAB patients (0%) were re-operated on, P=0.011. This is showing a significantly higher incidence of bleeding requiring re-operation in the CPB patients.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to other complications, although the incidence was always higher in the CPB patients as evident from the information presented in Table 2.
|
3.3. Postoperative mortality
We defined the 30-day mortality as death within the 30 days following the operation. There was no death in the OPCAB patients compared to ten (11%) deaths in the CPB patients (P=0.0066) within 30 days. Out of the ten deaths, three patients (30%) died within 6 h after operation. Therefore, we did not include them in the analysis of some postoperative complications because of the early incidence of death following surgery. The ten deaths included: two (20%) died due to multi-organ failure, two (20%) died due to permanent stroke and six (60%) died due to cardiac reasons including peri-operative MI or pulmonary oedema.
The patients were operated on by three surgeons with different techniques and preferences, all patients who died had preoperative ejection fraction<30%. Five (50%) of them underwent emergency CABG and four out of these five patients had MI within 4 weeks prior to surgery, had IABP inserted preoperatively and were on intravenous nitrates (vasodilator therapy).
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The elderly are a challenging group of patients increasingly presenting to cardiac surgeons. These patients have diminished functional reserves and are more likely to have preoperative co-morbid conditions. Although the advances in CPB, myocardial protection and critical care have improved the outcome in this group; morbidity and mortality rates stayed significantly higher than that of younger age groups [2]. This leads to considering other alternatives to surgical revascularisation for these patients, with the chance of presenting late for surgical treatment. Achieving or maintaining an acceptable quality of life for this group of patients without burdening the health system with regard to the cost of their surgical treatment and then the management of their postoperative problems, has been a challenge.
It has been shown that bypass pump time is an independent predictor of hospital mortality in patients aged 70 years or older, in addition to age and preoperative angina status [2]. Furthermore, it has also been shown that following a rapid recovery protocol for CABG patients aged 80 years and older, emphasising reduced CPB time in addition to other things; could achieve excellent results in terms of postoperative morbidity, mortality and ITU and hospital stays [6]. Therefore, it has been concluded that operative strategies concerning elderly patients should be centred on minimal CPB time, as this group of patients are at extreme risk to the hazards associated with prolonged CPB.
Beating heart surgery is becoming more widely adopted and continues to be explored as an alternative to conventional CABG surgery in many cardiac units worldwide [7,8]. It has recently been shown that beating heart surgery is associated with a significant reduction in the cost of treatment in high-risk and elderly patients [9].
Our data suggest that elderly patients can undergo safe surgical myocardial revascularisation by OPCAB technique that is associated with a significantly lower postoperative morbidity and mortality than conventional CABG using CPB. The apparently high mortality (11%) in the control group could be explained by the fact that they were high-risk patients as reflected by the high Parsonnet score. Interestingly, the OPCAB group had a similar risk score but with significantly lower mortality, which may suggest some benefit of the OPCAB technique. Furthermore, our mortality rate in this high-risk group of patients compares favourably to other series (Edmunds et al. 24% [10], Houser et al. 15.2% [11], Mullany et al. 10.7% [3], Gersh et al. 13.8% [12,13], Talwalkar et al. 8% [14] and Horneffer et al. 9.3% [2]).
There are few limitations in our study. Firstly, the patients have been operated on by different surgeons with different techniques and preferences and the choice of the surgical technique was completely the judgement of the individual surgeon. Therefore, there might be a hidden selection bias not seen in the variables analysed. Secondly, two out of the three surgeons used the CPB for the high-risk emergency and salvage cases, and this has probably caused the high mortality in that group.
Although, our retrospective analysis has shown important differences in the outcome between both the techniques in elderly patients, we believe that a prospective randomised clinical trial would strengthen the findings of this present study.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S S Panesar, T Athanasiou, S Nair, C Rao, C Jones, M Nicolaou, and A Darzi Early outcomes in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 4921 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting--comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1808 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Ferreira-Gonzalez, A. Ribera, P. Cascant, G. Permanyer-Miralda, and for the ARCA study group Outcomes in off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting stratified by pre-operative risk profile: an assessment using propensity score Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2473 - 2480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mishra, R. Malhotra, A. Karlekar, Y. Mishra, and N. Trehan Propensity Case-Matched Analysis of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Atheromatous Aorta Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 608 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Ruzzeh, S. George, M. Bustami, J. Wray, C. Ilsley, T. Athanasiou, and M. Amrani Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial BMJ, June 10, 2006; 332(7554): 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weissman Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Shinn, Y. J. Oh, S. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, C. S. Lee, and Y. L. Kwak Evaluation of serial haemodynamic changes during coronary artery anastomoses in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: initial experiences using two deep pericardial stay sutures and octopus tissue stabilizer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 978 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Athanasiou, O. Aziz, O. Mangoush, A. Weerasinghe, S. Al-Ruzzeh, S. Purkayastha, J. Pepper, M. Amrani, B. Glenville, and R. Casula Do off-pump techniques reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1567 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Reuthebuch, A. Kadner, M. Lachat, A. Kunzli, U. P. Schurr, and M. I. Turina Early bypass occlusion after deployment of Nitinol connector devices J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1421 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Stallwood, A. D. Grayson, K. Mills, and N. D. Scawn Acute renal failure in coronary artery bypass surgery: independent effect of cardiopulmonary bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 968 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-G. Chassot, P. van der Linden, M. Zaugg, X. M. Mueller, and D. R. Spahn Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 400 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Athanasiou, S. Al-Ruzzeh, P. Kumar, M.-C. Crossman, M. Amrani, J. R. Pepper, R. Del Stanbridge, R. Casula, and B. Glenville Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 745 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sharony, E. A. Grossi, P. C. Saunders, A. C. Galloway, R. Applebaum, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, M. Kanchuger, I. Kronzon, and S. B. Colvin Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 406 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Ruzzeh, T. Athanasiou, S. George, and M. Amrani Methodological approach in adopting off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a British cardiothoracic unit: Harefield experience Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S61 - S66. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Oo, A. D. Grayson, N. C. Patel, D. M. Pullan, W. C. Dihmis, and B. M. Fabri Is off-pump coronary surgery justified in EuroSCORE high-risk cases? A propensity score analysis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 660 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Ngaage Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the myth, the logic and the science Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 557 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A Archbold and N P Curzen Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1134 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sharony, C. S. Bizekis, M. Kanchuger, A. C. Galloway, P. C. Saunders, R. Applebaum, C. F. Schwartz, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, F. G. Baumann, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reduces Mortality and Stroke in Patients With Atheromatous Aortas: A Case Control Study Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-15 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Chong, C. R. Hampton, and E. D. Verrier Microvascular Inflammatory Response in Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 333 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Athanasiou, S. Al-Ruzzeh, R. D. Stanbridge, R. P. Casula, B. E. Glenville, and M. Amrani Is the female gender an independent predictor of adverse outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1153 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Reuthebuch, M. Lachat, A. Kadner, and M. Turina Early bypass occlusion in patients with the St Jude Medical Symmetry connector J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2003; 125(2): 443 - 444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Ruzzeh, K. Nakamura, T. Athanasiou, T. Modine, S. George, M. Yacoub, C. Ilsley, and M. Amrani Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 50 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Hoff, S. K. Ball, W. H. Coltharp, D. M. Glassford Jr, J. W. Lea IV, and M. R. Petracek Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1340 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |