|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1199-1201
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
Received 22 May 2001; accepted 31 August 2001.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-7050-609-664; fax: +44-870-126-9996
e-mail: wongch{at}postmaster.co.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Left heart bypass Coarctation Paraplegia
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, it is imperative that everything is done to protect the spinal cord during surgery in this group, but there is no consensus on the optimal technique.
An ischaemic insult to the spinal cord arises with the placement of an aortic cross-clamp. Shunts [4], cardiopulmonary bypass [5] and profound hypothermia with circulatory arrest [6] may reduce the impact. However, the avoidance of any ischaemic insult is essential to eliminate the possibility of paraplegia.
We have use left heart bypass (LHB) to maintain spinal cord perfusion during repair to provide additional protection.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The coarctation repair was performed in all patients through a fourth-space thoracotomy in the left lateral position. In all cases, the distal aortic pressure dropped to below 20 mmHg upon the temporary application of an aortic cross-clamp.
LHB was instituted after full heparinization using a centrifugal pump without a reservoir and minimal lengths of tubing. The left pulmonary vein was cannulated for venous drainage and the left atrial pressure was monitored though the atrial appendage [7]. Blood was returned to the descending aorta distal to the coarctation. The circuit was filled retrogradely with blood from the patient in adults, whilst in children, the circuit was primed with blood.
The core temperature was allowed to drift to a mean of 32.2°C (range, 3134°C) for additional spinal cord protection.
Femoral blood and left atrial pressures were maintained about a mean of 55 and 79 mmHg, respectively during LHB by manipulation of the pump-flows, the use of volume replacement, and vasodilators and vasoconstrictors. Blood was collected separately and returned to the patient with a syringe driver.
An inter-positional gelatine-impregnated Dacron conduit was used in five cases (55.6%), a Gore-Tex patch in two (22.2%), and in the remaining two cases (22.2%), an end-to-end anastomosis was performed.
The mean cross-clamp and bypass times were 36.4 (range, 1965 min) and 40.3 min (range, 2270 min), respectively.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Paraplegia occurs due to an ischaemic insult to the spinal cord arising from the application of a cross-clamp to the descending aorta. In studies of adult descending thoracic aortic surgery, the most important aetiological factor is the cross-clamp time. Although there is no additional risk for cross-clamp times less than 20 min, the risk is not eliminated entirely.
The risk of paraplegia can only be eradicated if there is no interruption of spinal blood flow. This is impossible to achieve, but it may be approximated with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and shunts.
Bypass allows active cooling, but profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest are needed to effect repair [6]. This has not been seen to produce a superior outcome and has obvious drawbacks.
The passive Gott-shunt has the attraction of being quick and simple to implement. However, maintenance of upper and lower body perfusion pressures is difficult. However, this can be achieved with LHB using simple manipulations, yet allowing passive cooling.
In adult thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, the use of LHB has been reported to improve the outcome [8]. However, it would be extremely difficult to prove that LHB reduces the incidence of paraplegia or renal dysfunction following coarctation repair without a large multi-centre trial. Therefore, in the absence of contrary evidence, it is logical to attempt to minimize disturbance to the spinal cord circulation, which is the cause of paraplegia.
We have shown that LHB can be carried out quickly, simply and safely. It maintains spinal cord perfusion during coarctation surgery and minimizes any ischaemic insult. Repair of the coarctation can then proceed properly, allowing an accurate repair without time pressure. We would recommend its use to increase the safety margin in the high-risk population.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. G. Levy Praschker, P. Mordant, E. Barreda, I. Gandjbakhch, and A. Pavie Long-term results of ascending aorta-abdominal aorta extra-anatomic bypass for recoarctation in adults with 27-year follow-up Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 805 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Backer, R. D. Stewart, A. M. Kelle, and C. Mavroudis Use of partial cardiopulmonary bypass for coarctation repair through a left thoracotomy in children without collaterals. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 964 - 972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |