EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, S. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1277
© 2001 Elsevier Science NL


Letter to the Editor

Reply to Urbanski

John G. Byrne, Tomislav Mihaljevic, Sary F. Aranki

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Received 10 September 2001; accepted 11 September 2001.

Tel.: +1-617-732-7678; fax: +1-617-878-0848
e-mail: jbyrne{at}partners.org

We appreciate the letter by Dr Urbanski clarifying some of the technical details of his operation [1]. Fig. 1 in his letter is particularly helpful in understanding how the 3-mm rim is used in an everting fashion. Regarding kinking of the dacron tube graft, we have not yet experienced this complication and it should be easily avoided by measuring the graft appropriately at the time of operation. Regarding reoperation, we believe our technique may facilitate easier reoperation, should that become necessary, because only the suture line between the Freestyle valve and the tube graft needs to be taken down and a new prosthesis placed into the ‘neo annulus’ of the Freestyle valve. This has been documented to be feasible and safe [2,3]. We believe reoperation using Urbanski's technique may be more cumbersome with the potential need to re-replace the entire conduit. However, both his and our operation seem most appropriate for the elderly and the need for reoperation should be rare using either technique. We do believe however that our technique is perhaps simpler, more reproducible and adds only one additional step (Freestyle-tube graft anastomosis) compared to the classic mechanical valved conduit.

References

  1. Urbanski P.P., Hacker R.W. Replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with a valved stentless composite graft: technical considerations and early clinical results. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:17-20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Byrne J.G., Karavas A.N., Akiog L., Adams D.H., Cheung A., Cohn L.H., Aranki S.F. Aortic valve reoperation after homograft or autograft replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:451-457.[Medline]
  3. Sundt R., III TM, asmi N., Wong K., Radley-Smith R., Khaghani A., Yacoub M.H. Reoperative aortic valve operation after homograft root replacement: surgical options and results. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(S95-99):S100.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, S. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS