|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:302-306
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Carlo Forlanini Hospital, Via Portuense 332, 00149, Rome, Italy
Received 13 September 2001; received in revised form 22 November 2001; accepted 27 November 2001.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-06-55180680; fax: +39-06-6638734
e-mail: gcardillo{at}scamilloforlanini.rm.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Video-assisted thoracic surgery Pleural effusion Recurrent pleural effusion Pleurodesis Treatment
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The evidence of a pleural effusion require early evacuation of the fluid in order to relief symptoms, such as dyspnea, othopnea, and cough, and to allow for re-expansion of the lung; furthermore diagnosis should be obtained as soon as possible. Treatment options include needle thoracocentesis or tube thoracostomy. Recurrent or persistent pleural effusions in oncologic patients represent a challenge for treatment and need for a reliable, safe and definitive treatment. Videothoracoscopy (VATS) represents the gold standard for recurrent pleural effusions either for obtaining a diagnosis or for palliation of the effusion. The aim of this report is to evaluate the results and the long-term follow-up of 611 patients treated by videothoracoscopic talc poudrage for malignant recurrent pleural effusions.
| 2. Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the 611 patients, 491 (80.3%) had an history of previous malignancy. Forty-two patients developed pleural effusion following surgical treatment of lung neoplasm.
All patients underwent preoperative bronchoscopy to exclude endobronchial obstruction, and chest CT scan. In 97.8% (598 out of 611) of the patients one or two preoperative needle thoracocentesis (with a mean of 1250 ml of evacuated pleural fluid) were performed in order to evaluate the possibilities of the lung to re-expand following evacuation of the pleural cavity and to obtain diagnosis. In 82% of the patients (501 out of 611) three or four thoracocentesis were performed. VATS was performed in all patients under general anaesthesia. A 10.5-mm camera port and one or two 5.5-mm instrumentation ports were inserted. The pleural effusion was carefully aspirated; fibrinous adhesions were taken down while fibrous adhesions were divided with diathermy coagulation. A thorough assessment of the pleura and lung surface was made, and multiple (at least 67 samples) biopsies were taken from appropriate areas. The degree of lung expansion was ascertained with sustained positive pressure ventilation (25 cm of H20). If lung expansion was not adequate to fill the hemithorax (trapped lung syndrome), a decortication was undertaken by removing the visceral cortex from the underlying lung by combined blunt dissection and traction from forceps in the same way as in open surgery [2]. Pleurodesis was performed with 5 g of sterile purified talc powder insufflated through a talc atomizer under direct vision. At the end of the procedure one (occasionally two) the chest tube was left in situ. The drain was removed when the volume collected remained under 200 ml for at least 48 h, usually 35 days.
Before being discharged from the hospital the patients were interviewed and a chest roentgenogram was obtained. Outpatients were followed-up by clinical interviews and chest X-ray after 1, 3, and 6 months, and every 8 months. Follow-up ended 1 September 2001. The effectiveness of talc pleurodesis was ascertained on relief of symptoms, and recurrence of pleural effusion by roentgenogram. A satisfactory result was defined as the improvement of symptoms with no detectable fluid on chest X-ray or evidence of residual fluid only in the costophrenic angle. In case of no-symptomatic improvement or recurrence of pleural fluid, the result was judged unsatisfactory.
| 3. Statistical analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 4. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| 5. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In patients with trapped lung syndrome, thoracoscopic decortication represents the procedure of choice to achieve long-term pleurodesis with a statistically significant difference compared to talc poudrage only (P<0.0001). Pleuroperitoneal shunts have been claimed by some authors [9] for trapped lung syndrome but we do not have any experience with such devices.
Adjuvant postoperative treatment (chemo/hormono and/or radiotherapy) does not statistically modify the success rate of talc poudrage in our experience.
The analysis of our 44 failed VATS talc poudrage pointed out that in at least 14 (31.8%) of these, the operating surgeon judged the lung to be trapped; of these only one patient belonged (2.27%) to the group of thoracoscopic decortications while the remaining 13 patients with trapped lung syndrome did not undergo thoracoscopic decortication because of a poor performance status. Two patients who showed a late recurrence of pleural effusion with a free lung underwent a redo-VATS talc poudrage. We believe that in case of early recurrence of effusion there is no rationale for a successful redo-pleurodesis. Only patients who show late recurrence (at least one year in our series) and good performance status, may probably benefit from a redo-treatment. Alternatives for patients with early recurrence include chest tube or pleuroperitoneal shunt insertions.
In conclusion, videothoracoscopic talc poudrage represents a safe and reliable method to obtain pleurodesis in patients with malignant recurrent pleural effusion non-responding to corticosteroid therapy and or to chemotherapy, or in cases in which the diagnosis has not been ascertained The long-term results show a very high successful rate (92.7%). A more effective pleurodesis is likely if videothoracoscopic talc poudrage is performed early after the diagnosis and the lung is free to re-expand. At least one needle thoracocentesis is recommended before surgery in order to evaluate the compliance of the lung. Adjuvant therapy does not improve the success rate of talc poudrage. In trapped lung syndrome the failure rate of talc poudrage alone is very high so that a thoracoscopic decortication should be added. An alternative procedure is represented by the insertion of a pleuroperitoneal shunt [9]. Regarding the side effects of talc poudrage, no increased risk of malignant pleural mesothelioma, no significant deterioration of lung function, and no significant evidence of ARDS has been reported in controlled clinical trials and in our series [1014].
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Present address: Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, University of Rome, La Sapienza. ![]()
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Talc pleurodesis has been shown to be highly effective from your results and from the published literature. Therefore I do not understand why you have to give additional postoperative radiation to your patients.
We reported a few years ago a randomized, prospective study comparing talc slurry with VATS talc insufflation for patients with malignant pleural effusion (Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:166558) and found no differences between groups. We therefore advocate talc slurry for these patients who do not have trapped lungs. Not every patient needs to have surgery, and VATS although generally safe, is certainly not free from complications.
Dr Cardillo: Regarding the question, we use radiotherapy only in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, because we and others have seen the diffusion of the tumour along the trocar, at the point in which the ports are inserted. So the only reason to give local radiotherapy in patients with mesothelioma is to avoid local dissemination of the tumour.
Regarding talc slurry, I know that some institutions prefer talc slurry instead of talc poudrage. Our experience, and we think in this approach, is a little bit different, but, of course, the issue is open.
Dr H. Hauck (Vienna, Austria): Two questions. The first, do you have experience in this procedure on both sides, and the second question, what do you do if the lung did not expand fully?
Dr Cardillo: We have seen patients with effusion in both sides and in some cases we have treated it simultaneously, but it depends on the patient's condition. Sometimes we do a staged procedure, sometimes we do a one-stage procedure.
As to the second question, as I showed in one of my slides, a thoracoscopic decortication should be added to the procedure, otherwise, the talc poudrage is ineffective. An alternative is represented by the pleuroperitoneal shunt, but we have never used it.
Dr D. Blyth (Durban, South Africa): What I would like to ask you about is your management of tuberculosis. Certainly we would see so very much more pleuropulmonary tuberculosis, in other words, a lot of lung destruction. Did you see this with your cases, did you follow them up with CT scan, say, later on to determine extent of damage, or was that your definitive treatment, or did you have to go on to surgery at a later stage and did the pleurodesis then complicate your surgery?
Dr Cardillo: We have seen some patients with tuberculosis, as I showed in my slides, but usually before doing the operation we do a CT scan to ascertain the condition of the lung, and in patients with a destroyed lung, as you asked me, I think talc poudrage is ineffective. We have to choose the type of surgery very, very carefully in these patients, and then to decide the operation with the pulmonologist. So it is a big problem. You cannot solve this problem with just talc poudrage.
Mr A. Mearns (Bradford, UK): Two questions. One a question, the other a comment. The first one is the talc varies throughout the world and it depends which pit they are taking it out of in your country. Some of it causes patients to have very serious reactions. What is your pharmacist doing to the talc before you get in theatres so that all the pyrogens have gone, because it can be very pyrogenic?
But number two, I would like to challenge the concept that you treat mesothelioma effusions with talc. Mesothelioma effusions accumulate very slowly when they are drained and very few of the patients feed a second drainage. The tragedy of mesothelioma is the effusion space is very quickly obliterated by the progress of the tumour, and you don't need a bulk of talc in smothering a tumour space that is about to be obliterated by the progression of the disease, because this is not a cure, and very few patients actually need a talc poudrage. You need a diagnosis, I agree, and that you pick themselves out by having a significant respiratory problem with a second or third accumulation of fluid. Far too much talc is going on unnecessarily in the patient with mesothelioma because doctors feel they must do something. Don't do it.
Dr Cardillo: Regarding the need of talc poudrage in mesothelioma, personally we disagree with you. We have treated 54 patients with mesothelioma, and this is a huge number. The great majority of these patients were treated because there was no diagnosis. In patients with mesothelioma it is very difficult to ascertain the diagnosis only with a cytological examination. Usually pathologists ask for a biopsy in mesothelioma, and in most of the patients we have done the operation not only for palliation of the effusion but for diagnosis, and moreover, most of our patients started effusion sometime before surgery and we see that the recurrence was very quick to come back of the effusion. So that was the reason we did talc poudrage in mesothelioma.
So the message is, in mesothelioma you have to carefully stage the patient, and I think that VATS is the most important procedure to stage the patient. You can see how is the mediastinal pleura, the diaphragmatic pleura. So it is important.
Dr Mearns: My problem is not the thoracotomy or the adequacy of the biopsy. That is mandatory. The question is whether you actually need to leave some talc in as a mark that you have been there. You must drain the effusion, correct, and you must get an adequate biopsy, correct, but why do you need the talc in everybody? That is what I am saying. There is too much talc going in. Everybody can have a biopsy, everybody can have a drainage, a first-time drainage of their effusion. That's good surgery. It's the talc signature I challenge.
Dr O. Kshivets (Siauliai, Lithuania): These are patients that are very difficult to treat and any success in this field should be appreciated. My question is, did you try to combine talc with intrapleural chemotherapy?
Dr Cardillo: Really, we didn't in this group of patients, absolutely, we didn't try to give intrapleural chemotherapy plus talc poudrage.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A Qureshi, S. L Collinson, R. J Powell, P. O Froeschle, and R. G Berrisford Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion Associated with Trapped Lung Syndrome Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2008; 16(2): 120 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Noppen Who's (still) afraid of talc? Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2007; 29(4): 619 - 621. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Kuzniar, M. G. Blum, K. Kasibowska-Kuzniar, and G. M. Mutlu Predictors of Acute Lung Injury and Severe Hypoxemia in Patients Undergoing Operative Talc Pleurodesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 1976 - 1981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rodriguez-Panadero, J. P. Janssen, and P. Astoul Thoracoscopy: general overview and place in the diagnosis and management of pleural effusion. Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2006; 28(2): 409 - 422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Laisaar, V. Palmiste, T. Vooder, and T. Umbleja Life expectancy of patients with malignant pleural effusion treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 307 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Akopov, V. I. Egorov, V. V. Varlamov, Y. N. Levashev, and D. Y. Artioukh Thoracoscopic collagen pleurodesis in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 28(5): 750 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kolschmann, A. Ballin, and A. Gillissen Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Thoracoscopic Talc Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusions Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1431 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Light Talc for Pleurodesis? Chest, November 1, 2002; 122(5): 1506 - 1508. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |