|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:470-473
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL
a Department for Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 1820, 1090 Vienna, Austria
b Department of Medical Computer Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Received 27 September 2001; received in revised form 20 December 2001; accepted 23 December 2001.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43-1-40400-5620; fax: +43-1-40400-5640
e-mail: paul.simon{at}univie.ac.at
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Valves Aorta Ross operation Autograft Dilatation
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean age of the patients was 36±11 years (range, 1858 years). There were 79 male patients (74%) and 28 female patients (26%). The underlying valve pathology and hemodynamic lesions are shown in Table 1.
|
The autograft was measured in the parasternal long-axis view of the 2D-echocardiographic image at end-diastole at the level of the sinus of Valsalvae. AI was graded semi-quantitatively using color Doppler (grade 0=no insufficiency; grade I=mild; grade II=moderate, hemodynamically non-significant; grade III and IV=hemodynamically significant insufficiency). At the level of the sinus, a diameter greater than 37 mm was determined as the threshold for root dilatation based on standard echocardiographic values for the aortic root [12]. Clinically important dilatation was defined as a root diameter greater than 42 mm.
Patients were also analyzed in regard to the percentage progression of the sinus to identify patients who have progressive dilatation independent of the initial size of the autograft after surgery. Risk factors thought to be important in the potential development of dilatation were evaluated.
2.1. Statistical analysis
Data are described with mean and standard deviation, when applicable, or otherwise with median, minimum and maximum. Estimates of dilatation-free survival, defined as a diameter of not more than 37 mm, was calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier and the resulting estimates are graphically presented. Group comparisons of initial sinus were tested using the Student's t-test.
It was assumed that the importance of changes in diameter depends on the initial value and therefore the percentage changes from the first diameter measurements were calculated. If there was no measurement within the first 3 months after surgery, the patient was withdrawn from further analysis. The effect of risk factors on percentage changes of the diameter were evaluated by analysis of covariance. The following risk factors were included in the model: age at surgery; sex; autograft support technique with wrapping; valve pathology; sinus diameter at early measurement; and time since surgery. The effect of continuous covariates is described by the slope of the regression-line and the influence of categorical covariates is described by least-square means and their standard error.
All tests are two-sided and statistical significance was assumed at P
0.05.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, there is concern that the pulmonary autograft may dilate in the systemic circulation with progressive aortic regurgitation. In addition, aortic valve disease especially the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve may be associated with abnormalities of the ascending aortic root structure [7,8]. It has been suggested that in some of these patients these structural abnormalities are not limited to the ascending aorta but a higher degree of elastic fiber fragmentation and degenerative changes are also seen in the pulmonary root [9]. These structural changes have been implicated in the development of progressive dilatation of the autograft root.
In our study with a follow-up of more than 8 years, we have observed dilatation of the autograft root. After 7 years, only 45% have a sinus diameter of less than 37 mm, the threshold for echocardiographic dilatation. However, in 90% of patients this dilatation was less than 25%. We did not find progressive development of clinically relevant aortic regurgitation. This is in accordance with the findings of Carr-White et al. [10] who found in their study no dilation of the sinus of more than 20% during a 4 year follow-up with no significant aortic regurgitation in their patients. They observed significant differences in aortic and pulmonary root structure and mechanical behavior as well as signs of adaptation of the pulmonary root to higher pressures.
An important risk factor for dilatation observed in our study was the time from surgery, with an annual rate of dilatation of 1.4 percentage points. Since we did not find that dilatation up to 25% of the initial diameter was associated with progressive AI, considerable tolerance of the pulmonary root may be assumed. Male gender was also found to be a risk factor for dilation with an increase in diameter of 9.2% in men vs. 0.9% in women when they have the same underlying initial sinus. The reason for this remains unclear. Whether a higher stroke volume in men and the associated increase in autograft stretch may contribute to this finding needs to be determined. Technical considerations seem also to be of importance. We have used strict intra-annular implantation of the pulmonary root. The aortic annulus is carefully evaluated especially in patients with AI and bicuspid valves [11] and reduced if there is mismatch to the pulmonary root. The sino-tubular junction is also carefully measured and reduced if ascending aortic ectasia is present in order to avoid distension of the pulmonary root at this level which may lead to primary valve regurgitation or may reduce the overlap of the leaflets and hence the tolerance to late dilation. In a subset of 39 patients, we have employed root stabilizing techniques namely wrapping of the root with a vicryl net or stabilization of the non-coronary sinus with the remnant of the ascending aorta or a combination of the two techniques. Failure to use such techniques was associated with a 7.2% increase in diameter as opposed to only 2.8% in patients in whom a stabilization technique was used. These data support our view that support of the autograft sinus may prevent dilation and such techniques are now routinely used. Other series in which AI developed during follow-up may have not employed annulus fixation, adjustment of the sino-tubular junction or root stabilization techniques which may explain our finding of stable valve performance of the autograft up to 8.2 years. This may also explain why AI as the primary hemodynamic lesion and bicuspid valve were not found to be significant risk factors in our series of patients.
| 5. Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
No histologic material for evaluation is available to determine whether patients with more pronounced dilatation show more severe degenerative changes of the pulmonary artery at the time of surgery.
Subcoronary implantation and the inclusion technique were not used. Therefore, comparisons with these techniques cannot be drawn from our study.
| 6. Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. O. Bohm, W. Hemmer, J.-G. Rein, A. Horke, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, and C. A. Botha A single-institution experience with the ross operation over 11 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. de Kerchove, J. Rubay, A. Pasquet, A. Poncelet, C. Ovaert, M. Pirotte, M. Buche, W. D'Hoore, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Ross Operation in the Adult: Long-Term Outcomes After Root Replacement and Inclusion Techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Warnes, R. G. Williams, T. M. Bashore, J. S. Child, H. M. Connolly, J. A. Dearani, P. del Nido, J. W. Fasules, T. P. Graham Jr, Z. M. Hijazi, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 2, 2008; 52(23): e143 - e263. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Warnes, R. G. Williams, T. M. Bashore, J. S. Child, H. M. Connolly, J. A. Dearani, P. del Nido, J. W. Fasules, T. P. Graham Jr, Z. M. Hijazi, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease): Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Circulation, December 2, 2008; 118(23): e714 - e833. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Frigiola, M. Ranucci, C. Carlucci, A. Giamberti, R. Abella, and M. Di Donato The Ross Procedure in Adults: Long-Term Follow-Up and Echocardiographic Changes Leading to Pulmonary Autograft Reoperation Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 482 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M.A. Klieverik, J. A. Bekkers, J. W. Roos, M.J.C. Eijkemans, G. B. Raap, Ad. J.J.C. Bogers, and J. J.M. Takkenberg Autograft or allograft aortic valve replacement in young adult patients with congenital aortic valve disease Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2008; 29(11): 1446 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kadner, O. Raisky, A. Degandt, D. Tamisier, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and P. R. Vouhe The Ross Procedure in Infants and Young Children Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Stewart, C. L. Backer, N. D. Hillman, C. Lundt, and C. Mavroudis The Ross Operation in Children: Effects of Aortic Annuloplasty Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1326 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, M. D. Rodefeld, Y. Mahomed, and M. W. Turrentine Incidence of and Risk Factors for Pulmonary Autograft Dilation After Ross Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1781 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Pasquali, M. S. Cohen, D. Shera, G. Wernovsky, T. L. Spray, and B. S. Marino The Relationship Between Neo-Aortic Root Dilation, Insufficiency, and Reintervention Following the Ross Procedure in Infants, Children, and Young Adults J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2007; 49(17): 1806 - 1812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, B. Absil, J. Rubay, P. Noirhomme, J.-C. Funken, R. Verhelst, A. Poncelet, and G. El Khoury The Ross Procedure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up in 219 Consecutive Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1285 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Watanabe, S. Saito, H. Saito, and H. Kurosawa Valve-sparing aortic root replacement with repair of leaflet prolapse after Ross operation Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2007; 6(1): 89 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Berdajs, G. Zund, U. Schurr, C. Camenisch, M. I. Turina, and M. Genoni Geometric models of the aortic and pulmonary roots: suggestions for the Ross procedure Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 31 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Koul, F. Al-Rashidi, M. Bhat, and C. Meurling A modified Ross operation to prevent pulmonary autograft dilatation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 127 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Schoof, J. J.M. Takkenberg, R.-J. van Suylen, P. E. Zondervan, M. G. Hazekamp, R. A.E. Dion, and A. J.J.C. Bogers Degeneration of the pulmonary autograft: An explant study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1426 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, A. Horke, W. Hemmer, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, F. Uhlemann, and J.-G. Rein Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 940 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Muresian The Ross Procedure: New Insights Into the Surgical Anatomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 495 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Williams, J. M. Quaegebeur, D. T. Hsu, W. M. Gersony, F. Bourlon, R. S. Mosca, D. R. Gersony, and D. E. Solowiejczyk Ross Procedure in Infants and Toddlers Followed Into Childhood Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-390 - I-395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Duebener, U. Stierle, A. Erasmi, M. F. Bechtel, D. Zurakowski, J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, W. Hemmer, J.-G. Rein, H.-H. Sievers, et al. Ross Procedure and Left Ventricular Mass Regression Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-415 - I-422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. T. Kouchoukos, P. Masetti, N. J. Nickerson, C. F. Castner, W. D. Shannon, and V. G. Davila-Roman The Ross procedure: Long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 773 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Stradins, R. Lacis, I. Ozolanta, B. Purina, V. Ose, L. Feldmane, and V. Kasyanov Comparison of biomechanical and structural properties between human aortic and pulmonary valve Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 26(3): 634 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Kabbani, H. Jamil, A. Hammoud, J. A. Hatab, F. Nabhani, R. Hariri, N. Sabbagh, and D. Ross The mitral pulmonary autograft: assessment at midterm Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 60 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Kincaid, J. D. Maloney, S. W. Lavender II, and N. D. Kon Dissection in a pulmonary autograft Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 707 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Concha, G. Pradas, A. Juffe, J. M. Caffarena, A. Montero, and P. J. Aranda Comprehensive experience with the Ross operation in Spain Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 521 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Luciani, G. Casali, A. Favaro, M. A. Prioli, L. Barozzi, F. Santini, and A. Mazzucco Fate of the Aortic Root Late After Ross Operation Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |