|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:47-52
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77025, USA
Received 19 September 2001; received in revised form 20 March 2002; accepted 25 March 2002.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-713-745-4547; fax: +1-713-790-4901
e-mail: avaporci{at}notes.mdacc.tmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Metastasis Cardiac tumors Cardiopulmonary bypass
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiac involvement by direct extension or metastasis is uniformly fatal. Treatment options for these patients are severely limited, often consisting of palliative pericardial drainage [3]. Except in cases of minor involvement of the left atrium, intrathoracic tumors extending into cardiac structures are usually deemed unresectable, and surgical resection of metastatic disease to the heart is not standard therapy.
However, other tumors without cardiac involvement that previously were not considered surgically approachable are now being resected in select cases, with some long-term survival as well as effective palliation. Examples include Pancoast tumors involving the vertebral body or subclavian vessels and isolated adrenal or brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer [46]. The ability to resect these advanced tumors while maintaining acceptable morbidity and mortality rates is largely the result of careful patient selection, better surgical technique, and improved perioperative and postoperative management. In light of these improved results in non-cardiac cases by using aggressive surgical techniques for patients whose disease was formerly thought to be unresectable, we have offered aggressive surgical resection to a select group of patients with intrathoracic tumors extending into cardiac structures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the feasibility and benefits of resection with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) of metastatic or non-cardiac primary malignancies extending directly into or metastasizing to the heart in select patients.
| 2. Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data on a number of variables, including demographics, symptoms and signs at presentation, and any preoperative therapy, were collected. Tumor characteristics, including location, histologic features, and the presence of metastases, as well as operative details were collected. All complications were noted, along with overall survival duration.
The decision to proceed with resection had been determined after evaluating the results of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography. Patients had been presented at multidisciplinary conferences before undergoing resection. The decision to proceed in each case had been based on a number of tumor-related and patient-related factors, which included tumor biology (indolent vs. aggressive), availability of active chemotherapeutic agents to achieve cytoreduction and hence improve resectability, disease-free interval in cases involving metastatic lesions, the presence and severity of symptoms, and the physiologic status of the patient.
The requirement for CPB had been based on any one of three general indications: direct invasion of cardiac structures, great-vessel involvement necessitating CPB for resection or significant cardiac compression requiring CPB to allow manipulation of the tumor during resection. In our study, surgery was considered curative in cases in which an R0 resection was achieved and the patient was free of extracardiac metastases. The operation was considered palliative in cases in which the cardiac resection was classified as R1 or R2 or in which synchronous extracardiac metastases were present at the time of resection.
Survival curves were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier [7]. The statistical test to compare survival was the log rank test.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
3.3. Resectability
In 11 patients, the only site of disease was intrathoracic. A complete (R0) resection was performed in ten of these patients (91%), while the remaining patient had residual microscopic disease only (R1 resection). Eight patients had synchronous extracardiac disease. In five of these patients (63%), the intracardiac tumors were completely resected; in the other three, gross residual cardiac disease remained after attempted resection of the intracardiac tumor (R2 resection). Therefore, the overall resectability of tumors from cardiac structures only was R0 in 15 cases (79%), R1 in one case (5%), and R2 in three cases (16%).
3.4. Postoperative course
The average hospital stay was 18.3±4.1 days, with 6.7±2.4 days spent in the intensive care unit and 4.8±2.4 days spent with the patients on a ventilator. Complications occurred in 11 patients (58%) and are detailed in Table 2. Two patients (11%), both of whom underwent palliative resection, died during the in-hospital or 30 day postoperative period.
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most common sites of metastasis to the heart are the pericardium and epicardium. These metastases commonly present as pericardial effusions and are not amenable to resection. Infrequently, however, the patient may develop an isolated cardiac or intrathoracic metastasis that involves the heart by direct extension. Primary mediastinal and intrathoracic tumors may also extend into cardiac structures. Treatment options for these patients are limited. The rare occurrence of these metastases results in only sporadic anecdotal reports of successful treatment [811].
Even in cases in which the tumors are localized to the heart, treatment options other than surgery (i.e. chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and transplantation) have had only sporadic success [1215]. Some reports of resection of non-small cell lung cancer involving great vessels or the left atrium, tumors formerly felt to be unresectable, demonstrate that survival following resection is higher than that following non-surgical treatment [6]. Likewise, aggressive repeated resections of pulmonary metastases have also led to long-term survival in some cases. Thus, an aggressive surgical approach employing CPB for resection of these tumors can be justified in a highly select group of patients.
4.1. Patient selection
The patients reviewed in this study were a highly select group. The decision to proceed with surgery was made on an individual basis after multidisciplinary assessment. Factors addressed included biologic features of the tumor (i.e. the tumor's aggressiveness, responsiveness to chemotherapy, and resectability), symptomatology, and performance status of the patients. The mean age of the patients was 45 years. Preoperative assessment was thorough and included transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in most patients. Patients considered for palliative surgery had either considerable symptoms or impending cardiac compromise or were believed to have extracardiac disease that could be resected at a later date.
4.2. Technical
A wide variety of techniques must be employed to successfully resect these tumors. Our 19 patients required various combinations of incisions, cannulation sites, and methods of CPB (alone or in combination with cardiac or circulatory arrest). Because each tumor has its own unique attributes requiring surgical adaptation, no standard approach to these tumors exists. In some operations, a second surgical team was involved to assist with resection of the intra-abdominal portion of the tumor. A coordinated effort between the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and perfusionist is required. Each member of this team should be prepared to modify his planned approach on the basis of intraoperative findings.
4.3. Feasibility
An R0 resection was achieved in 79% of these tumors. The morbidity rate associated with these operations was acceptable, considering the proportion of patients who received simultaneous pulmonary resections. Likewise, the mortality rate was also acceptable. Although this was a highly select group of patients, it is apparent that with careful preoperative assessment complete resection can be obtained with acceptable risk.
4.4. Outcome
Generalization of the results seen in this group of patients is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the tumors and the highly select patient population examined. However, it is evident that with careful multidisciplinary assessment of patients, the use of CPB to obtain a complete resection can help to achieve long-term survival. The trend toward increased mortality combined with the significantly diminished long-term survival among patients who underwent palliative resection makes the indiscriminate use of this technique for palliation unjustified. In these patients, careful assessment of the severity of the patient's symptoms and the extent of their non-cardiac disease is mandatory before any attempted resection.
In conclusion, our review of patients requiring CPB to resect a predominantly metastatic group of cardiac tumors showed that the procedure was performed without significant increases in morbidity or mortality rates. Most patients were able to undergo complete clearance of their cardiac disease. Although only a small group of patients were studied and follow-up was moderate, with careful patient selection, long-term survival was achieved in a large proportion of the group rendered free of all disease at the completion of surgery. Patients with simultaneous extracardiac disease obtained palliation but, as expected, with greatly diminished survival.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr Vaporciyan: PET scanning, unfortunately, was just recently introduced at our institution. We were doing PET scans at outside institutions. Most of the patients received CT scanning, of specific regions, bone scanning, CT of the brain, MRI, and an aggressive work-up for any evidence of metastatic lesions. In addition, to determine resectability, all the cardiac patients received a transthoracic echocardiogram, and a majority, about 85%, received a transesophageal echocardiogram, along usually with an MRI of the mediastinum.
Dr Yim: I am focusing more on the nodal metastases.
Dr Vaporciyan: The nodal metastases were aggressively worked up with just conventional radiographic imaging and any additional tests that were indicated. PET scanning at our institution has only been available for about the last two years.
Dr Yim: How about mediastinoscopy?
Dr Vaporciyan: Mediastinoscopy was utilized for nonsmall cell lung cancers, of course, but for the sarcomatous metastases that were isolated to the lung without evidence of mediastinal nodes, we still resected those patients if we could get clearance of their disease. Most of our patients with metastatic sarcomas usually do not involve the mediastinal nodes.
Dr P. Macchiarini (Hanover, Germany): I have one very short technical question and one oncological question.
First, a technical question. I saw that you never used fibrillation, and cardiopulmonary bypass you did either such or as a diastolic arrest or with circulatory arrest, and you might I think take all the steps to resect the tumor and then do it under fibrillation and avoid therefore the very high incidence of respiratory complications you had, probably related to such strategy.
Dr Vaporciyan: The tumors here that were presented were only the ones that failed any other modality and required cardiopulmonary bypass for resection. There were numerous tumors that involved either the main left or right pulmonary artery trunk that could be resected with fibrillation and a clamp or atrial structures that we could fibrillate and resect with a clamp. The ones presented here, however, surpassed all those possible techniques. As you can see, only three or so of the patients could be done on simple bypass. The majority had, on average, a 50-minute arrest time and so their tumors were not technically resectable with simple fibrillation.
Dr Macchiarini: The second and last question is, from an oncological point of view, you showed an 11% survival in the palliative group, which makes, however, a 25% mortality, which makes no oncological sense. Do you have any explanation?
Dr Vaporciyan: Well, this was a palliative group as well as an extremely selected group. They were felt to be in immediate danger of death due to the location of their tumor or were experiencing significant changes in quality of life. They were also patients who probably already had long-term survival with their disease. For example, one was a leiomyomatosis with an extensive IVC thrombus up into the right ventricle. Despite the ability to perform only an R1 resection she was afforded considerable relief of her dyspnea. Some of the other patients also underwent additional resective procedures of their extracardiac metastases later. One was a young 28-year-old girl with an angiosarcoma of the heart who then underwent lobectomy to clear the rest of her disease, and is still free of disease over a year and a half later.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Wiebe, H. Baraki, P. Macchiarini, and A. Haverich Extended pulmonary resections of advanced thoracic malignancies with support of cardiopulmonary bypass Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 571 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Weder Editorial comment Extended pulmonary resections of advanced thoracic malignancies with support of cardio-pulmonary bypass - is surgery justified? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 577 - 578. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Perrot, E. Fadel, S. Mussot, A. de Palma, A. Chapelier, and P. Dartevelle Resection of Locally Advanced (T4) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Cardiopulmonary Bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1691 - 1696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asai, K. Suzuki, H. Shimota, T. Takahashi, K. Yamashita, and T. Kazui Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the mediastinum: A temporary aortic transection approach J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2004; 128(4): 615 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |