|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:78-81
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Received 28 July 2001; received in revised form 9 March 2002; accepted 8 April 2002.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +353-1-8301122; fax: +353-1-8034773
e-mail: hossein{at}iol.ie
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Homograft Calcification Pulmonary circulation Beating heart
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The type of homograft, aortic or pulmonary, and the site of placement, right versus left ventricular outflow tract may affect the long-term function and outcome of these devices. In our unit, we have used cryopreserved homograft conduits from two groups of donors. The first group were from cadaveric donors and the second group of homografts were harvested from beating heart donors. This study was undertaken to see if there is any difference in the incidence of calcification between aortic and pulmonary homografts placed in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and what effect if any the mode of harvest has on the rate of calcification of these homografts.
| 2. Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Our preservation method is as follows. After harvesting, aortic and pulmonary valves are each placed in 100 ml of M199 medium plus antibiotics (50 iu/ml Penicillin, 50 mcg/ml Streptomycin, 10 mcg/ml Amphotericin B), and are incubated at 37°C for 24 h. During this 24-h sterilisation period, tissue culture is performed (mitral or tricuspid valves can be used) to determine the viability of leaflet tissue. The viability is assessed by determining the rate at which the valve metabolises the glucose in the tissue culture medium. Samples of the arterial wall are used from each homograft to test for any resistant organisms persisting after the 24-h sterilisation period. The homografts are rinsed in cold RPMI 1640 culture medium (supplied by Bio Sciences Ltd., Ireland). They are then transferred into a sterile cryopreservation pack containing 3040 ml of the pre-cooled freezing solution consisting of 10 ml of dimethylesulfoxide (manufactured by Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., Bedford, OH) added to 90 ml of pre-cooled RPMI culture medium. This pack is then sealed hermetically using heat sealer, and then packed into a second cryopreservation pack, and preserved using the KRYO 10 Ser.III controlled rate freezer to -190°C. The valves are stored in liquid nitrogen in its vapour phase.
2.2. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP, Version 3.2.5 (SAS Institute). Logistic regression analysis was carried out using Log Xact (Cytel Software Corporation, MA, USA).
Continuous variables were described using mean±SD. Students t-test was used to compare continuous variables, MannWhitney Rank Sum test was used to compare medians; where normality test failed. Non-continuous variables were compared using chi-squared test or Fisher Exact test as appropriate.
Logistic regression analysis was performed using Exact tests with both types and source of homografts as factors and controlling for follow-up time.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From the 50 survivors, 24 patients had aortic homografts and 26 had pulmonary homografts. Twenty-four of the devices were obtained from cadaveric donors and 26 were from beating heart donors. Calcification was detected in 10 homografts, (20.0%). Patients' age, sex, conduit size and ABO compatibility were not related to the incidence of calcification. In addition, there was no significant difference in the recipient characteristics of cadaveric and beating heart donor homografts. All the calcified devices were aortic in origin. The incidence of calcification in the aortic homografts was significantly higher when compared to pulmonary homografts (P<0.0001) (Fig. 1 ). Of particular interest is the comparison of cadaveric donor homografts versus beating heart donor homografts. Eight of the cadaveric (33.0%) and two of beating heart donor devices (8.0%) showed evidence of calcification.
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Today cryopreserved homograft conduits and fresh antibiotic preserved conduits have gained widespread acceptance. Actuarial freedom from reoperation for obstruction in patients receiving cryopreserved or fresh homografts implanted in the right side of the heart is reported to be 94% at 3.5 years [9]. Kay and Ross reported on their experience with antibiotic sterilised homografts, the actuarial probability of conduit obstruction requiring reoperation was 13% at 10 years [10]. Fontan et al. reported similar excellent results [11].
There has been a considerable debate on the choice of conduit for RVOT reconstruction. Non-valved synthetic conduits, porcine-valved conduits, aortic homografts and pulmonary homografts have been tried. Dacron tube grafts may develop obstruction due to neointimal hyperplasia. A considerable proportion of patients who have xenograft conduit implanted in the RVOT will need reoperation at 10 years. Kirklin reported 59% freedom from replacement of xenograft (or irradiated allograft) at 10 years [9]. Richard et al. reported actuarial freedom from xenograft conduits replacement of 81% at 5 years and zero at 10 years [12].
Aortic homografts have been used extensively for RVOT reconstruction, although the high incidence of calcification in earlier series were likely to be due to irradiation methods of preservation. It now appears that when implanted in the right side of the heart, cryopreserved pulmonary homografts have a better performance than their cryopreserved aortic counterparts. Eguchi and Asano [13] in a dog model of RVOT reconstruction discovered that neither calcification nor degeneration occurred in the homograft pulmonary arterial wall as long as 16 months after implantation, while aortic homograft showed marked calcification during the same period. Albert et al. [14] reported similar survival for cryopreserved aortic and pulmonary homografts in the pulmonary position in humans. However, pulmonary homografts showed better valvular mechanics.
Our results support the work of those authors [14,15], who have concluded that pulmonary homograft is the conduits of choice for the RVOT reconstruction. Although none of our patients required reoperation, all the calcified conduits in our series were aortic in origin.
Histological examination shows that calcification is localised mostly in the elastic structure and is related to the total amount of tissue calcium. The amount of pulmonary elastic tissue per unit of medial surface area in a histologic section is only 5060% of that in the aorta. In addition, the average amount of biochemically detectable calcium in the pulmonary tissue is half of that in the aortic specimens [16].
In our series, the incidence of calcification in beating heart donor homografts was lower than the cadaveric ones. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Although our follow-up period for the cadaveric conduits was longer, all the calcifications appeared within 18 months of implantation and despite extended follow-up, no new calcification occurred.
Theoretically one might expect reduced incidence of calcification in the beating heart harvested conduits because one might achieve a better cellular viability with these devices. In cadaveric homografts, 80% of fibroblasts are viable after 11 h. The percentage of viable cells decreases progressively to 65% with an interval of 48 h after death of the donor [16]. Segments of pulmonary valves obtained from beating heart donor valves had a higher initial viability than non-beating-heart donor valves [17]. It has been shown that increased cell viability in cryopreserved heart valves correlates with improved clinical performance [18].
In conclusion, we have shown excellent results using cryopreserved homograft valved conduits for RVOT reconstruction. Our intermediate-term survival and freedom from reoperation has encouraged us to continue implanting these devices. In our experience, pulmonary homografts have significantly lower incidence of calcification than aortic ones when placed in the right side of the heart. Harvesting these devices from beating heart donors does not reduce the incidence of calcification significantly.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Rubino, A.-M. Hamad, F. Rea, and G. Gerosa Reconstruction of the right atrium with pulmonary artery homograft after resection of right atrial lipomatosis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2007; 6(6): 826 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Reinhartz, V. M. Reddy, E. Petrossian, M. MacDonald, J. J. Lamberti, S. J. Roth, G. E. Wright, S. B. Perry, S. Suleman, and F. L. Hanley Homograft Valved Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Conduit as a Modification of the Norwood Procedure Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-594 - I-599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |