EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuthebuch, O.
Right arrow Articles by Zünd, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reuthebuch, O.
Right arrow Articles by Zünd, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:244-248
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL


Advanced training model for beating heart coronary artery surgery: the Zurich heart-trainer

O. Reuthebucha*, A. Langb, P. Groscurthb, M. Lachata, M. Turinaa, G. Zünda

a Clinic for Cardio-vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
b Institute of Anatomy, University Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

Received 29 January 2002; received in revised form 16 April 2002; accepted 1 May 2002.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +41-1-2553679; fax: +41-1-2554446
e-mail: oliver.reuthebuch{at}chi.usz.ch


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Coronary artery surgery with beating heart technique is gaining increasing popularity. However, it is a challenging technique even for well-trained cardiac surgeons. Thus, a training model for beating heart surgery was developed to increase safety and accuracy of this procedure. Methods: The model consists of differentially hardened polyurethane resembling mechanical properties of the human heart. The covering used in this model is a 1:1 replica of the human thoracic wall with optionally embedded skeletal structures. Sternotomy, lateral thoracotomy or trocar placement is possible to access the lungs, the pericardium and the heart with adjacent vessels. Disposable artificial coronaries variable in size, wall quality or wall thickness are embedded in the synthetic myocardium. Two-layer vessels, which can simulate dissection, are available. Bypass conduits utilize the same material. Coronaries/bypasses as well as part of the ascending aorta are water-tight and can be rinsed with saline. Lungs can be inflated. A purpose-built pump induces heart movement with adjustable or randomized stroke volume, heart rate and arrhythmia induction. Results: The model was tested in a recent ‘Wet-Lab’ course attended by 30 surgeons. All conventional instruments and stabilizers with standard techniques can be used. Training with beating or non-beating heart was possible. Time needed for an anastomosis was similar to clinical experience. Each artificial tissue showed its individual nature-like qualities. Various degrees of difficulty can be selected, according to stroke volume, heart rate, arrhythmia, vessel size and vessel quality. The model can be quickly and easily set up and is fully reusable. Conclusions: The similarity to human tissue and the easy set-up make this completely artificial model an ideal teaching tool to increase the confidence of cardiac surgeons dealing with beating heart and minimally invasive surgery.

Key Words: Coronary disease • Surgery • Off-pump • Training model


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
With every new up-coming surgical technique, surgeons have to be well trained to achieve sufficient skills prior to operating on humans. Animal laboratories are convenient for skilled training [1,2]. However, based on animal protection motives, they are not widely accepted among the population and thus now-a-days only limited and very restrictive use of these laboratories are made. Therefore the need for realistic artificial training models is gaining increasing importance to keep surgical skills at a high level. This became evident, when minimal-invasive laparoscopic surgery began its flush of victory all over the world, only little more than a decade ago. Several training centers were established and all kinds of training models built [35], including teaching devices for thoracic procedures [1,6] as well as for training microvessel anastomoses [7,8].

However, at present, only few, but otherwise imperfect, models exist to train beating heart coronary artery revascularization. Therefore we developed a totally artificial training model for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) encompassing an easy set-up, beating and non-beating heart features, cardiac accessibility via conventional sternotomy or lateral thoracotomy as well as reusability with only grafts to be disposable.

Implication of human characteristics such as size, anatomy, loss of sight due to severe bleeding, tissue quality and fragility of vessels should facilitate transfer from model to human and help to increase the confidence of the trainee for his clinical work.


    2. Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
The prosthetic model is a 1:1 thoracic replica of the human chest reversibly mounted on a water-tight box, which was already described by Segesser et al. [9]. Main component of the shell is differentially hardened polyurethane resembling numerous mechanical properties. Various covers are available either with preformed median sternotomy or left lateral thoracotomy. Skeletal structures can be optionally embedded. The rims of the incisions are reinforced to avoid tear down while spreading or while fixing retraction sutures (Fig. 1 ).



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Replica (1:1) of the human wall used as cover of the training model.

 
Underneath the hollow cover, separately inflatable lungs consisting of polyurethane are placed in the cavity of the box that also contains the heart. They can be removed individually. A synthetic pericardium loosely encloses the heart and is fixed at the ascending aorta/pulmonary arteries. It shows a Y-shaped incision with the Y up-side-down to easily access the coronaries. Due to its multi-layered structure, it has extreme tensile strength to endure retraction sutures.

The external aspect of the heart model is a polyurethane reproduction of a human heart with adjacent vessels such as ascending aorta, pulmonary artery, pulmonary veins and superior and inferior vena cava. It is univentricular inside. The wall thickness and stiffness are adapted to the required amount of movement with the ventricle softened and the adjacent vessels more rigid. Air can be inflated and deflated to simulate the beating heart through a special connector in the inferior vena cava. According to the anatomic course of the three major coronaries (left anterior descending (LAD), circumflex (CX) and right coronary artery (RCA)), small cavities are subepicardially embedded ending up at the distal ascending aorta. A special polyurethane-inlay can be inserted in the ascending aorta to train proximal anastomoses either with partial clamping or with connecting devices. This disposable inlay can be infused with saline under high pressure to control tightness of anastomoses (Fig. 2 ).



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Partially disposable aorta to train proximal anastomoses.

 
Due to its soft consistence, the heart can be enucleated to reach all coronaries. With a sucking or compressing stabilizer supported by deep pericardial retraction sutures, coronaries can be displayed and stabilized to perform the anastomoses.

The artificial coronaries are inserted in circular cavities with a specially designed flexible hook. At the end, they can be sealed or connected to an infusion system. Effluxing saline will be collected in a water-tight box. Coronaries are made of polyurethane and are available in various sizes (beginning with 1 mm in diameter), lengths, colors, wall thicknesses and wall quality (fragile or durable) (Fig. 3 ). Even dissection in vessels with non-glued two-layer wall can be simulated (Fig. 4 ). Bypass conduits utilize the same material.



View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cross-section of artificial vessels with various diameters and wall quality.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Two-layer vessels for simulating dissection of the wall.

 
A purpose-built high-permanence pump induces the heart movement. It is attached to the connector in the vena cava via a tube. The pump is placed beside or underneath the model. Heart rate can be adjusted to be between 40 and 100 beats/min and the amount of wall motion can be adjusted by regulating the quantity of air. To increase complexity of training stroke-volume, heart rate as well as arrhythmia induction can be randomized including single or multiple ventricular extrasystolies, ventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (Fig. 5 ).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Purpose-built pump to regulate heart rate, stroke volume and arrhythmia induction.

 

    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
The model was tested by surgeons in training as well as by experienced surgeons. Recently it was used in a ‘Wet-Lab’ attended by 30 cardiac surgeons (The Heart Lab, Geneva, Switzerland, www.heartlab.org), where it was used to train beating or non-beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery.

Since no biological tissue is required, shipping and storage was extremely easy. The model was easily and quickly set-up either on a conventional table or on an operating table. In general, the model was highly accepted due to its realistic and nature-like features. The preformed thoracic incisions were placed anatomically correct, so that the underlying structures could be easily accessed. All conventional retractors could be used.

The pericardium showed to be sufficiently reinforced to be sutured to the skin or to retractors and thus enabling an additional exposure of the antero-lateral and posterior aspect of the heart. The model was used to train surgeons for beating or non-beating heart coronary artery bypass surgeries. Depending on wall thickness and stroke volume, the cardiac movements could be adjusted to the skills of the surgeons. To increase complexity of the procedure, lungs could be additionally ventilated. Due to the flexibility of polyurethane, even the beating heart could be simply shifted and stabilized either with sucking or compressing stabilizers (Fig. 6 ). Course of coronaries was marked with colors on the surface of the heart for easy detection. All three major coronaries (LAD, RCX, RCA) could be visualized. Using conventional instruments, the epicardial layer could be dissected to visualize the coronaries (Fig. 7 ). With stay sutures or micro-spreaders, the incision was kept open. If vessels were insufflated, temporary occlusion with bull-dog clamps or sutures were feasible. Insertion of various intra-coronary shunts was simple and terminated bleeding from the anastomotic site. Anastomoses were performed in a standard manner using 7-0 or 8-0 prolene (Fig. 8 ). Tightness of anastomoses was tested by injection of saline. Setting and placement of different stabilizers could be meticulously done.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Approach to LAD, RCX or RCA using stabilizers.

 


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Nature-like handling of artificial tissue.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Vessels are water-tight and can be rinsed with saline to control tightness of anastomoses.

 
After distal anastomoses, proximal anastomoses were taught. The polyurethane inlet in the ascending aorta could be punched with standard instruments and anastomoses done with conventional sutures or automated connecting devices (U-ClipTM, Coalescent Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale,CA; SymmetryTM Bypass System, St. Jude Medical, USA). The training model was prepared for the next trainee by simply removing and replacing the artificial coronaries. Removed coronaries could be incised to assess quality of anastomoses.

Degrees of difficulty of beating heart revascularization depended on stroke volume, heart rate, arrhythmia induction, vessel size and vessel quality. Especially coronaries and bypass-grafts of small diameter, thin walls and possible wall dissection proved to be a great challenge not only for the untrained surgeons but also for experienced ones.

The purpose-built pump could be easily set-up and connected with the heart. With several switches and regulators, complexity of the procedure was adjusted. Especially randomized arrhythmia induction increased intricacy. Despite pump being in continuous use, it never failed.


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
In recent years an increasing shift from on-pump CABG towards off-pump CABG can be observed. This is clearly reflected in the huge variety and diversity of instruments presently available to immobilize the target coronaries [10]. However, beside stabilization, there are other topics to be dealt within off-pump CABG, such as exposure of vessels, temporary occlusion of coronaries, use of intra-coronary shunts or handling of connector devices for proximal anastomoses.

Due to the complexity of beating-heart coronary artery surgery, it appears to be mandatory to conduct an appropriate training before operating patients. Though in the past this was done in adapted steps in humans, complexity of present procedures may require further efforts. However, we could not find a suitable ex vivo model, although several tools are mentioned in the literature. Izzat et al. [10] have built a box to perform anastomoses with a moving operating field [11]. However, there is no similarity to the human anatomy. Stanbridge et al. report results using the beating heart model created by Limbs and Things, Ltd. (Bristol, UK). Though it was simulated to be life-like, various features were lacking such as variability of vessels, continuous infusion of grafts and manipulation of the heart [12].

With this in mind we have developed a totally artificial training model for beating heart coronary artery revascularization based on polyurethane. It combines a high similarity in shape and haptics to human tissue with an easy set-up and cost-effective reusability. It can be used in graduated steps beginning with mere end-to-side or end-to-end anastomoses of vessels, followed by revascularization of the arrested heart and finally revascularization of the beating heart.

Due to its nature-like characteristics not only the surgeons can be trained on procedures but also the use and feasibility of newly developed instruments and devices can be tested. Furthermore dexterity of young surgeons can be assessed prior to be accepted for definite training.

The modular concept allows different covers with numerous incisions. The surgeons could be trained for beating heart coronary artery surgery by use of sternotomy, lateral thoracotomy or even trocar placement for totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.

With this model we think to have invented a realistic and helpful educational tool. Training upon this phantom is practicable during an annual workshop (www.heartlab.org). On the other hand it is also commercially available (Med Connect, Pfäffikon, Switzerland) to provide a continuous educational platform in the clinic.

The acceptance of the model in our hospital and during a recent Wet-Lab has encouraged us to keep on developing further training models including intracardiac procedures.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Eaton B.D., Messent D.O., Haywood I.R. Animal cadaveric models for advanced trauma life support training. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:135-139.[Medline]
  2. Kirwan W.O., Kaar T.K., Waldron R. Starting laparoscopic cholecystectomy – the pig as a training model. Irish J Med Sci 1991;160(8):243-246.[Medline]
  3. Hill J., Kiff E.S. An abdominal wall jig for surgical craft workshop. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:386-387.[Medline]
  4. Sackier J.M., Berci G., Paz-Partlow M. A new training device for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1991;5(3):158-159.[Medline]
  5. Windsor J.A. Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: a training model. J R Coll Surg Edinburgh 1993;38(1):48-49.[Medline]
  6. Franchella A, Shweiki F, Riccipetitoni G, Mandrioloi G, Chendi D, Pelizzo G, Georgacopulo P. Left lung transplantation in piglets: a training model. Transplant Proc 1994;26(1):214.
  7. Kim D.C., Hayward P.G., Morrison W.A. Training model for microvessel anastomoses. Microsurgery 1994;15:820-821.[Medline]
  8. Satur C.M.R., Gupta N.K. Angioscopy-guided training model of coronary artery anastomoses. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1343-1345.[Abstract]
  9. von Segesser L.K., Westaby S., Pomar J., Loisance D., Groscurth P., Turina M. Less invasive aortic valve surgery: rationale and technique. Eur J Cardiovasc Surg 1999;15:781-785.
  10. Izzat M.B., Yim A.C.P. Cardiac stabilizer for minimally invasive direct coronary artery by pass. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:570-571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Izzat M.B., El-Zufari M.H., Yim A.P.C. Training model for ‘beating-heart’ coronary artery anastomoses. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:580-581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Stanbridge R., O'Regan D., Cherian A., Ramanan R. Use of a pulsatile beating heart model for training surgeons in beating heart surgery. HSF 1999:1999-8488.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
P. Abdel-Sayed, M. Kalejs, and L. K. von Segesser
A new training set-up for trans-apical aortic valve replacement
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2009; 8(6): 599 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. M. Carter and M. B. Marshall
Open lobectomy simulator is an effective tool for teaching thoracic surgical skills.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1546 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. I. Fann, A. D. Caffarelli, G. Georgette, S. K. Howard, D. M. Gaba, P. Youngblood, R. S. Mitchell, and T. A. Burdon
Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2008; 136(6): 1486 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Watanabe, S. Omata, M. Odamura, M. Okada, Y. Nakamura, and H. Yokoyama
Three-dimensional quantification of cardiac surface motion: a newly developed three-dimensional digital motion-capture and reconstruction system for beating heart surgery.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1162 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
N. Hudorovic
Reduction in hospitalisation rates following simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting; experience from a single centre
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. J. Murphy, C. A. Rogers, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini
Acquiring Proficiency in Off-Pump Surgery: Traversing the Learning Curve, Reproducibility, and Quality Control
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1965 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. S. Leopold, H. D. Morgan, N. J. Kadel, G. C. Gardner, D. C. Schaad, and F. M. Wolf
Impact of Educational Intervention on Confidence and Competence in the Performance of a Simple Surgical Task
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1031 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuthebuch, O.
Right arrow Articles by Zünd, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reuthebuch, O.
Right arrow Articles by Zünd, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS