| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:685-694
© 2002 Elsevier Science NL
Krasnodar Regional Thoracic Surgery Center, Sity Hospital 2, 6\2 Krasnykh Partizan Street, Krasnodar 350012, Russia
Received 18 September 2001; received in revised form 22 July 2002; accepted 14 August 2002.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +7-8612-22-59-15; fax: +7-8612-22-01-77
e-mail: igorpoliakov{at}mail.ru
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract 1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
Key Words: Carinal pneumonectomy • Carinal resection • Sternotomy • Systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection
|
1. Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
|
|
2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
|
2.3. Anesthesia
Anesthesia was performed with intravenous drugs; inhalation medications were avoided. Early extubation in the ICU was carried out whenever possible. Ninety-eight (42%) patients were intubated with a thin single-lumen tube (No. 7-8), which was inserted in the contralateral main bronchus and left there during construction of the anastomosis. In the remaining patients, the operation was started with a double-lumen intubation. As soon as the feasibility of resection was ascertained, we resected the bifurcation and removed the specimen, and we performed across-the-field ventilation through a sterile intubation tube inserted into the distal part of the contralateral bronchus. In 91 (39%) cases we applied a flexible thin tube No. 5-6, which was sutured to the bronchial edge by an atraumatic ligature to avoid its displacement. In 42 cases (18%) high-jet ventilation was applied. The catheter was inserted through the wound as well as through the trachea. In the case of difficult exposure of the opposite side of the anastomosis due to the intubation tube (in three cases), we made an incision 1.5–2 cm lower than the resection edge of the main bronchus to insert distally either a thin intubation tube or a high-jet ventilation catheter. In all utilizations of the shunt-respiration system, orotracheal intubation was kept, but the tube with deflated cuff was pulled back to the level of the vocal cords. We thus avoided repeated intubation, with overbending of the neck and increased traction on the anastomosis.
2.4. Surgical approach and exposure of bifurcation
In order to approach the carina we applied either routine lateral thoracotomy, or sternotomy, or combined sterno-thoracotomy or thoracotomy-sternal accesses.
Many authors usually use right-sided thoracotomy. Access to lower and middle aspects of the trachea is not easy through a left thoracotomy due to the overhanging aortic arch and supraaortic vessels. These difficulties were overcome with two artifacts: mobilization of the aortic arch, and mobilization of the trachea with immediate preoperative mediastinoscopy. Moreover, pericardium was transected both from right and left sides before the resection. For malignant lesions right and left systematic lymph node dissection was a routine procedure.
During sternotomy access for malignant disease, routine lymph node dissection was performed bilaterally [17]. However, in the case of left carinal pneumonectomy performed through a sternotomy, access to the posterior part of the hilum was complicated because of the overhanging heart, and additional pressure on it resulted in undesirable effects – arrhythmia and lowered arterial pressure. To avoid these effects and to guarantee a full lymph node dissection, we used left-sided video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) prior to sternotomy, to transect inferior and sometimes superior pulmonary veins, and to resect hilar, paraesophageal and subcarinal lymph nodes [18]. Thus, we excluded tumor invasion of pleura, while facilitating further removal of lung via sternotomy access.
During sternotomy, regardless of the side of pulmonary resection, the main bronchus and trachea were exposed in the aorta-caval space. After removal of the specimen, the anastomosis was sutured in the same space. The suture line was covered with a pedicled flap of mediastinal and thymic fat, with a part of pericardium or with omentum. In all cases, before completing the anastomosis, the neck was strongly flexed. The chin was tagged to the anterior chest wall by one or two heavy sutures, left in place for 7–8 days. In the case of pneumonectomy, we attempted to seal open pleural space hermetically and take in mediastinal pleura. In that case a drainage tube behind the sternum was connected to the low-pressure aspiration (2–4 cm H2O). The intrapleural drain was put on a water seal. In other cases the number of drains and aspiration regimens depended on the operative volume.
2.5. Technical aspects of anastomosis
Following tracheal and bronchial mobilizations we fixed stay sutures proximally and distally to the line of transection. The anterior semi-circumference of airways was transected first. Thus, the posterior wall was exposed, which reduced the risk of injuring the neighboring structures of the bronchus. An elastic probe (15 mm in diameter) was inserted into the esophagus for accurate identification. At first, angle-sutures were placed on either side of the anastomosis at the membranous-cartilaginous angles. The membranous part of the anastomosis was sutured. After knotting the stitches and removing the cross-field ventilation system, ventilation was carried out with the trocar, which was temporally pushed beyond the suture line. The tube was pulled back into the trachea after hermetic sealing of the anastomosis.
In most cases ‘end-to-end’ anastomosis was applied. If the diameters of the trachea and bronchus did not correspond to each other, two technical variants were used. At first, the principle of the ‘telescope’ was used – the cartilaginous part of the main bronchus was inserted into the lumen of the trachea up to 1–2 mm (in 11 patients), and the membranous part was sutured end-to-end. In nine patients we performed so-called ‘rotating’ anastomosis [19]. A technical peculiarity was that the membranous parts of the trachea and main bronchus were rotated on each other by 30–60°. This facilitated the possibility of pulling the caliber of either part to be anastomosed, to avoid narrowing of the anastomotic lumen and to decrease tension along the suture line.
We performed three main types of carinal resections. In the majority of cases carinal pneumonectomy (or a similar procedure if a patient had a main bronchus stump fistula or tumor recurrence in the main bronchus stump) was performed (Fig. 1b,c) . The second type included isolated carinal resection, right and left main bronchi being anastomosed with the trachea as a ‘neo-carina’. The third type was a ‘complex’ anastomosis following sleeve carinal resection: an end-to-end anastomosis was performed between the trachea and one of the main bronchi, and the second bronchus was reimplanted ‘end-to-side’ above or below the tracheobronchial anastomosis. Both absorbable and unabsorbable atraumatic threads of 3-4/0 were used for sutures. A continuous suture was used for the membranous part, and separate knot sutures were used for the cartilaginous semi-circle of anastomosis. In 39 (16.8%) patients we used a continuous suture with a single polypropylene thread (‘parachute technique’) [20]. While creating reconstructions as a ‘double barrel gun’ after carinal transection, the left main bronchus was intubated, medial parts of bronchi were sutured and then the ‘double barrel gun’ was sutured with the trachea. In the case of reimplantation anastomosis was formed as an ‘end-to-side’ by means of separate knot sutures, when the main tracheobronchial anastomosis was sealed hermetically. The fenestration of the trachea or bronchus was created in a longitudinal direction on the cartilage, which prevented retraction of the lumen after anastomosis. Owing to the overhanging aortic arch, reimplantation of the left bronchus was carried out below the anastomotic line; after right-sided resection with preservation of the right upper lobe, the bronchus of the upper lobe was reimplanted above the anastomotic line into the lateral wall of the trachea (Fig. 1a).
|
|
3. Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
|
Short stump fistula of the main bronchus was an indication for surgery in 25 patients (10.8%). The diameter of the fistula ranged from 10 to 30 mm. The operation was undertaken from 35 days to 28 months following pneumonectomy. Six of the patients had incidental tumor cells in the fistula.
3.2. Preoperative endoscopic management
Prior to the operation, we performed endoscopic ablation of obstructive tumor or granulation tissue from the trachea or main bronchus in 43 patients (18.6%). The obstacle was removed with the tip of the bronchoscope, forceps or electric loop. Among these patients, there were three with bronchogenic carcinoma (1.2% of the total), nine with scar stenoses (3.8% of the total), 11 with mucoepidermoid cancer (4.7% of the total), seven with adenocystic cancer (3% of the total), and 13 with carcinoid tumors (5.6% of the total). In all nine patients with scar stenosis of the carina, attempts to treat the stenosis by endoscopic means failed as re-stenosis developed. Preoperative irradiation was administered to 39 patients (19.3%). Four had small cell lung cancer, 26 had bronchogenic carcinoma, and four had adenocystic cancer. Furthermore, five of the nine patients with tumor recurrence in the bronchial stump were given induction radiotherapy. The dose of radiotherapy varied from 45 to 60 Gy. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to two patients with adenocarcinoma.
All patients with tuberculosis had been given specific anti-tuberculous therapy for 3 months before the operation. None of them had a positive sputum test by the time of the operation. In 25 cases with bronchial fistula, initial VATS was performed in order to debride empyema, and we placed drainage tubes in all of them.
3.3. Surgery
Lateral thoracotomy was used in 102 patients (44.2%), left-sided in 29 (12.5%). There were 54 right carinal pneumonectomies (23.4%), and 26 left carinal pneumonectomies (11.25%). In seven cases the lung was preserved and the carina was resected with construction of an anastomosis of the double-barrel type. In 15 cases, various types of complex tracheo-bronchial reconstructions were performed.
Sternotomy was undertaken in 129 patients (55.8%), 46 of them having right-sided tumors (19.9%). Right carinal pneumonectomy was performed in 84 patients (36.6%), and left carinal pneumonectomy in 25 (10.8%). We formed a transsternal neo-carina anastomosis in 18 cases (7.7%). In all 25 patients with a main bronchus fistula (nine left-sided) and in three patients with tumor recurrence in the main bronchus stump (two left-sided), we performed resections via a sternotomy.
Combined access was applied in 26 cases (11.2%). Of those, 12 had undergone VATS surgery before left carinal resection was performed (5.1%). Eight patients required thoracotomy to be performed (3.5%): five on the left because of dense adhesion with the descending aorta, and three on the right side due to invasion of the esophagus. In six patients (2.6%), left thoracotomy was combined with sternotomy. It was necessary to mobilize the trachea and right lung in order to reduce the tension of the anastomosis line, and to remove enlarged right mediastinal lymph nodes.
Among patients with malignant disease, carinal resection was combined with superior vena cava reconstruction in two cases (0.8%), resection of the muscular wall of the esophagus in three cases (1.2%), resection of the chest wall in 12 cases (5.1%), wedge resection of the aorta in one case (0.43%) and resection of the atrium in 13 cases (5.6%).
The length of resection was defined by the length of the resected part of the trachea and bronchus. Resection up to 2 cm was performed in 31 cases (13.4%), to 4 cm in 112 (48.5%), to 6 cm in 69 (29.9%) and to more than 6 cm in 19 (8.2%) cases. The mean length of resection was 3.8 cm.
The anastomosis was wrapped with a pedicled pericardial flap in 112 patients (48.5%), remnants of thymus in 63 (27.3%), omentum in 21 (9.1%) and adjacent fat in five cases (2.1%). In 30 cases (12.9%) anastomosis was not protected.
3.4. Complications and mortality
We observed complications in 82 patients (35.6%) during the hospital stay (Table 4). Intraoperatively, there were injuries to great vessels in four patients (1.7%): pulmonary artery in two patients, and superior vena cava in two patients. In one patient bleeding developed because the vessel clamp sprang off the atrium; a sudden blood loss of about 1000 ml was rapidly followed by hypotension and cardiac arrest, but normal hemodynamics were recovered after infusion therapy and defibrillation. Intraoperative blood loss among all other patients ranged from 200 to 800 ml, and required blood transfusion in one patient only. In 21 cases (9.1%) we observed cardiac arrhythmia intraoperatively.
|
Pleural empyema and local mediastinitis developed in 34 patients (41.6%), and five patients (6.1%) had sepsis. All patients were drained. Intrapleural bleeding and clotted hemothorax were found in nine patients (10.9%); re-thoracotomy was required in five cases (55%) and re-sternotomy was required in one case (11%). Sputum retention and lung atelectasis developed in 49 patients (59.7%). In addition to fibrobronchoscopy we performed microtracheostomy in 19 patients.
Cardiac arrhythmia occurred in 24 patients: the disorder appeared intraoperatively in 19 cases (79%), and 11 events (58%) developed during left pneumonectomy. Among three patients with resection extended to the esophageal muscular wall, one (33%) was found to have esophageal-pleural fistula on postoperative day 12. He died of associated sepsis.
There were no cases of intraoperative mortality. The overall hospital mortality rate was 16% (37 patients). Anastomotic complications were the most common cause of death and applied to 21 patients: 19 had complete dehiscence, and two had a microfistula which resulted in erosive bleeding. Pneumonia, sepsis, pulmonary and cerebral edema and ARDS resulted in death. The ARDS mortality rate was 81%. Pneumonia was associated with a 26% mortality rate (four of 15). Pulmonary artery embolism (in two) and superior vena cava (SVC) graft thrombosis (one) were associated with a 100% mortality rate.
3.5. Reoperations
We performed 13 reoperations (5.6%): 11 patients had a total dehiscence of anastomoses, and two had a microfistula. Operations were performed from 2 h to 3 days after diagnosis of the complication. Re-resection of the carina was associated with a high risk of failure and resulted in death in nine cases (70%). ARDS developed in two patients (15%) and caused their death. The overall mortality rate of such operations was 85%.
3.6. Long-term follow-up
Long-term follow-up was available in 161 (82%) patients and ranged from 2 months to 12 years. All patients with trauma and scar stenoses were followed up. The patient operated on for traumatic disruption has survived for 5 years without complications. Among the nine patients with scar stenoses, one patient (11%) was found to have granulation tissue growth along the anterior semi-circle of anastomosis, at the location of healed microfistula, 38 days after primary resection. The lumen of the anastomosis was constricted at 1/4. Granulation tissue was successfully removed by a laser device. Two patients of that group developed late recurrence of single lung tuberculosis. They died of non-controlled progressive tuberculosis within 2 years of the operation. Two patients were still alive 8 and 3 years after surgery. The other died in different terms because of unrelated causes.
Nine patients (3.8%) who underwent carinal resection due to main bronchus fistula required removal of granulation tissue along the anastomotic line; a temporary tracheal stent was left in place in two patients. One of these two patients recovered and has no restenosis after removal of the stent, whereas the second patient developed an arterio-bronchial fistula under the inserted stent and died of sudden hemoptysis.
One hundred and one patients with bronchogenic carcinoma were followed up from 1.5 months to 8 years. The overall 5-year survival rate was 24.7% (from 0% to 32% in different groups). In cases with direct invasion only 19 (30.6%) of 62 patients reached 5-year survival, including those with N2 disease. The overall 5-year survival rate was 19%. Only one patient who had an isolated right lesion of tracheo-bronchial lymph nodes and had undergone carinal resection for carinal and tracheal invasion by mediastinal lymph nodes (out of a total of 16 patients) survived more than 5 years. In the subgroup with preoperatively diagnosed T3, four of 23 patients (17.3%) survived 5 years, and actuarial 5-year survival was 7% (Fig. 2) . Such low survival of these 23 patients is explained by the fact that 61% were N2. In all groups of patients mediastinal lymph node involvement was a deleterious factor. There were significant differences in survival rates between N0–1 and N2 patients, with respective 5-year survival rates of 32% versus 7.5%. Another deleterious factor was direct invasion of lymph nodes into the carina or trachea, since 5-year survival in such patients was only 2.6% (Fig. 3) .
|
|
Twenty-six patients with non-primary bronchogenic cancer have been followed-up over 9 years. Unfavorable prognosis included the presence of carcinosarcoma, as two patients having undergone carinal resection died during the next 2 years of tumor recurrence. Five-year survival was observed in 16 cases (61%); of those, 12 patients (63%) had carcinoid tumors, and four patients (80%) had adenocystic cancer. Estimated actuarial survival was 66% and 75%, respectively. None of them revealed metastatic spread in mediastinal lymph nodes or invasion of surrounding structures.
For malignant pathology, chemotherapy was administered in three patients (2.4%) with adenocarcinoma and in two patients (1.6%) with small cell cancer. Radiotherapy of doses varying from 45 to 55 Gy was applied postoperatively in 21 (16.5%) patients.
Long-term complications of surgery included intrabronchial granulomas and empyema. Granuloma along the suture line was observed in 17 patients. In all cases this complication was cured by rigid bronchoscopy. Chronic pleural empyema developed in 15 patients, and was associated with fistula in 12 patients. Empyema was healed after a period of 23–79 days and fistula was relieved independently.
|
4. Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
The population of our region is about 5.2 million people. Annually about 3000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer. Of them more than 60% have advanced stages of lung cancer. Tumor invasion of the carina usually precludes surgery. The issue of patient selection has not yet been solved. To a definite extent it deals with the difficulties of preoperative assessment of resectability. Computer tomography, videobronchoscopes with high resolution, and a wider application of mediastinoscopy enables a more thorough selection of patients for operation [1–3]. In our experience, the number of ‘unplanned’ carinal resections decreased from 39% in the first decade to 23% in the second one.
The anesthesiological technique should be directed towards development of adequate ventilation and earlier extubation of the patient. Having applied various modes of ventilation we revealed that distal ventilation was the most suitable device which was safe for the patient and convenient for the surgeon. We have started applying jet ventilation if other methods are not suitable. However, we should note a more frequent development of ARDS: eight of 11 cases while applying jet ventilation (P<0.05).
The left-sided resection is related to a higher rate of complications [2]. In our experience we have not found reliable data regarding this fact. However, left-sided operations have their own peculiarities of performance. Thoracotomy access is supposed to allow for a tracheal resection up to 2–3 cm. To perform more extended tracheal resection, mobilization of aorta should be undertaken. This manipulation increases operative trauma and hence the complications rate although this access is convenient to form complex anastomoses. In our experience we prefer sternotomy for the left-sided resections routinely.
Right thoracotomy is a more wide-spread and convenient access to the tracheobronchial bifurcation [1]. However, in the majority of patients carinal resection is performed for malignant pathology; therefore, a systematic removal and analysis of mediastinal lymph nodes is required to adequately stage the patient and to predict a prognosis of survival [6,23]. Our retrospective analysis demonstrates that mediastinal lymph node involvement (N2) is an unfavorable factor for survival, especially if there is invasion of the tumor from the lymph nodes into the carina or bronchi (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, operation is indicated under the conditions of systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (unilateral or bilateral). It was recorded that all survivors with N2 disease had undergone systematic lymph node dissection. There is no doubt that sternotomy is the most suitable access for complete removal of lymph nodes and mediastinal fat. Besides, other advantages of this access are lower pain and lower harm to respiratory mechanics, which are of great importance for patients with reduced pulmonary function [6]. We consider that contraindications to sternotomy in the event of posterior mediastinal invasion or tumor localization in the aorto-pulmonary window are relative. Combined sterno-thoracotomy access [24] or VATS [1] for hilar mobilization and lymph node dissection may be a compromise. Besides, sternotomy enables us to perform total mobilization of both trachea and lung and to avoid laryngeal mobilization (it has never been used in our series).
Extension of resection influences complication and mortality rates, especially those related to the anastomosis. We consider resection of 2–4 cm to be safe [2,5]. In our series, the mean length of resection was 5.3 cm among patients who died postoperatively versus 3.4 cm in the group of survivors (P<0.01). It is possible that besides the tension on the suture line, devascularization of the area, which occurs during extensive resections, may lead to difficulties relating to bronchial trophicity.
We have not found any differences in complications and mortality rates when analyzing types of sutures (an interrupted suture, a blanket suture, and a combined suture) and types of anastomosis (simple membrane-to-membrane, cartilage-to-cartilage, ‘telescoping’ type, and ‘rotating’ type). We prefer a blanket prolene suture, which is placed in monofilament, as it is simple, rapid and convenient in performance. In the case of limited leakage after completion of the anastomosis, it is possible to place one to two interrupted sutures. In two cases anastomosis was created by means of a microsurgical technique, separately stitching mucous membrane and muscle carcass [25]. This is a rather complicated technique and the absence of advantages compared to other methods resulted in it being rejected in common practice.
The choice of adequate material to cover the anastomosis is an important component of surgery. An omentum flap is the best choice although its application increases operative traumatism. It is especially helpful for reoperations and management of complications. No vascularized flap was used in cases when tension along the anastomotic line was slight [1]. Development of total dehiscence of anastomosis was not correlated with the covering of the anastomotic line. However, in the case of a microfistula appearing during the first 6–8 days postoperatively, the presence of a muscle flap was meaningful – the microfistula healed without any further surgery. On the other hand, two patients developed rigid fibrous cuirass of a flap around the anastomosis, which led to incurable anastomotic constriction.
Malignant disease is a certain risk factor, as the majority of complications occurring in such patients resulted in death: 91.8% were lung cancer patients versus 8.2% with other diseases. There are some possible explanations for this fact. In patients with benign diseases, the main purpose was to perform economic resection with the least possible extent. At the same time, the objective of achieving clean margins of resection in cancer patients influenced the extension of resection and increased the complications rate. The volume of parenchymal resection was also one of the significant factors heralding postoperative complications (P<0.05). Operations preserving both lungs (‘neo-carina’, ‘complex’ types) were characterized by a rather low rate of morbidity and mortality (Table 5). Almost 94.5% of patients dying postoperatively underwent sleeve pneumonectomy, with an overall mortality rate of 18.3%. Pneumonia of a single lung also resulted in death in 90% of patients versus 5.2% following conservative operations. Preservation even of a part of the lung is likely to provide an improved ‘functional stability’ when complications arise.
|
We conclude that carinal sleeve resection with various modes of reconstruction is an elective option for advanced lung cancer, and may be safely performed for other pulmonary pathologies. The surgical approach to the carina and suture types, and planned reconstruction are defined by the experience and skills of the surgeon. Proper selection of patients and an ideal operative technique aiming to release tension along the anastomosis favor a successful outcome. Systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection should be a routine procedure, especially in patients with invasion of mediastinal lymph nodes.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
Dr Poliakov: Yes, but you have to know our circumstances, because our region is around 3.5 thousand cases per year of lung cancer, only 20% have to be resected, and multimodality treatment is usually impossible, only 5% of our patients got multimodality treatment. So surgery is the only one way to treat these kinds of patients. Maybe it is old, but it is true.
Dr M. Furrer (Chur, Switzerland): Resection of a T4 nonsmall cell carcinoma is usually considered to be justified only without mediastinal lymph node involvement. You showed us that you had only a 30% rate of mediastinoscopy. Could you comment on your preoperative work-up of these patients?
Dr Poliakov: It is a useful procedure, mediastinoscopy, but even if you perform mediastinoscopy, you can show about the lymph node involvement totally. You have to perform open surgery to obtain each lymph node. You have to see what happened in the pleural cavity in the mediastinum. It is the best way to obtain resectability.
Dr G. Stamatis (Essen, Germany): I have two questions. The first one, you have shown that in N2 disease the five-year survival is under 7%. Do you exclude now patients with N2 disease for resection? And the second question, you have shown a high incidence of anastomosis problem. Do you need tissue to cover the anastomosis?
Dr Poliakov: Yes, all patients who had N2 were included in the overall survival rate, with T3 and T4, of course. But there was only a small amount of N2 patients. So without N2, I showed N0N1 survival more than 40%, to the one question.
And the second one, usually we used a pedicle flap from pericardium or surrounding tissue as an omental flap, but in 40 cases we didn't use any covering for the anastomosis. It means when the length of resection less than around 2 cm or 3 cm.
Dr P. Macchiarini (Hannover, Germany): I think this is a wonderful work because it is so far as I know the largest experience worldwide on carinal resection, which is twice as much T1 presented last year by Mr Grillo's group in the Harvard Medical School. I would like to ask a question and make some comments.
The first one is that I had the distinct privilege to be trained by Philippe Dartevelle, who has a wonderful experience on this topic, and he told me, since the beginning, don't do an operation like this in patients with N2 disease except if you have a station 7, which makes sense in terms of long-term survival. Yet I see from your presentation that you have, depending on the T stage, T3, T4, an N2 status in between 30 and 66%, and unfortunately, well, you did 33% in the patients mediastinoscopy, but, as you stated, maybe incorrectly, only to open the pretracheal plane and not to dissect the mediastinum. Yet of these patients, only 20% underwent some form of radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Would you like to comment on that, please.
Dr Poliakov: It is our policy, we perform mediastinoscopy for these patients, but it is better to see what is happening in the pleural cavity and the mediastinum without mediastinoscopy. But the mediastinoscopy is the usual procedure for a left thoracotomy for the left-side resection, especially for the left thoracotomy.
Dr Macchiarini: The second question is, Mr Grillo showed us that if you exceed the 4 cm length of resection of the tracheobronchial tree, you have always a problem in terms of tension of the anastomosis, and yet you had 37% of patients that had more than 6 cm.
Dr Poliakov: Yes, it is true, but it is included in the mortality, because sometimes it is unexpected resection during the surgery. So it is a small number of patients with a resection more than 6 cm.
Dr P. Dartevelle (Le Plessis Robinson, France): This is one of the biggest series ever to be presented. I have two questions for you. You had quite a lot of anastomotic problems as well as fistulas and empyemas. I wonder whether preoperative radiotherapy you think has contributed to that, and if you looked at those patients without radiotherapy, if the anastomotic problems were less?
And the second question concerns complex carinal resection, do you have facilities for extracorporeal circulation to be assisted when it is necessary?
Dr Poliakov: Related to the second question, we have no possibilities for extracorporeal circulation.
And for the first question, yes, there is no significance between the patient who was done with radiotherapy and for other patients; there are no differences, significant differences.
Dr D. Dougenis (Patras, Greece): It is a very nice series, but I don't agree with your indications because you cannot do an operation with a 50% mortality rate for N2 disease when you have no five-year survival rate, and I think that half of your indications were bad indications. In our series in my own hospital, the survival rate after 100 carinal pneumonectomies is 45% for selected patients, and the mortality rate is 6%, and it is probably because the patients are very well selected.
But I agree with you for the technique. I think that even for wide pneumonectomy, for wide carinal pneumonectomy, perhaps the median sternotomy is the best approach, and for left carinal pneumonectomy, it is true that the median sternotomy is the best approach to do a radical resection, and it is not very difficult if you mobilize totally the aortic arch of the aorta.
Dr Poliakov: Thank you very much, but it is our policy, it is more convenient for us to perform this by sternotomy because we did not need to mobilize the aortic arch in these cases. It is our manner.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. R. Shen, B. F. Meyers, J. M. Larner, and D. R. Jones Special Treatment Issues in Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 290S - 305S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Yamamoto, Y. Miyamoto, A. Ohsumi, N. Imanishi, and F. Kojima Surgical Results of Carinal Reconstruction: An Alterative Technique for Tumors Involving the Tracheal Carina Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 216 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Alifano and J.-F. Regnard Sleeve pneumonectomy MMCTS, May 7, 2007; 2007(0507): 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Macchiarini, M. Altmayer, T. Go, T. Walles, K. Schulze, I. Wildfang, A. Haverich, M. Hardin, and Hannover Interdisciplinary Intrathoracic Tumor Tas Technical Innovations of Carinal Resection for Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 1989 - 1997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Chichevatov, A. Gorshenev, and E. Sinev Preventive diaphragm plasty after pneumonectomy on account of lung cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, August 1, 2006; 14(4): 265 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. de Perrot, E. Fadel, O. Mercier, S. Mussot, A. Chapelier, and P. Dartevelle Long-term results after carinal resection for carcinoma: Does the benefit warrant the risk? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2006; 131(1): 81 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-F. Regnard, C. Perrotin, R. Giovannetti, O. Schussler, A. Petino, L. Spaggiari, M. Alifano, and P. Magdeleinat Resection for Tumors With Carinal Involvement: Technical Aspects, Results, and Prognostic Factors Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1841 - 1846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. A. DiPerna and D. E. Wood Surgical Management of T3 and T4 Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 5038s - 5044s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
