HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Cemal Asim Kutlu Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kutlu, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kutlu, C. A. Related Collections Lung - other

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:469
© 2003 Elsevier Science NL

Letter to the Editor

Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome following pneumonectomy

Chest Surgery Center, Yedikule Hospital for Chest Disease and Chest Surgery, Zeytinburnu 34760, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 7 March 2003; received in revised form 9 March 2003; accepted 9 June 2003.

^* Tel.: +90-212-296-1680; fax: +90-212-247-4122
e-mail: cakutlu{at}turk.net

Key Words: Postoperative lung injury • Pneumonectomy

I read with great interest the excellent article entitled ‘Predicting pulmonary complications after pneumonectomy for lung cancer’ [1]. The authors reviewed a large number of cases undergoing pneumonectomy and confirmed that the pulmonary complications are the major cause of postoperative mortality following pneumonectomy. Algar et al. addressed seven groups of pulmonary complications in the paper. Unfortunately, I found such a classification rather confusing. The criteria for the complications classified as pneumonia (no. 1), atelectasis (no. 2) and pneumothorax (no. 7) are clearly defined. On the other hand, I think respiratory failure (RF) (no. 3), post-pneumonectomy pulmonary edema (PPE) (no. 4), ventilatory dependence (VD) (no. 5) and reintubation (no. 6) are harder for the reader to figure out. The criteria (pO₂<60, pCO₂>45 mmHg) given for RF occur due to several reasons some of which are managed with a basic support in patients following pneumonectomy. The criteria for the diagnosis of PPE have not been provided in the literature. Thus, ‘pulmonary edema without clinical evidence of heart failure’ is not explanatory for the reader to understand the clinical condition considered as PPE in the paper. Furthermore, some of the pulmonary complications are named as VD and reintubation. In conclusion, these four complications (nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6) seem to be similar and difficult to separate from each other. Any patient in this series might have required reintubation due to ARF caused by PPE.

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are postoperative complications following pulmonary resection that are well defined in the literature [2]. A variety of names including PPE is applied for postoperative lung injury (ALI/ARDS). It has been previously reported that postoperative lung injury is diagnosed not only following pneumonectomy but also following lobectomy even after minor resections [2]. The Consensus Committee provided objective criteria for the diagnosis of ALI/ARDS in 1994 [3]. Pulmonary complications are easily classified and reported using these objective criteria. It seems some of the patients considered as complicated with ARF, PPE, VD and reintubation might have been complicated with ALI/ARDS. This does not make any difference for the conclusion made by Algar et al., but I think it would be interesting to re-evaluate the results of the excellent series from that point of view.

References

1. Algar F.J., Alvarez A., Salvatierra A., Baamonde C., Aranda J.L., Lopez-Pujol F.J. Predicting pulmonary complications after pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:201-208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Kutlu C.A., Williams E.A., Evans T.W., Pastorino U., Goldstraw P. Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:376-380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Bernard G.R., Artigas A., Brigham K.L., Carlet J., Falke K., Hudson L., Lamy M., Legall J.R., Morris A., Spragg R., the Consensus Committee. The American-European consensus conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes and clinical trial coordination. Am J Crit Care Med 1994;149:818-824.[Abstract]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Cemal Asim Kutlu Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kutlu, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kutlu, C. A. Related Collections Lung - other