EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Folke Nilsson
Anders Jeppsson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bech-Hanssen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppsson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bech-Hanssen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppsson, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:723-730
© 2003 Elsevier Science NL


Mortality after mitral regurgitation surgery: importance of clinical and echocardiographic variables

Odd Bech-Hanssena*, Tina Rydénb, Henrik Schersténb, Anders Odénb, Folke Nilssonb, Anders Jeppssonb

a Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden

Received 24 May 2003; received in revised form 28 July 2003; accepted 30 July 2003.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-31-342-2735; fax: +46-31-828978
e-mail: odd.bech-hanssen{at}klinfys.gu.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Objectives: The management of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) constitutes a challenge due to its heterogeneity in terms of etiology and possible treatment strategies. In the present study, we sought to describe the importance of preoperative echocardiographic and clinical variables in relation to outcome 5 years after surgical treatment of MR. Methods: The echocardiographic reports (transthoracic) from 298 patients were analyzed and the anatomic lesions were classified into one of three main groups (functional, organic degenerated with hypermobile valve or organic degenerated without hypermobility). 5-year cumulative survival was compared with the expected survival in an age- and gender-matched normal population. Risk functions were determined with a Poisson regression model. Results: Operative mortality was 4.4%, with higher mortality in patients with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (7.6 vs. 2.2%, P=0.03). Survival after 5 years was 65% in patients with concomitant CABG, compared with the expected 86% (P<0.001), 70 vs. 88% (P<0.001) in patients with preoperative NYHA class III/IV, while survival in patients with NYHA class I/II did not differ from the expected (90 vs. 90%, P=0.56). In patients with a hypermobile valve without CABG, postoperative survival did not differ from the expected (91 vs. 89%, P=0.92). The estimated risk ratio for death, repair versus prosthesis, was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.32–1.00, P=0.05). Conclusions: The present study shows that it is possible, using transthoracic echocardiography and clinical data, to identify patients with an excellent outcome. The adverse effects of severe symptomatology and replacement compared with repair are demonstrated. The findings encourage early intervention before severe symptoms occur, especially if repair is possible.

Key Words: Echocardiography • Mitral regurgitation • 5-year survival


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
The management of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) constitutes a challenge due to its heterogeneity in terms of etiology and possible treatment strategies. MR can either be due to a degenerative process in the valve itself (hypermobile valve or other organic degenerated valves) or can be secondary to changes in the left ventricle or mitral annulus (functional MR).

The treatment of patients with MR has changed in recent decades, with an increasing proportion undergoing valve repair instead of valve replacement. The reported excellent short- and long-term results of mitral repair [15] can potentially influence the policy regarding the timing of mitral surgery. Some authors now recommend surgery in patients without symptoms or signs of left ventricular dysfunction, if the likelihood of successful repair is high and the operative risks are low [6,7]. Operating on asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients requires the diagnosis of the anatomic lesion and assessment of the likelihood of repair to be correct and the operative mortality as well as the late failure of repair to be low. Previous reports that recommend early surgical intervention in patients with severe MR are often based on lessons learned from patients with flail leaflets and they reflect a surgical standard that may be not representative for many institutions [4,5,8]. Our surgical policy regarding the timing and choice of procedure (repair or replacement) has been relatively conservative and is probably representative of the standard at many institutions.

In the present retrospective study, we investigate all the patients undergoing mitral valve surgery from 1995 to 1999, with the aim of describing the importance of both clinical and preoperative echocardiographic variables in relation to the outcome.


    2. Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
2.1. Patient population
The total patient population that was admitted for mitral valve surgery between January 1995 and December 1999 comprised 449 patients. Patients with significant mitral stenosis (n=76) or concomitant aortic valve surgery were excluded (n=56). Of the 317 patients with pure MR, preoperative echocardiography was performed at our institution in 298 patients and at affiliated hospitals in 19 patients. Only investigations performed at our institution were included in the analysis. Clinical and operative data were collected prospectively in a database (Corbase, Journalia AB, Sweden).

2.2. Surgical procedure
The operation techniques included median sternotomy and cold blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection. The total subvalvular apparatus was preserved in patients undergoing valve replacement, when possible. In patients undergoing repair due to hypermobility of the median portion of the posterior leaflet, a quadrangular resection was performed. In patients with hypermobility of the anterior leaflet either transposition of chorda or a small triangular resections was used. No chordal shortening or artificial chorda procedures were performed. All patients undergoing valve repair received an annuloplasty with a ring inserted.

2.3. Assessment of anatomic lesions by echocardiography
The mitral anatomic lesions were divided into three groups as previously described: (1) functional with normal leaflets, (2) organic degenerated hypermobile leaflets or (3) organic degenerated leaflets without hypermobility [9]. The group with hypermobile leaflets comprises patients with prolapse, flail leaflets due to rupture of chorda and papillary muscle rupture. The group with organic degenerated valves includes rheumatic valve disease and endocarditis.

The reports from the physicians performing the preoperative echocardiograpic examinations were analyzed and the anatomic lesions and the mechanisms involved were classified into one of the three groups (functional, hypermobility or organic degenerated). The echocardiographic tapes were not reinterpreted.

2.4. Echocardiography
M-mode measurements were made according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography [10]. The ejection fraction was calculated either from M-mode according to Teichholz, or from two-dimensional recordings according to Simpson's rule. When image quality did not permit calculation, the ejection fraction was assessed by eyeballing. The mitral annulus diameter was assessed either by eyeballing or by measurements at the beginning of diastole from the parasternal length axis, apical four-chamber and two-chamber views.

All the patients were investigated by color Doppler, as well as by pulsed and continuous wave Doppler. Mitral flow was recorded at the tips of the mitral leaflets in the four-chamber view. Pulmonary venous flow velocities were obtained by placing the sample volume at the orifice of the upper right pulmonary vein. Continuous wave Doppler signals were recorded by a 2 MHz non-imaging probe to obtain an optimal signal-to-noise ratio and multiple windows were used.

The assessment of MR severity was based on a number of variables: color Doppler jet characteristics including jet width and area, continuous wave Doppler intensity and shape of the spectral recording, mitral inflow, pulmonary vein flow pattern by pulsed wave Doppler, left atrial size, left ventricular dimensions and pulmonary artery pressure.

2.5. Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean±SD. An unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare appropriate data, while the chi-square test was used for proportions. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Operative mortality was defined as death within the first month or during the same period of hospitalization.

5-year cumulative survival (Kaplan–Meier) was compared with the expected survival in an age- and gender-matched normal population. The expected number of deaths was calculated for the patients under the assumption that their risk coincided with that of the normal population. Age, sex and calendar time were taken into account and the comparisons between observed and expected numbers were performed using Poisson distributions.

The death hazard function was estimated using a Poisson model depending on a set of variables [11]. The hazard function was of the form exp(ß01x12x2+...+ßkxk), where the beta values are coefficients and x1,x2,...,xk are the values of the variables. The analysis was performed stepwise. The following variables were included: age, gender, time since surgical treatment, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), repair or prosthesis, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and NYHA class. In the last step, only the variables of significant importance (P<0.05) were included.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
3.1. Baseline characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the overall group and subgroups are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Sixty percent of the patients had severe symptoms (NYHA class III/IV), 20% had atrial fibrillation, 37% signs of left ventricular dysfunction (EF<60%) and 82% pulmonary hypertension (>30 mmHg). Patients with functional MR had more pronounced left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared with patients with hypermobile and organic degenerated valves. Patients with hypermobile valves were less symptomatic than patients with functional MR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the overall group and different anatomic lesions

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Baseline characteristics according to surgical procedure and coronary artery bypass

 
Patients undergoing valve replacement were more often female, had more symptoms and more frequent atrial fibrillation compared with those who underwent repair. Patients with concomitant CABG were older, more often male, had higher serum creatinine and more pronounced systolic dysfunction.

3.2. Anatomic lesions and surgical strategy
The echocardiographic assessment of anatomic lesions and mechanisms responsible for the MR were functional MR in 19%, hypermobile leaflets in 63%, organic degenerated in 10%, previous mitral surgery in 4% and not possible to classify from report in 4%.

In the patients with functional MR, the left ventricular systolic function was abnormal in the majority of the patients with regional dysfunction in 66% and uniform dysfunction in 21%. Hypermobility engaged the posterior leaflet in 59%, the anterior leaflet in 23% and both leaflets in 16%. Four patients (2%) had a papillary muscle rupture. Three patients in the group with echocardiographic organic degenerated valves had typical rheumatic lesions (10%) and a fairly large proportion (45%) had vegetations.

The proportion of the patients undergoing repair was 58% (of these, 34% with isolated annuloplasty) and, among those who underwent valve replacement, 79% received a mechanical prosthesis. The proportion of repair in patients with functional MR, hypermobile leaflets and organic degenerated leaflets was 84, 58 and 28%, respectively. Hypermobility in the posterior leaflet led to repair in 78% of the patients. Patients with hypermobility in the anterior or both valves underwent repair in 29% and 23% of cases, respectively. The proportion with repair was 28% in patients with organic degenerative valve disease.

3.3. Operative mortality and reoperations
Thirteen patients (overall 4.4%) died within 1 month of operation or during the same period of hospitalization. In patients without CABG (n=172), in-hospital mortality was 2.2% compared with 7.6% in patients with CABG (P=0.03). Patients who died early or in hospital were older (71±5 vs. 64±11 years, P=0.01), they had concomitant CABG performed more frequently (69% vs. 39%, P=0.03) and had higher preoperative serum creatinine (133±67 vs. 106±29 mmol/l, P=0.004) compared with those who survived for longer. The significance of female gender was borderline (54 vs. 29%, P=0.06). Operative mortality was not affected by repair or valve replacement or anatomic lesion.

Reoperations were performed in 12 patients with primary repairs and three patients with primary valve replacement. Six patients in the group with primary repairs were reoperated on within the first month and a further three subjects were operated on within the first year. Among patients treated with repair undergoing a reoperation, six (50%) had a hypermobile posterior leaflet, two (17%) had endocarditis and two had functional MR. Freedom from reoperation during the follow-up time (median 45 months) was 92% in the repair group and 98% in the prosthesis group.

3.4. 5-year results
The overall survival after 5 years was significantly lower in the patient group compared with the expected survival in an age- and gender-matched normal population (P<0.001) (Fig. 1 and Table 3). Survival in patients without CABG did not differ significantly from that in the normal population, while patients with CABG had a lower 5-year survival than expected (Fig. 2) . Patients with preoperative NYHA class III, IV had a lower 5-year survival than the normal population (Fig. 2, P<0.001), while survival in patients with NYHA class I or II did not differ from the survival expected in a normal population, Fig. 2. The observed survival was reduced in patients undergoing both valve replacement (P<0.001) and repair (P=0.03), Fig. 3 and Table 3.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Observed postoperative survival for all patients compared with the expected survival.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Expected number of deaths and the probability of surviving 5 years in patients and the corresponding normal population

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Observed and expected survival in patients without (upper left) and with CABG (upper right) and with NYHA class I/II (lower left) and NYHA class III/IV (lower right).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Observed and expected survival in patients undergoing replacement (left) and repair (right).

 
Patients with functional MR and patients with organic degenerated valves had increased mortality compared with the normal population (Fig. 4 and Table 3), while survival in patients with hypermobility without concomitant CABG did not differ from the normal population (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Concomitant CABG in patients with hypermobile valves adversely affected survival (Fig. 4). The proportion of patients with hypermobile valves in NYHA class III/IV were 50% in those without CABG and 59% in those with CABG (P=0.36).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Observed and expected survival in patients with functional MR (upper left), MR due to organic degenerated valves (upper right), hypermobile valves with concomitant CABG (lower left) and hypermobility without CABG (lower right).

 
3.5. Risk functions
The estimated risk ratio for death, repair versus prosthesis, was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.32–1.00, P=0.05). In a separate model, the interaction between the variable repair/prosthesis and time since surgical treatment was included. Table 4 shows that the difference between repair and replacement increased with time.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. The risk ratios (repair/replacement) in different follow-up periods

 

    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we have shown that it is possible, using preoperative echocardiographic and clinical data, to identify a subgroup of patients with low operative mortality and excellent 5-year survival after surgical treatment for severe MR. Further, a negative effect by preoperatively impaired functional status (NYHA class III/IV) on outcome was demonstrated.

4.1. Excess mortality due to heart dysfunction
All patients undergoing mitral valve surgery due to MR between 1995 and 1999 were included in the study. In overall terms, many patients had severe symptoms (NYHA III/IV), frequent atrial fibrillation, signs of left ventricular dysfunction (EF<60%) and pulmonary hypertension. Severe symptoms at the time of operation did not determine operative mortality, but NYHA class clearly influenced 5-year mortality. Severe symptoms thus indicate an increased risk of irreversible myocardial damage leading to excessive mortality compared with the normal population.

In contrast to other reports, we were not able to establish a link between preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction and outcome [12]. It is possible to speculate that, in patients with severe MR which unloads the ventricle into the left atrium, an apparently normal ejection fraction can obfuscate ventricular dysfunction [12,13]. Indeed, this finding underscores the limitation in the assessment of ventricular function by the ejection fraction in patients with severe MR.

4.2. Timing of surgery
The timing of surgical intervention in patients with severe MR cannot be generalized. According to the current ACC/AHA guidelines, there is general agreement that symptomatic patients with severe MR will benefit from surgical treatment [14]. The benefit of the surgical treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe MR and normal left ventricular function, on the other hand, has not been established [14,15]. However, some experienced centers now recommend surgery in this patient group [6,7,16]. Operating on asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients requires the diagnosis of the anatomic lesion and the assessment of the likelihood of repair to be correct, the operative mortality to be very low and the mortality rate after operation to be lower than the risk of death if uncorrected. The data from the present study show that it was possible, using echocardiography, to identify an important subgroup of patients (41% of total) with hypermobile valves without CABG, with low operative mortality (2.3%) and 5-year survival that was no different from that of the normal background population. The long-term outcome is known to be dependent upon preoperative symptoms [17], left ventricular function [18] and the presence of atrial fibrillation [19]. It is therefore conceivable that early intervention will also improve the long-term outcome in patients with hypermobile valves in whom repair can be performed.

From our data, we do not know the extent to which the patients had been followed with clinical and echocardiographic investigations during an asymptomatic phase or whether they were symptomatic at the time of the primary diagnosis. However, patients with hypermobile leaflets and MR are often recognized as a result of a heart murmur when they still are mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic. Approximately 50% of the patients with hypermobile valves were in functional class III/IV and it can therefore be argued that a large proportion of the patients with severe MR were operated on too late. Patients with ischemic functional MR, on the other hand, often present with symptoms primarily caused by their coronary artery disease and the timing of surgery must be individualized.

4.3. Importance of surgical procedure
In the present study, we found that patients undergoing repair had a better outcome than patients undergoing valve replacement. We found important baseline differences (NYHA class, atrial fibrillation) that can partly explain the observed difference. However, using the Poisson regression model we could demonstrate better outcome in the repair group independent of these baseline differences, and the difference between repair and replacement increased with time. Previous studies comparing mitral repair with replacement are conflicting. There are studies that suggest that repair is preferable, but differences in baseline characteristics complicate the interpretation of these results [20,21], while other reports with multivariate analysis do not confirm the superiority of repair [22,23]. However, some more recent reports [1,4] are in agreement with our findings that repair improves the outcome compared with valve replacement. Principally the observed difference in outcome between repair and replacement can be explained by more pronounced left ventricular function dysfunction or valve-related complications in the replacement group. The surgical procedure used during the study period preserved the subvalvular apparatus in order to avoid the deterioration in left ventricular function in patients without chordal support. However, we do not have any data on the postoperative left ventricular function and therefore residual myocardial dysfunction might contribute to the less favorable outcome in the replacement group. Further studies are needed to explain the difference in outcome between the repair and replacement group.

In the study period, the surgical strategy at our institution tended to be conservative, the percentage of repair was 58%, which can be compared with the 75–85% reported from some other institutions [4,9]. Patients with hypermobility in the posterior leaflet and functional MR were treated with repair on a level that can be compared with others [4,9]. However, patients with hypermobility in the anterior leaflet or both leaflets most frequently underwent replacement, as did patients with an infected mitral valve. The fairly low percentage of repair at our institution reflects a concern about the durability of procedures on the anterior leaflet or infected mitral valve. A prerequisite for a change in treatment strategy must be that these patients can be successfully treated with repair. The documented superiority of repair in terms of outcome [4,9], together with more recent good results regarding the durability of valve repair on anterior prolapses [4,8,24] and infected mitral valves [2] should, however, encourage efforts to increase the percentage of valve repair.

4.4. Study limitations
The main limitation of the present study that might have influenced the results is the retrospective design. The echocardiographic reports, the description of surgical findings and the treatment strategy in relation to the echocardiographic and surgical findings were not clearly defined. Several echocardiographers and surgeons participated and it is therefore conceivable that varying skills in echocardiography and surgery might have introduced misinterpretations of anatomic lesions.

4.5. Conclusions
In the study period, most patients were clearly symptomatic and often displayed signs of systolic dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. It is important to note that, in patients with NYHA class I/II and patients with hypermobile leaflets without coronary artery bypass, the 5-year survival did not differ from that of a normal age- and gender-matched population. Patients undergoing repair had a better outcome compared with the replacement group. It is possible, using transthoracic echocardiography and clinical data, to identify patients with an excellent outcome. The findings encourage early intervention before severe symptoms occur, especially if repair is possible.


    Acknowledgments
 
The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, the Swedish Medical Society and the VästraGötaland Region.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Orszulak T.A., Tajik A.J., Bailey K.R., Frye R.L. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation 1995;91:1022-1028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Muehrcke D.D., Cosgrove D.M., 3rd, Lytle B.W., Taylor P.C., Burgar A.M., Durnwald C.P., Loop F.D. Is there an advantage to repairing infected mitral valves?. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1718-1724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gillinov A.M., Wierup P.N., Blackstone E.H., Bishay E.S., Cosgrove D.M., White J., Lytle B.W., MacCarthy P.M. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:1125-1141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mohty D., Orszulak T.A., Schaff H.V., Avierinos J.F., Tajik J.A., Enriquez-Sarano M. Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 2001;104:I1-I7.
  5. Braunberger E., Deloche A., Berrebi A., Abdallah F., Celestin J.A., Meimoun P., Chattelier G., Chauvaud S., Fabiani J.N., Carpentier A. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral insufficiency. Circulation 2001;104(Suppl I):I8-I11.
  6. Ling L.H., Enriquez-Sarano M., Seward J.B., Tajik A.J., Schaff H.V., Bailey K.R., Frye R.L. Clinical outcome of mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1417-1423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Enriquez-Sarano M. Timing of mitral valve surgery. Heart 2002;87:79-85.[Free Full Text]
  8. Gillinov A.M., Cosgrove D.M., Blackstone E.H., Diaz R., Arnold J.H., Lytle B.W., Smedira N.G., Sabik J.F., McCarthy P.M., Loop F.D. Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Enriquez-Sarano M., Freeman W.K., Tribouilloy C.M., Orszulak T.A., Khandheria B.K., Seward J.B., Bailey K.R., Tajik A.J. Functional anatomy of mitral regurgitation: accuracy and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1129-1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Sahn D.J., DeMaria A., Kisslo J., Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantification in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072-1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Breslow N.E., Day N.E. Statistical methods in cancer research. IARC Scientific Publications. 1987.
  12. Enriques-Sarano M., Jamil Tajik A., Schaff H., Orzulak T., Bailey K., Frye R. Echocardiographic prediction of survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1994;90:830-837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Starling M.R. Left ventricular pump efficiency in long-term mitral regurgitation assessed by means of left ventricular-arterial coupling relations. Am Heart J 1994;127:1324-1335.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Bonow R.O., Carabello B., de Leon A.C., Edmunds L.H., Fedderly B.J., Freed M., Gaasch W.H., McKay C.R., Nishimura R.A., O'Gara P.T., O'Rourke R.A., Rahimtoola S.H. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task force on practise guidelines (Committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease). Circulation 1998;98:1949-1984.[Free Full Text]
  15. Iung B., Gohlke-Bärwolf C., Tornos P., Tribouilly C., Hall R., Butchart E., Vahanian A. Recommendations on the management of the asymptomatic patient with valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1253-1266.[Free Full Text]
  16. Sousa Uva M., Dreyfus G., Rescigno G., al Aile N., Mascagni R., La Marra M., Pouillart F., Pargaonkar S., Palsky E., Raffou R., Scorsin M., Noera G., Lessana A. Surgical treatment of asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1240-1249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tribouilloy C.M., Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Orszulak T.A., Bailey K.R., Tajik A.J., Frye R.L. Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: rationale for optimizing surgical indications. Circulation 1999;99:400-405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Orszulak T.A., Bailey K.R., Tajik A.J., Frye R.L. Congestive heart failure after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. A long-term study. Circulation 1995;92:2496-2503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lim E., Barlow C.W., Hosseinpour A.R., Wisbey C., Wilson K., Pidgeon W., Charman S., Barlow J.B., Wells F.C. Influence of atrial fibrillation on outcome following mitral valve repair. Circulation 2001;104:I59-I63.
  20. Orszulak T., Schaff H., Danielson G., Piehler J.M., Pluth J.R., Frye R.L., McGoon D.C., Elvebakk L.R. Mitral regurgitation due to ruptured chorda tendineae. Early and late results of valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89:491-498.[Abstract]
  21. Angell W., Oury J., Shah P. A comparison of replacement and reconstruction in patients with mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93:665-674.[Abstract]
  22. Galloway A., Colvin S., Baumann F., Grossi E.A., Ribakove G.H., Harty S., Spencer F.C. A comparison of mitral valve reconstruction with mitral valve replacement: intermediate-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 1989:47.
  23. Sand M., Naftel D., Blackstone E., Kirklin J., Karp R. A comparison of repair and replacement for mitral valve incompetence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:208-219.[Abstract]
  24. Totaro P., Tulumello E., Fellini P., Rambaldini M., La Canna G., Coletti G., Zogno M., Lorusso R. Mitral valve repair for isolated prolapse of the anterior leaflet: an 11-year follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:119-126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. J. M. Westenberg, S. D. Roes, N. Ajmone Marsan, N. M. J. Binnendijk, J. Doornbos, J. J. Bax, J. H. C. Reiber, A. de Roos, and R. J. van der Geest
Mitral Valve and Tricuspid Valve Blood Flow: Accurate Quantification with 3D Velocity-encoded MR Imaging with Retrospective Valve Tracking
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 792 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Determinants of operative mortality in valvular heart surgery.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 547 - 557.



Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. J.M. Westenberg, J. Doornbos, M. I.M. Versteegh, J. J. Bax, R. J. van der Geest, A. de Roos, R. A.E. Dion, and J. H.C. Reiber
Accurate quantitation of regurgitant volume with MRI in patients selected for mitral valve repair
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Folke Nilsson
Anders Jeppsson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bech-Hanssen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppsson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bech-Hanssen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jeppsson, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS