EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Matti R. Tarkka
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Järvinen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Järvinen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:750-756
© 2003 Elsevier Science NL


Changes in health-related quality of life and functional capacity following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Otso Järvinena*, Timo Saarinenb, Juhani Julkunenb,c, Heini Huhtalad, Matti R. Tarkkaa

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
b Rehabilitation Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
c Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
d School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Received 18 April 2003; received in revised form 14 June 2003; accepted 19 June 2003.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +358-3-247-4881
e-mail: otsojarvinen{at}koti.soon.fi


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Improvement in survival and quality of life are the primary indications for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations. Among elderly patients the main goal of surgery is not necessarily to prolong life, but to improve the health-related quality of life. Factors associated with mortality and morbidity following CABG surgery have been well defined, but the quality of life and functional capacity in elderly patients undergoing CABG are poorly documented. The aim here was to investigate changes in health-related quality of life, overall performance status and symptomatic status during 1 year after CABG surgery. Methods: Comprehensive data on 508 CABG patients were prospectively collected, including preoperative risk factors and postoperative morbidity in a surgical center and in all eighteen secondary referral hospitals up to discharge. The RAND-36 Health Survey (RAND-36) was used as indicator of quality of life. The primary outcome was change in the physical component summary, mental component summary and General Health summary scores from the RAND-36. Karnofsky dependency category was used to assess overall performance status, and symptomatic status was estimated according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. All assessments were made preoperatively and repeated 12 months later. Analysis was based on three age groups: 64 years or less (282 patients), 65–74 years (175 patients), and 75 or more years (51 patients). Results: Thirty-day and 1-year survival rates were 98.2 and 96.7%, respectively. A great majority (86.4%) of the patients recovered without major complication. In all, the present data showed significant improvement in all eight domains of QOL as well as in functional capacity and NYHA class during the 1st year after CABG. However, the mean change in RAND-36 Mental Component Summary scores among patients aged 75 years or more did not reach a statistically significant level (P=0.097) and they had significantly minor improvement as compared to younger patients (P<0.05). Moreover, their General Health score improvement was poorer and statistically insignificant (P=0.817). Conclusions: Elderly patients not only have higher mortality and morbidity but also derive less benefit from CABG regarding certain aspects of QOL.

Key Words: Coronary artery bypass • Outcome • Quality of life • Functional capacity • Elderly


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Improvements in survival and quality of life are the primary indications for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations [1]. Factors associated with survival following CABG surgery have been well defined. A number of risk indices have been developed for the prediction of postoperative mortality [2,3] and some solely for the prediction of morbidity [4,5]. However, there are limited data available to help clinicians identify patients likely to experience improvement or decrement in their overall quality of life following CABG surgery. Although the operation relieves angina, this reduction does not directly translate into quality of life improvement following surgery, since multiple physical and psychological factors may be involved.

In the past two decades, the median age of patients selected for CABG surgery has increased [6,7]. The elderly are a challenging group of patients undergoing surgical procedures. Their functional reserve capacity is diminished compared with younger patients [8] and they are more likely to have preoperative comorbid conditions [9]. In this group of patients life expectancy is also limited by natural factors, so that the gain in added life years by operative treatment is – naturally – limited. Although several publications have documented operative results in the elderly, there is a lack of data on quality of life in this group.

In the present prospective study we assessed in detail changes in health-related quality of life (RAND-36), overall performance status (Karnofsky score) and symptomatic status (New York Heart Association, NYHA class) during the 1st year following CABG surgery. Special interest was focused on the postoperative benefits for elderly patients.


    2. Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
2.1. Procedure and subjects
The data were obtained from Tampere University Hospital between May 2, 1999 and November 30, 2000. The cohort comprised 508 patients who underwent isolated CABG. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Tampere University Hospital and each patient gave written informed consent to participate. There were 420 (82.7%) male patients in the sample. Age range was from 34 to 92 years (median 63). Three hundred and ninety-eight (78.3%) of the procedures were performed electively, 108 (21.3%) urgently and two (0.4%) as emergencies. Four hundred and fifty-three (89.2%) patients underwent bypass grafting through a sternotomy incision with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB; on-pump) and 55 (10.8%) were operated without CPB (off-pump).

During the primary hospital stay a comprehensive pre-, peri- and postoperative medical data body was collected. A summary of the preoperative data are shown in Table 1. Most patients were discharged on the 6th day (median) after the operation to the local district hospital, where they were kept for another 6 days (as a median). The data from these secondary discharge hospitals were collected by referring physicians and sent to the first author (O.J.) for analysis. All outcome events, including 30-day mortality and complications, were recorded for joint analysis with the primary hospital data. Major postoperative complications included mortality, stroke, mediastinitis, sepsis, low output syndrome, prolonged ventilatory support (>36 h), acute renal failure requiring dialysis, perioperative myocardial infarction (a new Q-wave in the electrocardiogram or a peak level of CK-MB more than 150 µmol/l), pulmonary embolism and severe cardiac failure or severe ventricular arrhythmia requiring ICU or CCU stay in the primary or secondary referral hospital. Atrial fibrillation was recorded as a minor complication.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative clinical characteristics of the study population

 
2.2. Assessment of health-related quality of life and functional capacity
All assessments were made preoperatively and repeated 12 months later. The baseline self-report questionnaire was given to the patients the day before surgery. Patients unable or unwilling to complete the survey were excluded from the study. The total number of patients undergoing CABG in our institution during the study period (May 1999–November 2000) was 1128. Of these, 508 (45.0%) completed a baseline survey. Compared with these 508 patients the 620 patients who did not complete a baseline survey were older (median age 68 versus 63 years, P<0.001), were less often men (64.8 versus 82.7%, P<0.001), had a higher Euroscore risk sum (median 4 versus 2, P<0.001), were operated more often urgently (47.1 versus 21.3%, P<0.001), had more often three-vessel disease (68.0 versus 60.4%, P=0.029) or diabetes mellitus (22.3 versus 17.3%, P=0.039).

The follow-up questionnaire including the same measures was mailed to the participants 1 year after the by-pass operation. Seventeen (3.3%) had died during this postoperative period. Four hundred and sixty-five (94.7%) of the 491 surviving patients returned the follow-up questionnaire, mean time of follow-up being 12.6 (SD 1.2) months. Compared with the 465 patients who completed the form, those 26 patients who did not complete it were younger (median age 54 versus 63 years, P=0.006). However, there were no significant differences in the majority of variables, including sex, Euroscore risk sum, priority of operation, or in the NYHA class.

We used the Finnish adaptation of the RAND-36 generic health-related quality of life scale, for which there are reference values available for the Finnish population [10]. The RAND-36 is a widely used and validated scale which yields scores for eight dimensions of health-related quality of life: (1) general health; (2) physical functioning; (3) role functioning/physical; (4) bodily pain; (5) emotional well-being; (6) role functioning/emotional; (7) social functioning; and (8) energy [11,12]. The scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, 0 being the poorest and 100 the best possible health status. To reduce the number of outcome variables two summary scores can also be used: the physical component summary (PCS) equals the mean value of the physical sub-scales (1–4) while the mental component summary (MCS) equals the mean value of more psychical sub-scales (5–8) [1315]. We also used the RAND-36 first item for ’general health’ separately (Fig. 1) . The main content of this item is worded: "In general, would you say your health is: excellent, very good, good, fair, poor?".



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. General health scores (RAND-36) preoperatively and 1 year after coronary bypass grafting by age.

 
Preoperative and 1-year follow-up performance status was assessed using the Karnofsky scoring system (see Table 2) [16]. Pre- and postoperative functional capacity was ranked according to the NYHA classification. Statistics Finland provided causes and dates of death after discharging.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Karnofsky performance status scale

 
Patient and outcome variables are expressed mostly as a percentage of the total. In some analyses age was used as a grouping variable as follows: 64 years or less (282 patients), 65–74 years (175 patients), and 75 or more years (51 patients). Categorical variables between the groups were compared using Pearson's Chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared by one-way analysis of variance for variables with normal distributions and Kruskal–Wallis test for variables with non-normal distributions. Baseline and follow-up variables were compared using paired-samples t-test or variance analysis for repeated measures. P values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 9.0 for Windows.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Thirty-day and 1 year survival rates were 98.2% (nine deaths) and 96.7% (17 deaths), respectively. Both 30-day (55.6%) and subsequent (62.5%) deaths occurred mainly for cardiac-related reasons. Major postoperative adverse events were as follows: prolonged hospitalization (more than 3 weeks); 7.9%, perioperative myocardial infarction; 2.6%, stroke; 2.0%, mediastinitis; 1.4%, and impaired renal function requiring dialysis; 1.0%. A great majority (86.4%) of the patients recovered without any major complication. In all, atrial fibrillation was the most common postoperative complication, occurring in 169 patients (33.3%). There was an obvious tendency to more adverse events among the elderly in that 9.9, 14.3 and 31.4% of patients aged under 65 years, 65–74 years and 75 or more years, respectively, had major complication before discharge home (P<0.001). Likewise 30-day and 1-year mortalities were associated with age (P=0.029, P=0.095); 0.7 and 2.1% in the youngest, 2.3 and 4.0% in the middle age, and 5.9 and 7.8% in the oldest age group, respectively.

The study sample evinced depressed preoperative health status in all eight dimensions of the RAND-36 as compared to the general Finnish population (Table 3). All these health scores improved significantly (P<0.001) following CABG surgery, approaching the values in the general population. Moreover, emotional well-being and energy reached even higher scores.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Quality of life scores (RAND-36) for survivors and general population

 
Subgroup analyses confirmed statistically significant patterns of change in the RAND-36 PCS and MCS scores with different age, sex, left ventricular function and diabetes status (Tables 4 and 5). However, the mean change in MCS scores among those aged 75 years or more did not reach a statistically significant level (P=0.097). Furthermore, despite the highly significant improvement in PCS also in the eldest group, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant age by change interaction (P=0.013) for PCS, indicating a less steep improvement for the eldest subgroup of patients. In all, as compared to the younger patients this elderly group showed markedly less improvement in their PCS (P=0.042) and MCS (P=0.048) scores.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Mean change in Rand-36 PCS scores with different age, sex, left ventricular function and diabetes status

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Mean change in RAND-36 mental component summary (MCS) scores with different age, sex, left ventricular function and diabetes status

 
The RAND-36 general health scores improved significantly when comparing the baseline and 1-year follow-up values (mean change +4.09, P<0.001) in the whole study population (Table 3). However, parallel with the above results, improvement in general health score was obvious and statistically significant only among patients aged under 65 years (P=0.005) and 65–74 years (P<0.001), not with those aged 75 years or more (P=0.817). Among these elderly, only 1.39% average improvement was detected in general health scores (Fig. 1).

Karnofsky performance status score improved from preoperative 70% to postoperative 90% (mode) at 1 year (P<0.001, Fig. 2) . In 70.5% of the patients the Karnofsky score improved by at least 10%. Patient's age or sex played no significant role in the magnitude of the improvement.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Functional status (Karnofsky score) preoperatively and 1 year after coronary bypass grafting.

 
One year after the operation 89.9% of the surviving patients were in NYHA functional classes I or II. This freedom from anginal symptoms was less obvious among those aged 75 or more as compared to those aged 64 years or less (75.6 versus 93.7%, P=0.016). In all, 85.0% of the surviving patients had improved by at least one functional class 1 year after the operation.


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
This study evaluated the impact of CABG on improvement in various aspects of quality of life and functional capacity during 1 year after the operation. Special interest was focused on an analysis of the benefits for elderly patients. CABG surgery on elderly patients has become very common, and nowadays more than one in four patients operated on in Western countries are over 70 years old [17]. Consequently, also the definition of elderly in the literature has gradually risen from 65 to 80 years or older. Age greater than 70 years [4] or 80 years [3] is reported to be a prominent predictive preoperative factor for increased morbidity after CABG. Tu and associates found the relative mortality risk in the short term after CABG to increase to 2.1 for patients between 65 and 74 years of age and to 3.8 for those older than 75 years [18]. Although factors associated with morbidity and mortality following CABG surgery have been defined, only scattered data are available regarding QOL, overall performance status and functional outcome in elderly patients. In our study, we set the age of 75 years as the lower cut-off for the oldest age group, since only 1.6% of the patients were 80 or more years old.

NYHA functional class has been used by some authors as an indicator for postoperative QOL [9]. The usefulness of this, however, is restricted by the fact that it does not consider functional limitations due to other than cardiac disease. Thus, a patient who has achieved an excellent cardiac functional outcome after CABG could still be debilitated with poor QOL. A variety of health measurement tools have therefore been developed over the last decade for the purpose of quantifying and differentiating between different health states [19]. We chose the Finnish version of the RAND-36 Health Survey questionnaire, because it has been carefully adapted to Finnish populations and yields population-based reference values, which are derived from the randomly selected sample from the Finnish Population Register [10]. This sample consisted of 2060 persons aged 18–79 years and the results were weighted against the age and gender distribution of the Finnish general population. The generic health-related QOL measure has also previously been used to evaluate health status in general population surveys [20], and to determine the effectiveness of medical treatments in patients with angina [21], and more recently to evaluate the impact of mitral valve surgery [22] and CABG surgery [23,24] on patients’ QOL.

The present study demonstrated significant improvement in all eight dimensions of health-related QOL during the 1st year after CABG. Previous studies have found favourable and in some cases equal results in an ageing population as in a younger population in terms of health-related QOL after CABG [8]. On the other hand, some previous research has also indicated that older patients run an increased risk of postoperative psychiatric complications and cognitive decline [25]. From this perspective it is of note that the positive change in the physical aspects of QOL (PCS) was highly significant also in the oldest age group in our study, i.e. patients aged 75 or more years, and comparable with younger patients, whereas the mean improvement in psycho-social aspects of QOL (MCS) seemed to be significantly smaller as compared to younger groups. Moreover, a tendency towards less marked improvement in RAND-36 scores among the elderly was also seen in general health perceptions, as patients aged 75 or more years reported only minor improvement following surgery. These results could be explained by more prevalent comorbidity in the oldest patients. In contrast to somewhat pessimistic interpretations of the possible benefits for women regarding QOL [24], our results indicate that women benefit equally well from CABG.

We used the Karnofsky dependency classification to reflect the degree of help the patients needed. The Karnofsky dependency scale was originally designed to assess overall performance status in cancer patients [16], but it has since been used by some authors in cardiac patients [8,9]. The Karnofsky performance status of patients after CABG has received little attention, possibly because many patients are well functional both before and after surgery. Nonetheless, Karnofsky dependency classification here revealed a significant shift towards more independent functioning in daily activities in all age groups.

In accord with reports in the literature, higher age was significantly associated with higher mortality and morbidity in our data [3,4]. Higher morbidity and mortality in the elderly may reflect an increased presence of comorbidities as well as a lack of functional reserves among these patients. However, recovery without any major complication was likely at a 75% level even in those aged 75 or more years.

CABG treats the manifestations of coronary artery disease and angina therefore often returns as coronary disease progresses. The risk of recurring angina is low for the first 5 years after the operation and then begins to rise, seemingly related to late closure of bypass conduits [1]. Of particular note is that almost one fourth of the eldest patients in our material reported a return of angina (NYHA functional classes III or IV) during 1 year following the operation, this being significantly more than the 6% reported by the patients in the youngest age group. This may partially reflect the more extensive nature of coronary artery disease in the elderly, but also more comorbidities and non-cardiac disorders which may have impacted on elderly patients’ views of their general health and thus on the reported NYHA class.

In addition to the prospective design and relatively large number of patients included in this study, the reliability of our results is underlined by the fact that the relevant medical and clinical variables were carefully recorded for the analysis. Data on primary hospital care were complete, and our data also included events in the secondary referral hospitals, which is important, since only 2.4% of the patients were discharged straight home. A comprehensive battery of previously validated health measurement tools were used and all assessments were made preoperatively and repeated 12 months later. The response rate to our follow-up questionnaire was good (94.7%), and except for younger age, no other differences were found between the non-responders and responders in their preoperative clinical characteristics such as sex, Euroscore risk sum, priority of operation or NYHA class.

This notwithstanding, several potential limitations of this study should be discussed. First, there were a large number of patients who refused or were unable to complete the baseline survey prior to CABG and were thus excluded from this psycho-social follow-up study. Excluded patients were 5 years older and acutely ill and they were often operated urgently or in emergencies. The extent to which the findings can be generalized to all patients undergoing CABG may thus be questioned. Secondly, the hypothesis was that the changes in QOL would result from the intervening CABG. However, other major life events may have taken place during the year between assessments. Moreover, there is a lack of ‘golden standards’ for clinically important change in QOL scores in CABG surgery patients. Third, the NYHA class reported by the patient at 1 year may be of limited value only, since we were not able to confirm that symptoms experienced were a result of myocardial ischaemia and not of other comorbidities such as chronic obstructive airways disease. Finally, 1-year follow-up is still a relatively short period to evaluate long-range outcomes and stability of quality of life after the CABG operation.

In conclusion, a majority of patients experience significant improvement in their QOL and functional capacity during the 1st year after CABG, as measured by the RAND-36 questionnaire, Karnofsky dependency category and NYHA functional class. Men and women benefit equally well from CABG. In contrast to most previous reports, we found that patients aged more than 75, who are often suboptimal candidates for CABG, not only have higher mortality and morbidity but are also likely to derive less benefit from CABG in terms of certain aspects of QOL. It is therefore important in clinical practice to consider the age-related aspects of outcome, particularly when the main goal of surgery is to improve QOL.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Eagle K.A., Guyton R.A., Davidoff R., Ewy G.A., Fonger J., Gardner T.J., Gott J.P., Herrmann H.C., Marlow R.A., Nugent W.C., O'Connor G.T., Orszulak T.A., Rieselbach R.E., Winters W.L., Yusuf S. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1262-1342.[Free Full Text]
  2. Nashef SAM, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R, EuroSCORE Study Group. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:9–13.
  3. Parsonnet V., Dean D., Bernstein A.D. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 1989;79(Suppl. I):3-12.
  4. Kurki T.S.O., Kataja M. Preoperative prediction of postoperative morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1740-1745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kurki T.S., Järvinen O., Kataja M.J., Laurikka J., Tarkka M. Performance of three preoperative risk indices; CABDEAL, EuroSCORE and Cleveland models in a prospective coronary bypass database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:406-410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Acinapura A.J., Jacobowitz I.J., Kramer M.D., Adkins M.S., Zisbroad Z., Cunningham J.N., Jr Demographic changes in coronary artery bypass surgery and its effect on mortality and morbidity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1990;4:175-181.[Abstract]
  7. Estafanous F.G., Loop F.D., Higgins T.L., Tekyi-Mensah S., Lytle B.W., Cosgrove D.M., Roberts-Brown M., Starr N.J. Increased risk and decreased morbidity of coronary artery bypass grafting between 1986 and 1994. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:383-389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Glower D.D., Christopher T.D., Milano C.A., White W.D., Smith L.R., Jones R.H., Sabiston D.C., Jr Performance status and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in persons aged 80–93 years. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:567-571.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kumar P., Zehr K.J., Chang A., Cameron D.E., Baumgartner W.A. Quality of life in octogenarians after open heart surgery. Chest 1995;108:919-926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Aalto A-M, Aro AR, Teperi J., RAND-36 as a measure of Health-Related Quality of Life. Reliability, construct validity and reference values in the Finnish general population (in Finnish with English summary). Helsinki: Stakes, Research Reports 101, 1999.
  11. Hays R.D., Sherbourne C.D., Mazel R. The RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0. Health Economics 1993;2:217-277.[Medline]
  12. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS-36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992;30:473-481.[Medline]
  13. Hays R.D., Stewart A.L. The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients. Psychological assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990;58(2):22-30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Hays R.D., Marshall G.N., Wang E.Y.I., Sherbourne C.D. Four years cross-lagged associations between physical and mental health in the medical outcome study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62(3):441-449.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Rumsfeld J.S., Magid D.J., O'Brien M., McCarthy M., Jr, MacWhinney S., Shroyer A.L.W., Moritz T.E., Henderson W.G., Sethi G.K., Grover F.L., Hammermeister K.E. Changes in health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:2026-2032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Karnofsky D.A., Burchenal J.H. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod C.M., ed. Symposium held at New York Academy of Medicine, New York, 1948. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949:191-205.
  17. Roques F., Nashef S.A., Michel P., Gauducheau E., de Vincentiis C., Baudet E., Cortina J., David M., Faichney A., Gabrielle F., Gams E., Harjula A., Jones M.T., Pintor P.P., Salamon R., Thulin L. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:816-822.
  18. Tu J.V., Sykora K., Naylor D. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough?. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1317-1323.[Abstract]
  19. Anderson R.T., Aaronson N.K., Bullinger M., Mcbee W.L. A review of the progress towards developing health related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research. Pharmacoeconomics 1996;4:336-355.
  20. Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Wright L. Short form 36 (SF 36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 1993;306:1437-1440.
  21. Charlier L., Dutrannois J., Kaufman L. The SF-36 questionnaire: a convenient way to assess quality of life in angina pectoris patients. Acta Cardiol 1997;3:247-260.
  22. Goldsmith I.R.A., Lip G.Y.H., Patel R.L. A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:949-955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lindsay G.M., Hanlon P., Smith L.N., Wheatley D.J. Assessment of changes in general health status using the short-form 36 questionnaire 1 year following coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:557-564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Simchen E., Galai N., Braun D., Zitser-Gurevich Y., Shabtai E., Naveh I. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with low quality of life 1 year after coronary bypass operations: the Israeli coronary artery bypass study (ISCAB). J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121(5):909-919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Duits E.A., Boeke S., Taams M.A., Passchier J., Erdman R.A.M. Prediction of quality of life after coronary bypass graft surgery: a review and evaluation of multiple, recent studies. Psychosom Med 1997;59:257-268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. L.P. Markou, M. Evers, H. A. van Swieten, and L. Noyez
Gender and physical activity one year after myocardial revascularization for stable angina
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 96 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Z. Colak, I. Segotic, S. Uzun, M. Mazar, V. Ivancan, and V. Majeric-Kogler
Health related quality of life following cardiac surgery correlation with EuroSCORE
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 72 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold
Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Loponen, M. Luther, J.-O. Wistbacka, K. Korpilahti, J. Laurikka, H. Sintonen, H. Huhtala, and M. R. Tarkka
Quality of life during 18 months after coronary artery bypass grafting
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 32(1): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. G. Koch, L. Li, M. Lauer, J. Sabik, N. J. Starr, and E. H. Blackstone
Effect of Functional Health-Related Quality of Life on Long-Term Survival After Cardiac Surgery
Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 692 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. R. Parikh, S. G. Coca, G. L. Smith, V. Vaccarino, and H. M. Krumholz
Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Health-Related Quality-of-Life Improvement After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.
Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2006; 166(18): 2014 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Szygula-Jurkiewicz, M. Zembala, K. Wilczek, R. Wojnicz, and L. Polonski
Health related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. 12-month follow up
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 882 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Jarvinen, J. Julkunen, T. Saarinen, J. Laurikka, and M. R. Tarkka
Effect of Diabetes on Outcome and Changes in Quality of Life After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 819 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Jarvinen, J. Julkunen, T. Saarinen, J. Laurikka, H. Huhtala, and M. R. Tarkka
Perioperative myocardial infarction has negative impact on health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 26(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Matti R. Tarkka
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Järvinen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Järvinen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS