|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:208-211
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shin-Koga Hospital, 120 Tenjin-cho, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-8577, Japan
b Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan
Received 12 September 2003; received in revised form 5 November 2003; accepted 11 November 2003.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-942-38-2222; fax: +81-942-38-2248
e-mail: myoshi{at}toq.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Ultrasonic scalpel Skeletonization Endothelium Internal thoracic artery Scanning electron microscopy
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.1. Operative technique
After performing a standard median sternotomy, the left ITA was harvested in a skeletonized fashion using an ultrasonic scalpel. We used a dissecting hook type blade (Harmonic Scalpel, dissecting hook type; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) and set the output of the ultrasonic scalpel at level 2. Higami et al. previously described these procedures in detail [4]. In brief, after a longitudinal incision on the endothoracic fascia about 1 cm medial to the ITA, the medial satellite vein is then swept away from the ITA by moving an ultrasonic scalpel quickly (quick touch method). The fatty tissue around the ITA is easily removed in this way. Next, the branches of the ITA are exposed and visualized. Next, by placing the tip of the blade on the branch at least 1 mm away from the ITA itself for 34 s, we are thus able to divide the branch by protein coagulation (close coagulation method). During skeletonization, care should be taken that the ultrasonic scalpel does not come in contact with the ITA for more than 0.2 s. In this way the ITA is fully skeletonized from its origin to 1 cm beyond the bifurcation. After the administration of heparin, the terminal portion of the ITA just proximal to the bifurcation is cut over an area measuring 1 cm in length, and then it is subjected to an SEM study to evaluate its endothelial integrity. One ITA skeletonized with scissors was also submitted to an SEM study as a control.
2.2. Preparation for scanning electron microscopy
ITA cylinders were cut longitudinally and then were immediately washed gently with a physiologic solution, and immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 h. All samples were washed in cacodylate buffer, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4), and thereafter were further dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethyl alcohol, and dried in CO2 at a critical point. After drying, all samples were mounted on specimen stubs using colloidal silver and coated with gold using argon, and finally were observed by SEM (Nippon Denshi JSM-25S11).
One pathologist examined all specimens and described the endothelial integrity according to the score system proposed by Fischlein et al. [6] using the following criteria: (1) completely confluent endothelium; (2) partially confluent endothelium; (3) loosely netted endothelium; (4) islands of endothelium; and (5) no endothelium.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The skeletonization of the ITA has been reported to have several advantages over harvesting the ITA as a pedicle. Skeletonization allows us to obtain a longer ITA [7], which means that a more proximal thick portion of the ITA can be used for anastomosis, and the ITA can then also reach more distal coronary artery branches. A sequential bypass graft is easier to perform with the skeletonized ITA. It also preserves the blood supply to the sternum, thus allowing for more rapid healing and a decreased risk of wound infection [3,8], while also preserving the pulmonary function [9]. The skeletonized ITA also has a greater free blood flow with no need for intraluminal papaverine injection [10]. Moreover, an injury to the ITA such as dissection or bleeding from the ITA can be easily detected in the skeletonized ITA. Higami et al. [4] has developed a new technique using an ultrasonic scalpel to skeletonize the ITA, and the reliability of this technique has also been reported [5]. Their histological study [11] confirmed that an ultrasonic scalpel applied on the branches more than 1 mm away from the ITA itself did not cause any endothelial injury, and these coagulated branches could tolerate pressure up to 350 mmHg. Whether or not the ultrasonic energy conveyed to the ITA can cause the endothelial cell injury remains a major concern, so we therefore designed this study to assess the endothelial integrity of the ITA.
In the present study, we skeletonized the ITAs using an ultrasonic scalpel according to the method developed by Higami et al. [4]. This technique does not apply any hemoclips on the side branches that are to be divided, so we did not experience any dissection or visible injury on the ITA. Lamm et al. [12] harvested the ITAs using either an ultrasonic scalpel or with a high-frequency electrocautery in the pedicled fashion and compared the endothelial cell integrity using the SEM. Their results showed that an ultrasonic scalpel preserved the endothelium better than the high-frequency electrocautery when these two tools were applied less than 5 mm close to the ITA. Moreover, they reported that an ultrasonic scalpel applied directly on the ITA for 1 s could cause injury to the endothelial cells. Lamm's method for applying an ultrasonic scalpel to harvest the ITAs was clearly different from the method developed by Higami et al. [4]. In the present study we were extremely careful not to touch the ITA itself with the ultrasonic scalpel, and to apply the scalpel on the side branches 1 mm away from the ITA when dividing them. None of the nine ITAs skeletonized with an ultrasonic scalpel showed any endothelial cell injury in the SEM study. This finding confirmed the preservation of the endothelial cell lining of the ultrasonically skeletonized ITAs at the cell level, and it also supported the histopathological findings reported by Higami et al. [11]. We concluded that the skeletonization of the ITA with an ultrasonic scalpel caused no deleterious injury on the endothelium, while the instantaneous transmission of ultrasonic energy on the adventitia of the ITA had no negative effect on the endothelium.
| 5. Study limitation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 6. Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Malinowski, M. A. Deja, K. S. Golba, T. Roleder, J. Biernat, and S. Wos Perivascular tissue of internal thoracic artery releases potent nitric oxide and prostacyclin-independent anticontractile factor Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 225 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pektok, M. Cikirikcioglu, C. Engin, G. Daglioz, Z. Ozcan, and H. Posacioglu Does harvesting of an internal thoracic artery with an ultrasonic scalpel have an effect on sternal perfusion? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 442 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoshikai, T. Itoh, K. Kamohara, J. Yunoki, and H. Fumoto Intimal injury of ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery by a vessel clamp: morphological analysis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 331 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsumoto, I. Tsuneyoshi, Y. Iguro, T. Kinjo, G. Yotsumoto, M. Ueno, Y. Kanmura, and R. Sakata Effects of ultrasonic skeletonization on internal thoracic and gastroepiploic arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 30(4): 592 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Lima Canadas, A. C. Canas, J. L. Orradre Romeo, C. I. Rubio Martinez, L. F. Lopez Almodovar, and M. Calleja Hernandez Endothelium histological integrity after skeletonized dissection of the left internal mammary artery with ultrasonic scalpel Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2005; 4(3): 160 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Raja and G. D. Dreyfus Internal Thoracic Artery: To Skeletonize or Not to Skeletonize? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1805 - 1811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |