|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:376-386
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
Review |
a Denia, Alicante, Spain
b Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, UC Clinical Centre of Serbia, 8th Kosta Todorovic St., 11000 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
c Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
d Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
e Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
f Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
g Department of Cardiology, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
h Department of Cardiology, Cardiac Imaging Unit, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Received 21 October 2003; received in revised form 8 December 2003; accepted 15 December 2003.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +381-11-3670-609; fax: +381-11-3610-880
e-mail: kocica{at}sezampro.yu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From the earliest Erasistratus' observations, principal mechanisms responsible for the ventricular filling have still remained obscured. Contemporary experimental and clinical investigations unequivocally support the attitude that only powerful suction force, developed by the normal ventricles, would be able to produce an efficient filling of the ventricular cavities. The true origin and the precise time frame for generating such force are still controversial.
Elastic recoil and muscular contraction were the most commonly mentioned, but yet, still not clearly explained mechanisms involved in the ventricular suction. Classical concepts about timing of successive mechanical events during the cardiac cycle, also do not offer understandable insight into the mechanism of the ventricular filling. The net result is the current state of insufficient knowledge of systolic and particularly diastolic function of normal and diseased heart.
Here we summarize experimental evidence and theoretical backgrounds, which could be useful in understanding the phenomenon of the ventricular filling. Anatomy of the VMB, and recent proofs for its segmental electrical and mechanical activation, undoubtedly indicates that ventricular filling is the consequence of an active muscular contraction. Contraction of the ascendent segment of the VMB, with simultaneous shortening and rectifying of its fibers, produces the paradoxical increase of the ventricular volume and lengthening of its long axis. Specific spatial arrangement of the ascendent segment fibers, their interaction with adjacent descendent segment fibers, elastic elements and intra-cavitary blood volume (hemoskeleton), explain the physical principles involved in this action. This contraction occurs during the last part of classical systole and the first part of diastole. Therefore, the most important part of ventricular diastole (i.e. the rapid filling phase), in which it receives >70% of the stroke volume, belongs to the active muscular contraction of the ascendent segment.
We hope that these facts will give rise to new understanding of the principal mechanisms involved in normal and abnormal diastolic heart function.
Key Words: Ventricle Myocardium Anatomy Physiology Myocardial mechanics
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Substantial progress has been done recently in elucidating subtle relationships at cellular and molecular levels [57], but only with the discovery of the ventricular myocardial band (VMB) [8,9] it became clear that unavoidable coherence and mutual coupling of form and function exist in the entire ventricular myocardium. With this new basic knowledge, it is now possible to understand the principles governing electrical, mechanical and energetical events within the human heart [10,11].
Etymologically, the terms systole and diastole, which would be frequently mentioned in this article, have been derived from the Greek's words stello (reduction, shortening) and diastello (augmentation, lengthening), respectively.
According to the classical mechanical conceptions [12,13], during the ventricular systole (i.e. from the initial increase of the ventricular pressure to the appearance of the aortic incisura), the initial isovolumetric contraction phase is followed by rapid and slow ejection, with consecutive reduction of the ventricular cavities volume and shortening of their long axes. Those two facts (i.e. volume reduction and long axis shortening), at first glance, may seem clearly coherent with the ventricular myocardial contraction. Similarly, during the classical diastole (i.e. from the appearance of the aortic incisura to the end of atrial contraction), the initial isovolumetric relaxation phase is followed by the auxotonic relaxation phases (i.e. rapid filling, diastasis and atrial contraction), with the increase of ventricular cavities volume and lengthening of their long axes. The mechanical events during this part of classical cardiac cycle (i.e. volume increase and axis lengthening), may also seem coherent with ventricualr myocardial relaxation (active and passive).
But, in reality, the volume increase of the ventricular cavities and consecutive lengthening of their long axes, begins as early as the last part of classical systole (slow ejection) and spans over the initial third of classical diastole (encompassing isovolumetric relaxation and rapid filling phases). Surprisingly, those two crucial actions responsible for the ventricular suction filling (i.e. ventricular volume increase and long axis lengthening) are apparently the results of ventricular myocardial contraction.
At first glance, this statement sounds like contradictio in adjecto. And really, it is difficult to relate causally any contraction (implying shortening) within ventricular wall, with subsequent increase of the ventricular volume and lengthening of its long axis.
The main purpose of this article is to elucidate the force, raised by myocardial contraction in the ventricular wall, capable of producing simultaneous increase of ventricular dimensions (i.e. volume and long axis). Our observations will help clinicians (cardiologists, cardiac surgeons) dealing with systolic and diastolic function of diseased hearts.
| 2. Historical background |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ever since that time, it was evident that vis a tergo (the force from behind carried out by the blood expelled from the left ventricle), described by William Harvey (15781657 AD), was not sufficient to explain venous return and filling of the ventricles [15].
Although the authorities, like Harvey and Albrecht von Haller (17081777), have persistently denied such possibility, Zugenbühler (1815) and Schubarth (1817) claimed that ventricles "must suck the blood in order to prevent the formation of an empty space". Wedemayer (1828) has experimentally proved the existence of atrial aspiration, connecting a catheter inserted in jugular vein of the horse with water-filled glass tube. Observing excised beating animal hearts, submerged in water (i.e. with no external pressure gradients), Johnson (1823) and Chassignac (1836) have noticed ejection of the fluid during systole and aspiration of the fluid during diastole. Reporting their results of intra-cavitary pressure measurements, Goltz and Gaule (1878) re-focused the attention on ventricular aspiration. These and all subsequent theoretical and experimental works advocating the existence of vis a fronte (the force from the front, attracting the blood to the heart) have initiated numerous controversies and emotional reactions. In a review of Gerhard Brecher's seminal book, Venous Return, it has been cleverly noted: "Whatever role cardiac suction of venous blood may play in determining circulatory dynamics, no one can deny that mention of this term has proven a most effective method of rising blood pressure in several generations of cardiovascular physiologists" [15,16].
Nowadays, almost 2300 years after Erasistratus, the debate is still going on. Early adherents of the active diastolic concept could not find another reasonable explanation for rapid ventricular filling during short diastolic periods, as during tachycardia and exercise in humans, or in a normal presence of extremely fast heart rates (>600 per min), as seen in some animals (mouse, humming bird). In spite of that, Harvey's position has been supported by many leading authorities at the beginning of past century. Von den Velden (1906), Straub (1910) and particularly Carl Wiggers (1928), could not accept the possibility of vis a fronte ventricular filling. Almost funny situation arose in Wiggers' own laboratory, when Louis Katz (1930) had experimentally proved diastolic sucking action of the turtle's left ventricle. Similar conceptions, although with different explanations, have been later on (1954) independently elaborated by Torrent-Guasp (active muscular contraction) and Villa (elastic recoil) [1517].
Two important facts, for proper understanding of this problem, came out from Purkinje's (1843) observations of punctum fixum and punctum mobile. Namely, he has observed that apex of the heart remains motionless, while atrioventricular junction moves toward and from it during ventricular systole and diastole, respectively. Later on (1935), this fact has been proved cinematographically by Benninghof [15].
A series of recently published explanations of ventricular structure and function [1,811] have finally shed a new light on this and many other very important issues. Current knowledge of the unique ventricular structure and functional relationships (presented at the NIH-NHLBI Workshop: Form and Function: New Views on Disease and Therapies for the Heart, April 2526, 2002, Bethesda, MD), urges for reconciliation of some exceeded concepts in cardiovascular basic science and clinical practice. Here we offer some experimental evidences and theoretical backgrounds, which could be useful in understanding the phenomenon of the ventricular filling by the active muscular contraction.
| 3. Ventricular myocardial bandform |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| 4. Ventricular myocardial bandfunction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The underlying mechanism of ventricular function could be roughly compared [1,810] with mechanical performance of an internal combustion motor engine (Fig. 3A) . The BL in that case represents a cylinder, meanwhile the AL would correspond to a piston. In spite of such morphological correspondence, there is a fundamental difference between the ways by which heart and motor engine perform their functions. This difference comes out from the earlier mentioned Purkinje's observations [15]. In the motor engine, the cylinder remains motionless during each working cycle. On the contrary, in the heart it is the cylinder (Fig. 3B), represented by the BL that moves up and down in each cardiac cycle. But, it must be said that the BL does not simply slides as a mobile metal cylinder slipping on the AL (as it will be explained later). It comes up and down accompanying the AL when it lengthens and shortens, respectively. In other words, it happens so with increase and decrease of the ventricular volume during each cardiac cycle, as it was clearly demonstrated by MR imaging of a beating heart in a longitudinal plane [1921].
|
| 5. The contraction of the RS and LS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 6. The contraction of the DS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| 7. The contraction of the ASsystolic ventricular filling |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From the anatomical point of view, it is important to notice two facts. The first one is that the length of the AS is greater than that of the DS (as it has been shown in previous reports) [1,811,17,31], and the second one is that the degree of radial inclination (i.e. obliquity) of the fibers, pertaining to the AS (even in a completely reposed ventricular myocardium), overcomes that of the DS. The second fact is a direct consequence of the previous one, keeping in mind that both segments are wrapped around dynamic fulcrum represented by certain volume of blood, which is always present inside the ventricular cavities [32]. Therefore, the intra-ventricular blood does not only passively sustain forces generated by the surrounding myocardium, but also provides a support to it (as a fulcrum) in generating such forces. Because of this interdependence, the term hemoskeleton was introduced to describe this specific role of the intra-ventricular blood. And really, it is more than evident from the clinical practice, that different loading conditions (i.e. dynamic changes of the hemoskeleton), have a great influence on ventricular performance [3335].
From the physical standpoint, it is important to realize that dynamic hemoskeleton, applying the principles of the first class lever, could change the mechanical efficiency of contracting myocardial fibers by altering the distance and proportion of the curvilinear lever arms. The term dynamic, used here to describe the hemoskeleton, emphasizes that the support it gives to surrounding myocardium, varies according to consecutive changes of intra-ventricular blood volume (i.e. fulcrum radius) during the cardiac cycle. In general, the bigger the hemoskeleton, the smaller the lever effect and vice versa.
Specific spatial arrangement of the DS and AS fibers and the presence of dynamic hemoskeleton, impose their complex interplay during the hysteresis cycle. Verticality, obliquity and conicity, although not equally represented, could be regarded as the common denominations for both DS and AS fibers. Predominant verticality in DS and obliquity in AS fibers, along with their X-crossing within the AL, evidently explain the opposite effects produced by their respective contraction.
Therefore, prior to its own contraction, the AS sustains progressive elongation by ongoing contraction of the DS (Fig. 4B). As mentioned above, predominant longitudinality of the DS fibers, along with presence of initially large hemoskeleton (i.e. end-diastolic blood volume), results in abrupt downward displacement of the ventricular base. At the same time, initially small but (as the ejection of blood progresses) increasing obliquity of the DS fibers, gives rise to counter-clockwise rotation of the ventricular base. This movement, apart from its wringing effect, increases the curvilinear distension of the AS to the maximal point, in which the hemoskeleton is represented by the residual blood volume inside the ventricular cavity.
At this moment, the AS segment starts its own contraction. Here, it is of utmost importance to realize two facts. The first one is that predominant obliquity of the reposed AS has been additionally increased during previous contraction of the DS. The second one, that forthcoming contraction of curvilinearly distended AS, utilizes as a fulcrum the smallest possible hemoskeleton (i.e. residual blood volume), thus attaining the maximal efficiency from the lever mechanism. Therefore, the contraction of the AS necessarily implies simultaneous shortening and pronounced rectifying of its fibers (Fig. 4A). This kind of active biomechanical performance could explain an almost paradoxical fact: ventricular elongation, promoted by muscular contraction.
Putting all these observations together, the contraction of the AS produces three simultaneous actions: abrupt lengthening of the ventricular longitudinal axis, clockwise rotation of the ventricular base, and increase in size and change in shape of the AV orifices. As a net result of these actions, ventricles are rapidly increasing their volumes, and with all valves being closed during that time, a powerful suction force for the atrial blood is thus generated.
As shown by Katz in 1930 [30], the fact that intra-ventricular pressure drops (dP/dt<0) even during the rapid filling phase, clearly points out that it has to be preceded by a large and rapid increase of the ventricular volume (dV/dt>0), capable of producing the effective suction force (dP/dV<0). Now, it is evident that such increase of the ventricular volume is produced by the contraction of the AS.
Another important question pertains to the chronological location of the AS contraction during the cardiac cycle. The contraction of the AS starts at the summit of the ventricular pressure curve and finishes at the end of the suction phase (i.e. rapid filling phase in classical conception). And really, the effects of the AS contraction, fulfill the etymological criteria defining diastole (i.e. augmentation, lengthening). But, in fact, the actual mechanism by which the AS attains its effects is the muscular contraction. Since the systole has been considered as a synonym for muscular contractile activity, applying this criterion, AS contraction could be regarded as a systolic event. Accordingly, it is clear that the title of this article has been intentionally composed in a manner to emphasize that ventricular filling is an active phenomenon, performed by the muscular contraction of the AS fibers.
| 8. The cardiac cycle |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After anatomical and functional explanations given here, it is almost natural to incorporate them in the logical sequence of the mechanical events during the cardiac cycle. The classical conception (Fig. 5B) about cardiac cycle is presented together with the new one (Fig. 5A) in order to make easier understanding of crucial differences between them.
|
|
8.1. Systole
8.1.1. Compression phase (Fig. 6B)
This phase starts at the end of diastole and runs until the first increase of the ventricular pressure finishes (black thick line at the LV pressure curve, diagram 2). The initial pressure increase is produced by the transversal, centripetal narrowing of the base of the ventricular cone. This movement occurs due to successive contraction of both segments of the BL (RS and LS). As a consequence of this belt action of the BL, occurs an abrupt apex dilatation, since at that time the apical region is still relaxed. The apex beat produced in this manner could be easily felt on the anterior thoracic wall.
In the classical concepts, this period is considered as the isovolumetric contraction phase. The term isovolumetric, in fact, does not reflect the reality, since the increase of pressure, registered during this phase, as an incontrovertible condition, requires a certain (even slight) degree of ventricular volume decrease.
8.1.2. Ejection phase (Fig. 6C)
This phase starts at the end of the compression phase and runs along the second increase of the ventricular pressure up to its summit (black thick line at the LV pressure curve, diagram 3). This pressure increase is produced by shortening of the ventricular cone due to a descending movement of the ventricular base (see adjunct triangle to diagram 3). This movement occurs due to the contraction of the DS. Because of its spatial orientation, contraction of the DS simultaneously produces a counter-clockwise rotation of the ventricular base, which in turn gives rise to a torsion or twist of the entire ventricular mass. The ejection of blood to the aorta and pulmonary arteries, takes place during this phase.
In the classical concepts, this period is considered as the rapid ejection phase. It is believed that during this phase, ventricular cavity suffers significant constriction (i.e. transversal shortening) in order to eject blood. This optical illusion appearing on transversal plane MRI is produced by the reduction of the height of the ventricular mass cone (due to its descent toward the apex). As a proof of this statement, it has been observed on MRI that the angle of the ventricular cone vertex remains constant along entire cardiac cycle.
8.2. Diastole
8.2.1. Decompression phase (Fig. 6D)
This phase starts at the end of the ejection phase and runs until decrease of the ventricular pressure reaches the atrial pressure level (black thick line at the LV pressure curve, diagram 4). This pressure decrease is produced by partial lengthening of the ventricular mass cone, due to initial ascending movement of the ventricular base (see adjunct triangle to diagram 4). This movement is a consequence of the initial contraction of the AS. Because of its spatial orientation, contraction of the AS, simultaneously produces an initial clockwise rotation of the ventricular base, which in turn gives rise to partial untorsion or untwist of the entire ventricular mass. During this phase, the residual volume of blood within ventricular cavities is released from any myocardial compression.
In the classical concepts, this period encompasses the slow ejection phase and isovolumetric relaxation phase. Similarly as previous, the term isovolumetric does not suit the reality, since the decrease of pressure, registered during this period, neccessairly implies certain level of increase of the ventricular cavities volume.
8.2.2. Suction phase (Fig. 6E)
This phase starts at the end of the decompression and runs until the end of the second, successive increase of the ventricular pressure (thick line at the LV pressure curve, diagram 5). The pressure decrease in suction phase is produced by complete lengthening of the ventricular mass cone, due to the final ascending movement of the ventricular base (see adjunct triangle to diagram 4). This movement also occurs due to the contraction of the AS. Because of its spatial orientation, the AS simultaneously produces the final clockwise rotation of the ventricular base, which in turn gives rise to complete untorsion or untwist of the entire ventricular mass. During this phase occurs an active suction of the blood from the atria.
In the classical concepts, this period is considered as the rapid filling phase. It is said, that during this phase, occurs significant transverse enlargement of the ventricular cavities. But, as explained earlier (now in the contrapose), this is also an optical phenomenon evident on MRI produced by the ascending movement of the ventricular base along its conical path.
8.3. Diastasis
8.3.1. Drainage phase and atrial contraction phase (Fig. 6A)
The drainage phase, occupying the whole diastasis period, starts at the end of the suction phase and ends when atrial contraction occurs, just before the next compression phase (black thick line at the LV pressure curve, diagram 4). Low and uniform pressure during this period is a result of complete relaxation and repose of the entire VMB. The widening of the ventricular cavities, started with AS contraction in previous phases, is thus completed. Since the ventricles have been already filled up with blood, passage of the blood from the atria in this period is reduced to neglectedly low levels.
In the classical concepts, this period belongs to the diastole, and is designated as diastasis phase, which precedes atrial contraction phase. The term diastasis [from Greek dia (to go through) and stasis (stagnation)] seems very appropriate, since it describes an interruption of the atrio-ventricular blood flow during this period. Nevertheless, it can be accepted that there is a slow dripping of blood during diastasis. The contribution of the atrial contraction to ventricular filling, even according to the classical conceptions, is disputable.
| 9. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anatomical facts about macroscopic structure of the ventricular myocardium explained in this article, came from the half century long experimental research on more than 1000 dissected hearts belonging to different species. The evidence of the VMB was not only an important structural fact, but also suggested numerous other solutions pertaining to the heart's mechanical and electrical physiology [1,810,17,26,31].
Development of new, highly sophisticated diagnostic techniques capable of producing dynamic, simultaneous images of ventricular cavities and ventricular walls as well as their powerful supporting hardware and software, have proved both structural and functional concepts derived from the VMB [19,20,21,34,43].
But still there are a lot of points to be clarified. The mechanisms responsible for ventricular filling have been, for a long time, very difficult to understand and explain even with the present knowledge of the VMB. It was fully accepted that left ventricular filling is facilitated by negative (suction) pressure, produced in the normal LV [30,32]. But who produces it? And how?
The forces capable of generating such a powerful suction have been attributed to many logical and other reasons. Kinematic interaction between the elastic and contractile element within the ventricular wall has been considered, so far, as a major source of diastolic suction forces. Systolic myocardial contraction, decreasing the ventricular volume below its equilibrium levels, produces the elastic deformation of the collagen network. There are opinions that potential energy, stored in stretched collagen fibers, could appear as powerful elastic recoil force in the second phase of the hysteresis cycle (i.e. during the diastole) [13,16,30,36]. Although this possibility sounds logical, there are numerous anatomical and functional data which make it hardly acceptable [30].
Myocardial collagen network arrangement (endo-, epi- and perimysial fibers) and function in different loading and contractile states has been excellently described by LeGrice [39,40]. But ventricular elastic machinery does not exclusively pertain to the myocardial matrix. Recent insights into the specific role of intra-cellular and sarcomeral proteins (e.g. titin) have elucidated their importance in contractile and elastic kinematic interaction. This interaction is essential for the uniform distribution of stress and strain within ventricular wall, which in turn, maintains the structural (and functional) stability of the sarcomere [57,13,18,3941]. And really, it has been proved that remarkable uniformity of sarcomere length (2.251.5 µm) exists in the individual as well as in adjacent myocytes. Whit sarcomere shortening capacity of 1020%, the heart is able to produce the ejection fraction of up to 60%, and systolic wall thickening of up to 30% [57,18,23]. It is obvious from these facts that some kind of amplification factor has to be involved in this functional augmentation during the systole. Spatial organization of VMB segments, their sequential activation and interaction with dynamic hemoskeleton utilizing the principles of lever explains the anatomical and mechanical background applied in this functional amplification. It was also estimated that <50% of normal systolic wall thickening could be explained by the increase of myocyte diameters, and that >50% of it occurs due to the transverse shear (slippage) along myocardial cleavage planes (layers) [18,40,42]. The reports on estimated percentage of systolic wall thickening varies according to the applied methodology [18,19,23]. Overestimation of this systolic phenomenon using MRI analyses [1921], as mentioned earlier, could be explained by the descending movement of the BL along the ventricular mass cone (see adjunct triangles to diagrams 3 and 4 in Fig. 6). Furthermore, Hexeberg has shown a significant transmural anisotropy of thickness between different layers during the systolic contraction. He has proved that thickening of the distinct myocardial layer does not only reflect the work performed by its constitutive fibers, but also the work of all other transmural layers [42]. These observations are also concordant with architectural plane and sequential activation of VMB segments. Therefore, the thickening of the ventricular wall during the systole appears to be a consequence of several factors, occurring during successive, longitudinal contraction along VMB. Histological arrangement of the myocardial fibers and layers (i.e. their three-dimensional structure, achieved by interconnection of the cardiomyocite lateral anastomotic branches) clearly defines the limits of both thickening and thinning within a particular layer during the longitudinal slippage of its fibers [57]. This limitation is also applicable to collagen network surrounding the contractile elements. As a consequence, elastic deformation forces generated within the ventricular wall, do not posses kinetic capacities, compared to those generated by active muscular contraction. The best evidence of this statement is the velocity of the ventricular filling, which could not be explained by slow, passive elastic recoil [1921]. Such a powerful (and fast) force may only belong to the muscular contraction. Moreover, even this conclusion may be insufficient in understanding the efficient ventricular filling during the extremely fast heart rates [15,16,28,43]. Further steps in ongoing research of the electrical transmission along the VMB could offer some explanations in the near future [43].
Muscular origin of diastolic suction, since earliest Galenic observations, has been advocated and denied from time to time. Ongoing debate about ventricular long axis function, in the recent literature, indicates that numerous investigators have indirectly proved the muscular (active) origin of the ventricular suction filling, even without any intention to do so. Most of them did so by observing systolic and diastolic behavior of the LV long axis on echocardiography. Sanderson et al. [44] was trying to explain the strange elongation of the LV long axis, discordant with Doppler mitral velocities, during the early diastole. He concluded that LV recoil was dependent on the energy stored by previous systole, and that impaired LV contraction during systole will lead to reduced suction and early diastolic filling. Instead of muscular contraction (i.e. AS contraction) directly responsible for early diastolic lengthening of the LV long axis, he believed that such force belongs to the elastic recoil generated during previous ejection phase. In his and in others' opinions [30,32], only the powerful contraction capable of emptying the LV below its equilibrium volume could produce effective suction pressure. Since he had correctly noticed that LV long axis elongates due to the rapid upward movement of the ventricular base, his insisting on the elastic recoil forces was strange. Interestingly, very soon after the previous report, Sanderson et al. [45] had realized "that factors other than intrinsic recoil or stored energy from the previous systole, influence the left ventricular long axis velocity in early diastole." In a series of editorial articles about normal and abnormal long axis function, Henein and Gibson [46,47] have emphasized the importance of the longitudinally directed fibers for LV systolic and diastolic function. Without referring any previous knowledge about VMB, their satement is concordant with important functions of the AL segments (DS and AS) described here. They have also realized that elongation of the LV long axis occurs due to the upward movement of the mitral ring, and moreover, they claim that such movement could not be regarded as a passive consequence. Surprisingly, they have proposed the contraction of the atrial pectinate muscles as a generating force, capable of pushing up (and very fast?) entire ventricular base. Another interesting observation was presented by Petrie et al. [48]. According to them, AV plane displacement may be considered as the most sensitive parameter of the LV systolic function, and very reliable early predictor of poor prognosis in patients with diastolic (or subtle systolic) heart failure.
Since François-Franck's first suggestion (1877) that most of the ventricular filling occurred in early diastole, it has been shown by many others [16,23,30,32,37,38] that >70% of the LV stroke volume is received during the first third of diastole (i.e. during classical rapid filling phase). The new concept of the ventricular mechanical events chronology during the cardiac cycle (presented here in comparison with classical one) clearly points out that the period of maximal ventricular filling, is in fact, the period that belongs to the contraction of the AS. Therefore, it is very important to realize that healthy heart possesses strong capacities (defined by specific spatial arrangement of the VMB segments) to ensure its own efficient emptying (systolic function) and filling (diastolic function), by means of successive muscular contraction along the VMB.
| 10. Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kusakari, C.-Y. Xiao, N. Himes, S. D. Kinsella, M. Takahashi, A. Rosenzweig, and T. Matsui Myocyte injury along myofibers in left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2009; 9(6): 951 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nasiraei-Moghaddam and M. Gharib Evidence for the existence of a functional helical myocardial band Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H127 - H131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Buckberg, J. I.E. Hoffman, A. Mahajan, S. Saleh, and C. Coghlan Cardiac Mechanics Revisited: The Relationship of Cardiac Architecture to Ventricular Function Circulation, December 9, 2008; 118(24): 2571 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Pavlopoulos, J. Grapsa, E. Stefanadi, E. Philippou, D. Dawson, and P. Nihoyannopoulos Is it only diastolic dysfunction? Segmental relaxation patterns and longitudinal systolic deformation in systemic hypertension Eur J Echocardiogr, November 1, 2008; 9(6): 741 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q Zhang, J W-H Fung, G W K Yip, J Y-S Chan, A P-W Lee, Y-Y Lam, L-W Wu, E B Wu, and C-M Yu Improvement of left ventricular myocardial short-axis, but not long-axis function or torsion after cardiac resynchronisation therapy: an assessment by two-dimensional speckle tracking Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1464 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Stelzer, H. S. Norman, P. P. Chen, J. R. Patel, and R. L. Moss Transmural variation in myosin heavy chain isoform expression modulates the timing of myocardial force generation in porcine left ventricle J. Physiol., November 1, 2008; 586(21): 5203 - 5214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Buckberg, A. Mahajan, S. Saleh, J. I.E. Hoffman, and C. Coghlan Structure and function relationships of the helical ventricular myocardial band J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 578 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Feinberg, A. Feigel, S. S. Shevkoplyas, S. Sheehy, G. M. Whitesides, and K. K. Parker Muscular Thin Films for Building Actuators and Powering Devices Science, September 7, 2007; 317(5843): 1366 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Gilbert, A. P. Benson, P. Li, and A. V. Holden Regional localisation of left ventricular sheet structure: integration with current models of cardiac fibre, sheet and band structure Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 231 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Barletta, A. Toso, R. Del Bene, M. Di Donato, M. Sabatier, and V. Dor Preoperative and Late Postoperative Mitral Regurgitation in Ventricular Reconstruction: Role of Local Left Ventricular Deformation Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2102 - 2109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ashraf, X. K. Li, M. T. Young, A. J. Jensen, J. Pemberton, L. Hui, P. Lysyansky, Z. Friedman, B. Park, and D. J. Sahn Delineation of cardiac twist by a sonographically based 2-dimensional strain analysis method: an in vitro validation study. J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2006; 25(9): 1193 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Coghlan and J. Hoffman Leonardo da Vinci's flights of the mind must continue: cardiac architecture and the fundamental relation of form and function revisited Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S4 - S17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kocica, A. F. Corno, F. Carreras-Costa, M. Ballester-Rodes, M. C. Moghbel, C. N.C. Cueva, V. Lackovic, V. I. Kanjuh, and F. Torrent-Guasp The helical ventricular myocardial band: global, three-dimensional, functional architecture of the ventricular myocardium Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S21 - S40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Lunkenheimer, K. Redmann, P. Westermann, K. Rothaus, C. W. Cryer, P. Niederer, and R. H. Anderson The myocardium and its fibrous matrix working in concert as a spatially netted mesh: a critical review of the purported tertiary structure of the ventricular mass Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S41 - S49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Carreras, M. Ballester, S. Pujadas, R. Leta, and G. Pons-Llado Morphological and functional evidences of the helical heart from non-invasive cardiac imaging Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S50 - S55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Corno, M. J. Kocica, and F. Torrent-Guasp The helical ventricular myocardial band of Torrent-Guasp: potential implications in congenital heart defects Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S61 - S68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg, M. Castella, M. Gharib, and S. Saleh Active myocyte shortening during the 'isovolumetric relaxation' phase of diastole is responsible for ventricular suction; 'systolic ventricular filling' Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S98 - S106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Castella, G. D. Buckberg, and S. Saleh Diastolic dysfunction in stunned myocardium: a state of abnormal excitation-contraction coupling that is limited by Na+-H+ exchange inhibition Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S107 - S114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hristov, O. J. Liakopoulos, G. D. Buckberg, and G. Trummer Septal structure and function relationships parallel the left ventricular free wall ascending and descending segments of the helical heart Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S115 - S125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ballester-Rodes, A. Flotats, F. Torrent-Guasp, I. Carrio-Gasset, M. Ballester-Alomar, F. Carreras, A. Ferreira, and J. Narula The sequence of regional ventricular motion Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S139 - S144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Jung, M. Markl, D. Foll, and J. Hennig Investigating myocardial motion by MRI using tissue phase mapping Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S150 - S157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Jung, B. W. Kreher, M. Markl, and J. Hennig Visualization of tissue velocity data from cardiac wall motion measurements with myocardial fiber tracking: principles and implications for cardiac fiber structures Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S158 - S164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg, A. Mahajan, B. Jung, M. Markl, J. Hennig, and M. Ballester-Rodes MRI myocardial motion and fiber tracking: a confirmation of knowledge from different imaging modalities Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(Suppl_1): S165 - S177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Anderson, S. Y. Ho, K. Redmann, D. Sanchez-Quintana, and P. P. Lunkenheimer The anatomical arrangement of the myocardial cells making up the ventricular mass Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 28(4): 517 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg Reply to Criscione et al. Nature is simple, but scientists are complicated Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 364 - 365. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Torrent-Guasp, M. J. Kocica, A. F. Corno, and F. Carreras-Costa Reply to Criscione et al. 'Sol Incit Omnibus' Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 365 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Lunkenheimer, K. Redmann, and R. H. Anderson Reply to Criscione et al. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 366 - 367. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Notomi, P. Lysyansky, R. M. Setser, T. Shiota, Z. B. Popovic, M. G. Martin-Miklovic, J. A. Weaver, S. J. Oryszak, N. L. Greenberg, R. D. White, et al. Measurement of Ventricular Torsion by Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Speckle Tracking Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 2034 - 2041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Notomi, R. M. Setser, T. Shiota, M. G. Martin-Miklovic, J. A. Weaver, Z. B. Popovic, H. Yamada, N. L. Greenberg, R. D. White, and J. D. Thomas Assessment of Left Ventricular Torsional Deformation by Doppler Tissue Imaging: Validation Study With Tagged Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, March 8, 2005; 111(9): 1141 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. von Segesser The myocardial band: fiction or fact? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 181 - 182. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Lunkenheimer, K. Redmann, and R. H. Anderson The architecture of the ventricular mass and its functional implications for organ-preserving surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 183 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Torrent-Guasp, M. J. Kocica, A. F. Corno, M. Komeda, F. Carreras-Costa, A. Flotats, J. Cosin-Aguillar, and H. Wen Towards new understanding of the heart structure and function Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 191 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg Architecture must document functional evidence to explain the living rhythm Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 202 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Corno Borderline left ventricle Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 67 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg, M. L. Weisfeldt, M. Ballester, R. Beyar, D. Burkhoff, H. C. Coghlan, M. Doyle, N. D. Epstein, M. Gharib, R. E. Ideker, et al. Left Ventricular Form and Function: Scientific Priorities and Strategic Planning for Development of New Views of Disease Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): e333 - e336. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.P. Lunkenheimer Systolic ventricular filling Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 26(3): 662 - 663. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Torrent-Guasp, M. J. Kocica, A. Corno, and F. Carreras-Costa Reply to Lunkenheimer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 26(3): 663 - 664. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Anderson Systolic ventricular filling Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 26(2): 461 - 461. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Torrent-Guasp, M. J. Kocica, A. F. Corno, and F. Carreras-Costa Reply to Anderson Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 26(2): 461 - 462. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |