| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:1011-1017
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
b Department of Cardiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Received 15 October 2003; received in revised form 26 January 2004; accepted 29 January 2004.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43-1-40400-5620; fax: +43-1-40400-5642
e-mail: wilfried.wisser{at}akh-wien.ac.at
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract 1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
Key Words: Chronic atrial fibrillation • Maze • Radiofrequency • Microwave
|
1. Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
Throughout the literature, the efficacy with respect to restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) is around 70–80% regardless of which device and lesion concept was used. This is significantly lower than the results given for the original Cox procedure [7]. This may be caused by a different lesion concept or by the lack of transmurality created by different forms of energy. The reason for it remains unclear, since hardly any papers are comparable with regard to device and pattern used. In addition, some authors [8] reported mixed patient cohorts including both paroxysmal and permanent AF.
The Maze procedure and all kinds of ablation procedures are usually performed in patients suffering from isolated mitral valve pathologies. Sparse data exist about its application in conjunction with more complex double and triple valve procedures [5]. One could argue that widening the indication criteria will include patients who most likely will profit most from restoring SR.
The first step aims to clarify the impact of different energy forms. Therefore, a prospective study was conducted to analyse the influence of two different ablation devices (microwave AFx and radiofrequency Medtronic) with respect to efficacy and restoration of SR. The gold standard of the Cox Maze procedure was chosen as the underlying lesion concept.
Secondly, it had to be elucidated whether patients undergoing more complex heart surgery, such as double and triple valve procedures, yielded the same success rates with the Maze procedure.
|
2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
The indications for surgery in group I were mitral valve regurgitation (n=4), mitral valve+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=3), mitral valve regurgitation+aortic valve stenosis (n=1), mitral valve stenosis (n=3), mitral valve stenosis+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=1), mitral valve stenosis+aortic valve stenosis (n=1), mitral valve stenosis+tricuspid valve regurgitation+aortic valve stenosis (n=1), mixed mitral valve lesion (n=2), mixed mitral valve lesion+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=2), aortic valve stenosis (n=4) and aortic valve insufficiency (n=1).
The indications for surgery in group II were mitral valve regurgitation (n=4), mitral valve+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=2), mitral valve regurgitation+aortic valve stenosis (n=1), mitral valve regurgitation+aortic valve stenosis+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=1), mitral valve regurgitation+coronary artery disease (n=2), mitral valve regurgitation+aortic valve insufficiency+coronary artery disease (n=1), mitral valve stenosis+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=1), mixed mitral valve lesion (n=4), aortic valve stenosis (n=2) and aortic valve stenosis+tricuspid valve regurgitation (n=1).
A tricuspid valve plasty was performed in all patients presenting with a tricuspid valve regurgitation grade 2 or greater.
All patients presented with chronic, permanent AF longer than 6 months despite complete antiarrhythmic therapy. The duration of AF was up to 32 years in group I and 12 years in group II. For demographic and preoperative data, refer to Table 1. No significant difference was calculated for any variable. The 95% confidence intervals for the Euro Score were –2.3 to 0.8 (SE 0.7), for the left atrial diameter –16.8 to 5.4 (SE 5.4) and for the right atrial diameter –12.8 to 5.5 (SE 4.3).
|
After onset of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, the venous inflow was occluded. At first the right-sided lesions were performed on the beating heart. The right atrial appendage was amputated and a lesion line was drawn to the annulus of the tricuspid valve. The right atrium was entered through a second incision on the lateral wall. From the corner of this incision a line was drawn cranially into the superior vena cava and caudally into the inferior vena cava. Then a lesion line was made from the incision to the posterior segment of the annulus of the tricuspid valve. The ablation was completed by a line from the edge of the incision, crossing the fossa ovalis and the isthmus into the coronary sinus and then down into the inferior vena cava.
Thereafter, the patient was cooled to 32 °C, the aorta was cross clamped and the heart arrested. Myocardial protection was achieved with cold blood cardioplegia infused ante and retrogradly. The left atrium was entered through the interatrial groove and the left sided Maze was performed. In contrast with the original Maze procedure, the left and right pulmonary veins were encircled separately, leading to two isolated isles, which were connected at the back of the left atrium creating a figure of ‘H’. Then the remaining lesions to the mitral annulus and the left atrial appendage were carried out.
After completion of the Maze procedure, the necessary valve surgeries were performed and the left atrium and/or the ascending aorta closed by a double running suture. The cross clamp was released and the closure of the right atrium and the reconstruction of the tricuspid valve, if necessary, were done on the beating heart.
2.2.1. The microwave system
The microwave generator (AFx®) delivers a continuous wave of 2.45 GHz and allows for variable power output. The Lynx probe consists of a 2 cm long ablation antenna. The energy was set at 40 W with an application time of 25 s. The ablation element was placed on the endocardium creating linear lesions, which were overlapped to ensure continuous transmural ablation.
2.2.2. The radiofrequency system
The system (Medtronic®) used consists of a unipolar surgical ablation pen, which is saline irrigated (5 ml/min) to cool the surface of the endocardium. The patient is grounded by an indifferent electrode applied to the skin. The power generator was set at 30 W. The tip was slowly oscillated about 10 times over the same area, to create continuous endocardial lesions.
2.3. Postoperative treatment
Immediately after surgery, no antiarrythmic therapy was given. In the case of AF, amiodarone was administered. Patients were loaded with 3x200 mg amiodarone daily. After reaching therapeutic blood levels and still persisting AF, electrical cardioversion by DC shock (up to twice 360 J) was performed. If AF was observed during the later follow up period, cardioversion was performed at most twice.
All patients received coumadine, targeting an international normalised ratio value between 2.2 and 2.5.
2.4. Follow up
Patients were evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months after operation and then on a yearly basis. Rhythm was determined on the basis of 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24 h Holter monitoring. Echocardiographic data were collected with respect to left and right atrial diameter. Hemodynamic response of atrial contraction was assessed by identification of a biphasic wave at the level of the tricuspid and mitral valves using colour-coded Doppler echocardiography.
2.5. Statistics
Data were analysed using JMP System software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences of preoperative data between the groups were analysed through Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables. A P-value <0.05 was chosen as significant. All values are expressed as mean±SD.
|
3. Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
|
|
All patients were either in SR or electrically paced in DDD or AAI mode immediately after surgery on admission to the intensive care unit. No patient had any cerebral thromboembolic complications postoperatively.
In group I, 5 patients (20%) received a permanent pacemaker (PM) for atrioventricular block (3 cases; 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively) and sick sinus syndrome (2 cases; 3 and 5 months postoperatively). At 3 months, 13, 1, 3 and 5 patients were in SR, junctional rhythm, on PM and in AF, respectively. At 6 months, 12, 1, 4, 1 and 4 patients were in SR, junctional rhythm, on PM, atrial flutter and in AF, respectively. At 12 months, 13, 5 and 4 patients were in SR, on PM and in AF, respectively. At 24 months, 12, 4 and 4 patients were in SR, on PM and in AF, respectively.
In group II, 4 patients (21%) received a permanent PM for atrioventricular block (2 cases; 1 month postoperatively) and sick sinus syndrome (1 case; 9 months postoperatively). One patient had a PM implanted preoperatively due to bradycardia. At 3 months, 9, 2, 3, 1 and 4 patients were in SR, junctional rhythm, on PM, atrial flutter and in AF, respectively. At 6 months, 11, 3 and 4 patients were in SR, on PM and in AF, respectively. At 12 months, 8, 3 and 3 patients were in SR, on PM and in AF, respectively. Data are depicted in Fig. 1 .
|
To evaluate the postoperative atrial transport function in patients with SR, additional pulsed-wave Doppler examinations were carried out between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. For organizational reasons, the data were available for 12 patients. A biatrial contraction was observed in 33% of the patients and a right atrial contraction in 50% of the patients.
|
4. Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
In the literature, the efficacy of these procedures with respect to restoration of SR lies between 70 and 80%, regardless of which device was used or which lesion concept was followed. These results are significantly lower than those given for the original Cox procedure [7]. The reason for this is still unclear, since hardly any papers are comparable with regard to device and pattern used. In addition, some authors [8] reported mixed patient cohorts including both paroxysmal and permanent AF.
One main principle of the Maze procedure is the creation of transmural, isolating scars. It is evident that this can be definitely accomplished by the classic cut and sew technique. The application of different forms of energy, however, carries the potential risk of lack of transmurality.
In a first step, a prospective study was conducted to analyse the influence of two different ablation devices (microwave AFx and radiofrequency Medtronic) with respect to efficacy and restoration of SR. The gold standard of the Cox Maze procedure was chosen as the underlying lesion concept for direct comparison. To our knowledge, the microwave tool has never been used for creating Cox Maze lesion lines, which makes any comparison impossible. We used these two widely accepted energy forms, based upon different physical principles, because both have some advantages.
The microwave (AFx inc.) consists of electromagnetic waves delivered at high frequency (2.45 GHz) provoking the vibration and rotation of the dipoles of water molecules, thus generating heat by friction. The release of the heat creates lesions at predictable depth [10]. Like in a microwave oven, the electromagnetic waves and the energy are not absorbed by air, blood or a previous ablation on the same spot; the ablation probe itself need not have permanent contact with the tissue. This often is advantageous, because it sometimes is difficult to achieve a complete dry field during surgery. The probe delivers energy, which heats tissue to a depth of 6 mm, without risk of endocardial surface charring or coagulation [11]. Histologic investigations showed dense scar tissue at 6 months with sharp demarcation lines towards the normal tissue [12]. Although the Lynx device is rather bulky, and in some situations hard to use, the malleable antenna of the next generation called Flex 4 can be applied easily.
In contrast, radiofrequency (Medtronic, Cardioblate) is applied with a frequency of 484.2 kHz by a pen which is as simple as drawing. The current flows from the tip of the radiofrequency catheter to an indifferent electrode, placed firmly behind the right shoulder of the patient, and resistively heats tissue in tip contact. However, to apply enough energy for creation of transmural lesions, the pen has to be moved in a pendulum swing fashion on an average of 10 times over the same area. The addition of saline irrigation has the theoretical advantage of cooling the tissue surface, providing a low impedance path, thus resulting in a lesion of greater depth and a higher chance of creating transmural lesions [13]. Nevertheless, the exact duration of application varies according to the tissue thickness and is a matter of experience. Whereas too little energy will not guarantee transmurality, too much energy may cause significant problems. The more energy is applied, the more possibly rapid heating will occur, which may result in rapid boiling of the intracellular fluid causing the so-called ‘tissue pops’. Though we observed these sudden ruptures of atrial wall rarely, they usually required suturing.
In our experience we found the drawing of the lesion lines much easier with the radiofrequency pen, which accounted for the significantly shorter ablation time. On the contrary, it is sometimes cumbersome to be sure that the lesions are really transmural; this is largely dependent on experience. It is important that the movement of the pen covers exactly the same area often enough. This is facilitated by the fact that the myocardial wall swells after the first oscillating movements. The swelling can be felt by the tip of the pen, thus serving as guidance. Conversely, the microwave Lynx probe creates a linear lesion of 2 cm with one application ensuring a fixed depth of ablation. However, it is much bulkier than the radiofrequency pen, which may be the reason why this device is rarely used to perform circular lesions around the pulmonary veins endocardially. Especially, encircling the upper left pulmonary veins is sometimes hard to accomplish. For ease of access the ablation can be performed through the resected left atrial appendage. In fact the complete lesion pattern was performed in all patients. During our study, the newly designed Flex 4 probe came to the market; it has a smart, malleable tip, which is promising for the future. The antenna and the shaft of this catheter can be bent as needed, simplifying the Maze procedure as with the radiofrequency pen.
Despite these differences between the two energy forms, we found similar success rates in terms of SR conversion rate. Our observed rates of freedom from AF of 80 and 81.2%, respectively, are consistent with other publications [5,14,15]. When looking at a subgroup of patients who underwent isolated mitral valve surgery alone, the success rate was 92%. Although this finding is very limited because of the small numbers, it may suggest that patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery yield almost similar results with the Maze procedure compared to Cox reports [2].
As reported in the literature [5], all our patients were either in SR or electrically paced immediately after surgery. Like others we observed, early atrial arrhythmias occurred within the first weeks postoperatively. The majority of these events responded to antiarrhythmic therapy and seemed to diminish when the healing process was completed. Cox speculated [1] that the inflammatory response and healing process may account for the early occurrence of atrial arrhythmias.
One possible complication during the Maze procedure is the production of AV-bloc. The incidence in our series was 13.6 and 10.5% in groups I and II, respectively, which was considerably higher than in the literature. Although some papers reported the need for PM implantation up to 25%, the incidence is mostly between 6 and 7% [15,16,21,23]. The reason for our high proportion of AV-blocs is unclear, but is definitely related to the lesion lines, which may have been too close to the AV node. The difference between the groups was not significant, but may be due to the fact that we eagerly took care of the AV node after the first observations of this complication.
Besides the restoration of SR, the aim of AF surgery is reestablishment of atrial transport function. This goal was achieved only in 33 and 50% of our patients for biatrial and right atrial contraction, respectively. Throughout the literature, data given vary widely between 30 and 91% for the left atrium and between 30 and 100% for the right atrium. Melo [3] reported an atrial transport function of 48 and 54% for the left and right sides, respectively, with a preoperative left atrial diameter of 54 mm. In contrast Sie and Khargi [14,16] found a left atrial transport function around 80% in their series. It is noteworthy that there is no further obvious difference between the reports of these three authors. All of them primarily included mitral valve cases with a history of AF of 6 years and a preoperative left atrial diameter of 50–58 mm. There is no clear reason for the differences in contractility, although Sie described that he used transesophageal rather than transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. This is paralleled by Cox's argument that transthoracic echocardiography might underestimate the success rate in terms of transport function [17]. Therefore, Cox suggested using transthoracic echo as a screening test only.
If this holds true, we probably underestimated the occurrence of left atrial contractile function in our patients. Furthermore, there might be another explanation for our results. In our own series, we were very liberal from the very beginning in terms of inclusion criteria. We accepted any patient with chronic AF for the Maze procedure, even those requiring double or triple valve procedures or patients with a long history of AF and huge left atria. This is in contrast to most published papers. Only 9 and 8 patients in groups I and II, respectively, presented with isolated mitral valve pathology, which is the main or sole patient cohort in most studies.
Secondly, our patients presented with much higher diameter (69 and 74 mm, groups I and II) of the left atrium preoperatively compared to most studies [3–6,14,15,18–24], in which the left atrial diameter was 50–60 mm. Interestingly, we observed similar success rates in terms of freedom from AF. However, the poor outcome with respect to contractility may rely on this fact as well. We can only speculate on this, since our patient cohort is too small to analyse this aspect in subgroups. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that patients with excessively large atria might regain SR, but not atrial transport function. This is in accordance with Itoh and colleagues [25], who emphasised that for the original Cox Maze operation left atrial dilatation seems to have negative effects on atrial contraction.
In conclusion, microwave and radiofrequency ablation yield similar results in terms of restoration of SR. Even patients with more complex double or triple valve procedures benefit from the Maze procedure with regard to freedom from AF. Nevertheless, further investigations have to clarify the impact of atrial size in this subset of patients upon the reestablishment of atrial transport function.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
Dr Wisser: I think we should not return to the classical Cox Maze, because the traditional Cox Maze procedure is very complex and I would hesitate to offer it to a patient undergoing triple valve surgery, adding, at least in our hands, approximately one hour additional cross clamp time to the patient.
Dr F. Mohr (Leipzig, Germany): So which is your preferred technique now? We want to learn a lesson from you.
Dr Wisser: Well, in fact, as everyone else, we are changing our protocols towards a left atrial approach. We are more and more doing left atrial Mazes only. In patients undergoing only an aortic valve procedure, for instance, I think there is no reason left to perform a real biatrial Maze procedure we did in our series here.
Dr M. Albreht (Lafayette, Colorado): Would you mind commenting on the similar end point result of an 80% success rate after a year comparing left atrial versus biatrial radio ablation?
Dr Wisser: I cannot comment on that in regard to our series, because our series consisted of patients who underwent all biatrial ablation, and the left atrials I just alluded to have been done by microwave ablation so far. This is why I have no personal data on radiofrequency ablation of the left side only which could be compared with the presented series.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstract1. Introduction2. Materials and methods3. Results4. DiscussionAppendix A. Conference...References |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Vicol, D. Kellerer, P. Petrakopoulou, I. Kaczmarek, P. Lamm, and B. Reichart Long-term results after ablation for long-standing atrial fibrillation concomitant to surgery for organic heart disease: Is microwave energy reliable? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1156 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Fleck, F. Wolf, T. Bader, R. Lehner, C. Aigner, G. Stix, E. Wolner, and W. Wisser Atrial Function After Ablation Procedure in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Using Steady-State Free Precession Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1600 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Wisser, G. Seebacher, T. Fleck, C. Aigner, C. Khazen, G. Stix, D. Hutschala, and E. Wolner Permanent Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: Is Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Enough? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1151 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Gillinov, S. Bhavani, E. H. Blackstone, J. Rajeswaran, L. G. Svensson, J. L. Navia, B.G. Pettersson, J. F. Sabik III, N. G. Smedira, T. Mihaljevic, et al. Surgery for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Patient Factors and Lesion Set Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 502 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Melby, A. Zierer, S. P. Kaiser, R. B. Schuessler, and R. J. Damiano Jr Epicardial microwave ablation on the beating heart for atrial fibrillation: The dependency of lesion depth on cardiac output. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 355 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Itoh, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, H. Nakajima, S. Komori, and S. Kitamura The impact of mitral valve surgery combined with maze procedure. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1030 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Barnett and N. Ad Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1029 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G Haywood Can we ablate permanent atrial fibrillation? Heart, February 1, 2006; 92(2): 152 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Gammie, J. C. Laschinger, J. M. Brown, R. S. Poston, R. N. Pierson III, L. G. Romar, K. L. Schwartz, M. J. Santos, and B. P. Griffith A Multi-Institutional Experience With the CryoMaze Procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 876 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S Kabbani, G. Murad, H. Jamil, A. Sabbagh, and K. Hamzeh Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Microwave Energy - Early Experience Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2005; 13(3): 247 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
