|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:628-633
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
a Departments of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels 1200, Belgium
b Public Health School, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Received 20 October 2003; received in revised form 30 April 2004; accepted 18 May 2004.
* Corresponding author. Address: Service de Chirurgie Cardiovasculaire et Thoracique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc UCL 90, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels B-1200, Belgium. Tel.: +32-2-764-6106; fax: +32-2-764-8960
e-mail: elkhoury{at}chir.ucl.ac.be
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Tricuspid aortic valve prolapse Aortic insufficiency Aortic valve repair
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thanks to a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and recent improvements in operative techniques, aortic cusp prolapses are now considered as potentially repairable lesions [1,35]. In the present study, we investigated whether the systematic search, identification and subsequent surgical correction of aortic cusp prolapses, whether isolated or associated with additional aortic root pathology, allow improving the surgical outcome of aortic root surgery and increase the durability of the repair.
| 2. Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| 3. Surgical strategy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.1.1. TEE examination
The quality of the cusp tissue, the level of coaptation, the presence of a cusp prolapse and the overall anatomy of the aortic root were assessed in the long-axis view, while the symmetry of the aortic root and the presence of redundant tissue was evaluated in the short-axis view. Color Doppler was used to analyse the direction of the regurgitant jet within the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). The presence of a central jet indicates that the level of cusp coaptation is symmetrical. By contrast, eccentric jets are typically associated with asymmetrical cusp coaptation due to the presence of either a true or a relative prolapse of one or more aortic cusps.
3.1.2. Surgical inspection
A transverse aortotomy respecting the root anatomy was systematically performed. Three prolene 4/0 sutures were then passed through the three commissures. The quality of the valve tissue, the free cusp margins, as well as the anatomy of the aortic root was then evaluated. Particular attention was paid to the presence of calcifications, fenestrations or dilatation. Close inspection of the level of the free cusp margins relative to that of their parietal insertion helped to identify true prolapses. For this purpose a vertical traction was exerted on the commissures and the free-cusp edge was gently pushed in its mid-point in order to identify prolapse below the level of cusp insertion. Difference in free margin lengths, and therefore the presence of relative prolapses was estimated by applying a radial tension on the commissures. This was achieved by placing 7/0 prolene sutures through the mid-point of each cusp and applying a vertical traction. When a prolapse was present, two areas of excess cusp tissue appeared on either sides of the suture allowing to identify the prolapsing cusp.
3.2. Prolapse or length correction
The correction of relative prolapses due to unequal length of one or more cusps was achieved by using either a double radial plication of the area of excess tissue or by a single central plication, depending on the quality of the cusp tissue and the degree of prolapse. In both cases, a 6/0 running suture was used. In patients with poor tissue quality and in whom suture plication was not possible, a triangular resection was performed (Fig. 1)
.
|
3.3. Subcommissural annuloplasty and free edge reinforcement
Subcommissural annuloplasty was performed using plegeted (IMPRA INC a subsidiary of CR Bard, Inc., USA) Ethibond 2/0 (Johnson and Johnson medical NV/SA) at the level of the interleaflet triangle, close to the base (Fig. 1). We used this to stabilize the aortic root and increase the area of cusp coaptation. Free margin reinforcement was performed with Gortex CV-7 (Gore W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). For this purpose, an over and over running suture was performed on each cusp while radial and vertical tensions were, respectively, exercised on the three commissures and the three margins. By exerting a gradual tension on the suture, it was possible to bring the free-cusp margins to the appropriate level, improve coaptation and correct any residual prolapse. The aim of this procedure is not only to reinforce the free margins of the cusps, but also to support the other techniques used for correction of the cusp prolapse, and hence produce a more durable repair.
3.4. Sino-tubular junction plasty
In isolated cusp prolapse associated with normal root anatomy, plasty of the sino-tubular junctions was performed using plegeted 4/0 prolene (Johnson and Johnson medical NV/SA) placed at the middle part of the inter-commissural segment (Fig. 1). Particular care was taken to avoid any overreduction which could distort the geometry of the aortic root.
3.5. Root aneurysm and pre-existing prolapse
After performing a transverse aortotomy, the cusps were carefully inspected to identify any prolapse as described earlier. Correction of the length of the cusp-free margins was always performed after preparation of the aortic valve for the sparing operation, and after excision of all diseased tissues. We used either the aortic root remodelling or the reimplantation technique. Subcommissural annuloplasty was only performed following root remodelling. After completion of the valve sparing procedure, the reconstructed aortic root was filled with the cardioplegic solution and valve competence was assessed. During this test, TEE was used to detect any residual regurgitation and, if present, to examine the direction of the jet and hence determine whether any new or residual cusp prolapse was present. After this, a gentle suction was applied superiorly to the level of cusp coaptation to further facilitate the detection of any cusp dysfunction. If prolapse was identified, it was corrected as described above. After the aorta was unclamped and haemodynamic conditions had returned back to normal, TEE was repeated. Any eccentric jet or AR grade >I prompted further correction.
| 4. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Four patients needed an early re-operation, 3 because of bleeding (1 in group I and 2 in group IIa) and 1 because of a recurrent aortic regurgitation at the control echocardiography on post-operative D5 (group I). At re-operation the valve could not be re-repaired and a homograft was implanted. Hospital morbidity included pneumonia in one patient, renal failure in another patient and complete A-V block in two patients. There was no hospital death. Mean post-operative hospital stay was 7±3 days (range 517 days), for both groups. At discharge echocardiography, 36 patients showed no residual artic regurgitation and 7 had grade I aortic regurgitation with a central jet (2 in group I, 2 in group IIa and 3 in group IIb).
Mean clinical follow-up was 23 months (range 284 months). One group IIa patient died at late follow-up from a cardiac cause. The other patients survived and were in NYHA class I. None needed a re-operation.
Mean echocardiographic follow-up was 15 months (range 250 months), and showed no progression of aortic regurgitation, except in 4 patients who developed a grade II aortic regurgitation (2 in group I, 1 in group IIa and 1 in group IIb).
| 5. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of these pathological processes is important because their presence influences the surgical techniques to be used and hence the durability of the repair. We have indeed learnt from mitral repair [12] that there are two important determinants of repair feasibility and durability: the quality of valve tissue left behind after surgery and the use of appropriate surgical technique[s].
Initial techniques for correction of aortic cusp prolapse have been described by Carpentier [12] and Duran et al. [2,4]. These authors reported excellent early results in patients whom prolapse aetiology was mainly rheumatic [4] or congenital [13] in origin. Long-term results have been also reported by Casselman et al. [5] in bicuspid aortic valves as well as after traumatic disruption of tricuspid aortic valves [14]. In these studies, repair failure, whenever occurring, was attributed to either progression of the underlying disease, recurrence of the cusp prolapse, dilation of the aorto-ventricular and sino-tubular junctions or inadequate surgical techniques.
Currently, there are no data about the long-term results of repair procedures to treat patients with a degenerative prolapse of a tricuspid aortic valve. Since tissue quality is usually good in these patients, we sought to investigate whether degenerative cusp prolapses of tricuspid aortic valves can be repaired by using surgical techniques that restore cusp coaptation and stabilize the aortic root.
5.1. Surgical considerations
Careful surgical inspection, together with a detailed per-operative TEE analysis, enabled us to identify cusp prolapses in a significant number of patients with isolated aortic regurgitation. It also allowed us to determine which cusp was involved and whether we were dealing with a true or a relative cusp prolapse. To make this difference, one needs to define an adequate reference point to which the actual level of cusp coaptation can be compared. When only one cusp is prolapsing, this can readily be achieved by taking the other two cusps as reference levels. When all three cusps are prolapsing, which is rare, the appropriate coaptation level is more difficult to define. In this case, we usually considered that the optimum height for coaptation should be the middle distance of the height of the commissure.
From a technical perspective, correction of the prolapse was most often achieved by using either a double radial plication of the area of excess tissue or by a single central plication, depending on the quality of the cusp tissue and the degree of prolapse. In patients with poor tissue quality and in whom suture plication was not possible, a triangular resection was performed. We never used commissural re-suspension or plication near the commissure because of the fragile nature of the tissue at this level and the presence of associated fenestrations. Unfortunately, correction of the free margin length by itself was frequently not sufficient to cure the prolapse. Indeed, at the end of this procedure, many patients still demonstrate a rather small coaptation area. Subcommisural anuloplasty helped us to increase the coaptation area. We always combined it with a free edge reinforcement to heighten the shortened cusp if necessary, to further stabilize the more fragile segments of the valve and reduce the incidence of prolapse recurrence.
Restoration of a normal sino-tubular junction is another important aspect of our repair strategy. In patients with tubular aneurysm, this is best achieved by replacing the tubular aorta, and adjusting the diameter of the graft to the diameter of the neo aorto-ventricular diameter (post-subcommisural annuloplasty). In patients with a normal tubular aorta, similar results can be obtained by performing three plications in the middle point of each sino-tubular junction segment. This further helps stabilizing the cusp repair and the aortic root itself, in much the same way correction of mitral leaflet prolapse and annular dilatation help stabilizing mitral reconstructions and increase the durability of the repair.
Aortic valve sparing surgery has been shown to be an excellent option for patients with proximal aortic aneurysm with or without aortic regurgitation. Two operative techniques have been described: aortic root remodelling [9,15] and reimplantation [8,15]. Although good results have been reported by several groups [611], many surgeons have abandoned these procedures because of a high incidence of immediate or early repair failures and the frequent persistence of severe aortic regurgitation after the operation. Although the exact reason for these failures remains a matter of debate, we believe that they are most likely due to either the presence of a pre-existing but unrecognized cusp prolapse or the appearance of a new prolapse, as a result of the surgical procedure itself. Asymmetrical re-approximation and overreduction of the sino-tubular junction have indeed been shown to cause cusp prolapse [16]. This was the case in two patients after a Ross procedure in which overreduction of the sino-tubular junction resulted in cusp prolapse and severe aortic regurgitation. As in cases of isolated cusp prolapse, careful analysis of the cups by TEE and by surgical inspection may help to identify these cusp prolapses and should prompt the surgeons to apply the appropriate surgical strategy. In this respect, our data indicate that whenever a cusp prolapse has been identified during a valve sparing operation, its correction allows to decrease the number of early failures in patients and improve long-term durability.
| 6. Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr El Khoury: The Gore-Tex is used in two situations. When the prolapse is corrected by plication or resection and the commissural areas are fragilized or the free margin is fragilized, I will add only this Gore-Tex to reinforce the repair and to stabilize the repair. When the repair is not corrected by plication or resection, sometimes I could use this free margin reinforcement to correct the prolapse by exerting some gradual tension on the over and over running suture, and so the level of coaptation is brought up. So free edge reinforcement is used to reinforce the free margin or to correct the prolapse.
Dr A. Moritz (Frankfurt, Germany): We also have a renewed interest in aortic valve repair. What else other than eyeballing is a method you have to judge leaflet prolapse, one?
And second, usually running sutures tend to stretch over time. We know this from aortotomy closure or we have not so good an experience with the running suture on mitral valve restriction or annular ring. So I am not sure how long this type of suture repair of the leaflet edge will stay.
Dr El Khoury: For the first question, the most important thing is really to expose very well the aortic root and the valve by a transverse aortotomy, putting three stitches on each commissure, doing a vertical traction on each commissure and have a look on the leaflet. A prolapse, an absolute prolapse, or let's say a real prolapse, when your commissures are really pulled up is when your free margin is below the aortic annulus.
Now, if you put radial tension on the commissure with a central stitch in the middle of each leaflet, you could compare the lengths of the normal, let's say, and the prolapsed leaflet, and it could give you an idea about the difference in length between the prolapsing and nonprolapsing leaflet. I think playing with the commissures and the central stitch could give you a clear idea about the presence of the prolapse and the amount of tissue to be repaired.
Now, for the second question, I think it is possible that this running stitch will be stretched or something like that, but I think, as for the mitral valve, if we could obtain immediately post-operatively very nice coaptation, the stress on the free margin will be lower and maybe the stress on the running suture is not too important to change the length of the free margin.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. de Kerchove, M. Boodhwani, D. Glineur, A. Poncelet, R. Verhelst, P. Astarci, V. Lacroix, J. Rubay, M. Vandyck, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, et al. Effects of Preoperative Aortic Insufficiency on Outcome After Aortic Valve-Sparing Surgery Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11_suppl_1): S120 - S126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. de Kerchove, M. Boodhwani, D. Glineur, A. Poncelet, J. Rubay, C. Watremez, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Cusp Prolapse Repair in Trileaflet Aortic Valves: Free Margin Plication and Free Margin Resuspension Techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 88(2): 455 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, A.-C. Pouleur, A. Robert, A. Pasquet, B. L. Gerber, P. Noirhomme, G. El Khoury, and J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde Mechanisms of Recurrent Aortic Regurgitation After Aortic Valve Repair: Predictive Value of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., August 1, 2009; 2(8): 931 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Settepani, M. Bergonzini, A. Barbone, E. Citterio, A. Basciu, D. Ornaghi, R. Gallotti, and G. Tarelli Reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the Valsalva graft: what have we learnt after 100 cases? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 113 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boodhwani, L. de Kerchove, and G. El Khoury Aortic root replacement using the reimplantation technique: tips and tricks Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, May 1, 2009; 8(5): 584 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boodhwani, L. de Kerchove, D. Glineur, A. Poncelet, J. Rubay, P. Astarci, R. Verhelst, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: Impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 286 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gaeta, S. Lentini, F. Tancredi, and F. Monaco Reinforcement of Anastomosis in Aortic Dissection Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1721 - 1721. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fattouch, R. Sampognaro, G. Bianco, E. Navarra, M. Moscarelli, G. Speziale, and G. Ruvolo Implantation of Gore-Tex Chordae on Aortic Valve Leaflet to Treat Prolapse Using "The Chordae Technique": Surgical Aspects and Clinical Results Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2019 - 2024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, F. Raoux, N. A. Attar, C. Acar, T. Joudinaud, and R. Raffoul A lesional classification to standardize surgical management of aortic insufficiency towards valve repair Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 872 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kadner, O. Raisky, A. Degandt, D. Tamisier, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and P. R. Vouhe The Ross Procedure in Infants and Young Children Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, A.-C. Pouleur, C. Goffinet, D. Vancraeynest, M. Van Dyck, A. Robert, B. L. Gerber, A. Pasquet, G. E. Khoury, and J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde Functional Anatomy of Aortic Regurgitation: Accuracy, Prediction of Surgical Repairability, and Outcome Implications of Transesophageal Echocardiography Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-264 - I-269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dave and R. Pretre Pericardial patch reconstruction of the congenitally diseased aortic valve MMCTS, May 7, 2007; 2007(0507): 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jeanmart, L. de Kerchove, D. Glineur, J.-M. Goffinet, I. Rougui, M. Van Dyck, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Aortic Valve Repair: The Functional Approach to Leaflet Prolapse and Valve-Sparing Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): S746 - S751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, A.-C. Pouleur, P. Noirhomme, J.-C. Funken, P. Astarci, R. Verhelst, A. Poncelet, and G. ElKhoury Repair of trileaflet aortic valve prolapse: mid-term outcome in patients with normal aortic root morphology Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2007; 6(1): 56 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. F. Lausberg, D. Aicher, F. Langer, and H.-J. Schafers Aortic valve repair with autologous pericardial patch. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 244 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pretre, A. Kadner, H. Dave, D. Bettex, and M. Genoni Tricuspidisation of the aortic valve with creation of a crown-like annulus is able to restore a normal valve function in bicuspid aortic valves. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1001 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Di Bartolomeo, D. Pacini, S. Martin-Suarez, A. Loforte, A. Dell'Amore, M. Ferlito, G. Bracchetti, and G. Bozzetti Valsalva prosthesis in aortic valve-sparing operations Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 294 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Settepani, D. Ornaghi, A. Barbone, E. Citterio, A. Eusebio, E. Manasse, G. Silvaggio, and R. Gallotti Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta: preliminary results Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2005; 4(2): 137 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |