|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:1187-1191
© 2004 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg 413 45, Sweden
Received 5 June 2004; received in revised form 13 August 2004; accepted 15 August 2004.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 31 3421556; fax: +46 31 417991. (E-mail: ali.belboul{at}hjl.gu.se).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A variety of complementary natural and synthetic materials have been tried to overcome such complications including fibrin sealants, collagen fleece, and synthetic glues, with mixed results. Irrespective of their efficacy, they cannot replace an exact and precise surgical technique. Nevertheless, they can be very helpful or even life saving in situations where air leakage cannot be assured by classic means. There is no consensus as to the best surgical technique, but there has been a consistent trend towards the use of fibrin glue material to reduce air leakage after pulmonary resection. Which glue to use, depends on several factors, including availability, haemostatic efficacy, mechanical properties, effects on wound healing, tissue cellular response, surgeons' experience and the possibility of transmission of bloodborne diseases.
The Vivostat® System (Vivolution A/S, Denmark) is a medical device for the perioperative preparation and application of an autologous fibrin sealant in the operating theatre. The system is fully automated and microprocessor-controlled, and is made up of three components: an automated processor unit, an automated applicator unit, and a disposable, single-patient-use unit, which includes a Preparation set, into which 120ml of blood is donated, and a Spraypen applicator [2,3]. Although, animal studies have suggested that Vivostat is effective at reducing air leakage following pulmonary resection [4], clinical studies with Vivostat in pulmonary surgery have not been published previously. The present study evaluated the use of Vivostat as an adjunct in pulmonary surgery. Postoperative air leakage, chest tube drainage and hospitalisation time were used as indicators of postoperative morbidity.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the end of the operation and before closing the chest, the lung was ventilated under positive end expiratory pressure and warm saline was installed into the chest cavity to test for air leaks. The operating surgeon then corrected any leaks surgically until satisfied that no more could be done. The patients were then assigned (20 per group) to either the control or Vivostat groups by opening a sealed envelope that contained the randomisation code (allocated by a computer generated random sequence). Patients assigned to the control group underwent no additional interventions. Patients assigned to the Vivostat group donated 120ml of blood and Vivostat fibrin sealant, which was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Vivostat was applied over the entire areas of risk for air leaks and bleeding (all areas of dissection) with the lung deflated and without ventilation. After 5min, the lung was ventilated and the chest closed with two drains set at 1015cmH2O.
The following variables were measured and recorded daily until discharged from hospital: rate of air leak on the day of the operation, and daily thereafter in the morning until chest drains were removed; time to chest tube removal; 24-h and chest-tube drainage (bleeding/exudation) volume at removal of chest tube, duration of TEDA treatment and postoperative length of hospital stay. Postoperative haemoglobin and leucucocyte counts were also recorded. The rate of air leakage was assessed by a mechanical suction pump and was expressed in litres per minute. The personnel recording these parameters were blinded to the intervention received. Adverse events were monitored throughout the patients hospital stay. Postoperative air leakage, chest tube drainage and hospitalisation time were used as indicators of postoperative morbidity.
| 3. Statistical analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 4. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
4.3. Performance variables
The results for each of the performance variables for both randomised groups are summarised in Table 2. Use of Vivostat was associated with a mean 255ml lower drainage volume in the 24-h postoperative period, and a mean lower total drainage volume of 382ml compared with the control group. These differences were highly statistically significant (both P<0.001).
|
|
| 5. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Use of fibrin sealants has been shown to reduce complications of air leakage, such as bronchopleural fistulae, the formation of pleural adhesions, pneumothorax, and secondary infections [911]. Conventional fibrin sealants utilise components prepared from pooled human plasma (fibrinogen, thrombin) and, sometimes, animal-derived components (e.g. bovine aprotinin or thrombin). These carry a potential risk of transmitting human- or animal-borne infectious materials (e.g. viruses such as hepatitis B and C, human T-cell leukaemia, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), or prions responsible for diseases such as CreutzfeldtJakob disease (CJD) or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)). There are additional concerns of antigenic reactions to foreign proteins and of thrombotic effects from high concentrations of added thrombin [12]. An autologous fibrin sealant free from added thrombin, such as Vivostat, provides a definite means of preventing these potential adverse effects.
In this study, we have demonstrated that the adjunctive use of Vivostat autologous fibrin sealant during lobectomy significantly reduces postoperative air leakage, both in terms of the rate of air leakage per patient and the proportion of patients experiencing air leakage, and the amount of postoperative bleeding/exudation. The majority of drainage fluid, at least in the first 24h, is due to bleeding. Vivostat use reduced this volume over the first 24h by 155ml, and by 358ml overall, more than compensating for the 120ml of blood donated by the patient for preparation of the fibrin sealant. Slightly higher haemoglobin levels were recorded in the Vivostat group postoperatively, although we could not confirm that this was a direct consequence of the reduced blood loss achieved with Vivostat. Reductions in bleeding and air leakage would be expected to reduce the need for chest-tube drainage and the need for hospitalisation. Although results for these parameters favoured Vivostat, no statistically significant differences were found. Reducing hospitalisation time is associated with considerable cost benefits, thus, a larger study may be justified to establish if there is a significant meaningful benefit for Vivostat in this regard.
Previous studies of the effects of fibrin sealants in pulmonary surgery have given inconsistent results with regard to air leakage and the duration of chest-tube drainage. Wong and Goldstraw [13], in a randomised trial of 66 patients with alveolar air leaks following pulmonary surgery, identified a non-significant but shorter duration of chest-tube drainage (6 vs. 9 days) and hospitalisation (6 vs. 8 days) for fibrin sealant (sprayed) and untreated controls, respectively. Fleischer et al. [14] were also unable to identify a significant effect of fibrin sealant in reducing the duration of chest-tube drain insertion (6.0 vs. 5.9 days) and hospitalisation (9.8 vs. 11.5), or in the duration of air leakage (2.3 vs. 3.3 day) for fibrin sealant versus controls, respectively, in a 28-patient lobectomy study. Gagarine et al. [15], in a retrospective study of 360 patients, of whom 102 received fibrin sealant during surgery, did identify a significant reduction of 1.4 days in duration of chest-tube intubation with fibrin sealant compared with control, but did not find any significant difference in the proportion of patients with extended air leaks (>7 days) or in the length of hospital stay (6.3 vs. 7.7 days, respectively). Finally, in a case-control study of 100 patients undergoing precision resections for lung metastases [16], more complications were significant benefits of fibrin sealant were found in comparison with cauterisation for duration air leakage (2.7 vs. 7.8 days, P<0.001), drain insertion (4.5 vs. 9.5, P<0.001) and hospital stay (6.5 vs. 11.5 days, P<0.001), and there were more adverse effects with cauterisation (28 vs. 2%, P<0.001). In the above studies, duration of hospitalisation (median 4.5 days) and duration of drainage (median 2 days) in the control groups were markedly longer than our study (median 4.5 days); suggesting differences in postoperative patient-management procedures. The relatively short period of hospitalisation in our study reduces the likelihood of finding a significant difference between treatment groups.
We believe our study was the first randomised clinical study to measure air leakage intraoperatively while patients were still on the respirator, and, postoperatively, by a flowmeter in the mechanical electrical suction device, with repeated measurements until the removal of the chest tube. This enabled the amount of air leakage, as well as the chest-tube drainage fluid to be quantified. In this way, despite the relatively small group sizes (20 per group), we were able to demonstrate a significant benefit for Vivostat over control in postoperative morbidity.
For some time we have used Vivostat routinely in cardiac surgery for redo-operations, aortic dissections and other high-risk bleeders, as well using Vivostat perioperatively in patients undergoing thoracoscopic procedures to control air leaks and bleeding. The morbidity benefits shown for Vivostat in this randomised, blinded study provides good justification for its routine use as a tissue sealant for pulmonary lobectomies.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Rocco, E. A. Rendina, F. Venuta, M. R. Mueller, S. Halezeroglu, H. Dienemann, D. V. Raemdonck, and H. J. Hansen The use of sealants in modern thoracic surgery: a survey Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D'Andrilli, C. Andreetti, M. Ibrahim, A. M. Ciccone, F. Venuta, U. Mansmann, and E. A. Rendina A prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of a surgical sealant to treat air leaks in lung surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 817 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moser, I. Opitz, W. Zhai, V. Rousson, E.W. Russi, W. Weder, and D. Lardinois Autologous fibrin sealant reduces the incidence of prolonged air leak and duration of chest tube drainage after lung volume reduction surgery: a prospective randomized blinded study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 843 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Akhyari, H. Kamiya, A. Haverich, M. Karck, and A. Lichtenberg Myocardial tissue engineering: the extracellular matrix. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 229 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Araki, H. Tao, N. Nakajima, H. Sugai, T. Sato, S.-H. Hyon, T. Nagayasu, and T. Nakamura Development of new biodegradable hydrogel glue for preventing alveolar air leakage. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1241 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tambiah, R. Rawlins, D. Robb, and T. Treasure Can tissue adhesives and glues significantly reduce the incidence and length of postoperative air leaks in patients having lung resections? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 529 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Araki, H. Tao, T. Sato, N. Nakajima, H. Sugai, S.-H. Hyon, T. Nagayasu, and T. Nakamura Creation of a uniform pleural defect model for the study of lung sealants J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dernevik, A. Belboul, and G. Radberg Initial experience with the world's first digital drainage system. The benefits of recording air leaks with graphic representation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 31(2): 209 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tansley, F. Al-Mulhim, E. Lim, G. Ladas, and P. Goldstraw A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of BioGlue in treating alveolar air leaks J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 105 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Intrapleural topical application of cisplatin with the surgical carrier Vivostat increases the local drug concentration in an immune-competent rat model with malignant pleuromesothelioma. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 697 - 703.e3. |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |