|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:634-637
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Received 20 July 2004; received in revised form 12 November 2004; accepted 29 December 2004.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 512 504 80820; fax: +43 512 504 22528. (E-mail: thomas.schachner{at}uibk.ac.at).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Axillary artery Cardiopulmonary bypass Axillary artery cannulation Malperfusion
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was the aim of our study to describe our experience with technical problems and complications of axillary artery cannulation and their association with the cannulation technique.
| 2. Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.2. Surgical technique
The perfusion via the axillary artery was performed as previously described [1,5]. In brief the axillary artery was exposed via a right infraclavicular approach. After clamping of the vessel and longitudinal arteriotomy either direct cannulation with a 20F or 22F straight cannula (DLP, Medtronic, Inc.) or an end-to-side anastomosis of an 8mm Gore-Tex graft was performed (sidegraft technique). The distal clamp on the axillary artery remained in case of direct cannulation, and it was removed in case of sidegrafting.
After decannulation the axillary artery was closed longitudinally using a 6/0 Prolene running suture or reconstructed with a Gore-Tex patch if the vessel diameter appeared to become narrowed with direct closure.
2.3. Statistical analysis
The SPSS software (SPSS 11.0) for windows was used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables are given as percentages continuous variables are presented as median and range. In univariate analysis qualitative variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Results were considered statistically significant at P values of less than 0.05.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Perfusion via the axillary artery was attempted in 65 patients (Fig. 1). In 20 cases the sidegraft technique was used, and in 45 cases direct cannulation was performed. Aortic dissection was present in 15/20 (75%) sidegraft cases, and in 27/45 (60%) cases of direct cannulation (P=0.24). Technical problems and complications occurred in 9/65 (14%) cases and were categorized into three groups (Table 2).
|
|
The following associations between surgical technique of axillary perfusion (i.e. direct cannulation or sidegraft technique) and categories of technical problems and complications could be found.
Group 1 problems (arterial damage or dissection of the axillary artery or the aorta) occurred in 0/20 (0%) cases of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 4/45 (9%) cases with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Group 2 problems (cannulation problems or insufficient CPB flow due to a narrow vessel) occurred in 0/20 (0%) cases of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 2/45 (4%) cases with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Group 3 problems (malperfusion in aortic dissections) occurred in 3/15 (20%) cases of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 0/27 (0%) cases with direct cannulation (P=0.016).
No postoperative complications related to axillary cannulation which were evaluated by clinical examination, such as brachial plexus injury, axillary artery thrombosis or local wound infection were observed.
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our series in 14% of the cases technical problems occurred (a very detailed prospective documentation may be one cause of this high rate), and in about 1/10 the cannulation had to be switched to either femoral or aortic perfusion. We categorized the problems into three groups.
4.1. Arterial injury
We experienced axillary artery injury in 5%. In literature this complication ranges between 0 [2,3,6] and 2% [9]. This is probably due to the fact that we included even small injuries that could be fixed with one or a few repair stitches. And the series with 0% of axillary artery injury contained 27 cases or less.
A new aortic dissection occurred in one of our patients who had severe aortic atherosclerosis and underwent axillary cannulation to perform CABG without aortic cannulation. The perfusion was switched immediately to the femoral artery and the patient underwent ascending aortic replacement and CABG. The patient survived the procedure. Sabik and co-workers [9] report a rate of new aortic dissections of 1% of axillary artery cannulations. In our experience arterial injury occured only in patients with direct cannulation of the axillary artery, which can be explained by the manipulation by the cannula itself.
4.2. Cannulation problems/low CPB flow
In one of our patients the (direct) cannulation of the axillary artery was impossible because of significant resistance in the artery during advancement of the cannula. In this case, we switched to femoral cannulation, another option would probably be the use of the sidegraft technique in axillary cannulation. Cannulation problems of the axillary artery are described in literature in a range of 110% [1,7,8]. A low CPB flow was present in one of our patients after axillary cannulation, and the perfusion was switched to aortic cannulation. This is in accordance with Sabik and co-workers [9] who report this problem in 1% of axillary CPB access.
4.3. Malperfusion
One major indication for axillary artery cannulation is acute aortic dissection, due to the rare involvement of the axillary artery into the dissection. However, we experienced malperfusion in three cases. All three cases were acute aortic dissections type A, and after initiation of CPB via the axillary artery a decreased blood pressure in the left radial artery and/or the femoral artery pressure line was noticed. The perfusion was switched to the femoral artery and pressures were again equalized. Interestingly all three cases of malperfusion occurred with the sidegraft technique of axillary artery cannulation, and statistical significance was reached. However, it remains to be elucidated why the malperfusion occurred only with this technique.
Postoperatively we found no local wound infection, no arm ischemia/compartment syndrome, and no brachial plexus injury as determined by clinical examination. This is in agreement with other authors findings (compare Table 3) and it is one advantage of axillary artery cannulation.
|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. F. Immer, B. Moser, E. S. Krahenbuhl, L. Englberger, M. Stalder, F. S. Eckstein, and T. Carrel Arterial access through the right subclavian artery in surgery of the aortic arch improves neurologic outcome and mid-term quality of life. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1614 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimokawa, S. Takanashi, N. Ozawa, and T. Itoh Management of intraoperative malperfusion syndrome using femoral artery cannulation for repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1619 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Rokkas, D. Angouras, T. Chamogeorgakis, and C. E. Anagnostopoulos Acute intraoperative aortic dissection following axillary artery cannulation Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 288 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Eusanio, M. Ciano, G. Labriola, G. Lionetti, and G. Di Eusanio Cannulation of the innominate artery during surgery of the thoracic aorta: our experience in 55 patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 270 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Inoue, T. Ueda, S. Taguchi, I. Kashima, K. Koizumi, R. Takahashi, and I. Kiso Ascending aorta cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 976 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Gulbins, A. Pritisanac, and J. Ennker Axillary Versus Femoral Cannulation for Aortic Surgery: Enough Evidence for a General Recommendation? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1219 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Reece, C. G. Tribble, R. L. Smith, R. R. Singh, B. M. Stiles, B. B. Peeler, J. A. Kern, and I. L. Kron Central cannulation is safe in acute aortic dissection repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Urbanski, A. Lenos, Y. Lindemann, E. Weigang, M. Zacher, and A. Diegeler Carotid artery cannulation in aortic surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1398 - 1403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. von Segesser Peripheral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass MMCTS, October 9, 2006; 2006(1009): 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |