EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas Schachner
Johannes Bonatti
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schachner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bonatti, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schachner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bonatti, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Great vessels

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:634-637
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Technical problems and complications of axillary artery cannulation

Thomas Schachner*, Johann Nagiller, Anne Zimmer, Guenther Laufer, Johannes Bonatti

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Received 20 July 2004; received in revised form 12 November 2004; accepted 29 December 2004.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 512 504 80820; fax: +43 512 504 22528. (E-mail: thomas.schachner{at}uibk.ac.at).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: Cardiopulmonary bypass via the axillary artery is frequently used especially in aortic dissections. With an increased use of this technique problems were recognized too. We describe the technical problems and complications associated with axillary artery cannulation. Methods: Sixty-five patients underwent cannulation of the axillary artery. The indication for operation was acute aortic dissection type A in 57%, chronic aortic dissection in 8%, aortic aneurysm in 18%, pseudoaneurysm in 3%, and others in 14%. Results: Technical problems and complications occurred in 14%, and in 11% the perfusion had to be switched to either femoral (n=5) or aortic cannulation (n=2). Arterial damage or dissection of the axillary artery or the aorta occurred in 0% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 9% with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Cannulation problems or insufficient CPB flow due to a narrow vessel occurred in 0% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 4% with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Malperfusion in aortic dissections occurred in 20% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 0% with direct cannulation (P=0.016). No postoperative complications related to axillary cannulation which were evaluated by clinical examination, such as brachial plexus injury, axillary artery thrombosis or local wound infection were observed. Conclusions: Although axillary artery cannulation is an attractive alternative to femoral cannulation there needs to be an alertness for technical problems. Different complications occur with either direct cannulation or the sidegraft technique and at present it remains the surgeons preference which technique for axillary artery cannulation is used.

Key Words: Axillary artery • Cardiopulmonary bypass • Axillary artery cannulation • Malperfusion


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via the axillary artery has become an alternative perfusion site especially in acute aortic dissections and patients with severe aortic atherosclerosis [1–7]. Despite several advantages of axillary artery cannulation such as antegrade perfusion of the aorta, problems and complications of this technique are getting known with increased use. It is still a matter of discussion which technique of axillary artery cannulation should be used: direct cannulation or the sidegraft technique [8,9].

It was the aim of our study to describe our experience with technical problems and complications of axillary artery cannulation and their association with the cannulation technique.


    2. Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
2.1. Patients
Between July 2000 and June 2004 (except one case in 1998) 65 patients underwent cannulation of the axillary artery at our institution. The median age was 63 (22–81) years and 74% of the patients were male. The indication for operation was acute aortic dissection type A in 37/65 (57%), chronic aortic dissection in 5/65 (8%), aortic aneurysm in 12/65 (18%), pseudoaneurysm in 2/65 (3%), and others (e.g. severe atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta with coronary artery disease or aortic stenosis, aortic valve regurgitation after previous ascending aortic replacement) in 9/65 (14%) of the patients. About 39/65 (60%) were performed as acute cases and 11/65 (17%) were reoperations.

2.2. Surgical technique
The perfusion via the axillary artery was performed as previously described [1,5]. In brief the axillary artery was exposed via a right infraclavicular approach. After clamping of the vessel and longitudinal arteriotomy either direct cannulation with a 20F or 22F straight cannula (DLP, Medtronic, Inc.) or an end-to-side anastomosis of an 8mm Gore-Tex graft was performed (sidegraft technique). The distal clamp on the axillary artery remained in case of direct cannulation, and it was removed in case of sidegrafting.

After decannulation the axillary artery was closed longitudinally using a 6/0 Prolene running suture or reconstructed with a Gore-Tex patch if the vessel diameter appeared to become narrowed with direct closure.

2.3. Statistical analysis
The SPSS software (SPSS 11.0) for windows was used for statistical analysis. Categorical variables are given as percentages continuous variables are presented as median and range. In univariate analysis qualitative variables were analyzed using chi-square tests. Results were considered statistically significant at P values of less than 0.05.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
The operations performed are listed in Table 1. The median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 203 (46–569)min, the median aortic cross clamp time was 113 (38–220)min. Hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) was used in 52/65 (80%) cases with a median circulatory arrest time of 35 (15–79)min. In four patients HCA was conducted at moderate hypothermia (at a body temperature of 24°C) with antegrade cerebral perfusion, whereas in 48 patients deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was performed (at a body temperature of 18°C, as determined by urinary bladder thermocatheter). Retrograde cerebral perfusion was performed in 23/65 (35%), and antegrade cerebral perfusion in 11/65 (17%) patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Operations of 65 patients undergoing perfusion via the axillary artery
 
The postoperative length of stay at the intensive care unit was five (1–77) days. The hospital mortality was 8/65 (12%).

Perfusion via the axillary artery was attempted in 65 patients (Fig. 1). In 20 cases the sidegraft technique was used, and in 45 cases direct cannulation was performed. Aortic dissection was present in 15/20 (75%) sidegraft cases, and in 27/45 (60%) cases of direct cannulation (P=0.24). Technical problems and complications occurred in 9/65 (14%) cases and were categorized into three groups (Table 2).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Number of axillary artery cannulations either with direct cannulation or with sidegraft technique per year.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Technical problems and complications of perfusion via the axillary artery in 65 patients
 
In 7/65 (11%) cases the perfusion had to be switched to either femoral (n=5) or aortic cannulation (n=2).

The following associations between surgical technique of axillary perfusion (i.e. direct cannulation or sidegraft technique) and categories of technical problems and complications could be found.

Group 1 problems (arterial damage or dissection of the axillary artery or the aorta) occurred in 0/20 (0%) cases of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 4/45 (9%) cases with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Group 2 problems (cannulation problems or insufficient CPB flow due to a narrow vessel) occurred in 0/20 (0%) cases of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 2/45 (4%) cases with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Group 3 problems (malperfusion in aortic dissections) occurred in 3/15 (20%) cases of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 0/27 (0%) cases with direct cannulation (P=0.016).

No postoperative complications related to axillary cannulation which were evaluated by clinical examination, such as brachial plexus injury, axillary artery thrombosis or local wound infection were observed.


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
During the last years the use of axillary artery cannulation has led to bigger series and an increased experience with this technique. Furthermore technical problems and complications of axillary cannulation were determined and quantified [1–9, Table 3].

In our series in 14% of the cases technical problems occurred (a very detailed prospective documentation may be one cause of this high rate), and in about 1/10 the cannulation had to be switched to either femoral or aortic perfusion. We categorized the problems into three groups.

4.1. Arterial injury
We experienced axillary artery injury in 5%. In literature this complication ranges between 0 [2,3,6] and 2% [9]. This is probably due to the fact that we included even small injuries that could be fixed with one or a few repair stitches. And the series with 0% of axillary artery injury contained 27 cases or less.

A new aortic dissection occurred in one of our patients who had severe aortic atherosclerosis and underwent axillary cannulation to perform CABG without aortic cannulation. The perfusion was switched immediately to the femoral artery and the patient underwent ascending aortic replacement and CABG. The patient survived the procedure. Sabik and co-workers [9] report a rate of new aortic dissections of 1% of axillary artery cannulations. In our experience arterial injury occured only in patients with direct cannulation of the axillary artery, which can be explained by the manipulation by the cannula itself.

4.2. Cannulation problems/low CPB flow
In one of our patients the (direct) cannulation of the axillary artery was impossible because of significant resistance in the artery during advancement of the cannula. In this case, we switched to femoral cannulation, another option would probably be the use of the sidegraft technique in axillary cannulation. Cannulation problems of the axillary artery are described in literature in a range of 1–10% [1,7,8]. A low CPB flow was present in one of our patients after axillary cannulation, and the perfusion was switched to aortic cannulation. This is in accordance with Sabik and co-workers [9] who report this problem in 1% of axillary CPB access.

4.3. Malperfusion
One major indication for axillary artery cannulation is acute aortic dissection, due to the rare involvement of the axillary artery into the dissection. However, we experienced malperfusion in three cases. All three cases were acute aortic dissections type A, and after initiation of CPB via the axillary artery a decreased blood pressure in the left radial artery and/or the femoral artery pressure line was noticed. The perfusion was switched to the femoral artery and pressures were again equalized. Interestingly all three cases of malperfusion occurred with the sidegraft technique of axillary artery cannulation, and statistical significance was reached. However, it remains to be elucidated why the malperfusion occurred only with this technique.

Postoperatively we found no local wound infection, no arm ischemia/compartment syndrome, and no brachial plexus injury as determined by clinical examination. This is in agreement with other authors findings (compare Table 3) and it is one advantage of axillary artery cannulation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Technical problems and complications related to axillary artery cannulation in newer literature
 
We conclude that axillary artery cannulation is an attractive alternative to femoral cannulation. Nevertheless there needs to be an alertness for technical problems. The surgical methods (i.e. direct cannulation or sidegraft technique) are still a matter of debate. Different problems and complications occur with each technique and at present it remains the surgeons preference which technique for axillary artery cannulation is used.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schachner T, Vertacnik K, Laufer G, Bonatti J. Axillary artery cannulation in surgery of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:445-447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Yavuz S, Gönzü MT, Türk T. Axillary artery cannulation for arterial inflow in patients with acute dissection of the ascending aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:313-315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Whitlark JD, Goldman SM, Sutter FP. Axillary artery cannulation in acute ascending aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1127-1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Neri E, Massetti M, Capannini G, Carone E, Tucci E, Diciolla F. Axillary artery cannulation in type A aortic dissection operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:324-329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schachner T, Laufer G, Vertacnik K, Bonaros N, Nagiller J, Bonatti J. Is the axillary artery a suitable cannulation site in aortic surgery?. J Cardiovasc Surg 2004;45:15-19.[Medline]
  6. Pasic M, Schubel J, Bauer M, Yankah C, Kuppe H, Weng Y, Hetzer R. Cannulation of the right axillary artery for surgery of acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:231-236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Watanabe K, Fukuda I, Osaka M, Imazuru T. Axillary artery and transapical aortic cannulation as an alternative to femoral artery cannulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:842-843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sinclair MC, Singer RL, Manley NJ, Montesano RM. Cannulation of the axillary artery for cardiopulmonary bypass: safeguards and pitfalls. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:931-934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sabik JF, Nemeh H, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Gillinov M, Rajeswaran J, Cosgrove DM. Cannulation of the axillary artery with a side graft reduces morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1315-1320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. F. Immer, B. Moser, E. S. Krahenbuhl, L. Englberger, M. Stalder, F. S. Eckstein, and T. Carrel
Arterial access through the right subclavian artery in surgery of the aortic arch improves neurologic outcome and mid-term quality of life.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1614 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Shimokawa, S. Takanashi, N. Ozawa, and T. Itoh
Management of intraoperative malperfusion syndrome using femoral artery cannulation for repair of acute type A aortic dissection.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1619 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
C. K. Rokkas, D. Angouras, T. Chamogeorgakis, and C. E. Anagnostopoulos
Acute intraoperative aortic dissection following axillary artery cannulation
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 288 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Di Eusanio, M. Ciano, G. Labriola, G. Lionetti, and G. Di Eusanio
Cannulation of the innominate artery during surgery of the thoracic aorta: our experience in 55 patients
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 270 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Inoue, T. Ueda, S. Taguchi, I. Kashima, K. Koizumi, R. Takahashi, and I. Kiso
Ascending aorta cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 976 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Gulbins, A. Pritisanac, and J. Ennker
Axillary Versus Femoral Cannulation for Aortic Surgery: Enough Evidence for a General Recommendation?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1219 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. B. Reece, C. G. Tribble, R. L. Smith, R. R. Singh, B. M. Stiles, B. B. Peeler, J. A. Kern, and I. L. Kron
Central cannulation is safe in acute aortic dissection repair
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 428 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. P. Urbanski, A. Lenos, Y. Lindemann, E. Weigang, M. Zacher, and A. Diegeler
Carotid artery cannulation in aortic surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1398 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MMCTSHome page
L. K. von Segesser
Peripheral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass
MMCTS, October 9, 2006; 2006(1009): 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas Schachner
Johannes Bonatti
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schachner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bonatti, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schachner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bonatti, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Great vessels


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS