EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yavuz Enc
Sertac Cicek
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enc, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cicek, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Enc, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cicek, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:930-931
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL

Letter to the Editor

Reply to Raja

Yavuz Enc*, Sertac Cicek

Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey

Received 3 January 2005; accepted 4 January 2005.

* Corresponding author. Address: Baglarbasi Mah. Fetih Sok. No. 9, 41700 Darica/Gebze, Turkey. Tel.: +90 262 7454242. (E-mail: erenenc{at}superonline.com).

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • Myocardial revascularization • On-pump • Off-pump

We thank you for your interest in our article. We absolutely agree with you that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is a safe alternative method for myocardial revascularization. OPCAB is a potentially more physiologic method with the possibility of reducing mortality and morbidity [1]. However, the recent meta-analysis reports that mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and renal failure were not reduced in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. But, the atrial fibrillation was reduced significantly by eliminating CPB [2]. We should emphasize that until recent years generally selected patients underwent OPCAB. With growing surgical experience, indication for OPCAB has been changing over the last few years and patients with multi-vessel grafts and more severely diseased vessels can now be a candidate for OPCAB. Therefore, patient selection is the most important weakness in the studies comparing OPCAB and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG) surgery.

Again we agree with Dr Raja that prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been allotted the highest level of evidence [3]. But, it is also difficult to design prospective double-blind randomized clinical trials concerning OPCAB and CCABG surgery due to the preference of surgeon and indication of surgical methods. Therefore, although there are some inherent weaknesses in retrospective studies which are well known, we should not ignore the results of well-designed retrospective randomized studies concerning OPCAB and CCABG surgery.

In our retrospective study [4], we tried to compare the patients with similar peroperative variables. The selection of the patients with single vessel disease can help us to standardize the patients. Moreover, the patients with single vessel disease could be easily randomized. On the other hand, the results do not suffice to exclude a possible advantage of OPCABs in patients receiving multiple bypasses. But nowadays, it is still difficult to randomize the patients when you design a randomized study to compare the patients with diffusely diseased multiple vessels. When double-blind randomization is possible with growing experience, the point under consideration will be answered. Until this time, a large-scale multi-center well-designed retrospective RCT of OPCAB versus CCABG may help us to answer the question of whether OPCAB reduces the incidence of post-operative AF.

References

  1. Raja SG, Dreyfus GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: to do or not to do? Current best available evidence. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004;18:486-505.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ, The Evidence-based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005;102(1):188-203.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. von Segesser LK. Writing off evidence in evidence-based medicine?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:403-404.[Free Full Text]
  4. Enc Y, Ketenci B, Ozsoy D, Camur G, Kayacioglu I, Terzi S, Cicek S. Atrial fibrillation after surgical revascularization: is there any difference between on-pump and off-pump?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:1129-1133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yavuz Enc
Sertac Cicek
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enc, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cicek, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Enc, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cicek, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS