|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:1030-1035
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL
a Division of General Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
b Department of Pathology, University of Bern, Switzerland
c John Radcliff Hospital, University of Oxford, UK
d Inovivo Oslo Research Park, Oslo, Norway
e Regional Hospital for Lung Diseases, Szczecin-Zdunowo, Poland
Received 22 September 2004; received in revised form 7 February 2005; accepted 9 March 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 31 632 2330; fax: +41 31 632 2327. (E-mail: ralph.schmid{at}insel.ch).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Organ transplantation In vivo electroporation Gene transfer
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acute rejection is a severe immunological process and the immunomodulatory and anti inflammatory properties of IL-10 ameliorates this reaction [3]. IL-10 is a pleiotropic cytokine. It inhibits the synthesis of cytokines by TH1 cells activated by monocyte/macrophage antigen-presenting cells [4]. In addition it has been shown that IL-10 inhibits monocyte/macrophage dependent T-cell activation and antigen presentation [3,5], as well as alloreactivity in vivo [6].
Gene transfer defined as the temporary introduction of genes that results in transient gene expression and production of a functional gene product to modify tissue responses, might be an effective strategy to decrease transplant rejection. Electroporation mediated gene transfer to the skeletal muscle has evolved as a safe and efficient method with very promising results [7]. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hIL-10 overexpression in peripheral muscle tissue of the recipient in combination with subtherapeutic doses of CsA to reduce acute rejection in a fully mismatched orthotopic rat lung transplantation model.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
CsA (Sandimmun®) was provided by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland and diluted in castor oil in a ratio of 1:9. All animals received human care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care, formulated by the National Society for Medical Research, and Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the institute of Laboratory Animal Research and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Pub. No. 86-23, revised 1985). The protocol was approved by the local animal study committee.
2.3. Operative procedure
2.3.1. Donor
The animal is anaesthetized in a glass chamber by inhaling 4% Halotane (SIGMA, Buchs, Switzerland). Thiopental (Pentotal®, Abbot AG, Baar, Switzerland) at a dosage of 50mg/kg body weight (b.w.) is administered i.p. Heparine (Liquemin®, Roche Pharma, Rheinach, Switzerland) is administered by injection into the penile vein (500IU/kg b.w.). A trachostomy is performed and the animal is ventilated with a 14 GA catheter (Insyte®, Becto Dickinson, Sandy UT USA) with 100% oxygen, a breathing frequency of 100/min, and tidal volume of 8ml/kg body weight by a rodent ventilator (Model 683, Harvard Apparatus, South Natick MA USA). After cutting the inferior vena cava and left appendix of the heart, a small silicon hose is inserted into the main pulmonary artery (PA) via an incision in the right ventricle. Both lungs are flushed with 20ml of LPD solution (Perfadex®,Vitrolife Pharmaceutics, Uppsala Sweden) at 20cm H2O pressure. The trachea is then tied with the lungs in end respiratory position. The heart-lung block is removed and the left lung is separated ex vivo. Small plastic cuffs are placed around the PA and the left pulmonary vein (PV), the vessels are everted and tied on the cuffs and fastened with 80 monofilament thread (Surgipro®, USSC, Norwalk CT USA). The graft is stored in LPD solution at 10°C until implantation.
2.3.2. Recipient
The recipient is anaesthetized by breathing 4% Halotane in the glass chamber. Pentobarbital (Nembutal®, Abbot AG, Baar Switzerland) at a dosage of 50mg/kg is administered i.p. Dissection of the left tibialis anterior muscle (MTA) is performed. The muscle is injected with 2.5µg of pCikhIL-10 with Omnican30 insulin syringe (Braun, Switzerland), and subsequently placed between the plate electrodes. 4x20ms impulses at 200V/cm are applied with the INOVIO Pulse Generator (Inovio Oslo).
After 24h, the recipient is anaesthetized by breathing 4% Halotane in the glass chamber again. Intubation is carried out using a 14 GA catheter placed into the trachea. Anaesthesia is maintained with Halotane at 2.5%. The recipient is ventilated with 1cm water PEEP, a breathing frequency of 100/min and a tidal volume of 8ml/kg body weight by rodent ventilator. A left thoracotomy is performed. The left hilum is dissected and micro clips are put on the left pulmonary artery (PA) and the left pulmonary vein (PV). The left main bronchus is ligated with 60 polyfilament thread (Sofsilk®, USSC, Norwalk CT USA) and cut. An incision is made in both PV and PA. The vessels are flushed with saline solution. The cuffs of the donor lung are inserted into the recipient's vessels, and 6-0 polyfilament ligatures (Sofsilk®) are placed around the cuffs and tied. The native PA and PV are cut off beyond the anastomoses and the native lung is removed. A 9-0 monofilament running over-and-over continuous suture (Monosof®, Tyco Healthcare, Wollerau Switzerland) is employed for the bronchial anastomosis. Ventilation is started. The microclips are removed to allow retrograde and subsequently anterograde perfusion of the graft. A small chest drain is inserted into the left pleural space and the thoracotomy is closed with three layers of continuous sutures. The chest drainage is removed after spontaneous breathing is restored, followed by extubation.
2.4. Statistics
For continuous data all values are given as mean±SD. Data were log-transformed and the t-test performed on these log-transformed data. A P-value less than 0.05 were considered significant. The STATISTICA 5.1 software (StatSoft®, Tulsa, OK) was used.
| 3. Assessment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.2. Histology
After explantation the graft is isolated and inflated to total capacity with 4% formaline and placed in a container with the same fixative for 12h. After paraffin fixation the sections were cut and routine haematoxylin and eosin staining performed. The histological assessment was done by a trained lung pathologist in blinded fashion according to the Working Formulation for the Classification of Pulmonary Allograft Rejection of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [9].
3.3. hIL-10 expression
3.3.1. ELISA
Circulating serum levels of hIL-10 were measured using hIL-10 immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Abingdon UK) following the manufacturers instructions. The antibody is specific and no cross-reaction with rat IL-10 occurs. 1ml blood was drawn from the inferior vena cava on day 5 at sacrifice, centrifuged, and stored at 20°C till the measurements. In order to assess the level of hIL-10 at the time of transplantation two separate animals were injected with pCikhIL-10 followed by electroporation as described above, as the loss of 1ml blood at the time of transplantation results in a high mortality of the animals.
3.3.2. In situ hybridization
The hIL-10 cDNA fragment (537bp) was subcloned into blue script vector (Stratagene, Europe The Netherlands). The plasmid containing the cDNA probe inserts was linearized using the restriction endonucleases Not-I for in vitro transcription of the sense strand and HindIII for the antisense strand. Single-stranded sense and antisense digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled cRNA probes were transcribed in vitro using 1ug of linearized template and 40 units of the appropriate polymerase (T7 RNA polymerase for the sense strand, SP6 RNA polymerase for the antisense strand) with DIG-labeled uridine triphosphate (UTP) using the DIG RNA Labeling Kit according to the manufacturer's directions (Roche Diagnostics, Basel Switzerland).
To localize the expression and distribution of hIL-10 after in vivo electroporation in the skeletal muscle we performed in situ hybridization to detect the expression at mRNA level. Tissue sections were deparaffinized in a xylene series and then rehydrated through a decreasing ethanol series diluted in dimethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. Sections were then subjected to Proteinase K treatment at 37°C for 10min. After washing with 1XPBS sections were treated with acetic anhydride for 10min at room temperature. The slides were washed again with 1XPBS and prehybridized for 2h at 55°C in the hybridization solution (Sigma/Aldrich USA) and t-RNA before hybridization with 100ng in 55ul of the sense or antisense cRNA DIG labelled probes in a humid chamber at 55°C for 18h. Hybridized slides were treated in increasingly stringent pre-heated 2xSSC+50% formamide, 2xSSC, 0.2% SDS for 15min at 37°C, followed by two washes with 0.1xSSC, 0.2% SDS for 15min at 60°C. Detection was carried out by incubation with an alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-DIG antibody using nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Basel Switzerland).
| 4. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4.2. Graft function
PaO2 (mean±SD) levels in arterial blood, obtained 5min after right hilar crossclamping in group B (233±123mmHg) were significantly higher than those in group A (44±8mmHg) (P=0.0091).
4.3. Rejection grading
The histopathological assessment demonstrated improvement in lung architecture in the treated animals as seen by the rejection score of IIIII A in group B (Fig. 2) as compared to III B in group A (Fig. 3, Table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The idea to reduce the alloimmune response after organ transplantation by overexpression of immunosuppressive proteins has been pursued by a number of groups [10,11], however, the technique so far was limited, first by the low efficiency of gene transfer, and second by temporary expression of the transgene. Previous studies evaluated the effect on acute rejection by local expression of transgene in the graft [11]. This may be more effective if only a low expression is desired. In addition, if the transduction is done at the time of organ harvest, in vivo or ex vivo, it is difficult to get a homogenous expression in the graft tissue which might limit the effect substantially. On the other hand the graft might be damaged by the transduction itself, as viral vectors cause inflammatory responses and the most effective non viral vectors, as for example PEI, are rather toxic for the lungs [12]. In contrast, peripheral transduction in the muscle results in high expression of the transgene in the recipient and is technically easy to achieve.
Electroporation mediated gene transfer has emerged as a promising gene delivery method. The technique is not only available at low cost, but its easiness of application in addition to its safety of production of the plasmid constructs are unique. Several reports show that it is one of the most efficient non-viral strategies [7], increasing reporter gene and therapeutic gene expression by several orders of magnitude over conventional non viral and viral vectors (Gazdhar et al, in press). In vivo electroporation is a physical method of gene transfer. The plasmid DNA is injected followed by delivery of a series of electric pulses of short duration using suitable electrodes. In preliminary studies we observed hIL-10 transduction alone was not consistently effective in reducing the acute rejection in lung transplantation model in spite of high hIL-10 serum levels.
IL-10 is a potent suppressor of TNF
Interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, interleukin-12, and interferon
production and may facilitate the induction of tolerance after allogenic transplantation [13,14]. Both CsA and IL-10 act synergistically inhibiting T cell activation and IL-2 and TNF
production. CsA inhibits calcineurin; IL-10 inhibits both Th1 cell proliferation and other proinflammatory cytokines. Thus, each drug acts via an independent pathway yet exert a complimentary immunosuppressive effect, but timing of gene transfer and the route of administration may play a key role. Our preliminary data showed that IL-10 overexpression at the time or after transplantation had little effect or was even detrimental, as reported earlier by other groups [1517]. In contrast previous reports show that IL-10 treatment of the recipient prior to transplantation enhances graft survival of heart allografts in mice [18], and rat liver allografts [19], and was effective in studies of bone marrow transplantation [20]. Very high doses of IL-10 have also proved to be deleterious as reported earlier [16], hence the optimal dosage is crucial.
In a study by Itano et al. the use of lipid mediated viral IL-10 transduction to the lung graft reduced rejection [21]. In our study hIL-10 was used which is active in the rat due to receptor homology [22,23] and which also results in higher serum concentrations than viral IL-10 as latter has been shown to be retained in the tissue compartments [24]. The sustained levels of circulating hIL-10 in the blood in the present experiments highlights the possibility to use the muscle for secretion of proteins into circulation thus opening a large field of therapeutic options [25].
In summary, our observations support the key role of IL-10 during the initial events of lung transplantation. The time course of the hIL-10 serum levels in the present experiment shows peak levels at 24h, gradually decreasing over the next five days. This fast increase of circulating hIL-10 achieved with the CMV promoter seems to be ideal for the prevention of acute rejection, however; other constructs that are currently evaluated by our group have to be employed for the maintenance of the transgene expression over longer time (Gazdhar et al. in press). In a parallel study conducted by our group, (Tavakoli et al in press) it has been shown that in cardiac transplantation hIL-10 alone, without additional CsA, is effective to reduce acute rejection in the same strain combination. In renal allografts, however, IL-10 has a detrimental effect [3].
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that electroporation mediated gene transfer of hIL-10 to skeletal muscle of the recipient in combination with low dose CsA improves lung allograft function, and reduces histologic rejection. This approach may even have clinical potential, as the method is easily applicable and may help to modify current methods of immunosupression in the early phase after transplantation.
| Appendix A. Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The second question is on the gene you adopted. The molecular structure of Human IL-10 is similar to cellular IL-10 produced in the animal. The anti-inflammatory activity of cellular IL-10 is known by downregulating several pro-inflammatory cytokines and natural killer cell activity. Conversely, this potent anti-inflammatory cytokine might have an important role in the differentiation of mastocytes.
Did you consider other gene vectors as a plasmid encoding viral IL-10? This cytokine is structurally similar to cellular IL-10. It inhibits as well the activity of the cytokines and downregulates the expression of major histocompatibility complex II on the surface of monocytes but does not possess the costimulatory effect on mastocytes.
Dr Pierog: We measured overexpression of human IL-10 only in the electroporated muscle and in circulating blood. We didn't measure the expression in the lung or in the liver. The human IL-10 was distributed to the bloodstream systematically. Regarding to your second question, we decided to use only human interleukin-10 because it results in higher serum concentration and makes it available systematically, whereas viral IL-10, is retained in the tissue compartments.
Dr D. Van Raemdonck (Leuven, Belgium): You've shown a nice drop in serum levels of interleukin-10 from post transplant day 1 to day 5. Can you also give us the figure on the level pre transplantation. Was there an increase in interleukin-10?
Dr Pierog: This expression was according to the CMV promoter/enhancer included in the plasmid. This promoter allows high expression which occurs 24hours following gene transfer, the levels were measured before transplantation, and then the expression gradually decreases between day 1 and day 5. This pattern of the expression was confirmed also in other experiments performed in our laboratories.
Dr G. Laufer (Innsbruck, Austria): You're basically augmenting your immunosuppression by this immunosuppressive cytokine. What would be the consequences for infection? I mean, if you have high levels of IL-10, that might also impair the resistance to viral infection, susceptibility to viral infection and viral disease early after transplantation.
Dr Pierog: We didn't assess susceptibility for infection. I can say that I performed many lung transplantations with using this regimen of immunosuppression and I have not seen any infections during the post operative course because the recipients were sacrificed after 5 days.
Dr D. Van Raemdonck (Leuven, Belgium): My final question would be, you did this gene transfer 24 hours prior to transplantation, how would you translate it to the clinical practice? How do we know 24 hours in advance that there will be a donor?
Dr Pierog: In the literature it has been demonstrated that human interleukin-10 administered after lung transplantation had no beneficial effect on lung transplantation. Even the rejection score may be worse after administration of human interleukin-10 following lung transplantation. In contrast, administration of human interleukin-10 prior to implantation has a beneficial effect. The mechanism of this phenomenon has not been elucidated so far.
Dr Van Raemdonck: But 24 hours seems a long period in advance. Have you looked at 12 or 6 hours prior to transplant?
Dr Pierog: This is an experimental setting for a proof of principle. The recipients were electroporated 24 hours prior to implantation because of the expression pattern provided by the CMV promoter of the plasmid, and because it is known that the levels of pro inflammatory cytokines like IL-2 and INF
attain the peak between 6 to 12 hours after transplantation, hence in order to achieve high expression of human IL-10 in the bloodstream at this time point a 24-hour interval might be ideal.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented at the joint 18th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery and the 12th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Leipzig, Germany, September 1215, 2004. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |