EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pierre Magdeleinat
Jean-François Regnard
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magdeleinat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Regnard, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magdeleinat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Regnard, J.-F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:1099-1105
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Early and long-term results of lung resection for non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with severe ventilatory impairment

Pierre Magdeleinat*, Agathe Seguin, Marco Alifano, Souheil Boubia, Jean-François Regnard

Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Unité de Chirurgie Thoracique, 1 Place du Parvis Notre-Dame, 75004 Paris, France

Received 12 October 2004; received in revised form 28 December 2004; accepted 10 January 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 4234 8314; fax: +33 1 4234 8073. (E-mail: pierre.magdeleinat{at}htd.ap-hop-paris.fr).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: To study clinical characteristics, surgical treatment modalities, early and long-term outcome of patients with severe ventilatory impairment undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of clinical records of all patients with severe chronic ventilatory impairment (FEV1 and/or FVC≤50% of predicted values) operated on for NSCLC in a 21-year period (1983–2003). Results: One hundred and six patients were operated on. Mean FEV1 and FVC were 40% (range 23–50%) and 69% (17–117%), respectively. An obstructive pattern was observed in 87 cases (82%). Extent of maximal exeresis was based on the assessment of predicted post-operative FEV1 (ppoFEV1). Major resections were contraindicated if ppoFEV1 was lower than 30%. Sixteen pneumonectomies, 73 lobectomies and 17 sublobar resections were carried out. Pathologic stages were I, II, IIIA and IIIB in 58, 26, 18 and 4 cases, respectively. Resection was complete in 104 patients. Operative mortality and morbidity were 8.5% (n=9) and 70% (n=74), respectively. Twenty-two patients needed prolonged (>48h) mechanical ventilation. Overall mean ppoFEV1 loss was 9.1% (0–34%). If ppoFEV1 loss was >15%, the morbidity rate was 100%. Mean PaCO2 and ppoFEV1 loss were higher among patients who died (41mmHg versus 37mmHg, P=0.02 and 13.2% versus 8.5%, P=0.025, respectively) as compared with operative survivors. Among patients with PaCO2>39mmHg and ppoFEV1 loss>15% (n=9), mortality rate was 33%. Overall 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 82 and 33%, respectively. Respiratory failure was the cause of late death in 2 patients. Among patients available at follow-up (n=85), respiratory function was considered subjectively improved, stable and worsened in 6 (7%), 62 (73%) and 17 (20%) cases, respectively. Eleven patients needed continuous oxygen therapy. Conclusions: Lung resection should not be denied a priori in patients with severe ventilatory impairment. Evaluation of predicted post-operative function often allows major resections, which are functionally economic, at the price of a high operative morbidity. Operative mortality, long-term survival and respiratory function are acceptable in the absence of a valid therapeutic alternative.

Key Words: Lung cancer • Lung resection • Ventilatory impairment • Spirometry • FEV1 • FVC


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
Surgery remains the best treatment option of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is generally believed that the existence of chronic ventilatory impairment (CVI) may limit possibilities of exeresis and increase operative morbidity and mortality. As a general rule in NSCLC surgery, intervention may be planned only if a complete exeresis is anticipated, with an acceptable operative risk and a satisfactory long-term quality of life.

The choice of methods for functional assessment as well as the determination of cut-off values indicating inoperability in patients with CVI remain uncertain. On the other hand few studies have specifically evaluated results of exeresis for NSCLC in patients with severe CVI. The aim of the present study was to report our experience in surgical treatment of NSCLC in patients with severe CVI, in order to evaluate operative morbidity and mortality as well as long-term survival and functional status.


    2. Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all patients who underwent surgery in a curative intent for NSCLC in a 21-year period (January 1983–December 2003). The same surgical team operated on all the patients, at the Marie Lannelongue Surgical Center (Le Plessis Robinson, France) up to August 2000 and at the Hôtel-Dieu Hôspital (Paris, France) thereafter. All the patients with CVI defined according to the European Respiratory Society criteria (Forced Vital Capacity [FVC] and/or Forced Expiratory Volume in 1s [FEV1] ≤50% of predicted value) [1] constituted the population of the present study. In all the cases repeated lung function tests were carried out in our Institution before the operation, as recommended [2], after a short course (2–3 weeks) of chest physiotherapy and optimal medical treatment. On the same occasion, reversibility test with inhaled beta-2 agonist agents was carried out and possible increase in FVC and FEV1 calculated. Patients were excluded from the study if the post-bronchodilator FEV1 was ≥55% of predicted value.

In all the patients pre-operative evaluation included their history, physical examination, routine blood tests, electrocardiography, spirometry, and perfusion lung scan. Cardiac echography was carried out in case of history of cardiac disorders or if a pneumonectomy was anticipated. Myocardial isotopic scan was performed in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and coronarography was prescribed in the case of abnormality of the latter. Doppler of supraortic vessels was carried out in patients aged more than 65 years or in the case of previous cerebrovascular accident. Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) determination as well as exercise tests were performed on the care of referring chest physicians, so no uniform protocol was adopted. Right heart catheterisation with temporary occlusion of pulmonary artery of the affected side was carried out in patients with predicted post-operative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) between 30 and 35%, and/or PaO2<65mmHg, if a pneumonectomy was anticipated.

Staging protocol included in all the cases chest X-ray, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, thoracic and upper abdominal CT scan. Cerebral CT scan was performed in the presence of cancer-related symptoms or if N2 disease was suspected. Isotopic bone scan was performed in the presence of bone pain and/or abnormalities in serum calcium or alkaline phosphatase.

The extent of maximal possible exeresis was based on the assessment of ppoFEV1. This value was calculated on the basis of best post-bronchodilator FEV1. ppoFEV1 loss was thus obtained by taking into account the function of the affected lung determined by perfusion lung scan (3): in case of anticipated pneumonectomy, the following equation was applied:{5000850.1099.si7}

If a lobectomy was anticipated, the following equation was applied:{5000850.1099.si8}

Subsequently, ppoFEV1 was calculated:{5000850.1099.si9}

If a pneumonectomy was anticipated on the basis of pre-operative work-up, it was contraindicated (‘mandatory’ lobectomy) if ppoFEV1 was lower than 30% or if right heart catheterisation with pulmonary artery occlusion showed pulmonary artery hypertension (mean pressure higher than 25mmHg, pre- post-occlusion gradient higher than 6mmHg, arterial desaturation during occlusion).

Lobectomy was contraindicated (‘mandatory’ segmentectomy or wedge resection) if ppoFEV1 was lower than 30%. Possible predominance of affected lung, existence of associated extra-pulmonary co-morbidities, and performance status were taken into account to determine the maximal exeresis possible, regardless of ppoFEV1.

In case of incomplete fissures, their opening was achieved by automatic stapler devices. In the last 5 years, staple lines were reinforced with expanded polytetrafluorethylene in case of emphysematous changes of the lung.

In the first part of the study, part of patients underwent nodal mediastinal picking, part full nodal dissection, whereas in the second part of the study, all underwent complete dissection. Radiotherapy or chemotherapy was performed under the care of referring physicians, so no uniform protocol was employed.

Operative mortality was calculated by taking into account all the deaths occurring within 30 days from the operation or during the hospitalisation. All complications occurring during this period were collected. Patients were divided in two groups according to the occurrence or not of post-operative complications, in order to identify factors predicting a complicated post-operative course. The following parameters were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis: age, sex, obesity, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, total lung capacity (TLC) (all expressed both in liters and percentage of predicted values), arterial gas analysis, function of the affected lung evaluated by perfusion lung scan, consumption of O2 at peak of effort (VO2 max, when performed and expressed as both ml/kg/min and % of predicted), history of heart disease, ppoFEV1 loss, ppoFEV1, ppoVO2max, and type of operation.

Long-term follow-up was obtained by referring pneumologists, who filled a questionnaire collecting data on the evolution of lung cancer, patient's functional status (evaluated subjectively: improved, stable or worsened after the operation), smoke stopping, lung function test (performed at least 3 months post-operatively). In the absence of a clinical follow-up, information on possible death was obtained by the municipality.

Factors negatively affecting survival and post-operative functional status were also evaluated: together with the above-mentioned variables, pathologic TNM was assessed. Percentage and mean comparisons, multivariate analysis (by logistic regression method and Cox's model), correlation tests and survival plots (according to the Kaplan–Meyer method, including operative mortality) were carried out with the SEM statistical package [4]. Results were considered significant if the P-value was less than 0.05.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
One hundred and six patients with potentially resectable NSCLC and severe CVI were operated on during the study period (86 in the first part, and 20 in the second one). They corresponded to 1.4% of patients with NSCLC treated by surgery in the same period by our team. There were 99 men and 7 women; mean age was 62 years (range 36–79). Ten patients had a marked obesity, defined as more than 20% of ideal body weight defined according to the Broca index (ideal body weight=size in cm–100). All the patients had a history of tobacco smoking (mean 52 pack/year), two/third of them had stopped tobacco consumption more than 1 month previously. Six patients had a history of controlateral lung resection (4 lobectomies, 1 bilobectomy, 1 segmentectomy), whereas 66 patients (62%) had associated comorbidities (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Extra-respiratory co-morbidities (n=66)
 

    4. Pre-operative functional assessment
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
Obstructive, restrictive, and combined CVI was present in 87 (82%), 1, and 18 (17%) cases, respectively. Results of initial spirometry are summarized in Table 2. Two patients had long-tem domiciliary oxygen therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Pre-operative functional assessment (n=106)
 
Ninety-six (90%) patients had an improvement in FEV1 after beta-2 agonist stimulation (mean FEV1 increase=14%). At perfusion lung scan, the affected lung was responsible, on the average, for 42% (range 0–82%) of total lung perfusion. The affected lung was predominant (more than 50% of total lung perfusion) in 37 patients (35%).

Mean DLCO (performed in 10 cases) was 49% (25–97%). In 29 patients (27%) an exercise test with VO2max determination was performed: mean value was 17.4ml/kg/min (range 10–26), corresponding to 64% of predicted value (40–80%).


    5. Treatment
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
All the patients underwent lung resection; a tracheotomy was performed in 26 cases (24%) within the second post-operative day.

In 16 patients (15%) a pneumonectomy (left-sided, n=10; right-sided, n=6) was carried out: it was extended to left atrium, main carina, chest wall, and muscular layer of oesophagus in 3, 2, 1, and 1 case, respectively. Seven patients had a non-functioning lung; in the remaining nine cases mean contribution of the resected lung to total lung perfusion was 25% (range 12–42%). Three patients had undergone right heart catheterisation with pulmonary artery blockage: in all the cases mean pulmonary artery pressure was lower than 25mmHg and no change in oxygen saturation was observed.

Seventy-three patients (69%) underwent lobectomy (superior, inferior, middle, and bilobectomy in 51, 15, 2, and 5 cases, respectively). Eighteen of them had bronchial or broncho-vascular sleeve resections, whereas extended resections were performed in five cases (chest wall, n=3; pericardium, n=1; adjacent lobe, n=1). In 67 patients (93%), lobectomy was considered ‘mandatory’ (pneumonectomy was contraindicated): 63 of them had a ppoFEV1 (post-pneumonectomy) lower than 30%, three had a base-line hypoxemia, and one had severe comorbidities.

Seventeen patients (16%) had a sub-lobar resection (segmentectomy, n=7; wedge resection, n=10). In two/third of them the operated lung was dominant. Lobectomy was contraindicated for ppoFEV1 (post-lobectomy) lower than 30% (n=8), associated co-morbidities (n=4), markedly dominant lung (n=4), and baseline hypoxemia (n=1).

If all the patients are considered together, mean ppoFEV1 loss was 9% (0–34%). ppoFEV1 loss was similar in patients undergoing lobectomy and in those undergoing pneumonectomy. The groups of different surgical treatment (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, sublobar resections) did not differ with respect to ppoFEV1 (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Predictive post-operative functional loss and predictive post-operative FEV1 according to the type of exeresis
 
Two patients underwent induction chemotherapy. Adjuvant treatments were administered in 10 patients (radiotherapy, n=7, chemotherapy, n=2; radio-chemotherapy, n=1). No uniform protocol was adopted.


    6. Pathologic examination
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
There were 64 squamous cell carcinomas, 30 adenocarcinomas, 6 large cell carcinomas, 3 mixed cellularity carcinomas (adenocarcinoma and epidermoid carcinoma, n=2; small cell carcinoma and epidermoid carcinoma, n=1), 2 neuroendocrine carcinomas, and 1 undifferentiated carcinoma. Pathologic stages were I, II, IIIa, and IIIB in 58 (55%), 26 (24%), 18 (17%), and 4 (4%) cases, respectively. Among patients treated by sublobar resections, 15 had stage I disease, and 2 stage IIIa disease.

A pathological completed resection was achieved in 104 cases (98%) and only two patients had microscopical residual disease.


    7. Post-operative outcome
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
Ninety-five percent of patients went to the intensive care unit (ICU) post-operatively. Post-operative course was uneventful in 32 patients (30%), with no need of prolonged mechanical ventilation (more than 24h) and a mean hospital stay of 13 days (4 days in ICU).

Seventy-four patients (70%) experienced post-operative complications. Mean hospital stay in these patients was 20 days (range 6–90) and mean ICU stay was 12 days. Forty-five patients had respiratory complications, whereas cardiovascular, surgical and miscellaneous adverse events occurred in 23, 26, and 11 cases, respectively (Table 4). Twenty-two of them needed prolonged mechanical ventilation (more than 48h), which lasted on the average 11 days (2–75 days).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Post-operative complications (n=74)
 
Nine (8.5%) patients died, after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and pneumonectomy in 6, 2, and 1 case, respectively. Causes of death were pneumonia (n=6), pulmonary embolism (n=2), and intestinal infarction (n=1).

Among patients treated by lobectomy (with exclusion of middle lobectomy or bilobectomy), no significant difference was observed in terms of morbidity (74% versus 66%) or mortality (7.84% versus 6.67%) after upper and lower lobectomy, respectively.

Among patients who had post-operative complications (n=74), mean ppoFEV1 loss was 9.6%, as compared to 7.4% of patients who had uncomplicated course (P=0.05). When ppoFEV1 loss was higher than 15% (n=93), the complication rate was 100%, whereas if ppoFEV1 was lower than 15% (n=13), the complication rate was 66% (P=0.027).

Mean ppoFEV1 loss was 13.2 and 8.5% in patients who died (n=9) and in operative survivors (n=97), respectively (P=0.025). Mean PaCO2 was 41 and 37mmHg in dead and survivors, respectively (P=0.02). Among patients who had PaCO2 higher than 39mmHg and a ppoFEV1 loss higher than 15% (n=9), mortality rate was 33%.

No other factor predicting significantly operative morbidity and mortality could be identified. In particular the age did not affect the outcome: mean age of patients experiencing complications and of those who had an uneventful post-operative course was 62.8 and 61.2 years, respectively (P=0.4). Similarly mean age was not significantly different in patients who died post-operatively and in operative survivors (66.4 versus 61.9, P=0.15).

At multivariate analysis PaCO2 was the only factor influencing operative mortality (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Risk factors of post-operative death
 

    8. Long-term outcome
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
Ninety-five out of 97 operative survivors (97.9%) were available at long-term follow-up (mean 41 months, range 1–168). Eighty-five out of 97 patients (87.6%) were seen at the outpatient clinic, whereas in the remaining 10 patients (10.3) information about possible death was obtained by the municipality.

Overall 1- and 5-year survival rates were 82 and 33%, respectively (Fig. 1). Median survival was 50 months and 25 months for stage I and stages II–III disease, respectively (P=0.01, Fig. 2). No other factor influencing significantly the survival was identified.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Overall survival (n=104). Two patients were lost at follow-up.

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Survival according to stage: stage I disease (n=57) versus stages II–III (n=47). P=0.01.

 
Late deaths occurred in 67 out of 97 patients (69.1%): tumor recurrence (both local and metastatic), cardiovascular events, second primary cancer, pneumonia, and miscellaneous causes were responsible for deaths in 25 (37%), 6, 5, 4, and 3 cases, respectively. Two patients (treated by lobectomy) died of respiratory failure 5 and 31 months post-operatively. The cause of death was unknown in 22 out of 67 patients (32.8%).

Late functional status was evaluated in 85 patients (17 months post-operatively on the average). Nine of them continued tobacco smoking. Functional status was considered, as compared to the pre-operative conditions, improved, stable or worsened in 6 (7%), 62 (73%), and 17 (20%) cases, respectively. Among these last patients, 11 needed long-term oxygen therapy. Three of them continued tobacco smoking.

ppoFEV1 was significantly lower in patients who needed long-term oxygen therapy, as compared to the other ones (40% versus 35%, P=0.026). No patient with a ppo FEV1 higher than 43% needed late long-term oxygen therapy.

Forty-six patients had post-operative spirometry (Table 6). Post-operative FEV1 was relatively well predicted by ppoFEV1. Lung resection resulted in a moderate but significant reduction in FEV1: mean values decreased from 1.18 to 1.07L. When patient with TLC>120% were considered alone, the reduction of FEV1 (both expressed in liters and as percent of predicted) was much less pronounced and did not reach significance. Only six patients treated by upper lobectomy with TLC>120% had post-operative spirometry. They also experienced a very low (not significant) decrease in terms of FEV1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Pre-operative and post-operative FEV1
 

    9. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 
Several studies were carried out in the attempt of defining respiratory function parameters predicting operative risk. It is generally believed that pre-operative standard spirometry allows identifying a group of patients with a high operative risk. In some authors' opinion the value of pre-operative FEV1 would establish the maximal possible exeresis: 2L for pneumonectomy, 1L for lobectomy, 0.6L for wedge resection [5]. Of note this value does not take into account the amount of resected functional parenchyma. Thus it was suggested that calculation of ppo respiratory function would be determinant in establishing limits of resectability: Olsen [6] introduced the concept that a ppoFEV1 lower than 800ml would contraindicate a pneumonectomy or a lobectomy. On the other hand according to several authors [7–10] ppoFEV1 should be expressed as percentage of predicted value, in order to take into account variations related to sex, age, and height. According to these authors a ppoFEV1 higher than 40% would not contraindicate any resection, whereas a ppoFEV1 lower than 40% would indicate a high operative risk, and a ppoFEV1 lower than 30% a prohibitive risk. This last figure is essentially derived from knowledge of natural history of COPD: patients with a FEV1 of approximately 1L have a yearly mortality rate of about 10% [11]. In fact 1L corresponds to 30% of predicted FEV1 in a male subject aged 50 years and of 170cm height [2]. On the other hand, among patients with COPD treated by long-term oxygen therapy, a FEV1 lower than 30% represents an independent risk of poor outcome [12].

Other techniques (DLCO determination, exercise tests with determination of VO2max) would allow establishing other limits indicating a prohibitive risk. A DLCO lower than 60% [13], a ppoDLCO lower than 40% [7], a VO2max lower than 15ml/kg/min [14], a VO2max lower than 60% of predicted value [15], a ppoVO2max lower than 10ml/kg/min [16] have all been identified as important indicators of high operative risk.

In our experience the most important criterion to determine the functional possibility of lung resection was the ppoFEV1, the lower limit being 30%. Anyway no value can be considered sufficient to predict accurately the possibility of surgery in a single patient, especially in case of very severe respiratory impairment [17]. The integration of several parameters including lung function tests, associated comorbidities, performance status is, in our opinion, of paramount importance in this judgment.

In our series a surgical treatment with a curative intent was possible in the great majority of cases (complete exeresis rate of 98%). To this purpose in 18 out of 73 lobectomy a sleeve resection (bronchial, arterial or both) was associated in order to avoid a pneumonectomy. On the other hand, 17 sublobar resections (wedges or segmentectomies) were carried out in 17 patients (15 with stage I disease) in order to avoid a lobectomy. In stage I disease, sublobar resections can be considered as valid alternatives (from an oncologic point of view) to lobectomy [18,19].

In our experience, mean predictive post-operative functional loss was as low as 9%, a value corresponding, in most instances, to only a part of the gain in respiratory function obtained by bronchodilator treatment and chest physiotherapy, which achieved a mean improvement in FEV1 of 14%. On the basis of these results, one could speculate that main criterion to determine the extent of possible exeresis in these patients is represented by the amount of resected functional parenchyma.

In this study, lung resection carried a high morbidity (70%) responsible for an important mortality (8.5%). In these high-risk patients, these figures are higher than those reported in most surgical series generally dealing with lung cancer patients (regardless of the presence of ventilatory impairment). In these series morbidity rates of 15–47% but mortality rates of 1–12% have been reported: the large variability is probably due to the differences in terms of respiratory function and extent of resection [20].

In our series, pneumonia occurred in 27 out of 106 patients (25.5%). This high incidence is probably due to the underlying chronic lung disease of these patients. Furthermore this number includes both proven (with bacteriological confirmation) and suspected but not proven pneumonias, although every effort was made to obtain samples for culture before starting of antibiotherapy.

Prolonged air leaks occurred in 18/90 lobar or sublobar resections (20%). In our opinion, this relatively high incidence might be explained by the emphysematous changes (which are obviously a pre-disposing factor por prolonged air leaks) often observed in our patients. Opening of lung fissures was achieved in most cases by automatic stapler devices, but reinforcement of staple lines with expanded polytetrafluorethylene was systematically adopted only in the last 5 years.

In our patients the occurrence of an infectious pneumonia or of a pulmonary embolism in spite of the usual prevention measures (antibioprophylaxys, prompt extubation, repeated bronchoscopy in case of atelectasis, anti-thrombotic agents) was a life-threatening event, responsible of eight out of nine deaths.

In our patients only the ppo functional loss influenced negatively the morbidity, whereas only the PaCO2 influenced the mortality. The other factors, which are classically believed to negatively affect the post-operative outcome (pre-operative and ppo respiratory function and VO2max as well as the extra-respiratory comorbidities) were not determinant in influencing the occurrence of complications. Similar results have been published by Cerfolio et al. [21], who did not find any predictive factor of post-operative complications in a series dealing with 85 patients with airflow limitation (FEV1 lower than 1.2L) undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. These authors reported a low mortality rate (2.4%), but in their experience, 41% of patients underwent sublobar resections (wedge resection or segmentectomy).

Not surprisingly 5-year survival rate of our patients was relatively low (overall 5-year survival, 33%; 5-year survival in stage I disease, 44%), probably because of the poor respiratory reserve, responsible by itself for a part of mortality [11]. Our long-term results are similar to those published in the few series reporting 5-year survival rates in patients with limited respiratory reserve: in stage I disease values of 54% have been reported [21], whereas overall survival rates (regardless of the stage) ranging 29–44% have been published [21–22].

In these patients with a high operative risk, other therapeutic options can be discussed. Walsh et al. [23] enrolled 66 patients (FEV1 or ppoFEV1 lower than 40% or PaCO2 higher than 45mmHg) which were further selectioned on the basis of results of the exercise test. Twenty-five patients (20 of them with a VO2max>15ml/kg/min, and five with a VO2max<15ml/kg/min) were operated on, whereas 41 (34 of them had a VO2max<15ml/kg/min and seven refused the operation) underwent radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Mean survival in the surgical group was 48 months, versus 17 months in the medical group (P=0.0014).

In the absence of a prospective data collection, it was not possible to objectively evaluate late quality of life. On the other hand, 80% of patients did not experience a subjective worsening of respiratory function and few changes were evident at lung function tests. As in previous studies [3] ppoFEV1 correctly predicted post-operative FEV1. Of note in our patients, ppoFEV1 was calculated on the basis of better FEV1 obtained after administration of bronchidilators, whereas post-operative FEV1 was measured at baseline.

We conclude that a complete exeresis is possible in selected patients with severe airflow limitation. The mobilization of respiratory reserve with brochodilator therapy and the evaluation of functioning parenchyma to be resected allow an exact planning of resection: oncologically satisfactory but functionally economic. These interventions carry a high morbidity requiring a heavy and expensive management in the intensive care unit. In the absence of valid therapeutic alternatives, long-term survival has to be considered acceptable at the price of a worsening of respiratory status in 20% of cases.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Methods
 3. Results
 4. Pre-operative functional...
 5. Treatment
 6. Pathologic examination
 7. Post-operative outcome
 8. Long-term outcome
 9. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, Paoletti P, Gibson J, Howard P, Yernault JC, Decramer M, Higenbottam T, Postma DS. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The European Respiratory Society Task Force. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1398-1420.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report working party standardization of lung function tests, European community for steel and coal. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993;16:5-40.
  3. Wernly JA, DeMeester TR, Kirchner PT, Myerowitz PD, Oxford DE, Golomb HM. Clinical value of quantitative ventilation-perfusion lung scans in the surgical management of bronchogenic carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;80:535-543.[Medline]
  4. Kwiatkowski F, Girard M, Hacene K, Berlie J. Sem: a suitable statistical software adaptated for research in oncology. Bull Cancer 2000;87:715-721.[Medline]
  5. Miller Jr JI. Physiologic evaluation of pulmonary function in the candidate for lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:347-351.[Abstract]
  6. Olsen GN, Block AJ, Swenson EW, Castle JR, Wynne JW. Pulmonary function evaluation of the lung resection candidate: a prospective study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1975;111:379-387.[Medline]
  7. Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, Musk AW, Antico VF, Lovegrove FT, Carter MJ, Finucane KE. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:902-910.[Medline]
  8. Wahi R, McMurtrey MJ, DeCaro LF, Mountain CF, Ali MK, Smith TL, Roth JA. Determinants of perioperative morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:33-37.[Abstract]
  9. Putnam Jr JB, Lammermeier DE, Colon R, McMurtrey MJ, Ali MK, Roth JA. Predicted pulmonary function and survival after pneumonectomy for primary lung carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:909-914.[Abstract]
  10. Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest 1994;105:753-759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Diener CF, Burrows B. Further observations on the course and prognosis of chronic obstructive lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1975;111:719-724.[Medline]
  12. Dallari R, Barozzi G, Pinelli G, Merighi V, Grandi P, Manzotti M, Tartoni PL. Predictors of survival in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with long-term oxygen therapy. Respiration 1994;61:8-13.
  13. Ferguson MK, Little L, Rizzo L, Popovich KJ, Glonek GF, Leff A, Manjoney D, Little AG. Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:894-900.[Abstract]
  14. Smith TP, Kinasewitz GT, Tucker WY, Spillers WP, George RB. Exercise capacity as a predictor of post-thoracotomy morbidity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;129:730-734.[Medline]
  15. Bolliger CT, Jordan P, Soler M, Stulz P, Gradel E, Skarvan K, Elsasser S, Gonon M, Wyser C, Tamm M. Exercise capacity as a predictor of postoperative complications in lung resection candidates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:1472-1480.[Abstract]
  16. Bolliger CT, Wyser C, Roser H, Soler M, Perruchoud AP. Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications. Chest 1995;108:341-348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Peters RM. Function of the gas exchange system and its evaluation. In: Barre AE, editor. Glenn's thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Stanford: Appleton and Lang; 1996. pp. 20-35.
  18. Ferguson MK, Lehman AG. Sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy: optimal management strategy using decision analysis techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1782-1788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Shennib H. Sublobar resection for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:S61-S63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bernard A, Ferrand L, Hagry O, Benoit L, Cheynel N, Favre JP. Identification of prognostic factors determining risk groups for lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1161-1167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Trastek VF, Deschamps C, Scanlon PD, Pairolero PC. Lung resection in patients with compromised pulmonary function. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:348-351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gebitekin C, Martin PG, Satur CM, Olgac G, Tian Y, Chaudhry I, Saunders NR, Walker DR. Results of pneumonectomy for cancer in patients with limited ventilatory function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:347-351.[Abstract]
  23. Walsh GL, Morice RC, Putnam Jr JB, Nesbitt JC, McMurtrey MJ, Ryan MB, Reising JM, Willis KM, Morton JD, Roth JA. Resection of lung cancer is justified in high-risk patients selected by exercise oxygen consumption. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:704-710.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A. E Martin-Ucar, K. R Fareed, A. Nakas, P. Vaughan, J. G Edwards, and D. A Waller
Is the initial feasibility of lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in severe heterogeneous emphysema justified by long-term survival?
Thorax, July 1, 2007; 62(7): 577 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Garzon, C. S.H. Ng, A. D.L. Sihoe, A. V. Manlulu, R. H.L. Wong, T. W. Lee, and A. P.C. Yim
Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer in Patients with Poor Lung Function
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 1996 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. J. Licker, I. Widikker, J. Robert, J.-G. Frey, A. Spiliopoulos, C. Ellenberger, A. Schweizer, and J.-M. Tschopp
Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1830 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pierre Magdeleinat
Jean-François Regnard
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magdeleinat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Regnard, J.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magdeleinat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Regnard, J.-F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS