EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thierry A. Folliguet
François Laborde
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folliguet, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laborde, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Folliguet, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laborde, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:172-173
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


How-to-do-it

Early experience with robotic aortic valve replacement

Thierry A. Folliguet * , Fabrice Vanhuyse, Zanis Konstantinos, François Laborde

Department of cardiovascular surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, F-75014 Paris, France

Received 26 October 2004; received in revised form 14 March 2005; accepted 17 March 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 56 61 65 10; fax: +33 1 56 61 65 23. (Email: thierry.folliguet{at}imm.fr).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
We report our initial experience with aortic valve replacement using robotic assistance. All procedures were performed with peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, transthoracic aortic cross-clamp, and antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia. One or two ports and a 5-cm intercostal incision in the right chest were used for access. All patients had aortic valve replacement performed robotically. Between February and September 2004, five patients underwent robotic aortic valve replacement. The mean age was 59 years (range 35–82 years). There were no incisional conversions, death, stokes, or reoperations for bleeding. Overall mean study times were as follows: procedure, 231.2min (range 180–315min); cardiopulmonary bypass, 121.5min (range 83–173min), and cross-clamp, 98.2min (range 67–140min). One patient developed postoperative pneumonia. Aortic valve replacement can be successfully performed with the da Vinci robotic system.

Key Words: Robotic • Video-thoracoscopy • Aortic valve replacement


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Minimally invasive endoscopic operative techniques are used widely in a variety of surgical disciplines, and are slowly being applied in cardiac surgery. Recently, a new generation of surgical telemanipulation systems has allowed surgeons to perform robotically assisted, coronary artery bypass grafts [1], patent ductus arteriosus closure [2], atrial septal defect closure [3], mitral valve repair and epicardial ablations for treatment of atrial fibrillation [4]. If this procedure has become routine in mitral valve repair no cases of aortic valve replacement has been yet reported. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing aortic valve replacement (AVR) in adults using a robotically assisted surgical system.


    2. Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
2.1. Patients
Between February 2004 and September 2004, five adults underwent robotically assisted aortic valve replacement. These patients were operated after institutional review board approval and informed consent. The patients comprised three men and two women, with a mean age of 59±20 years (range 35–81). Four patients had calcified aortic stenosis and one older patient had aortic insufficiency.

2.2. Surgical technique
After systemic heparinization the right femoral vessels were cannulated with a 21 F cannula in the vein, and a 17 F cannula in the artery. Additionally, a 17F wire-bound cannula was inserted in the right internal jugular vein for optimal drainage as with one venous cannula the total calculated flow could not be reached. Cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted and cooling to 28°C rectal temperature was obtained. A 4–5cm anterior incision was made in the right third or fourth intercostals space, the exact location was determined according to a preoperative gated CT scan (Fig. 1 ). A 30° angled camera was placed through the anterior aspect of the incision. Two ports were placed, one in the second intercostals space mid axillary and one in the fifth or fourth intercostals. The heart was arrested with cold crystalloid cardioplegia in the aortic root, and a cold saline irrigation was maintained in the pericardium. A left ventricular vent was positioned through the right upper pulmonary vein. The ascending aorta was cross-clamped with a transthoracic aortic cross-clamp and the aorta was retracted with sutures. The annulus was exposed by placing three sutures at each commissure. The da VinciTM Surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used to excise the valve and to place 12 stitches of 2/0 Ethibond pledgets sutures (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) on the annulus, and to close the aortotomy. Calcified debris was removed with irrigation placed through the aortotomy. All the sutures were placed on the annular prosthesis before it was lowered in place, and all knots were secured with a knot pusher. De-airing was done through the ascending aorta.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Operative site immediately after closure.

 

    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
There was no mortality and no procedure-related morbidity. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 121.5±37.5min and the cross-clamp time of 98.2±30.4min. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 1.8±2 days, and the mean length of stay was 8.6±3 days. Pain was controlled with a morphine drip used for the first 48h which was then relayed by per os medication.


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Our technique reported here shows a simple approach to AVR with robotic assistance which is similar to conventional surgery.

A number of incisions have been described to approach the aortic valve, J or L with partial sternal splitting or a mini thoracotomy in the right second intercostal space [5–8]. Comparing with other type of mini incision we have noticed in our limited experience that patients experienced incisional pain only in the first day's postoperative (Fig. 2 ). The patients described in this series seemed to regain upper extremity mobility quicker with reduced pain, and there was no discomfort due to sternal splitting as can be felt in the costal cartilages or in the scapulas. The cosmetic approach is different between male and female. In the male we perform the skin incision over the site of thoracotomy whereas in the female the incision is made under the breast. We also did not experience any problems due to femoral cannulation as we used a seldinger technique without vessels clamping, and we therefore maintained flow to the leg during all the procedure. ICU and in-hospital stay are rather long, as this is our early experience we preferred to keep patients in the hospital until they were adequately anticoagulated.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Operative incision 4 days postoperative.

 
This early experience of combining robotic assistance and a mini thoracotomy is a first step toward total endoscopic aortic valve replacement.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Material and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bonatti J, Schacher T, Bernecker O, Chevtnik O, Bonaros N, Ott H, Friedrich G, Weidinger F, Laufer G. Robotically totally endoscopic coronary bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Surg 2004;127(2):504-510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Le Bret E, Papadatos S, Folliguet T, Carbognani D, Petrie J, Aggoun Y, Batisse A, Bachet J, Laborde F. Interruption of patent ductus arteriosus in children: robotically assisted versus videothoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123(5):973-976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wimmer Greinecker G, Dogan S, Aybek T, Khan MF, Mierdl S, Byhahn C, Meritz A. Totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair in adults with computer-enhanced telemanipulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126(2):465-468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Reade CC, Johnson JO, Beletin G, Freund Jr WL, Jenkins NL, Bower CE, Masroor S, Krypsen AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood Jr WR. Combining robotic mitral valve repair and microwave atrial fibrillation ablation techniques and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79(2):480-484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gillinov AM, Banbury MK, Cosgrove DM. Hemisternotomy approach for aortic and mitral valve surgery. J Card Surg 2000;15(1):15-20.[Medline]
  6. Rodriguez JE, Cortina J, Perez de la Sota E, Maroto L, Ginestal F, Rufilanchas JJ. A new approach to cardiac valve replacement through a small midline incision and inverted L shape partial sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14(Suppl. 1):S115-S116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Izzat MB, Yim AP, El-Zufari MH, Khaw KS. Upper T mini-sternotomy for aortic valve operations. Chest 1998;114(1):291-294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, Butterheim PM, Esposito R, Baumann FG, Colvin SB. Minimally invasive port access surgery reduces operative morbidity for valve replacement in the elderly. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2(3):212-215.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thierry A. Folliguet
François Laborde
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folliguet, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laborde, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Folliguet, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laborde, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS